AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | Intel Pentium Silver N6000 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | K10 | Tremont | ||||||
| Core name | Regor | Jasper Lake | ||||||
| Family | Athlon II X2 200 | Pentium 6000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
ADX250OCGQBOX, |
DC8069704609905, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2009 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 234. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,0 GHz | 1,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 3,3 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
2 Cores 2 Threads @ 3,0 GHz |
4 Cores 4 Threads @ 1,1 / 3,3 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR2-1066, DDR3-1066 |
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 8 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 6 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32EU) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 32 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 256 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1338 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3 Motherboard | — | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 74°C | 105°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
— |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator |
||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions |
||||||
| Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
OS Guard, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 128 | 277 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 137 | 1. 105 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 98 | 116 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 165 | 295 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 189 | 243 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 318 | 662 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 566 | 681 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 956 | 1.677 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.132 | 1.464 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1.048 | 3. 816 |
||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.805 | 3.268 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
3.067 | 8.505 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
345 | 577 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
657 | 1.799 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
21,5 GFLOPS | 62,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
47 pts / W | 1.418 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Pentium Silver N6000 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is less. The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
277 1.105 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
128 137 |
In single core, the difference is 116%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 707%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
116 295 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
98 165 |
In single core, the difference is 18%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 79%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
243 662 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
189 318 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 108%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
681 1.677 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
566 956 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 75%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
1.464 3.816 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
1.132 1.048 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 264%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
3.268 8.505 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
1.805 3.067 |
In single core, the difference is 81%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 177%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
3.  4468.557 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
1.986 3.190 |
In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 168%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
577 1.  799 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
345 657 |
In single core, the difference is 67%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 174%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Pentium Silver N6000 |
633 1.787 |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
406 705 |
In single core, the difference is 56%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 153%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Athlon II X2 250 Intel equivalentIntel Pentium Silver N6000 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Pentium Silver N6005
What Is the Difference Between Intel Pentium and AMD Athlon?
Manage Your Business
by Alexander Poirier
Published on 1 Jan 2021
Most of the central processing units (CPUs) found in computers are manufactured by either Intel or AMD (Advanced Micro Devices). Though Intel processors are better known and many consider them to be more powerful, AMD processors offer consumers a lower cost and powerful alternative to Intel’s CPUs. Intel and AMD’s flagship processors, the Pentium and Athlon, respectively, are comparable in many ways. Nevertheless, there are some key differences between the two brands of processors.
History of Intel Pentium
The Intel Pentium processor was first introduced in 1993. Being the first Pentium processor, it was simply called the Pentium Processor. The Pentium name, however, has come to represent several subsequent CPU models, including the Pentium 2, Pentium 3, Pentium 4 and Pentium Dual-Core CPUs. Each succeeding CPU model has improved on the last in multiple ways, most notable by increasing the CPU’s processing speed and memory cache size. The «Pentium» name helped Intel gain a near-monopoly over the CPU market for a large part of the 1990s.
History of AMD Athlon
Intel’s near-monopoly was shattered when AMD introduced its Athlon line of processors in 1999. Like the Intel Pentium brand, Athlon has branded several AMD processors, including the Athlon XP, Athlon X2 and Athlon 64. Though technically «inferior» (on paper) to their Intel counterparts, these processors offer consumers the same, if not better performance, through a few technological differences.
Memory Cache
One of the key differences between Intel Pentium and AMD Athlon processors is the way they each store and access the CPU memory. This difference is also what accounts for the AMD Athlon processor’s relatively lower price and comparable performance (with technically lower specs) with the Intel Pentium. The Intel Pentium processors store their memory in an L2 (level 2) cache that is roughly double the size of the cache found in comparable AMD processors. The L2 cache is a memory bank that stores and transmits data to the L1 (level 1) cache which, in turn, stores and transmits data to the processor itself; the larger the L2 cache, the faster the processing speed. AMD Athlon processors, although they have roughly half the L2 cache space, are able to match this speed by integrating the memory cache into the processor itself. This technological decision allows AMD Athlon processors to access their cache data much quicker than Intel Pentium processors, even though the cache is smaller.