Amd athlon 64 x2 4200 review: AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 4800+ & 4200+ Dual Core Performance Preview

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ [in 3 benchmarks]


AMD
Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Buy

  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ sales on December 2006 at a recommended price of $309. This is Manchester architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 90 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2200 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket 939 processor with a TDP of 89 Watt.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


0.67%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


Athlon 64
X2 4200+

vs


EPYC
7h22

General info


Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating 2585
Value for money 0.38
Market segment Desktop processor
Architecture codename Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date December 2006 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $309 of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price $92 (0.3x MSRP) of 16317 (EPYC 7351)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 2 (Dual-core)
Threads 2
Boost clock speed 2.2 GHz of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache 256K of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache 512 KB of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache 0 KB of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography 90 nm of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size 220 mm2
Number of transistors 154 million of 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7950X)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility

Compatibility


Information on Athlon 64 X2 4200+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket 939
Thermal design power (TDP) 89 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 X2 4200+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


Athlon 64 X2 4200+
0.67

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%


Athlon 64 X2 4200+
679

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


Athlon 64 X2 4200+
212

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


Athlon 64 X2 4200+
379


Relative perfomance


Overall Athlon 64 X2 4200+ performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.



Intel Celeron E1400
100


AMD Athlon II X2 270u
100


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
100


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
100


Intel Pentium D 950
100


Intel Celeron J3060
100


AMD Athlon II X2 260u
98.51

Intel equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon 64 X2 4200+ from Intel is Celeron E1400, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 7 positions in our rating.


Celeron
E1400


Compare


Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon 64 X2 4200+:


Intel Celeron J3060
100


Intel Pentium D 950
100


Intel Celeron E1400
100


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
100


Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
98.51


Intel Pentium E2180
98.51


Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
95.52

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Pentium D
950


Compare


Celeron
E1400


Compare


Pentium
E2180


Compare


Athlon II
X2 260u


Compare


Pentium Dual
Core E2180


Compare


Athlon X2
BE-2400


Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Athlon 64 X2 4200+ according to our statistics.


GeForce
9600 GT

5.1%


GeForce
9500 GT

4.8%


GeForce
9800 GT

3.8%


GeForce
210

3.7%


GeForce GT
710

3.4%


GeForce GT
630

3.4%


GeForce
8600 GT

3.3%


GeForce GTX
550 Ti

2. 5%


GeForce GT
730

2.5%


GeForce GTS
450

2.4%

User rating


Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks

Buy on Amazon

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor released by AMD; release date: May 2006. At the time of release, the processor cost $309. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Manchester microarchitecture.

CPU is locked to prevent overclocking. Total number of cores — 2. Maximum CPU clock speed — 2.2 GHz. Manufacturing process technology — 90 nm. Cache size: L1 — 128 KB, L2 — 512 KB.

Supported socket types: 939. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 89 Watt.

Benchmarks





PassMark
Single thread mark

Top 1 CPU
This CPU


PassMark
CPU mark

Top 1 CPU
This CPU

117965


Geekbench 4
Single Core

Top 1 CPU
This CPU


Geekbench 4
Multi-Core

Top 1 CPU
This CPU







Name Value
PassMark — Single thread mark 0
PassMark — CPU mark 1285
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 219
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 398

Specifications (specs)




















Architecture codename Manchester
Launch date May 2006
Launch price (MSRP) $309
Place in performance rating 2724
Price now $179. 95
Value for money (0-100) 1.80
Vertical segment Desktop
64 bit support
Die size 156 mm
L1 cache 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 2
Transistor count 154 million

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Sockets supported 939
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt

AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+ Cool Cores / Processors & Memory

Today November 16, 2022

About
Advertising
Newsletter
Contacts

Author: Alex Nab

To become a leader, you need success, success and more success. This rule is good
taken over by AMD. For several years in a row, we have seen successful achievements
this manufacturer. AMD was the first to introduce an objective processor rating, introduced
support for 64-bit computing, successfully implements energy saving technologies
and hardware protection.

The first in our hands was a 2-core processor AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+, compatible
with any motherboard that supports Athlon 64 class CPU and Athlon FX (Socket
939). The dual-core Pentium XE 840, unfortunately, was delayed somewhere along the way, to the consumer
will have to wait for the appearance of special motherboards using the latest
HMC 945P, 945G and 955X scheduled for official delivery in mid-2005
of the year.

AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+ in place

How we tested

The test bench is based on the Gigabyte GA-K8NS Ultra-939 motherboard
(nForce3 250), cooling systems Gigabyte 3D Ultra (4700 rpm), 1 GB 2-channel
Corsair DDR400 memory, 256 MB FIC Radeon 9800XT video card, Maxtor hard drive
7B250S0, AOpen COM5232 optical drive, NAVI 400 ATX 12V power supply
and monitor Samsung 152S. The power consumption of the test stand (without monitor) was monitored
certified electricity meter «Mercury 200.02»
(accuracy classes 1 and 2).

