Amd athlon fx 64: AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 Windsor 2.8GHz 2 x 1MB L2 Cache Socket AM2 Dual Core Processor, ADAFX62CSBOX : Electronics

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 review: AMD Athlon 64 FX-62

AMD’s Athlon 64 FX-62 represents a major shift in design for AMD. The chip itself is straightforward; it’s a dual-core performance CPU that offers a marginal performance increase over the older Athlon 64 FX-60. More importantly, the FX-62 is the flagship of AMD’s new AM2 motherboard chipset, which introduces several new features to the AMD desktop platform. This means that if you want to upgrade to this CPU, you’ll also need a new motherboard. You’ll get plenty of advanced features if you make the switch, but keep in mind that Intel’s Core 2 Duo chips are right around the corner, and early tests have shown that AMD’s hold on the performance belt might be slipping.

The Athlon 64 FX-62 is not a revolutionary upgrade to AMD’s old lineup. Aside from the new interface, the biggest change is the upgrade to a 2.8GHz per core, a minor uptick from the FX-60’s 2.6GHz. Despite the predictable CPU tweaking, the more important development is the FX-62’s transition to AMD’s new AM2 chipset. For the past two years, AMD’s desktop chips have used either Socket 939 or the lower-end Socket 754 motherboards. With AM2, AMD introduces not only an entirely new pin layout for its desktop chips, it also brings support for DDR2 memory. AM2 will support 667MHz DDR2 memory for all of AMD’s chips, and at least up to 800MHz memory when paired with compatible Athlon 64 X2 and Athlon FX CPUs. It’s been rumored that AM2 can support up to 1,066MHz DDR2 memory as well, although AMD won’t officially support it. For Intel’s part, its 900-series chipsets have supported DDR2 in various clock speeds since their debut in early 2004, but that support hasn’t translated to performance wins due to DDR2 memory’s higher latency than plain old DDR. DDR2 generally isn’t slower than DDR, but it hasn’t really offered a benefit. But the time is now ripe for AMD to switch because falling prices are making high quantities of DDR2 memory more cost effective than DDR, and with Windows Vista and its 1GB system memory requirements, you can expect that PCs with 2GB and 4GB of memory will soon become the norm.

There’s more to the Socket AM2 story (check back for a blog later), but as far as the Athlon 64 FX-62 is concerned, neither the new chip nor the new chipset translate to remarkable performance gains. Its SysMark 2004 overall scores are only 3.5 percent faster than the FX-60’s. The FX-62’s strongest improvement was on our multitasking test, where it showed a 10 percent performance gain. Otherwise, on our dual-core and gaming tests, the FX-62 turned in scores between 8 and 1 percent faster than the FX-60, barely overcoming the statistical margin of error. Still, right now the Athlon 64 FX-62 is technically the desktop CPU performance leader. But with recent brewings at Intel, that lead could change hands soon.

At Intel’s Spring Developer’s Forum, Intel provided tech enthusiast site Anandtech the chance to test its upcoming Core 2 Duo desktop chip (then code-named Conroe) against an overclocked Athlon 64 FX-60. The results weren’t in AMD’s favor. We can’t judge based on prerelease testing, especially when it was conducted in an Intel-controlled environment (Anandtech acknowledged the possibility for Intel chicanery as well), but with no major performance boost from the Athlon 64 FX-62, and the fact that Intel’s Core 2 Duo represents a brand-new architecture for the desktop, AMD’s performance lead looks vulnerable. Intel’s road map puts the release date of its next-generation Extreme Edition CPU in the second half of the year, and the company announced the official name of the mainstream Core 2 Duo chip this month. If you absolutely need more power now, the Athlon 64 FX-62 will deliver. But we feel that it’s worth waiting at least a month or two to see what Intel brings to the table.

BAPCo SysMark 2004 tests
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

BAPCo SysMark 2004 rating

SysMark 2004 Internet-content-creation rating

SysMark 2004 office-productivity rating

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62

294

367

235

AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

282

353

225

Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965

271

332

222

Half-Life 2: Lost Coast demo
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62

120. 6

AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

115.7

Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965

94.8

Multitasking test
(Shorter bars indicate better performance) (McAfee VirusScan 10 and DivX 6.2)

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62

147

AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

163

Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965

190

Multimedia tests
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

DivX 6.2

Apple iTunes 6.0.4.2

Adobe Photoshop CS2

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62

255

AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

258

Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965

107

289

System configurations:

AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 test bed:
Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard; Nvidia Nforce 4 SLI chipset; Crucial 1,024MB DDR SDRAM 400MHz; 512MB Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX; 74GB Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm Serial ATA hard drive; Windows XP Professional SP2; Antec 550w power supply

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 test bed:
Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard; Nvidia Nforce 590 SLI chipset; Corsair 1,024MB DDR2 SDRAM 1,066MHz; 512MB Nvidia GeForce 7900GTX; Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm Serial ATA hard drive; Windows XP Professional SP2; Antec 550w power supply

Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 test bed:
Intel 975X Express chipset motherboard; Intel 975X Express chipset; Crucial 1,024MB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHz; 512MB Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX; Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm Serial ATA hard drive; Windows XP Professional SP2; Antec 550w power supply

Athlon 64 FX-74 [in 1 benchmark]

AMD
Athlon 64 FX-74

Buy

Interface

Core clock speed

Max video memory

Memory type

Memory clock speed

Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 sales on November 2006 at a recommended price of $500. This is Windsor architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 90 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3000 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket F processor with a TDP of 125 Watt. It supports DDR1 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.96%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Athlon 64
FX-74

