AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-970
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-970 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-8350
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i7-970
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8350
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- Around 21% higher clock speed: 4. 2 GHz vs 3.46 GHz
- 5.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1577 vs 1454
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.886 vs 1.559
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.137 vs 6.816
Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs July 2010 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.46 GHz |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 130 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1577 vs 1454 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.886 vs 1.559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.137 vs 6.816 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-970
- 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 67.9°C vs 61°C
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6498 vs 6010
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 592 vs 566
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3217 vs 2751
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 49.006 vs 21.912
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.506 vs 0.424
- 2. 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.584 vs 1.199
Number of threads | 12 vs 8 |
Maximum core temperature | 67.9°C vs 61°C |
L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) vs 8 MB |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6498 vs 6010 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 592 vs 566 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3217 vs 2751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.006 vs 21.912 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.506 vs 0.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.584 vs 1.199 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-970
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-8350 | Intel Core i7-970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1577 | 1454 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6010 | 6498 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 566 | 592 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2751 | 3217 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3146 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.886 | 1.559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.912 | 49.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.424 | 0.506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.199 | 2.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.137 | 6.816 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-8350 | Intel Core i7-970 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Vishera | Gulftown |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 | July 2010 |
OPN PIB | FD8350FRHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8350FRW8KHK | |
Place in performance rating | 1723 | 1866 |
Price now | $79. 99 | $148.99 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.95 | 16.59 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $662 | |
Processor Number | i7-970 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 4 GHz | 3. 20 GHz |
Die size | 315 mm | 239 mm2 |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 12288 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61°C | 67.9°C |
Maximum frequency | 4. 2 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V — Max: 1.4 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 Million | 1170 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 4.8 GT/s QPI | |
Number of QPI Links | 1 | |
VID voltage range | 0. 800V-1.375V | |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Max memory channels | 3 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | FCLGA1366 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 130 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 42. 5mm X 45.0mm | |
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
FX-8370 vs Core i7-11700 — How Many FPS
Availability
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy on Amazon
$270
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 2387 days newer than FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
-
Performs up to 44% better in League of Legends than FX-8370 — 1207 vs 839 FPS
-
Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 — 65 vs 125 Watts
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 — 16 vs 8 threads
-
Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn’t have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
839
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Core i7-11700
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
1207
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-11700
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
206
FPS
304
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
839
FPS
1207
FPS
League of Legends
361
FPS
530
FPS
VALORANT
224
FPS
328
FPS
Fortnite
222
FPS
335
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
568
36%
Multi-Core
2780
32%
Core i7-11700
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1594
100%
Multi-Core
8556
100%
AMD FX-8370 |
vs |
Intel Core i7-11700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date |
Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads |
16 |
4. 0 GHz |
Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP |
65 W |
32 nm | Process Size |
14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier |
25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics |
UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
Builds Using FX-8370 or Core i7-11700
League of Legends, 1080p, High
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 Gaming Laptop
533
FPS
$
1.69
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i7-11700
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 Gaming Laptop
533
FPS
$
1. 5
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i7-11700
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$799.98
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
ROG Strix G10 Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
1.54
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,038.45
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
1.88
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,269
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
2. 29
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
64 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,549
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
2.37
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
64 GB, 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,599
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Dell XPS 8940 Desktop PC
971
FPS
$
0.96
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i7-11700
32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 6 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$929.62
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
HP Pavilion TG01 Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
2. 16
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
64 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,459.99
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
1.97
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
16 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,329
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
ASUS ROG Strix G10CE Gaming Desktop PC
676
FPS
$
2.07
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-11700
32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
FX-8370
Ryzen 7 5800X
Core i7-11700
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 5800X
FX-8370
Ryzen 7 5700X
Core i7-11700
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 5700X
FX-8370
Ryzen 5 5600X
$229.99
Core i7-11700
N/A Stock
Ryzen 5 5600X
$229.99
FX-8370
Core i5-13600K
$319.99
Core i7-11700
N/A Stock
Core i5-13600K
$319.99
FX-8370
Core i5-13600KF
$309.79
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-10700K: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic wire headphones
36 ballla
AMD FX-8350
65 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-10700K
I7-10700KF
502 VS
63 63 facts in comparisons
Intel Core i7-10700K
Why is AMD FX-8350 better than Intel Core i7-10700K?
- 5. 26% higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 8 x 3.8GHz - 6MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 2MB - 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core - Has FMA4?
Why is Intel Core i7-10700K better than AMD FX-8350?
