AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Intel Pentium Gold 6405U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Intel Pentium Gold 6405U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Athlon II X2 250 on one side and the Intel Pentium Gold 6405U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,0GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | Intel Pentium Gold 6405U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | K10 | Comet Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Regor | Comet Lake-U | ||||||
| Family | Athlon II X2 200 | Pentium 6000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
ADX250OCGQBOX, |
FJ8070104307703, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2009 | Q4 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 234. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,0 GHz | 2,4 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | — | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR2-1066, DDR3-1066 |
DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 17,1 GB/s | 37,5 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 15 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 950 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 422,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1528 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3 Motherboard | — | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 74°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
— |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 98 | 99 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 165 | 260 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 189 | 200 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 318 | 220 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1. 132 |
1.410 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.048 | 2.359 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.805 | 2.826 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
3.067 | 5.379 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
345 | 572 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
657 | 1.334 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
21,5 GFLOPS | 30,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
47 pts / W | 359 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Athlon II X2 250 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium Gold 6405U is less. The Intel Pentium Gold 6405U was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U |
99 260 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
98 165 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 58%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
189 318 |
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U |
200 220 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U |
1.410 2.359 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
1.132 1.048 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 125%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U |
2.  8265.379 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
1.805 3.067 |
In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 75%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U |
572 1.  334 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
345 657 |
In single core, the difference is 66%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 103%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Gold 6405U |
627 1.420 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
406 705 |
In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 101%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers.
This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Athlon II X2 250 Intel equivalentIntel Pentium Gold 6405U AMD equivalent
AMD Athlon II X2 220 vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 220 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 620 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
AMD Athlon II X2 220
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Pentium 4 HT 620
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 220
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 4.
6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later - Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 84 Watt
| Launch date | September 2010 vs February 2005 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 28 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 HT 620
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 801 vs 339
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 906 vs 603
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 801 vs 339 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 906 vs 603 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 HT 620
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon II X2 220 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1099 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1028 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 339 | 801 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 603 | 906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon II X2 220 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 620 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Regor | Prescott |
| Launch date | September 2010 | February 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $32 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2355 | 2237 |
| Price now | $32. 19 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.92 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | 620 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 117 mm | 135 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 28 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 8 GHz |
2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 169 million |
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 68 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 67.7°C | |
| VID voltage range | 1. 200V-1.400V |
|
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | PLGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon II X2 220 with others
AMD
Athlon II X2 220
vs
Intel
Celeron 440
AMD
Athlon II X2 220
vs
AMD
Phenom X3 8250e
AMD
Athlon II X2 220
vs
AMD
Athlon II X3 425
AMD
Athlon II X2 220
vs
Intel
Core i7-875K
AMD
Athlon II X2 220
vs
AMD
Athlon II X4 651
AMD
Athlon II X2 220
vs
Intel
Core i3-3220
Intel Pentium M 705 vs AMD Athlon II N350: Comparison
AMD Athlon II N350
Intel Pentium M 705
VS
WINNER
AMD Athlon II N350
Rating: 2 points
Intel Pentium M 705
Rating: 1 points
Test results
Performance
Interfaces and communications
Key features
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
- Number of Cores
PassMark CPU score
AMD Athlon II N350: 818
Intel Pentium M 705:
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
AMD Athlon II N350: 35 W
Intel Pentium M 705: 24.
5 W
Process
AMD Athlon II N350: 45 nm
Intel Pentium M 705: 130 nm
Number of transistors
AMD Athlon II N350: 234 million
Intel Pentium M 705: million
Cores
AMD Athlon II N350: 2
Intel Pentium M 705: 1
Description
AMD Athlon II N350 runs at No Hz, second Intel Pentium M 705 runs at 1.5 Hz. AMD Athlon II N350 is capable of overclocking up to 2.4 Hz, and the second up to 1.5 Hz. The maximum energy consumption of the first processor is 35 W, while the Intel Pentium M 705 has 24.5 W.
Regarding architecture, AMD Athlon II N350 is based on 45 nm technology. Intel Pentium M 705 on 130 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. AMD Athlon II N350 may support DDR No data available. Maximum supported size N/A MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is No data.
The second processor Intel Pentium M 705 is capable of supporting DDR No data. Throughput is No data. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. AMD Athlon II N350 has a graphics core No data available. The frequency of which is — No data MHz. Intel Pentium M 705 received a video core No data. Here the frequency is No data MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the AMD Athlon II N350 scored 818. And the Intel Pentium M 705 scored No data points.
