Amd fx 8300 vs 6350: AMD FX-6350 Six-Core vs FX-8300

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/fx-8300-vs-fx-6350%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti



Radeon RX
580

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Core i3
1115G4



EPYC
7h22



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
1135G7



Core i5
12400F











Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/fx-8300-vs-fx-6350%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti



Radeon RX
580

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Core i3
1115G4



EPYC
7h22



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
1135G7



Core i5
12400F











Comparison of AMD FX-6350 and AMD FX-8300

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6350 and AMD FX-8300 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s).
nine0003

AMD FX-6350

versus
AMD FX-6350 : 1548 vs 1492

  • About 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 551 vs 518
  • Issue date April 2013 vs October 2012
    PassMark — Single thread mark 1548 vs 1492
    Geekbench 4 — Single Core 551 vs 518

    Reasons to choose AMD FX-8300

    • 2 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6
    • 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
    • About 16% more max core temperature: 70. 50°C vs 61°C
    • About 33% more L1 cache, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • Approximately 33% larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • Approximately 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
    • Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark approximately 18% higher: 5299 vs 4503
    • About 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2318 vs 2117
    • About 33% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.817 vs 6.641
    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) approximately 7% faster performance: 19.41 vs 18.143

    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining benchmark (mHash/s) approximately 16% greater performance: 5.999 vs 5.179

    nine0029 384 KB vs 288 KB

    Cores 8 vs 6
    Number of threads 8 vs 6
    Maximum core temperature 70. 50°C vs 61°C
    Level 1 cache
    Level 2 cache 8MB vs 6MB
    Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
    PassMark — CPU mark 5299 vs 4503
    Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2318 vs 2117
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.817 vs 6.641
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 19.41 vs 18.143
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.999 vs 5.179

    Benchmark comparison

    CPU 1: AMD FX-6350
    CPU 2: AMD FX-8300

    nine0029

    PassMark — Single thread mark
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    PassMark — CPU mark
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    Geekbench 4 — Single Core
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    CPU 1
    CPU 2

    nine0030

    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    18.143
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    CPU 1
    CPU 2

    nine0309 AMD FX-8300

    Name AMD FX-6350
    PassMark — Single thread mark 1548 1492
    PassMark — CPU mark 4503 5299
    Geekbench 4 — Single Core 551 518
    Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2117 2318
    3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 0 2697
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.641 8.817
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 18.143 19.41
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.179 5.999
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.397
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.995

    Performance comparison

    nine0033

    nine0029

    nine0029 384KB

    nine0029 32nm SOI

    nine0029 8

    nine0029 1200 million

    configuration

    nine0033

    nine0029

    nine0309 AMD FX-6350 AMD FX-8300
    Architecture name Vishera Vishera
    Family AMD FX-Series Processors AMD FX-Series Processors
    Issue date April 2013 October 2012
    OPN PIB FD6350FRHKBOX FD8300WMHKBOX
    OPN Tray FD6350FRW6KHK FD8300WMW8KHK
    Rank 2264 2102
    Price now $129. 99 $80.59
    Series AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 15.84 21.28
    Applicability Desktop Desktop
    Support 64 bit
    Base frequency 3.9 GHz 3.3 GHz
    Crystal area 315mm 315mm
    Level 1 cache 288KB
    Level 2 cache 6MB 8MB
    Level 3 cache 8MB 8MB
    Process 32nm SOI
    Maximum core temperature 61°C 70. 50°C
    Maximum frequency 4.2GHz 4.2GHz
    Number of cores 6
    Number of threads 6 8
    Voltage P0 Vcore Min: 1.25V — Max: 1.4125V Min: 1.075 V — Max: 1.2875 V
    Number of transistors 1200 million
    Unlocked
    Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz
    Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3
    Maximum number of processors in 1 1
    Supported sockets AM3+ AM3+
    Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt
    Revision PCI Express n/a n/a
    Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
    Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
    Intel® AES New Instructions
    AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

    AMD FX-8300 vs.

    AMD FX-6350

    AMD FX-8300

    AMD FX-8300 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 95 W .The processor connects to an AM3+ CPU socket This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q2/2013

    AMD FX-6350

    AMD FX-6350 runs with 6 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 125 W .CPU connects to AM3+ CPU socket This version include 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q2/2013

    AMD FX-8300

    AMD FX-6350

    Compare Parts

    3. 30 GHz

    Frequency 3.90 GHz
    8 Kernels 6
    4.20GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.20 GHz
    4.00GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.20 GHz
    No. Hyper Threading No.
    Yes Acceleration Yes
    normal Basic architecture normal
    no iGPU GPU no iGPU
    no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
    32nm Technologies 32nm
    no turbo GPU (Turbo) no turbo
    DirectX Version
    Max. displays
    DDR3-1866 memory size DDR3-1866
    2 Memory channels 2
    Maximum memory size
    Yes ECC Yes
    L2 Cache
    8. 00MB L3 Cache 8.00 MB
    PCIe version
    PCIe lanes
    32nm Technologies 32nm
    AM3+ Connector AM3+
    95 W TDP 125W
    AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
    Q2/2013 Release date Q2/2013

    Show more details

    Show more details

    Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.