- 1067MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 1866MHz - 8 more CPU threads?
16 vs 8 - 39°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 61°C - 18nm smaller semiconductors?
14nm vs 32nm - 0.9GHz higher turbo clock speed?
5.1GHz vs 4.2GHz - 3.25x higher PassMark score?
19240 vs 5926 - 8MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 8MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3 vs 2
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core i7-10700k
VS
Intel Core i5-12600k
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core I77777470K Intel Core i7-10700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD FX-8350
vs
AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-10700K
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
AMD FX-8350
VS
Intel Core2 9000
Intel Core i7-107-102 Intel Core i7-1 AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i7-10700K
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
AMD FX-8350
VS 9000 AMD AMD
Intel Core i7-10700K
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Intel Core i7-10700k
VS
Intel Core
AMD FXD FXD FXD vs
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-10700k
VS
Intel Core i9-10900k
AMD FX-8350
VS
AMD
VS
VS
Intel Core I7-102 Intel Core I7-1
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
AMD FX-8350
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-10700K
VS
Intel Core i9-9900k
9012 9025 9025
Reviews Users are cheaper users AMD FX-8350
5 User reviews
AMD FX-8350
9. 8 /10
5 User reviews
Intel Core i7-10700K
User reviews0002 Intel Core i7-10700k
10.0 /10
2 reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
9.6 /10
9000 5 Votes
9000 9000 9000 9000 2 VOTES
Games
9.6 /10
5 Votes
10.0249 /10
2 Votes
performance
/10
2 Votes
Reliability
9.6 /10
5 Votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
Energy efficiency
8.6 /10 9000 Votes 9000 Votes /10
2 votes
Performance
CPU speed
8 x 4GHz
8 x 3.8GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor (processors) can perform. It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
5.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i7-10700K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
1MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
164.9seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
540.4seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
N/A
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
∅
N/A
1200MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU actuators
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX 9 version0003
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs imaging units
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
1866MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
45.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i7-10700K
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multi-threading
Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i7-10700K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i7-10700K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i7-10700K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD FX-8350
✔Intel Core i7-10700K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-8350
✖Intel Core i7-10700K
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8350)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Which is better AMD FX-8350 or Intel Core i7-3820? — Habr Q&A
Because frequencies and all sorts of quantities mean absolutely nothing apart from architecture.
FX’s have weak cores, a fairly large part of the blocks are divided in pairs (in particular, FPUs). But what Intel called 4-core processors with 8 executable threads, fx’s have 8-core processors.
Tasks come into play next:
in games you need a little, but productive cores. fx can compete only with i5
If you need a lot of integer mathematics, fx’s are quite appropriate.
Answer written
comment
LGA2011 setup will be decently more expensive than AM3+. Prospects — theoretically still Ivy Bridge-E and to the landfill, but there is and will be a cloud of very expensive processors that can then be perfectly upgraded (for example, even from SB-E something like E5-2650, 2670, etc. — tr eight-core monster). The performance is higher than that of Vishera (corresponding to the price — everything is fair :)).
LGA1155 is only slightly more expensive than AM3+. Prospects — no (Haswell / Broadwell on LGA1150).
AM3+ is the most economical platform in this segment. The prospects are either gone, or one more generation, or two more generations. Now the FX-8350 is about the level of i5-3330 to i7-3770, but costs as much as i5-3470. FX-8320 is even better in terms of price / quality ratio. In 70% of games at the level of i5 or a little worse. In software, even modern, it’s about the same. In some applications, the i7-3770 is doing well (say, in 1% of applications or even less often). In a pure single-stream — trash.
FX-8350 versus i5-3570K consumes 2 times more power and 1. 5 times higher heat dissipation. For home, both are ok.
Answer written
comment
Look at tasks. If your tasks are mostly integer and are well parallelized, then AMD is good here. If they are poorly paralleled, then Intel has better performance per core.
I have an FX8120 — enough for everything I need.
Answer written
comment
Well, in addition to the frequency, etc. there is the concept of architecture, there is forecasting, for example.
If it’s completely on the fingers, then for example, if a processor with a frequency of 800 MHz per cycle executes 2 commands, and a processor at 1500 MHz only one, then the first one will be faster.
In fact, everything is noticeably more complicated and you just need to look at the tests and nothing else.
Answer written
comment
According to Passmark’s test results, AMD is still slightly more productive than AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i7-3820
And if you also compare the price, then Intel is “in flight”.
Answer written
comment
Are you checkered or should you go?
You need to look not at the numbers on the box (how many cores, etc.