Why AMD Athlon II N350 is better than Intel Pentium M 705
- Process technology 45 nm vs 130 nm, -65% less
818
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all2
max 256
Average: 10.7
1
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all256KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
An L2 cache with a large amount of scratchpad memory can increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all1MB
max 512
Average: 4.
5 MB
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
Maximum clock speed in Turbo mode
When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all2.4GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
1.5GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
1
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Socket
S1
H-PBGA479.
PPGA478 AMD Virtualization Technology
Yes
N/A
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
45 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
130 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
234 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system.
The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all35W
Average: 67.6W
24.5W
Average: 67.6W
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system, unlike a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show completelythere is
no
COOD Name
Champlain
Banias
Purpose
Laptop
Laptop
FAQ
Can AMD Athlon II N350 and Intel Pentium M 705 work in 4K mode?
AMD Athlon II N350 — Not available. Intel Pentium M 705 — No data available.
How many PCIe lanes
AMD Athlon II N350 — Not available. Intel Pentium M 705 — No data available.
How much RAM is supported?
AMD Athlon II N350 supports No GB data.
Intel Pentium M 705 supports N/AGB. How fast are the processors?
AMD Athlon II N350 clocked at GHz.5 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
AMD Athlon II N350 has 2 cores. The Intel Pentium M 705 has 1 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
AMD Athlon II N350 — Not available. Intel Pentium M 705 — No data available.
Does the AMD Athlon II N350 have integrated graphics?
AMD Athlon II N350 — Not available. Intel Pentium M 705 — N/A
What kind of RAM does it support
AMD Athlon II N350 supports DDR N/A. Intel Pentium M 705 supports DDR No data available.
What is the socket of the processors?
AMD Athlon II N350 uses S1. The H-PBGA479 is used to install the Intel Pentium M 705. PPGA478.
What architecture is used?
AMD Athlon II N350 is based on the Champlain architecture. The Intel Pentium M 705 is based on the Banias architecture.
Is the AMD Athlon II N350 multiplier unlocked?
AMD Athlon II N350 — Not available.
Intel Pentium M 705 — No data available. How do processors perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, AMD Athlon II N350 scored 818 points. The Intel Pentium M 705 scored No data points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of AMD Athlon II N350 reaches 2.4 Hz. The maximum frequency of the Intel Pentium M 705 reaches 1.5 Hz.
How much energy do they consume?
The power consumption of the AMD Athlon II N350 can be up to 35 watts. The Intel Pentium M 705 has up to 35 watts.
Intel Pentium M 705
VS
AMD Athlon II N350
AMD Athlon II P340
VS
Intel Pentium M 705
AMD Athlon II M300
VS
Intel Pentium M 705
Intel Pentium M 705
VS
AMD Geode LX800
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Celeron G6900
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i7-12650H
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i5-12600H
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i7-1280P
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i7-1255U
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i3-1220P
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i3-12300T
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i3-12100T
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i5-12500T
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i5-12400T
AMD Opteron 4386
VS
Intel Core i7-12700T
AMD Athlon II X2 220 or Intel Pentium 4 2.
60GHz
- Main page
Compare - Pentium 4 2.66Ghz
Compare
Speed in games
Athlon II X2 220
33.2 (+71%)
Pentium 4 2.60GHZ
1
Preparations in the games and similar apparatus, according tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Athlon II X2 220
37.8 (+67%)
Pentium 4 2.60GHz
22.7
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Athlon II X2 220
16.6 (+78%)
Pentium 4 2.60GHz
9.3
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Athlon II X2 220
29.2 (+62%)
Pentium 4 2.60GHz
18
Demanding games and tasks
Athlon II X2 220
6.
9 (+188%) Pentium 4 2.60GHz
2.4
Extreme
Athlon II X2 220
1.4 (+180%)
Pentium 4 2.60GHz
0.5
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16.
Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
AMD Athlon II X2 220
1003 (+367%)
Intel Pentium 4 2.60GHZ
215
Characteristics
Coqucation is cocted in the maternity fee. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. AM3 Manufacturer Company AMD Intel Performance
Cores The total number of physical cores. 2 No data ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 2 2 Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. 
Missing Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can try to disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 2.8 GHz 2.9 GHz Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Detailed information
Which is better
AMD Athlon II X2 220
- On average, gaming performance is 71% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 188%.
- Main page