EPYC
7h22

General info

Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	2410
Value for money	0. 13
Market segment	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date	November 2006 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$500	of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price	$500 (1x MSRP)	of 15411 (EPYC 7351)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2
Boost clock speed	3 GHz	of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache	128 KB	of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache	1 MB	of 12 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache	0 KB	of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography	90 nm	of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size	235 mm²
Number of transistors	227 million	of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	—

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket	F
Thermal design power (TDP)	125 Watt	of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-74’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1

of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 FX-74. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-74
0.96

Passmark

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

Athlon 64 FX-74
972

Relative perfomance

Overall Athlon 64 FX-74 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
100

AMD Athlon II X2 240
100

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
100

AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
100

AMD E2-3200
98.96

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
97.92

AMD Athlon II X2 215
97.92

Intel equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon 64 FX-74 from Intel is Core 2 Duo E7200, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

Core 2
Duo E7200

Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon 64 FX-74:

Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
102. 08

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
100

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
100

AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
100

Intel Celeron E3500
96.88

Intel Pentium E5400
96.88

Intel Pentium E5300
93.75

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Core 2
Duo E7200

Compare

Core 2
Duo E7300

Compare

Athlon II
X2 215

Compare

Athlon II
X2 240e

Compare

Core 2
Duo E6750

Compare

Athlon 64
X2 6000+

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Athlon 64 FX-74 according to our statistics.

GeForce GT
640

20%

GeForce GTX
1050

20%

GeForce GT
1030

20%

GeForce GTX
650 Ti

20%

GeForce
8200M G mGPU AMD

20%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ vs FX-8350

FD8350FRHKBOX

YouTube*NEW*

About

▲
5133
▼

Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 366,716 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

365,852 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 69% Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)

Poor: 53%

Great: 69%

SPEED RANK: 502^nd / 1367

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 49%

Yacht

864 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 52% Base clock 3. 2 GHz
Worst Bench: 33% Base clock 3.2 GHz

Poor: 33%

Great: 52%

SPEED RANK: 894^th / 1367

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 30%

Raft


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		62.7 %	Much faster effective speed. +41%		44.4 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	81.8 Pts	Slightly lower memory latency. +9%	75 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	68.8 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +56%	44.2 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	129 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +56%	82.8 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	237 Pts	Hugely faster quad-core speed. +182%	83.9 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	377 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +341%	85.4 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	91. 5 Pts	+3%	88.8 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	75.9 Pts	Much faster OC single-core speed. +59%	47.7 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	149 Pts	Much faster OC dual-core speed. +57%	94.8 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	278 Pts	Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +193%	94.9 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	430 Pts	Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +354%	94.8 Pts

Market Share

Based on 55,948,540 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)		0.2 %	Insanely higher market share. +∞%		0 %
User Rating UBM User Rating		56 %	Slightly more popular. +10%		51 %


Age Newest	120 Months		103+ Months	More recent. +14%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	431 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +353%	95. 2 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	383 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +345%	86.1 Pts

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel’s processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel’s two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. ^{[May ’13 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (661)

MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (660)

Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (639)

Asus M5A97 R2.0 (603)

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (400)

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (374)

Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (324)

Asus M3A78-VM (3)

Asus M2N-E SLI (2)

Asus M2N-E (2)

Asrock 960GC-GS FX (2)

Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H (1)

Asus CROSSHAIR (1)

Asus M2N-SLI DELUXE (1)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.

Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

— Download and run UserBenchmark.

— CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.

— GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.

— Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.

— RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.

— SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.

— Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.

— Identify the strongest components in your PC.

— See speed test results from other users.

— Compare your components to the current market leaders.

— Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.

— Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated



Intel Core i5-12600K



Intel Core i5-12400F



Intel Core i7-12700K



Intel Core i3-12100F



Intel Core i5-12400



Intel Core i5-11600K



Intel Core i7-11700K



AMD Ryzen 5 5600X



AMD Ryzen 5 3600



Intel Core i5-11400F



Intel Core i5-9600K



Intel Core i5-10400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback
FSB/ht/qpi 200 cache L1, KB 128 x 2 cache L2, KB 1024 x 2
9000 9000
L3 cache, KB
power voltage, in 1. 35 ~ 1.4 TDP, W 125 TOMALES, ML 243 Crystal Square, apt. mm 219 Temperature limit °C 63 set of instructions RISC, IA32, X86-64, NXBIT, MMX, 3DNOW!+, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 AM
9000 9012 9000 9000 perlet 9 7950XRyzen 9 7900XRyzen 7 7700XRyzen 5 7600XRyzen 9 5950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760Kathlon X4 750Kathlon X4 740athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-3300PHEL0T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333) Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton) + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370) Celeron 333 (Slot 1) Celeron 300A (S370) Celeron 300A (SLOT 1) Celeron 300CELERON 266

Go to all processors

Compare

AmDryzen 9 7950XRYZEN 9 7900XRRYZEN 5 7600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN 76600XRYZEN5950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8 -5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500 A4-3400A4-3300Phenom II X6 1100TPhenom II X6 1090T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333) Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266) Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton) + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266

Up to 10 processors can be selected simultaneously
by holding Ctrl

AMD Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX 9 processors0001

“ Still, we didn’t wait in vain, guys!”
famous advertisement

The first AMD64 architecture processors appeared in April of this year. At that time, AMD introduced the Opteron 200 series server models. They could be used in single and dual processor configurations. Unfortunately, the frequencies of the presented processors (1.41.8 GHz) did not please users very much at first. However, thanks to its unique architecture, Opteron performed well. By autumn, the Opteron lineup expanded with both new frequencies and new series. Today, AMD already offers three series of processors for use in one- (series 100), two- (series 200) and four- or eight-processor (series 800) systems. The maximum frequency for Opteron processors is currently 2 GHz (XX6 models).

