Amd phenom ii x4 vs fx 6300: AMD FX-6300 vs Phenom II X4 965

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

• — Download and run UserBenchmark.
• — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
• — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
• — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
• — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
• — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
• — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
• — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
• — See speed test results from other users.
• — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
• — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
• — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

•   

  Intel Core i5-12600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400F

•   

  Intel Core i7-12700K

•   

  Intel Core i3-12100F

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400

•   

  Intel Core i5-11600K

•   

  Intel Core i7-11700K

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 3600

•   

  Intel Core i5-9600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-11400F

•   

  Intel Core i5-10400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

Phenom II X4 965 vs FX-6300 Six-Core — Red Dead Redemption 2 with GTX 750 Ti Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 750 Ti with

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Red Dead Redemption 2

GTX 750 Ti with

AMD FX-6300 Six-Core

Phenom II X4 965
FX-6300 Six-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

4193 Pts

6385 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1183 Pts

1407 Pts

Red Dead Redemption 2

Phenom II X4 965 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in Red Dead Redemption 2 using GTX 750 Ti — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Phenom II X4 965
FX-6300 Six-Core

Ultra Quality

High Quality

Medium Quality

Low Quality

Phenom II X4 965

FX-6300 Six-Core

Compare Phenom II X4 965 vs FX-6300 Six-Core specifications

Share Your Comments 78

Compare Phenom II X4 965 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Total War: Attila

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Dragon Age: Inquisition

2014

Far Cry 4

2014

GRID Autosport

2014

Shadow of Mordor

2014

The Talos Principle

2014

Battlefield 4

2013

Bioshock Infinite

2013

Company of Heroes 2

2013

Crysis 3

2013

GRID 2

2013

Metro: Last Light

2013

Total War: Rome 2

2013

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Crysis: Warhead

2008

AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD FX-6300.

Which is the Best?

X

This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time.
More info

General Specifications

Brand

AMD

AMD

Model

Phenom II X4 965

FX-6300

Origin

Malaysia

Malaysia

About the Product

The frequency of the Phenom II X4 965 BE is 3. 4GHz. The processor has a L2 cache of 512 KB per core, the volume of the L3 cache is 6 MB. The new AMD chip has a TDP of 125 watts. The processor has support for DDR3 1333 memory.

The AMD FX-6300 is a processor based on the Piledriver microarchitecture and manufactured using a 32nm process technology. The frequency of the processor equipped with Vishera cores is 3.5 GHz. There is support for Turbo mode, up to 4.1 GHz.

Package Size

Height

5 in.

5.5 in.

Width

4.4 in.

5 in.

Depth

3 in.

2.8 in.

Weight

1.1 lbs.

1.3 lbs.

• Height

• Width

• Depth

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

Details

Socket

AM3

AM3+

Lithography

45 nm

32 nm

Type of Processors

Desktop

Desktop

Code Name

Deneb

Vishera

What customers say about «Details»

AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU Processor

• For an AM3 socket this is one of the best options available.
• We married this cpu to a ASUS AM3 socket M4A88T-M motherboard, works great.
• If you have a motherboard that has a socket for AMD3 CPU, then this is what you want.
• Great upgrade for anyone who has an older AM3 socket mother board.
• This is the fastest and best I could find for my socket type.

AMD FX-6300 CPU Processor

• Good performance with fast memory. Good price as well.
• The Phenom II 965 had a weaker memory controller than this FX series processor, I am very pleased to see my options increased for overclocking my ram if I so choose.
• Bought this as part of a gift (built a media center pc) and it is quite fast and perhaps overkill of HD but not so much for 4k content (have yet to try it since I don’t have a 4K display yet).
• I tried using the Turbo boost, and only got to 3.7ghz with a aftermarket cooler, and the CPU will have cache faults frequently.
• Thats not good at all, in fact the CPU started slowing itself down to prevent damage. This means I was actually getting a SLOWER processer than I paid for.

