Amd fx 8350 black edition vs i7 4770k: AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-4770K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-8350 on one side and the Intel Core i7-4770K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor		AMD FX-8350				Intel Core i7-4770K
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Piledriver				Haswell
Core name		Vishera				Haswell-DT
Family		FX-8000				Core i7-4000
Part number(s), S-Spec		FD8350FRW8KHK, FD8350FRHKBOX, FX-8350 Black Edition				BX80646I74770K, BXC80646I74770K, BXF80646I74770K, CM8064601464206, QEH6
Release date		Q4 2012				Q2 2013
Lithography		32 nm SOI				22 nm
Transistors		1. 200.000.000				1.400.000.000
Cores		8				4
Threads		8				8
Base frequency		4,0 GHz				3,5 GHz
Turbo frequency		4,2 GHz				3,9 GHz
High performance cores		8 Cores 8 Threads @ 4,0 / 4,2 GHz				4 Cores 8 Threads @ 3,5 / 3,9 GHz
Cache memory		8 MB				8 MB
Max memory capacity		32 GB				32 GB
Memory types		DDR3-1866				DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max memory bandwidth		29,9 GB/s				25,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		16				16
TDP		125 W				84 W
Suggested PSU		650W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		None				Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU execution units		—				20
GPU shading units		—				160
GPU base clock		—				350 MHz
GPU boost clock		—				1250 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		—				352 GFLOPS
Socket		AM3+				LGA1150
Compatible motherboard		Socket AM3+ Motherboard				Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		61°C				105°C
Drystone MIPS		97. 114 DMIPS				127.282 DMIPS
Crypto engine		Advanced Encryption Standard instructions				AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security		Enhanced Virus Protection				OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Anti-Theft Technology
Max display resolution		—				4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (DP), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (eDP), 1920 x 1200@60Hz (VGA)
CPU-Z single thread		231				482
CPU-Z multi thread		1. 597				2.483
Cinebench R15 single thread		100				156
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		669				791
Cinebench R23 single thread		484				934
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		3.355				4.757
PassMark single thread		1.573				2.144
PassMark CPU Mark		5.944				7.081
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core		2.738				4.589
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core		10. 978				15.120
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		99,6 GFLOPS				261,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		88 pts / W				180 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD FX-8350 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-8350 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-4770K is less. The Intel Core i7-4770K was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-4770K	482 2.483
AMD FX-8350	231 1.597

In single core, the difference is 109%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-4770K	156 791
AMD FX-8350	100 669

In single core, the difference is 56%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 18%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-4770K	934 4.757
AMD FX-8350	484 3.355

In single core, the difference is 93%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 42%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-4770K	2.144 7.081
AMD FX-8350	1.573 5.944

In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i7-4770K	4.589 15.120
AMD FX-8350	2.738 10.978

In single core, the difference is 68%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i7-4770K	4. 393 14.891
AMD FX-8350	2.755 10.794

In single core, the difference is 59%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i7-4770K	4.985 17.196
AMD FX-8350	2.233 5.530

In single core, the difference is 123%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 211%.

On Mac OS X:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
Intel Core i7-4770K	4.738 15.083
AMD FX-8350	2. 688 11.071

In single core, the difference is 76%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD FX-8350 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-4770K AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i7-4770Intel Core i7-4770HQIntel Core i7-4770S

Intel Core i7-4770K vs AMD FX-8350

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-4770K and AMD FX-8350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i7-4770K

Buy on Amazon

vs

AMD FX-8350

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4770K

• CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher maximum core temperature: 72. 72°C vs 61°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• Around 49% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2165 vs 1580
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 7125 vs 6033
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 982 vs 566
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3688 vs 2751
• Around 93% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 2575 vs 1337
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 89.554 vs 21.912
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.625 vs 0.424
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.525 vs 1.199

Launch date	1 June 2013 vs 23 October 2012
Maximum core temperature	72. 72°C vs 61°C
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	84 Watt vs 125 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark	2165 vs 1580
PassMark — CPU mark	7125 vs 6033
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	982 vs 566
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3688 vs 2751
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2575 vs 1337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	89. 554 vs 21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.625 vs 0.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.525 vs 1.199

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8350

• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.886 vs 5.223
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.137 vs 6.308

Number of cores	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	4. 2 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
L1 cache	384 KB vs 256 KB
L2 cache	8 MB vs 1 MB
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.886 vs 5.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	7.137 vs 6.308

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core i7-4770K
CPU 2: AMD FX-8350

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	89.554 21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	Intel Core i7-4770K	AMD FX-8350
PassMark — Single thread mark	2165	1580
PassMark — CPU mark	7125	6033
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	982	566
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3688	2751
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2575	1337
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.223	9.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	89.554	21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.625	0.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.525	1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.308	7.137
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1347
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	2349
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3778
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1347
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	2349
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3778

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Core i7-4770K	AMD FX-8350
Architecture codename	Haswell	Vishera
Launch date	1 June 2013	23 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$399
Place in performance rating	1393	2242
Price now	$284. 99	$79.99
Processor Number	i7-4770K
Series	4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors	AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Status	Discontinued
Value for money (0-100)	10.43	32.95
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Family		AMD FX-Series Processors
OPN PIB		FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray		FD8350FRW8KHK
64 bit support
Base frequency	3. 50 GHz	4 GHz
Bus Speed	5 GT/s DMI2
Die size	177 mm	315 mm
L1 cache	256 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	32 nm SOI
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C
Maximum core temperature	72. 72°C	61°C
Maximum frequency	3.90 GHz	4.2 GHz
Number of cores	4	8
Number of threads	8	8
Transistor count	1400 Million	1200 Million
Unlocked
P0 Vcore voltage		Min: 1.2 V — Max: 1.4 V
Max memory channels	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25. 6 GB/s
Maximum memory size	32 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V	DDR3
Supported memory frequency		1866 MHz
Device ID	0x412
Graphics base frequency	350 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1.25 GHz
Graphics max frequency	1. 25 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Max video memory	2 GB
Processor graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 4600
DisplayPort
DVI
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported	3
VGA
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Max resolution over DisplayPort	[email protected]
Max resolution over eDP	[email protected]
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]
Max resolution over VGA	[email protected]
DirectX	11.2/12
OpenGL	4.3
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCLGA1150	AM3+
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	84 Watt	125 Watt
Thermal Solution	PCG 2013D
Max number of PCIe lanes	16
PCI Express revision	Up to 3. 0	n / a
PCIe configurations	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability	1S Only
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.