Amd fx vs intel i7: AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core vs Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-970


Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-970 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8350

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i7-970

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8350

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
  • Around 21% higher clock speed: 4. 2 GHz vs 3.46 GHz
  • 5.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 130 Watt
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1577 vs 1454
  • 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.886 vs 1.559
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.137 vs 6.816










Launch date 23 October 2012 vs July 2010
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 8 vs 6
Maximum frequency 4.2 GHz vs 3.46 GHz
L2 cache 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt vs 130 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark 1577 vs 1454
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 vs 1.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 vs 6.816

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-970

  • 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
  • Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 67.9°C vs 61°C
  • Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6498 vs 6010
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 592 vs 566
  • Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3217 vs 2751
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 49.006 vs 21.912
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.506 vs 0.424
  • 2. 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.584 vs 1.199










Number of threads 12 vs 8
Maximum core temperature 67.9°C vs 61°C
L3 cache 12288 KB (shared) vs 8 MB
PassMark — CPU mark 6498 vs 6010
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 592 vs 566
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 3217 vs 2751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 49.006 vs 21.912
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.506 vs 0.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.584 vs 1.199

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-970










PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2

21.912

49.006

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2












Name AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-970
PassMark — Single thread mark 1577 1454
PassMark — CPU mark 6010 6498
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 566 592
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 3217
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 3146
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 1.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.912 49.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.424 0.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.199 2.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 6.816

Compare specifications (specs)


















































AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-970
Architecture codename Vishera Gulftown
Family AMD FX-Series Processors
Launch date 23 October 2012 July 2010
OPN PIB FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray FD8350FRW8KHK
Place in performance rating 1723 1866
Price now $79. 99 $148.99
Series AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Value for money (0-100) 32.95 16.59
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)

$662
Processor Number

i7-970
Status

Discontinued
64 bit support
Base frequency 4 GHz 3. 20 GHz
Die size 315 mm 239 mm2
L1 cache 384 KB 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 8 MB 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 8 MB 12288 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm SOI 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 61°C 67.9°C
Maximum frequency 4. 2 GHz 3.46 GHz
Number of cores 8 6
Number of threads 8 12
P0 Vcore voltage Min: 1.2 V — Max: 1.4 V
Transistor count 1200 Million 1170 million
Unlocked
Bus Speed

4.8 GT/s QPI
Number of QPI Links

1
VID voltage range

0. 800V-1.375V
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3 800/1066
Max memory channels

3
Maximum memory bandwidth

25.6 GB/s
Maximum memory size

24 GB
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3+ FCLGA1366
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt 130 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available

Package Size

42. 5mm X 45.0mm
PCI Express revision n / a
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology

Idle States

Instruction set extensions

Intel® SSE4. 2
Intel 64

Intel® Demand Based Switching

Intel® Hyper-Threading technology

Intel® Turbo Boost technology

Physical Address Extensions (PAE)

36-bit
Thermal Monitoring

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

FX-8370 vs Core i7-11700 — How Many FPS

Availability

AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition

Buy on Amazon

$270

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

Availability

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 2387 days newer than FX-8370.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700

  • Performs up to 44% better in League of Legends than FX-8370 — 1207 vs 839 FPS

  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 — 65 vs 125 Watts

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 — 16 vs 8 threads

  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn’t have integrated graphics

League of Legends

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

839

70%

Value, $/FPS

$0.32/FPS

100%

Price, $

$270

100%

Value Winner

AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition

Buy for $270 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

Core i7-11700

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

1207

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

FPS Winner

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Core i7-11700

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

206

FPS

304

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

839

FPS

1207

FPS

League of Legends

361

FPS

530

FPS

VALORANT

224

FPS

328

FPS

Fortnite

222

FPS

335

FPS

Apex Legends

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

568

36%

Multi-Core

2780

32%

Core i7-11700

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

1594

100%

Multi-Core

8556

100%

AMD FX-8370

vs

Intel Core i7-11700

Sep 2nd, 2014 Release Date

Mar 16th, 2021

FX Collection Core i7
Vishera Codename Rocket Lake
AMD Socket AM3+ Socket Intel Socket 1200