However, “not just servers”, and the market waited and even demanded to show something really new, massive, inexpensive for everyone. A lot of rumors and assumptions about the frequency, socket, L2 cache size and even the name of the new desktop processors excited the imagination. And in the last third of September, AMD finally revealed its plans to conquer the market.

So, on September 23, desktop models are officially presented:

AMD Athlon 64 3200+

AMD Athlon 64 FX-51

Notebook processors (DTR (DeskTop Replacement) class) are also announced with 3000+ and 3200+ ratings, but since they differ from Athlon 64 only in the absence of a die-covering cover, special mention should be made of them. we won’t talk for now, but just a little later we will publish an article about such a processor. We only note that the Cool’n’Quiet mobile technology of dynamic frequency and voltage change can be used in all processors of the AMD64 architecture, it’s only a matter of supporting such functionality by the motherboard. And of course, while Mobile Athlon 64 processors can only be used in DTR systems: they consume up to 89Watt e.g. version 3000+ consumes 81 watts. By the way, this figure for Opteron is 85 W for junior models and 89 W for 2.0 GHz and higher (the same applies to Athlon 64/Athlon 64 FX).

So, now let’s try to put everything in its place. To get started, we recommend reading our past articles on AMD64 architecture:

AMD Opteron and Athlon 64 architecture facts and assumptions

A detailed study of the AMD64 architecture

Testing Athlon 64 and Opteron processors in real applications

Since a lot has already been said and written about Opteron processors, we will describe the new products in the form of differences from them, since the cores of all are almost the same.

The processor called Athlon 64 uses Socket 754 and has a single-channel integrated memory controller with DDR400 support (not registered!). It replaced the Athlon XP, which will be gradually forced out of the market. Despite the fact that the performance index of the new processor is the same as that of its predecessor (and the frequency is even lower), significant differences in the architecture let us hope that it will outperform Athlon XP 3200+ in speed.

Things are even simpler with the Athlon 64 FX at the time of the announcement, it differed from the Opteron only by the frequency, which for the FX-51 model is 2.2 GHz. Of course, formally there is also a difference in DDR400 memory support, however, as we will see later, this does not count :). AMD is positioning this processor as a high-end desktop model. Although, given its complete interchangeability with the Opteron (in single-processor systems), it becomes clear that the «positioning» is very shaky, and can easily be ignored by particularly smart buyers. 🙂

Despite the fact that both sockets have the same distance of 1.27 mm between the contacts in the grid, Socket 754 is not a subset of Socket 940, since its contacts are located in a 29 by 29 mm square versus 31 by 31 mm for the 940. Therefore, unlike, for example, the well-known i865/i875 and i848 pair, manufacturers will have to create different board designs for these products.

However, both sockets use the same cooling device mounting system.

The base on which the cooler is actually attached consists of two parts: a metal substrate and a plastic frame, which are located on different sides of the motherboard and fastened with two screws. The cooler itself is attached to the frame with two powerful latches.

The coolers we used had a copper base and welded copper fins. The design is similar to the well-known Thermaltake Volcano 7+/11+ models. By the way, by the abundance of signs of this trademark on different parts of the boxed cooler, it can be assumed that this company helped AMD in the development of cooling systems for new processors. The sizes of different models are slightly different. The boxed version from the Opteron 240 (working seamlessly with faster processors, including the Opteron 146) used a 55x75x5mm base and 46 12cm fins ² . The 70x70x15 mm fan from Delta, model AFB0712HBB, had a built-in temperature sensor for speed control (maximum value 4300 rpm). The version from Thermaltake had different parameters: base 65x60x4 and 36 fins 18 cm each ² , the fan is the same, but without a sensor. In addition to all-copper versions, there was one aluminum version with a copper cylinder inside. In addition, it is possible to use Zalman CNPS7000-Cu (however, it is fastened with screws and therefore is not very convenient for frequent replacements).

In principle, the design of the cooler assumes that it also blows a little on the memory modules located next to the processor, however, one of the versions used had ribs oriented along the long side of the socket and therefore (at least on the tested boards) is unsuitable for this purpose.

As far as noise is concerned, all fans are very quiet (Delta has a noise rating of 38.5 dBA at maximum speed). So from this point of view, the new AMD products are all right, despite the fact that they have almost twice as many transistors in the core as the Athlon XP (105.9million against 54.3).

Here is a summary table of the parameters of old and new processors that claim a place in the desktop PC system unit. The Opteron looks a bit alien here, of course, and is presented rather for visual comparison with Athlon 64 FX. However, the price of the 100 series models is not so terrible from $250. Athlon 64 Athlon 64 FX Opteron Pentium 4 3.2 GHz bus 3.2 GB/s 6.4 GB/s 6.4 GB/s 6.4 GB/s
90 GB/s 6.4 GB/s
90 GB/s 6.4 GB/s memory speed 6.4 GB/s ^* 3.2 GB/s 6.4 GB/s 5.3 GB/s
6. 4 GB/s ^* L1 I: 64KB
D: 64 KB I: 64KB
D: 64 KB I: 64KB
D: 64 KB 0113

As for the future plans of the company, we can assume only one thing frequencies will increase. The previous architecture (Barton core) reached 2.2 GHz, and the Athlon 64 FX starts from there. So hopefully there will be next, faster processors, but the revolutionary part is over. The next big step is moving to 90nm technology.

Externally, the processors do not differ from each other. Only the Athlon 64 has a case similar to the latest «green» Athlon XP with an organic base, while the Athlon 64 FX and Opteron have a ceramic case. And of course, they are all closed with a metal lid.
So, the first letter says about the brand: O Opteron, A Athlon 64. The second about the application: S Server, D Desktop. Of course, for now we only have combinations of OS and AD, but who knows, maybe AMD will also release a server Athlon 64? 🙂

The third letter, according to some sources, defines a certain «Power Limit». However, there are no detailed explanations yet, and all the tested processors have the letter “A” here, so you can’t distinguish them by this parameter yet.

