Core i5-2400 vs FX-6300 — How Many FPS
Availability
Intel Core i5-2400 3.10 GHz Quad-Core Processor
Buy on Amazon
$50.1
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 653 days older than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 6% better in VALORANT than FX-6300 — 369 vs 349 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn’t have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 — 6 vs 4 threads
VALORANT
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
369
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0. 14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 3.10 GHz Quad-Core Processor
Buy for $50.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
349
94%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
1147
FPS
1092
FPS
Minecraft
211
FPS
199
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
855
FPS
814
FPS
League of Legends
369
FPS
349
FPS
VALORANT
228
FPS
216
FPS
Fortnite
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
654
100%
Multi-Core
2103
100%
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Single-Core
519
74%
Multi-Core
1905
90%
|
Intel Core i5-2400 |
vs |
AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date |
Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 4 | Cores |
6 |
| 4 | Threads |
6 |
3. 1 GHz |
Base Clock Speed |
3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
|
31.0x |
Multiplier | 17.5x |
|
Intel HD 2000 |
Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable |
Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-2400 or FX-6300
VALORANT, 1080p, High
CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Master Gaming PC
$
1356.96
/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-6300
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,356.96
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
CyberpowerPC Gamer Ultra Gaming PC
$
1199.
99
/FPS
Radeon R7 240
FX-6300
8 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,199.99
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i5-2400
Core 2 Quad Q9550
$48.02
FX-6300
N/A Stock
Core 2 Quad Q9550
$48.02
Core i5-2400
Pentium G630
FX-6300
N/A Stock
Pentium G630
Core i5-2400
Athlon II X4 630
$48.04
FX-6300
N/A Stock
Athlon II X4 630
$48.04
Core i5-2400
Core i7-4765T
$59.99
FX-6300
N/A Stock
Core i7-4765T
$59.99
Core i5-2400
Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Core i5-6200U vs AMD FX-6300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-6200U and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Intel Core i5-6200U
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD FX-6300
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-6200U
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 70.
50°C - A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1572 vs 1488
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 596 vs 527
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.309 vs 16.195
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.306 vs 0.85
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.135 vs 4.767
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs October 2012 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 70.50°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1572 vs 1488 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 596 vs 527 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
19.309 vs 16.195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.306 vs 0.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.135 vs 4.767 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.80 GHz
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4188 vs 3005
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1914 vs 1415
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.339 vs 0.28
| Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 6 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 2.80 GHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB vs 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB vs 3 MB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4188 vs 3005 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1914 vs 1415 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
0.339 vs 0.28 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-6200U
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-6200U | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1572 | 1488 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3005 | 4188 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 596 | 527 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1415 | 1914 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | 2087 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
19.309 | 16.195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.28 | 0.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.306 | 0.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.135 | 4.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1324 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
4174 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1324 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 4174 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.905 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-6200U | AMD FX-6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Vishera |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1506 | 2233 |
| Processor Number | i5-6200U | |
| Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | FD6300WMHKBOX | |
| OPN Tray | FD6300WMW6KHK | |
| Price now | $58. 99 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 31.81 | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Die size | 99 mm | 315 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 70. 50°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 6 |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.15 V — Max: 1.3875 V | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34. 1 GB/s |
|
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Device ID | 0x1916 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 32 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Configurable TDP-down | 7.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2. |
|
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1356 | AM3+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3. |
3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. |