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

8 Cores 8
8 Threads

16

4. 0 GHz

Base Clock Speed 2.5 GHz
4.3 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

4.9 GHz

125 W TDP

65 W

32 nm Process Size

14 nm

20.0x Multiplier

25.0x

None Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 750

Yes

Overclockable No

Builds Using FX-8370 or Core i7-11700

League of Legends, 1080p, High

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 Gaming Laptop

533

FPS

$

1.69

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Core i7-11700

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$899.99

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 Gaming Laptop

533

FPS

$

1. 5

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Core i7-11700

8 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$799.98

In Stock

Updated 62 minutes ago

ROG Strix G10 Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

1.54

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,038.45

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

1.88

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,269

In Stock

Updated 59 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

2. 29

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

64 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,549

In Stock

Updated 59 minutes ago

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

2.37

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

64 GB, 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,599

In Stock

Updated 58 minutes ago

Dell XPS 8940 Desktop PC

971

FPS

$

0.96

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Core i7-11700

32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 6 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$929.62

In Stock

Updated 60 minutes ago

HP Pavilion TG01 Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

2. 16

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

64 GB, 2 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,459.99

In Stock

Updated 60 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

1.97

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

16 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,329

In Stock

Updated 58 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC

676

FPS

$

2.07

/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060

Core i7-11700

32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,399

In Stock

Updated 59 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

FX-8370

Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i7-11700

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 5800X

FX-8370

Ryzen 7 5700X

Core i7-11700

N/A Stock

Ryzen 7 5700X

FX-8370

Ryzen 5 5600X

$229.99

Core i7-11700

N/A Stock

Ryzen 5 5600X

$229.99

FX-8370

Core i5-13600K

$319.99

Core i7-11700

N/A Stock

Core i5-13600K

$319.99

FX-8370

Core i5-13600KF

$309.79

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-10700K: What is the difference?

Smartphone-graphic wire headphones

36 ballla

AMD FX-8350

65 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-10700K

I7-10700KF

502 VS

63 63 facts in comparisons

Intel Core i7-10700K

Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-10700K?

  • 5. 26% higher CPU speed?
    8 x 4GHz vs 8 x 3.8GHz
  • 6MB more L2 cache?
    8MB vs 2MB
  • 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
  • Has FMA4?

Why is Intel Core i7-10700K better than AMD FX-8350?

  • 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
    2933MHz vs 1866MHz
  • 8 more CPU threads?
    16 vs 8
  • 39°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
    100°C vs 61°C
  • 18nm smaller semiconductors?
    14nm vs 32nm
  • 0.9GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    5.1GHz vs 4.2GHz
  • 3.25x higher PassMark score?
    19240 vs 5926
  • 8MB more L3 cache?
    16MB vs 8MB
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    3 vs 2

What are the most popular comparisons?

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 3600

Intel Core i7-10700k

VS

Intel Core i5-12600k

AMD FX-8350

Intel Core I77777470K Intel Core i7-10700K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD FX-8350

vs

AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-10700K

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core2 9000

Intel Core i7-107-102 Intel Core i7-1 AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