Finally, the fourth item is the model number. For the Opteron, these are three digits, the first is the series number, the second is still four, and the last, always even, determines the frequency: from «0» for 1.4 GHz to «6» for 2.0 GHz. For Athlon 64, we see here the performance index in the form of four digits, which correspond to the name of a particular model. The situation is similar with Athlon 64 FX.

The following package options follow: A 754-pin OuPGA with cover (for Athlon 64), B 754-pin OuPGA without cover (mobile Athlon 64) and C 940-pin CuPGA also with iron cover for Opteron and Athlon 64 fx.

The next letter indicates the core voltage. For the first Opteron we tested it is 1.55V (letter C) and for all others it is 1.50V (letter E). Letters are allowed through one to Y, which corresponds to a value of 1. 00 V.

The seventh indicator determines the operating temperature of the processor. «O» corresponds to 69°C, «P» 70°C. The next letters in alphabetical order denote b or higher temperatures, up to «Z» 105 degrees Celsius.

The last digit indicates the size of the L2 cache of the processor: 1 64 KB, 2 128 KB, 3 256 KB, 4 512 KB, 5 1 MB. As you can easily see, representatives of the AMD64 architecture do not yet have less than one megabyte of cache.

And finally, the last two letters define stepping, revision, socket, number of coherent HT buses and all that. The main thing to remember is that if the letters are older than AI, then this is a C0 stepping or higher.

In general, the most important (and easy to remember :-)) are the first three letters that define the server or desktop processor, and of course the model index, which shows the performance in units known only to the manufacturer itself. 🙂

Since performance is not the only thing that interests buyers, we will also announce the prices at which the company plans to sell new products: $417 for Athlon 64 3200+ and $733 for Athlon 64 FX-51 (mobile processors will go for $417 and $278 for models 3200+ and 3000+ respectively). In general, prices are at the level of high-end desktop processors, but up to the coveted «$64 for 64 bits!» still very, very far away. On the other hand, this is only the beginning, and we can expect a significant reduction in prices in the coming months, but now all this is only for the very impatient. Well, the number of processors sold will be determined by the results they show in performance tests.

As you remember, during the introduction of Athlon XP, AMD published a list of applications that it used to assign ratings. But using not even a rating, but a code name (FX-51) for a desktop processor, the company once again emphasized its original approach to the concept of «performance».

The current version of the list of applications used to measure speed is:

Productivity eTesting Labs inc. Business Winstone 2001

eTesting Labs inc. Business Winstone 2002

BAPCo SYSmark 2001 Office Productivity

Media Computing eTesting Labs inc. Content Creation Winstone 2002

eTesting Labs inc. Content Creation Winstone 2003

RAW AVI to MPEG2 (Bbmpeg, AVItoMPEGg2)

XMPEG 5.0 patched / DivX (5.03 Pro bundle) MPEG2 to MPEG4

RazorLAME 1.1.5 MP3 encoder

BAPCo SYSmark 2001 Internet Content Creation

WinRAR

3D Gaming Futuremark Corporation 3DMark 2001SE (D3D Hardware T&L)

Futuremark Corporation 3DMark 2001SE (D3D Software T&L)

Futuremark Corporation 3DMark 2003 Hardware

Futuremark Corporation 3DMark 2003 Software

Futuremark Corporation 3DMark 2003 CPU

Aquamark (1024×768)

Commanche 4 Demo (1024x768x32)

Half-Life Smokin’ (1024x768x32)

Jedi Knights II demo (1024x768x32)

QuakeIII Demo2 (1024x768x32)

Return to Castle Wolfenstein 3D (1024x768x32)

Serious Sam: Karnak: Peaceful Night Coup demo (1024x768x32)0012

Unreal Tournment (1024x768x32)

Unreal Tournment 2003 Flyby

Unreal Tournment 2003 Botmatch

Splinter Cell (1_1_1)

Splinter Cell (1_1_2)

General Performance BAPCo SYSmark 2001 Overall Performance

Of course, compared to the previous version, it has become a little better popular tasks such as media encoding and archiving have been added. On the other hand, the abundance of synthetic tests like SYSmark and Winstone is a little confusing. Since it has long been known that any modern processor with a frequency of about 2 GHz is able to provide decent work in modern office applications. Of course, there are examples of receiving 1000 emails with packed attachments per day and constantly checking all this (including a two-gigabyte mail database) with an antivirus, but in this case it is not hardware that needs to be upgraded :-), and the indicated synthetics do not lose such a situation.

We throw out 3DMark tests with «D3D Software T&L» there, because if a person has already spent money on such a processor and did not buy a decent video card, then, apparently, he will not play on a computer.

With some games like QuakeIII it is also not very clear should I buy a new processor to increase the number of fps from 220 to 290? 🙂 Yes, and in the test guide from AMD, it sometimes slips «Select «Preferences» to «Speed». On the one hand, of course, it is clear that we do not want to test a video card, but

In general, what remains is encoding to MP3 (although and so it takes 5-10 minutes per disc, why is it faster? :-)), conversion to MPEG2 (but it’s also not clear why this should be done from RAW AVI? All discs are large and fast, to store more than one and a half gigabytes per minute?), but «MPEG2 to MPEG4» definitely continues to unnerve with its slowness.

There are obviously not enough rendering class tasks and calculation tasks. Apparently, the company refers these applications to workstations. In general, perhaps, this is correct, because, according to numerous surveys, powerful PCs at home are usually used for you know what :-). However, the positioning (that’s a suspicious word again :-)) of the Athlon 64 FX processor can easily be corrected towards «entry-level workstations», if it shows a decent speed in these applications.