Before testing each processor, Windows was installed in the system
XP Professional SP2 (Build 2600). As synthetic tests, we used
PCMark04, 3DMark03, SiSoft Sandra 2005 packages. From specialized tests
SysMark 2004, Far Cry, Unreal Tournament were launched on real applications
2004, Serious Sam: The Second Encounter, VirtualDub, WinRAR.

All launches of test applications were performed as with Gigabyte F5 BIOS firmware
(12/21/2004) and BIOS Gigabyte F6 (05/04/2005), in graphics resolution
1024 x 768 pixels at 32-bit color using a Samsung monitor
152S. Each test was carried out three times, followed by the allocation of the average
results in summary tables.

Gigabyte F5 BIOS not recognized

AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+ recognized by Gigabyte F6 BIOS

took the «outdated» board Gigabyte GA-K8NS Ultra-939 (based on nForce3
250) and, without changing the F5 firmware dated 12/21/2004 (by the way, there was no other at the time
the beginning of the tests), compared the revolutionary newcomer with the AMD Athlon 64 processor
4000+. And, as it turned out in our tests, the old kernel turned out to be «better
new two», however, it is necessary to make an allowance for the anonymous presentation of the latest
processor in the motherboard BIOS.

Unlike the new Intel Smithfield die, which integrates on a single
substrate two core Prescott revision EO, dual-core Athlon64 X2 under
codenamed Manchester is made on a single chip, consisting of two
Venice cores with separate cache modules and common memory controllers,
HyperTransport buses, as well as the command queue.

Undoubtedly, Intel technology can significantly reduce the cost of production
and reduce the amount of marriage, but nevertheless, AMD is known for its «modest»
pricing policy: for example, for an AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+ processor, sellers will ask
about $550. So the price competition promises to be hot.

Smithfield = 2 x Prescott

AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+

Recall that our single-core Athlon 64 4000+ processor is based on the SledgeHammer core
by 0.13 micron technology and has 1 MB of second-level cache, while the cores
Venice is manufactured using a 0.09 micron process technology with 512 KB L2 cache (by the way, this explains
low power consumption of the Manchester core). Each core of the Athlon64 X2 processor
4200+ has its own cache memory.

We saw a slight CPU advantage throughout our tests.
Athlon 64 4000+. The success of the new AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+ processor was noted only
in tests for transcoding media content. Of course, the results are not amazing,
but do not forget that the 4000+ model is by far the most productive
single-core AMD processor, while the Athlon64 X2 4200+ is
junior model of the new line with the lowest clock speeds.

It is possible that AMD will limit the frequency rating of single-core chips to the bar
4000+, and high rates will be assigned only to dual-core architecture solutions
x2. After all, both Venice cores operate at a real frequency of 2.2 GHz and in terms of performance
they can easily withstand the 2.4 GHz Athlon 64 4000+.

Of course, the latest improvements in AMD architecture technology will allow for the foreseeable
future to achieve a real frequency of 2.8 GHz. At the same time, the increase in the frequency of processors
The Athlon 64 delivers a significant performance boost that will allow the company to
AMD to be confident in the future of their «nuclear» processors.

So far, it is obvious that the dual-core debut in our test bench has taken place and even
somewhat surprised by compatibility with «outdated» boards, very low
power consumption (see table) and decent performance in all types
modern software. True, the inconsistency is somewhat alarming.
processor indexes of real performance of processors of the Athlon family
64, because so far the 4000+ model looks preferable to a dual-core processor
4200+. Perhaps everything will be fixed with the advent of a new BIOS version of motherboards
and special software written for parallel computing. So it will have to
wait a bit. For now, try running multiple apps at the same time
— you will definitely notice the advantage of the «nuclear duo».

Games, mode 1024 x 768 x 32

Specialized tests

Opengl test SPECVIEWPERF8, frame/C

PACHES


⇣ Contents

If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER.

Related materials

Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/172072/page-1.html

⇣ Comments

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE processor review: features, benchmark tests

The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ EE processor was released by AMD, release date: May 2006. The processor is designed for desktop computers and is built on the Windsor architecture.

Processor locked for overclocking. The total number of cores is 2. The maximum clock frequency of the processor is 2.2 GHz. Technological process — 90 nm. Cache size: L1 — 256 KB, L2 — 512 KB.

Supported socket type: AM2. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 65 Watt.

Architecture name Windsor
Production date May 2006
Place in the ranking not rated
Applicability Desktop
Support 64 bit
Crystal area 220 mm
Level 1 cache 256KB
Level 2 cache 512KB
Process 90nm
Maximum frequency 2.

2024 © All rights reserved