Intel Core i7-10700K

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 3700x

AMD FX-8350

VS 9000 AMD AMD

Intel Core i7-10700K

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5700g

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Intel Core i7-10700k

VS

Intel Core

AMD FXD FXD FXD vs

AMD RYZEN 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-10700k

VS

Intel Core i9-10900k

AMD FX-8350

VS

AMD

VS

VS

Intel Core I7-102 Intel Core I7-1

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i7-10700K

VS

Intel Core i9-9900k

9012 9025 9025

Reviews Users are cheaper users AMD FX-8350

5 User reviews

AMD FX-8350

9. 8 /10

5 User reviews

Intel Core i7-10700K

User reviews0002 Intel Core i7-10700k

10.0 /10

2 reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

9.6 /10

9000 5 Votes

9000 9000 9000 9000 2 VOTES

Games

9.6 /10

5 Votes

10.0249 /10

2 Votes

performance

/10

2 Votes

Reliability

9.6 /10

5 Votes

10.0 /10

2 Votes

Energy efficiency

8.6 /10 9000 Votes 9000 Votes /10

2 votes

Performance

CPU speed

8 x 4GHz

8 x 3.8GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor (processors) can perform. It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

5.1GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-10700K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

L2 core

1MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

L3 core

1MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Geotagging

PassMark result

This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.

PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

164.9seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

540.4seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Integrated graphics

GPU clock speed

N/A

350MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

turbo GPU

N/A

1200MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

GPU actuators

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.

monitor support

N/A

By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.

DirectX 9 version0003

N/A

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

OpenGL version

N/A

The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.

OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

texture units (TMUs)

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

ROPs imaging units

Not applicable

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

RAM speed

1866MHz

2933MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

45.8GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

bus baud rate

5.4GT/s

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-10700K

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Functions

uses multi-threading

Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

Has AES

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-10700K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

Has AVX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-10700K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

version of SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

Has F16C

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-10700K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

Has MMX

✔AMD FX-8350

✔Intel Core i7-10700K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

Has TrustZone

✖AMD FX-8350

✖Intel Core i7-10700K

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.

interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

This page is currently only available in English.

Which is better AMD FX-8350 or Intel Core i7-3820? — Habr Q&A

Because frequencies and all sorts of quantities mean absolutely nothing apart from architecture.

FX’s have weak cores, a fairly large part of the blocks are divided in pairs (in particular, FPUs). But what Intel called 4-core processors with 8 executable threads, fx’s have 8-core processors.

Tasks come into play next:
in games you need a little, but productive cores. fx can compete only with i5
If you need a lot of integer mathematics, fx’s are quite appropriate.

Answer written

comment

LGA2011 setup will be decently more expensive than AM3+. Prospects — theoretically still Ivy Bridge-E and to the landfill, but there is and will be a cloud of very expensive processors that can then be perfectly upgraded (for example, even from SB-E something like E5-2650, 2670, etc. — tr eight-core monster). The performance is higher than that of Vishera (corresponding to the price — everything is fair :)).

LGA1155 is only slightly more expensive than AM3+. Prospects — no (Haswell / Broadwell on LGA1150).

AM3+ is the most economical platform in this segment. The prospects are either gone, or one more generation, or two more generations. Now the FX-8350 is about the level of i5-3330 to i7-3770, but costs as much as i5-3470. FX-8320 is even better in terms of price / quality ratio. In 70% of games at the level of i5 or a little worse. In software, even modern, it’s about the same. In some applications, the i7-3770 is doing well (say, in 1% of applications or even less often). In a pure single-stream — trash.

FX-8350 versus i5-3570K consumes 2 times more power and 1. 5 times higher heat dissipation. For home, both are ok.

Answer written

comment

Look at tasks. If your tasks are mostly integer and are well parallelized, then AMD is good here. If they are poorly paralleled, then Intel has better performance per core.

I have an FX8120 — enough for everything I need.

Answer written

comment

Well, in addition to the frequency, etc. there is the concept of architecture, there is forecasting, for example.

If it’s completely on the fingers, then for example, if a processor with a frequency of 800 MHz per cycle executes 2 commands, and a processor at 1500 MHz only one, then the first one will be faster.

In fact, everything is noticeably more complicated and you just need to look at the tests and nothing else.

Answer written

comment

According to Passmark’s test results, AMD is still slightly more productive than AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-3820
And if you also compare the price, then Intel is “in flight”.

Answer written

comment

Are you checkered or should you go?
You need to look not at the numbers on the box (how many cores, etc.