64-bit applications and Windows XP for AMD64

We want to warn you in advance that despite the numbers «64» in the name, we won’t really be using 64-bit extensions on desktops soon. Of course, enthusiasts can already try them using the corresponding versions of Linux, but the real mass distribution of the 64-bit mode will only begin with the release by Microsoft of its Windows OS for this platform. At the moment the company is working on two versions of OS server and desktop. Both of them already exist in the form of beta versions. We had an opportunity to get acquainted with the pre-release of Windows XP for AMD64.

As you can see in the screenshot, the launch of the usual Microsoft Office XP, the VirtualDub program with the DivX codec, and the FAR file manager were successful. What can not be said about graphic applications. Despite «full compatibility», an attempt to run the games QuakeIII and Return to Castle Wolfenstein ended in failure (the games could not adjust the graphics system). While Serious Sam: The Second Encounter and Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo worked without problems. As for speed, its performance in 3D applications, which are games, is very much influenced by video card drivers. In this case, the NVIDIA Detonators version 50.30 from May of this year lacked stars from the sky and showed a 30 percent drop in speed compared to Windows XP Pro with the 45.23 driver. Apparently, it is the porting of drivers for a new system (which is mandatory, since the drivers in it must be 64-bit) that will be the main problem at first. Note that the OS hides them so that you can only find the actual driver files manually in Explorer. An attempt to find them by searching in the explorer or the FAR file manager ended in failure. There are also doubts about the version of the NVIDIA driver being used, since the number 50.40 and the date August 8 this year appear in the properties of the driver file.

Of course, most console applications shouldn’t have problems running under this OS version either. The exceptions are programs that use 16-bit code (for example, in libraries), and those that run special system drivers for their work, for example, to access hardware resources (one of these programs is a utility for obtaining information about the processor, motherboard board and memory, CPU-Z was not able to show all information in full under Windows XP for AMD64). Well, the fact that the performance of win32 applications (not graphical ones) in the new OS is at least no worse than in the 32-bit version is also evidenced by the fact that the SPEC CPU2000 test results, some subtests of which are very sensitive to memory speed , practically do not change when working in Windows XP for AMD64.

Chipsets

Chipsets for AMD64 architecture processors differ in that in the case of desktop application they practically do not affect the speed. Judge for yourself: the memory in such systems is connected directly to the processor, and the only formally «fat» consumer of information the video card has long acquired its large and fast memory. So the main streams of information circulate outside the chipset. Yes, of course, there is network and storage, but standard 100BaseTX requires only about 10 MB / s, and hard drives, although improving the interface towards 150 MB / s, but (also for desktops) by themselves are only approaching read speeds with surface of the order of 7080 MB/s.

Of course, for workstations we also have gigabit network controllers and RAID arrays on hard drives, but that’s a completely different story.

Another interesting property of chipsets is their versatility and scalability. Since they communicate with the processor(s) exclusively via the standard HyperTransport bus, taking into account the positive experience with Socket A, manufacturers can count on a long life of their developments. Well, the fact that any chipset (at least formally) can work with one or two or more processors allows you to position one product on several markets at the same time.

However, the first generation of desktop chipsets have a common drawback they support only one HT bus. As you remember from previous publications, the AMD8000 chipset has excellent expansion capabilities, since most chips have two HT buses and can be connected in series (however, the “output” bus is only eight-bit). Since the current edition of HT supports transfer rates up to 6. 4 GB / s, this eliminates the bottleneck for six PCI-X buses, twelve PCI 2.2 64 bit / 66 MHz, or 48 regular PCI 32 bit / 33 MHz.

Unfortunately, existing non-AMD solutions lack these capabilities and are limited to conventional PCs, and to move to the next level, manufacturers will have to come up with something new.

Note that in addition to the products from NVIDIA (nForce 3 Pro 150) and VIA (VIA K8T800) that we are considering today, ALI (ALi 1687) and SiS (SiS 755) products have also entered the chipset market for new AMD processors. Now these are two-chip solutions, but single-chip products are also in the plans. In addition, chipsets with PCI Express and 3GIO bus support are expected to appear in the future. By this time, ATI also promises to present its chipsets, including the variant with integrated graphics.

NVIDIA

NVIDIA nForce3 Pro 150 was one of the first third-party chipsets for AMD processors. This single-chip solution combines both a bridge to support AGP and PCI buses and all standard southbridge controllers:

2 channels PATA/IDE with UltraATA 133 and RAID support

Fast Ethernet network controller

6 USB 2. 0 ports

AC’97 audio controller with 5.1 support and digital output

controller, 2 PATA ports and 4 SATA ports. Well, today’s boards use external chips for SATA and Gigabit Ethernet.

Motherboards based on this chipset participate in testing today: ASUS SK8N for Socket 940 and Gigabyte K8NNXP for Socket 754.

Since the main topic of the article is new processors, we will only give brief characteristics of the boards here, and leave a detailed comparison until next time.