Technical Specifications

CPU Cores

CPU Threads

Clock Speed

3.4 GHz

3.5 GHz

Max TDP

80 W

95 W

Max Temperature

62 °C

70.5 °C

Data Width

64 bits

64 bits

Virtualization Technology

Yes

Yes

Turbo Clock Speed

3.8 GHz

• CPU Cores

• CPU Threads

• Max TDP

• Data Width

• Virtualization Technology

• Max Temperature

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

What customers say about «Technical Specifications»

AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU Processor

• With air cooling the max stable overclock you will likely get is 3. 5 GHz.
• I upgraded my PC to this processor and the speed is noticeable at first boot.
• This processor gave me the desired speed. Still fast.
• If you need to keep costs down and still want some decent speed this is the processor to go with.
• Really nimble. It is very fast and offers great overclocking speed.

AMD FX-6300 CPU Processor

• The AMD FX-6300 is an excellent CPU. Being a six core, it already has an advantage over the more standard quad-core options.
• Upgraded my mothers Desktop PC from an old Pre-Built HP (quad-core) to this FX-6300 — 6-core and what a difference. Even though these processors are an older generation, they still kick out a very very good performance for the price.
• It certainly is an old chip at this point, but the price to performance is still one of the best.
• It has been stress tested for the past 5 minutes. No crashes and the temperature seems stable at 39 degress celcius. The CPU is overclocked using the OC Genie of the MSI Motherboard.
• The only thing that should have been improved is the stock cooler. The temperature on this CPU measures at around 66°C at full load, which to me, is not really acceptable.

Cache And Memory Specifications

L1 Cache Size

256 kB

288 kB

L2 Cache Size

2048 kB

6000 kB

L3 Cache Size

6000 kB

8000 kB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

32 GB

Memory Types

DDR3

DDR3

Max Memory Channels

Max Memory Bandwidth

21.3 GB/s

29.9 GB/s

• L1 Cache Size

• Max Memory Channels

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

AMD Phenom II X4 965

AMD FX-6300

What customers say about «Cache And Memory Specifications»

AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU Processor

• Once I install this I decided to keep my motherboard and memory DDR2. Perfect works.
• Was using another prior to this (which was missing an L3 Cache). That L3 Cache makes quite a difference.
• Good power, cache, and heat parameters, and fast speed capacity.
• I think the architecture of the cache on this processor makes it a better gaming choice over the competition.
• Works great with my 32GB RAM. One of the best processors for me.

AMD FX-6300 CPU Processor

• Good performance with fast memory. Good price as well.
• This is a great processor if you are doing multiple things at once on your computer, remember to check the memory you have or what you will put in there because is slower then normal.
• This cpu is good for everything and if you combine with an AMD graphic and 8gb of ddr3 memory ram gonna be one of the faster pc on your neighborhood !!!
• It’s clocked at 1.2V and a clock speed of 3.5gh right our of the box. It has 8mb of cache. Recommend to anyone for there first build. Cheap with 6 cores and 3.5gh for 100 dollars nothing can beat it..

Supported Technologies

Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection

Yes

Yes

Turbo Boost / Turbo Core

Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!

Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport

Yes

Yes

• Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection

• Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!

• Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport

What customers say about «Supported Technologies»

 

Warranty / Certifications

Manufacturer Warranty

3 year(s)

3 year(s)

Certifications

CE, FCC

CE, FCC

Other Information

Manufacturer

Link

Link

Price History

✔ AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU Processor

✔ AMD FX-6300 CPU Processor

Popular Comparisons

Other reviews

Best CPUs

Best Gaming CPUs

Best Computer Power Supplies

Best Tempered Glass PC Cases

Best Case Fans

Best M. 2 Solid-State Drives

Best 140mm Case Fans

Best NVMe SSD

Best Motherboards

Best DDR4 RAM Kits to Upgrade Your PC

Best CPU Liquid Coolers

Best Solid State Drives

90,000 AMD FX-6300 or AMD Phenom II X4 945

• >
• Processors
• >
• Comparison
• >
• AMD FX-6300 VS AMD Phenom II X4 945 9000 9000
  

