FX-9830P [in 11 benchmarks]
AMD
FX-9830P
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD FX-9830P sales 1 June 2016. This is a Bristol Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3700 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is processor with a TDP of 25-45 Watt. It supports DDR3, DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.67%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General info
FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 1581 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (6 years old) |
|
| Current price | $749 | of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
| Threads | 4 | |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | of 4. |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | of 7.3 (Ryzen 9 7900) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | of 12 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 25-45 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by FX-9830P’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into FX-9830P.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of FX-9830P. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX-9830P
2.67
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.
5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
FX-9830P
3320
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9830P
479
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9830P
1391
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
FX-9830P
3033
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
FX-9830P
9822
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
FX-9830P
4
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FX-9830P
301
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FX-9830P
93
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FX-9830P
1.1
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
FX-9830P
2
Relative perfomance
Overall FX-9830P performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
Intel Core i3-7167U
101. 5
Intel Celeron N5100
101.12
Intel Core i7-6560U
100.37
AMD FX-9830P
100
Intel Core i7-6498DU
99.63
Intel Core i7-6500U
98.88
Intel Core i3-10110Y
98.5
FX-9830P Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to FX-9830P by Intel is Core i7-6560U, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our rating.
Core i7
6560U
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to FX-9830P:
Intel Core i3-7167U
101.5
Intel Celeron N5100
101. 12
Intel Core i7-6560U
100.37
AMD FX-9830P
100
Intel Core i7-6498DU
99.63
Intel Core i7-6500U
98.88
Intel Core i3-10110Y
98.5
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Core i7
6560U
Compare
Core i7
6498DU
Compare
Core i7
6500U
Compare
Core i3
7167U
Compare
Core i5
4400E
Compare
Core i5
6300U
Compare
Best GPU for FX-9830P
People consider these graphics cards to be good for FX-9830P, according to our PC configuration statistics.
Radeon R7
Graphics
16.6%
Radeon RX
550
15.7%
Radeon RX
560
12.4%
Radeon RX
460
5.4%
Radeon RX
560 Mobile
4.5%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
3.5%
Radeon RX
580
2.2%
Radeon RX
460 Mobile
1. 8%
Radeon RX
560X Mobile
1.5%
GeForce GTX
1650
1.4%
These are the fastest graphics cards for FX-9830P in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 719 configurations based on FX-9830P in our database.
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.3% (2/719)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.4% (3/719)
Radeon RX
6900 XT
0. 1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
3080
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
3070
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
2080 Ti
0.3% (2/719)
GeForce RTX
3060
0.1% (1/719)
Radeon
VII
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
2070
0.1% (1/719)
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/fx-9830p%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
1135G7
Core i5
12400F
Processor FX-9830P [in 11 benchmarks]
AMD
FX-9830P
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD FX-9830P sales 1 June 2016. This is Bristol Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3700MHz, the multiplier is locked. nine0005
In terms of compatibility, this is a processor with a TDP of 25-45W. It supports DDR3, DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.67%
from the leader which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General information
FX-9 Type (Desktop or Notebook) and Architecture Details0005
| Energy consumption (TDP) | 25-45 W | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Here are the technology solutions supported by the FX-9830P and the additional instruction sets. This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies.
| Extended instructions | Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory support
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by FX-9830P. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
| Memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Built-in video — specifications
General parameters of the video card built into the FX-9830P.
| GPU | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) |
These are the results of the FX-9830P performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
nine0005
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX-9830P
2.67
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 67%
FX-9830P
3320
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
nine0003 FX-9830P
479
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
FX-9830P
1391
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
FX-9830P
3033
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
FX-9830P
9822
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
FX-9830P
4
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor’s threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FX-9830P
301
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FX-9830P
93
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 14%
FX-9830P
1.1
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 13%
FX-9830P
2
Relative capacity
Overall performance of the FX-9830P compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.
Intel Core i3-7167U
101.5
Intel Celeron N5100
101.12
nine0003 Intel Core i7-6560U
100.37
AMD FX-9830P
100
Intel Core i7-6498DU
99.63
Intel Core i7-6500U
98.88
Intel Core i3-10110Y
98.5
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the closest competitor to the FX-9The 830P from Intel is the Core i7-6560U, which is approximately equal in speed and 3 positions higher in our rating.
Core i7
6560U
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the FX-9830P:
Intel Core i3-7167U
101.5
Intel Celeron N5100
nine0040 101.12
Intel Core i7-6560U
100.37
AMD FX-9830P
100
Intel Core i7-6498DU
99.63
Intel Core i7-6500U
98.88
Intel Core i3-10110Y
98.5
nine0005
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the one considered.
Core i7
6560U
Compare
Core i7
6498DU
Compare
Core i7
6500U
nine0045 Compare
Core i3
7167U
Compare
Core i5
4400E
Compare
Core i5
6300U
Compare
The best graphics cards for FX-9830P
719 configurations based on FX-9 are listed in our database830p.
According to statistics, these cards are most often used with FX-9830P:
Radeon R7
Graphics
16.6%
Radeon RX
550
15.7%
Radeon RX
560
12.4%
Radeon RX
nine0040 460
5.4%
Radeon RX
560 (mobile)
4.5%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
3.5%
Radeon RX
580
2.2%
Radeon RX
nine0040 460 (mobile)
1.8%
Radeon RX
560X (mobile)
1. 5%
GeForce GTX
1650
1.4%
Here are the most powerful video cards used with FX-9830P according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.3% (2/719)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.4% (3/719)
Radeon RX
6900XT
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
nine0040 3080
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
3070
0.1% (1/719)
GeForce RTX
2080 Ti
0.