999000

Athlon 64 has some limitations in terms of speeds and memory, caused by the use of non-registered modules. In particular, only 2 modules can be used at 400 MHz, which limits the maximum amount of RAM in this case to 2 GB.
As is usually the case, the manufacturer tries to fill the first products for the new architecture to the maximum, believing that the first buyers have a lot of money and can afford to spend a significant amount. So it happened with SK8N and K8NNXP. Now they can be purchased for about $200. Of course, this is too much for the mass market. Of course, we will soon see versions without FireWire and SATA controllers, which will be cheaper. And daily announcements from other manufacturers indicate future competition in the motherboard market for new AMD processors, which will also lead to lower prices.
VIA
VIA also could not refuse such a fresh market and released its own chipset for the new AMD VIA K8T800 processors. By the way, according to the first reviews of Athlon 64 on the Web, you should also remember the phantom called K8T400M (or even K8M400 with an integrated video controller), which did not reach mass production of motherboards. While AMD was postponing the release of their desktop processor, VIA released a new version of their chipset 🙂 (although it probably just renamed the old one).
Unlike the nForce3 chipset, it is made in an almost classic version with north and south bridges connected by an 8X V-Link bus with a bandwidth of 533 MB/s (some sources indicate 1 GB/s). The high-end southbridge uses the VT8237 chip (already known from KT600 boards), which supports:

eight USB 2.0 ports

two Parallel ATA133/100/66 ports supporting up to 4 devices

sound solutions from VIA : VIA Vinyl 5.1 & Vinyl Gold 7.1

two SATA ports with RAID support (V-RAID: RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 0+1, JBOD)

integrated 10/100 BaseT network controller

Gigabit Ethernet companion controller chipset, the company presents Hyper8 technology, behind the beautiful name of which lies support for the HyperTransport bus mode between the processor and the chipset 16 bit / 800 MHz in both directions.

Indeed, for nForce3 boards these parameters are «only» 8 bits/600 MHz in one direction and 16 bits/600 MHz in the other. However, such a formally large difference does not play any role today, since the only serious consumer of data in any chipset for AMD64 is the video controller on the AGP bus, which is currently almost not loaded during real operation. Perhaps in the future, for workstations and servers with PCI-X and PCI Express buses, this will be important, but now it is somewhat premature. Since the K8T800 board’s BIOS allows you to adjust the bit width and frequency of the HT bus, we conducted express testing in Return to Castle Wolfenstein and SPECviewperf and did not reveal any differences in speed when working in these modes.

ASUS K8V Deluxe and MSI K8T Neo motherboards for Socket 754 took part in the tests. The test results of the boards are almost the same. For definiteness, the diagrams show indicators of the board from ASUS. But we advise you to treat the results with caution, since beta versions of the BIOS were used, and a lot can change with the release.

Code ASUS SK8N
GIGABYTE K8NNXP

Chipset NVIDIA NFORCE3 PRO 150 900

USB 4 USB 2.0 + 1 USB 2.0 2 USB 2.0 + 2 connectors 2 USB 2.0

Firewire 2 ports (one on the bar, external controller TI) 3

Chipset-integrated IDE controller 2 PATA ports (ATA133) 2 PATA ports (ATA133)

PATA port, 2 SATA ports)
AMI BIOS 4 Mbit
Awardbios v6. 00pg

form-factor, dimensions ATX, 30.5×24.5 cm ATX, 30.5×24.4 cm

Board ASUS K8V Deluxe
MSI K8T Neo
1 FDD, 2 COM (one on bracket), 1 LPT, 2 PS/2 1 FDD, 1 COM, 1 LPT, 2 PS/2

USB USB 2.0 4 USB 2.0 + 2x USB 2.0

FireWire 2 ports (one on bracket, external VIA controller) 2 ports (external VIA controller) controller 2 PATA ports (ATA133), 2 SATA ports 2 PATA ports (ATA133), 2 SATA 9 ports7hf

BIOS 4 Mbps
AMI BIOS 4 Mbit
AMI BIOS
Form-Forms, dimensions ATX, 30.5×24.4 cm Atx, 30.5×22

As you can see from the table, both models are typical examples of high-end motherboards. Both use external gigabit network adapters, 5.1 sound controllers allow you to connect speakers through optical and coaxial digital outputs. Also impressive is the possible number of drives 6 each connected only to the southbridge and there is still an external ATA / RAID controller left in stock.
Athlon 64 (Socket 754): Gigabyte K8NNXP (nForce3 Pro 150), ASUS K8V Deluxe (K8T800)

Athlon 64 FX, Opteron (Socket 940): ASUS SK8N (nForce3 Pro 150) : ASUS P4C800 Deluxe (i875P)

Memory:

two 256 MB Kingmax DDR400 modules (2-3-3-5) for Athlon 64, Athlon XP and Pentium 4 systems Legacy Electronics DDR400 ECC Registered (2.5-3-3-5) for systems based on Athlon 64 FX-51 and Opteron (also used as DDR333 with the same timings), ECC control was disabled in the BIOS.
First, note that the methodology for testing systems in this article differs from that used previously. So the results cannot be directly compared. Moreover, we also changed the video card.

Of course, we did not use the entire list of applications proposed by AMD. This time we’ll look at gaming, media encoding, and archiving as the most CPU-intensive desktop applications.

To improve accuracy, all tests on real applications were run at least three times, and the median was chosen for the report.

Games

The following applications were used to test game performance:

Return to Castle Wolfenstein 1.41, id Software/Activision

Serious Sam: The Second Encounter 1.07, Croteam/GodGames

Unreal3 Tournament 2006 /Epic Games

The demo scenes recorded in these programs (checkpoint, Grand Cathedral, botmatch-antalus, flyby-antalus) were played in different resolutions with optimization of the «Quality» settings set in the game itself. No changes were made to the graphics card drivers other than disabling VSync.

Note that the results showed a high dependence of speed on resolution and, consequently, on the video card. Only the number of fps in the botmatch-antalus scene practically did not decrease with an increase in resolution. 1024×768 results are selected for the report. When playing at 800×600, the gap between the participants will be larger, while at 1600×1200 it will noticeably decrease. And if you use the anti-aliasing and anisotropy modes, then it may turn out that there will be no difference in the results at all.

In this fairly old game, Intel processors have always been favorites. However, with the release of 64-bit processors from AMD, the situation has changed dramatically. The new processors with a frequency of 2 GHz are on a par with the Pentium 4 3.2 GHz, and the Athlon 64 FX increases its result by almost 10% in proportion to the frequency and takes the lead.

This game already loves AMD products more. And if earlier we had parity between Athlon XP 3200+ and Pentium 4 3.2 GHz, now the new processors are taking the lead. Like last time, the leader is Athlon 64 FX-51.

Let’s also look at the dependence of the results on the resolution. The following two charts only show data for the Athlon 64 FX-51 and Pentium 4 3.2 GHz.

We see that RtCW is an easy task for the ATI RADEON 9800 Pro, and the results are practically independent of the resolution. The advantage of Athlon 64 FX is from 10 to 6% depending on the resolution.

For Serious Sam: The Second Encounter the situation is different at 1600×1200 the results of the systems are practically the same, but at 800×600 the difference is almost 30%.

In this game, the results generally repeat the data for Serious Sam: The Second Encounter. However, the spread of indicators in the flyby test is smaller and amounts to only 10%, while in the botmatch demo, which is more difficult for the processor, the leader outperforms the competitor by 25%.

For comparison, we also tested the two fastest systems with NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (driver 45.23).

On the whole, the alignment of forces remains the same in this case: Athlon 64 FX-51 outperforms Pentium 4 3.2 GHz from 7.5% in RtCW to 26.7% in UT2003 botmatch.

Media encoding

As before, two popular tasks are used: MP3 music encoding and MPEG4(DivX) video encoding. However, this time different settings and versions of the programs are used.

For the first task, we took the Lame 3.93 codec and used three settings:

—preset standard -m s

—preset 192 -m s

—preset cbr 192 -m s

the same size with an average bitrate of 192 Kbps. The original was a 71-minute WAV file (rewritten from CD-DA).

In this test, we see a clear dependence of the encoding speed on the frequency, and the Athlon XP 3200+ easily overtakes all new AMD processors with a frequency of 2.0 GHz and even slightly outperforms the Athlon 64 FX-51. And the product from Intel takes the lead with its 3.2 GHz. Its separation from the nearest pursuer is about 10%.

Video encoding in DivX (codec version 5.1) was made from a movie trailer in MPEG2 format (length 2:25, resolution 720×576) in the VirtualDub program (with support for reading MPEG2 format, version 1.5.4) using crop, deinterlace and resize filters .

Pentium 4 3.2 GHz is again in the lead, but this time the Athlon 64 FX-51 has practically overtaken it. But the Athlon XP 3200+ failed badly on this task. In principle, we can assume that the problem is the lack of SSE2 in the latter, but we have practically no information about SIMD support for the DivX codec, so we cannot say that this is the case. Just like with Lame, it is noticeable that the results are practically independent of the memory speed.

Archiving

Two programs were used for archiving: the console version of RAR (version 3.20) and 7-Zip (version 3.09.01 beta). Maximum compression settings: -m5 for RAR and -mx9 for 7-Zip.

The following input files were used:

Linux kernel sources (approximately 150 MB)

drivers for NVIDIA video cards (approximately 100 MB)

We already used the 7-Zip archiver earlier. It shows one of the best results in terms of compression ratio, but you have to pay for this with a long time. As an example, the table shows the efficiency in the maximum compression mode (the ratio of the volumes of the input and output files) and the running time of archivers in seconds. The zip format is the win32 console version of the pkzip archiver version 2.50 from PKWARE.
368
By the way, this table shows why we excluded archiving in the zip format from the tests its speed is determined more by the parameters of the hard drive than the processor. And the compression ratio is noticeably lower than that of competitors.

The only test where we see a noticeable difference in Athlon 64 performance on different chipsets. Moreover, its speed on nForce3 is the best among all participants. The difference between this configuration and the rest is the use of a Sil3512 SATA controller. Perhaps this is the case, or maybe there is some other secret in the NVIDIA chipset.

If we compare Pentium 4 3.2 GHz and Athlon 64 FX-51, then the latter is slightly ahead this time.

Here we have a different situation. The test shows a dependence on both memory speed (which is not surprising, since 7-Zip takes more than 300 MB of RAM when archiving test files) and processor frequency. And it seems that he likes the integrated controller in AMD processors more because of the lower delays. And again in this test Athlon 64 on nForce3 shows a good result and almost catches up with the leader. +14% UT2003 Flyby +10% +9% +7% UT2003 BotMatch +18%
+18000 9000 9000 9
Mediacoding LAME VBR -11% -9% -19% Lame Abr
-9%
-17% -17% -17% -17% -17% -17% -17% -17% -17% -10% -9% -18% DIVX -1% +4% -10% Archives
9
RAR, Kernel
+8% +26% 9001 % RAR, driver +2% +40% +15% 7-Zip, kernel +10% +10% +6% 7-Zip, driver +8% +12% +4%
So, we see that the new AMD Athlon 64 FX-51 processor shows excellent performance in gaming applications, outperforming its direct competitor Intel Pentium 4 3. 2 GHz by 10 percent or more. However, let’s not forget that the results strongly depend on the video card used, and if your 3D accelerator is not of the highest class, then you need to go to the store and buy it as soon as possible :-), otherwise you may not notice the effect of the money spent on the processor.

In MP3 encoding, the Intel product is unrivaled the high core frequency solves everything in this task. Tests show that the memory subsystem in this case has almost no noticeable effect on the result.

MPEG2 to DivX encoding is more complex, both core speed and processor/memory bus performance are important here. So Athlon 64 FX is practically catching up with Pentium 4. Other AMD processors show better results than their predecessor Athlon XP.

The Athlon 64 FX also outperforms the competition when it comes to archiving. And for 7-Zip, this is the merit of the integrated memory controller, which provided low memory access latencies.

In a comparison of equally rated 3200+ processors Athlon XP vs. Athlon 64 the latter wins everywhere except for MP3 encoding. However, with the release of the 2.2 GHz model (we hope that this will happen soon), this problem will disappear.

As regards the comparison of NVIDIA and VIA chipsets for Athlon 64, in all tests, except for archiving to RAR, their results practically do not differ. However, please consider the results of K8T800 as preliminary.

On the whole, our previous assumptions about the performance of the new AMD processors came true. Yes, they are good, but not as good as everyone would like. Of course, the potential of architecture is also visible on these samples, but buyers are usually not interested in abstract reasoning, but in real results. It’s hard to say whether the Athlon XP core has exhausted itself, but AMD really needed to introduce something new and original. And I think she succeeded.

Of course, today we have not reviewed all the tests of the new processor, but it is quite enough for a start. Ahead we have a discussion of the results of tests on professional applications, as well as numerous synthetics.

And finally, let’s try to figure out why AMD suddenly found such an interesting processor as the Athlon 64 FX-51 , which in all respects is very reminiscent of the delayed Opteron 148. As one of the scenarios, and quite plausible, we propose the following.

Starting from April, the development of the Opteron line went on as usual the frequency increased, new series were released. At the same time, the operation of the Athlon 64 processor was also tested, which, unlike the Opteron, used a single-channel memory controller, and it is probably impossible to say that it was “developed separately from the Opteron”. And the use of non-registered modules also seems natural for a desktop processor. It is not very clear why, but the frequency of the first Athlon 64 was 2.0 GHz. This was obviously not enough to compete with the Pentium 4 3.2 GHz. In addition, having a single-channel memory controller, the processor was outperformed by its competitor on this formal basis. And this despite today’s results in games the Athlon 64 3200+ still outperforms its competitor, in archiving too, only the encoding speed in MP3 and DivX let us down.

However, AMD needed a bright and unconditional victory. So, using a 2.2 GHz version of what was basically a server processor with a dual-channel memory controller, and making sure that 400 MHz register modules were already being produced in sufficient volumes, she introduced a new brand Athlon 64 FX, the first representative of which differed from other models in two parameters at once: frequency (cores) and memory speed from Opteron and frequency (cores) and a dual-channel controller from Athlon 64.

It won’t hurt sales of the Opteron line, especially since no one bothers to release these processors with a frequency of 2.2 GHz soon. Well, having set a price slightly higher than the cost of the Pentium 4 3.2 GHz, AMD has remained in the field of desktop processors.

True, there remains a slight ambiguity related to the use of registered memory modules with this processor. Many expected AMD’s high-end desktop to use conventional modules. But if this happened, then, firstly, it would be possible not to delay the announcement so long, and secondly, the processor could compete with the Opteron 100 series, having a higher frequency and working with cheaper memory. Of course, for most users, register modules (which, in fact, are needed to support large amounts of memory) are associated with the workstation and server market. However, it is strange to assume that the memory controller of the Athlon 64 FX and Opteron needs to be heavily modified to work with conventional modules because the Athlon 64 has no problems with this. So we are again witnessing market games that are far and inexplicable for a simple person.

The further fate of the Athlon 64 FX is shrouded in mist. On the one hand, AMD cannot stop increasing megahertz, on the other hand, the Opteron lineup is almost finished: x48 models will follow after x46 models, and then the existing notation system will have to be expanded. And the FX-51 will most likely be followed by the FX-53 with an increased frequency. Releasing a desktop processor that is exactly the same as a server processor, but with a higher frequency (and the ability to work only in single-processor configurations) means slowing down the pace of conquering the workstation market.

It would be strange to assume that AMD has technical problems with the release of processors with a high core frequency and two or three HT buses to work in multiprocessor configurations. But it is also not serious to expect that the mass market will switch to registered memory.

So under these conditions, AMD is likely to release 2.2GHz Opteron models, which will remain the company’s fastest server processors until the transition to 90nm technology. The Athlon 64 FX will clock up to 2.6 GHz or a little higher and will be AMD’s flagship desktop processor. At the same time, given the need to use register memory, it will not be supplied in large quantities. Although if this restriction is suddenly canceled next year :-), then its chances of becoming widespread will greatly increase. Well, Athlon 64 will successfully replace modern Athlon XP.

Athlon 64 FX-74 processor [in 1 benchmark]

AMD
Athlon 64 FX-74

Interface

Core frequency

Video memory size

Memory type

Memory frequency

Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 sales in November 2006 at a suggested price of $500. This is a desktop processor based on the Windsor architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3000 MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket F processor with a TDP of 125W. It supports DDR1 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

0.96%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Athlon 64
FX-74

or

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Athlon 64 FX-74, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

9999

Performance ranking 2410

Value for money

The price is now 500 $ (1x) of 15411 (EPYC 7351)

The price of the price

9000 for production of investments for the production considering the cost of other processors.

0

50

100

Features

Athlon 64 FX-74 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

9011
0 2
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
012

Nuclei
0 2

Flowers

—

Compatible

Information on Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

Types of RAM DDR1 of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600x)

Tests in the benchmark

These are the results of the Athlon 64 FX-74 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-74
0.96

Passmark

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

Athlon 64 FX-74
972

Relative capacity

Overall performance of the Athlon 64 FX-74 compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
100

AMD Athlon II X2 240
100

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
100

AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
100

AMD E2-3200
98.96

AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
97.92

AMD Athlon II X2 215
97.92

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the closest equivalent to Athlon 64 FX-74 from Intel is Core 2 Duo E7200, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

Core 2
Duo E7200

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Athlon 64 FX-74:

Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
102.