  Family

  Family

  FX-6100

  Compare

• FX-6120 SIX-Core
  Compare
• FX-6200 Six-Core
  Compare
• FX-6350 SIX-Core
  Compare
9000 9000 9000 Phenom II X4 X4 X4 X4 X4 X440
Compare
• Phenom II X4 955
  Compare
• Phenom II X4 965
  Compare
• Phenom II X4 970
  Compare
• Phenom II X4 975

  FX-6300

  52.6 (+6.7%)

  Phenom II X4 945

  49.1

  Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

  The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

  The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

  Speed ​​in office use

  FX-6300

  55.2 (+6.3%)

  Phenom II X4 945

  51.7

  Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

  The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

  Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

  Speed ​​in heavy applications

  FX-6300

  29.9 (+11%)

  Phenom II X4 945

  26.6

  Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.

  The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

  At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

  Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

  Speed ​​of numerical operations

  Simple household tasks

  FX-6300 47.2 (+10.4%) Phenom II X4 945 42.3

  Demanding games and tasks

  FX-6300 23.4 (+17.9%) Phenom II X4 945 19.2

  Extreme

  FX-6300 5.5 (+30.9%) Phenom II X4 945 3.8

  Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

  We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

  Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

  When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

  Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

  Benchmarks

  Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

  Basic

  Manufacturer	AMD	AMD
  DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.
  ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
  Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	No data	No data
  Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released.	10-2015	10-2016
  Model Official name.
  Cores The number of physical cores.	6	4
  ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	6	4
  Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing	Missing
  Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	3.5 GHz	3.35 GHz
  Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	No data	3
  L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	No data	No data
  Instructions
  Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.
  Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No	No
  Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.
  Number of QPI links
  TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	No data	No data
  Cooling system specifications

  Video core

  Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
  GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle.	No data	No data
  Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock.	No data	No data
  Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
  Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.

  RAM

  Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor.	No data	No data
  Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.
  RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.
  RAM bandwidth
  ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.	No data	No data

  PCI

  PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.	No data	No data
  PCI configuration options
  Number of PCI lanes	No data

  Data Security

  AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption.	No data	No data
  Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator.	No data	No data

  Decoration

  Dimensions	No data	No data
  Supported sockets	No data	No data
  Maximum processors per motherboard	No data	No data

  Which is better

  AMD FX-6300

  • On average, gaming performance is 4% better.
  • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 4%.
  • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 2%.
  • The number of physical cores is increased by 2.
  • The number of threads is increased by 2.
  • The base frequency is increased by 0. 15 GHz.

  AMD Phenom II X4 945

  • $80 down

  Compare AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 925

  Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 925 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
  Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

  AMD FX-6300

  versus

  AMD Phenom II X4 925

  Benefits

  Reasons to choose AMD FX-6300

  • Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 5 month(s)

  more capable of running 2 cores more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4

  • Approximately 36% more clock speed: 3. 8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
  • Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
  • L2 cache is 3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Performance in PassMark — Single benchmark about 31% more thread mark: 1489 vs 1138
  • About 91% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4183 vs 2193
  • About 48% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 527 vs 357
  • About 67% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1914 vs 1147
  • 6.3 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.905 vs 1.088
  • performance about 55% more in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 16.195 vs 10.457
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 72% more performance: 0. 339 vs 0.197
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 48% higher: 4.767 vs 3.231

  Release date	October 2012 vs May 2009
  Number of cores	6 vs 4
  Maximum frequency	3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
  Process	32nm SOI vs 45nm
  Level 2 cache	6 MB vs 512 KB (per core)
  Level 3 cache	8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared)
  PassMark — Single thread mark	1489 vs 1138
  PassMark — CPU mark	4183 vs 2193
  Geekbench 4 — Single Core	527 vs 357
  Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1914 vs 1147
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.905 vs 1.088
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	16.195 vs 10.457
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.339 vs 0.197
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.767 vs 3.231

  Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X4 925

  • L1 cache is about 78% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

  Level 1 cache

  128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB

  Benchmark comparison

  CPU 1: AMD FX-6300
  CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 925

  PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
  PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
  Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
  Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	16.195 10.457
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

  Name	AMD FX-6300	AMD Phenom II X4 925
  PassMark — Single thread mark	1489	1138
  PassMark — CPU mark	4183	2193
  Geekbench 4 — Single Core	527	357
  Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1914	1147
  3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2095
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.905	1.088
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	16.195	10.457
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.339	0.197
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	0.85
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.767	3.231

  Performance comparison

  	AMD FX-6300	AMD Phenom II X4 925
  Architecture name	Vishera	Deneb
  Family	AMD FX-Series Processors
  Production date	October 2012	May 2009
  OPN PIB	FD6300WMHKBOX
  OPN Tray	FD6300WMW6KHK
  Place in the ranking	1982	2375
  Price now	$58. 99	$43.99
  Series	AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors
  Price/performance ratio (0-100)	31.81	22.90
  Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
  Price at first issue date		$160
  Support 64 bit
  Base frequency	3.5 GHz
  Crystal area	315 mm	258mm
  Level 1 cache	288KB	128 KB (per core)
  Level 2 cache	6MB	512 KB (per core)
  Level 3 cache	8MB	6144 KB (shared)
  Process	32nm SOI	45nm
  Maximum core temperature	70. 50°C
  Maximum frequency	3.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
  Number of cores	6	4
  Number of threads	6
  Voltage P0 Vcore	Min: 1.15V — Max: 1.3875V
  Number of transistors	1200 million	758 million
  Unlocked
  Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz
  Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
  Maximum number of processors in configuration	1	1
  Supported sockets	AM3+	AM3
  Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt
  PCI Express revision	3. 0
  Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
  Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
  Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
  Intel® AES New Instructions
  AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

  Comparison of AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE

  Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
  Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

  AMD FX-6300

  versus

  AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE

  Benefits

  Reasons to choose AMD FX-6300

  • Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 6 more chances, 2 month(s)
  • run more applications at the same time: 6 vs 4
  • Approximately 19% more clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
  • A newer process of manufacturing the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
  • L2 cache is 3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L3 cache is approximately 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Approximately 32% less power consumption : 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
  • About 26% more Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 527 vs 419
  • About 37% more Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance: 1914 vs 1396
  • Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (Frames/s) about 73% more: 6.905 vs 3.993
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 41% more: 16.195 vs 11.511
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 73% more: 0.339 vs 0.196
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 14% more: 4.767 vs 4.178

  Issue date	October 2012 vs April 2009
  Number of cores	6 vs 4
  Maximum frequency	3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
  Process	32nm SOI vs 45nm
  Level 2 cache	6 MB vs 512 KB (per core)
  Level 3 cache	8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared)
  Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt vs 125 Watt
  Geekbench 4 — Single Core	527 vs 419
  Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1914 vs 1396
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.905 vs 3.993
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	16.195 vs 11.511
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.339 vs 0.196
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.767 vs 4.178

  Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE

  • CPU unlocked, unlocked multiplier makes it easy to overclock
  • L1 cache is about 78% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

  Unlocked	Unlocked / Locked
  Level 1 cache	128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB

  Benchmark comparison

  CPU 1: AMD FX-6300
  CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE

  Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
  Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	16.195 11.511
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

  Name	AMD FX-6300	AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE
  PassMark — Single thread mark	1489
  PassMark — CPU mark	4183
  Geekbench 4 — Single Core	527	419
  Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	1914	1396
  3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	2095	0
  CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.905	3.993
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	16.195	11.511
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.339	0.196
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	0.85
  CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.767	4.178

  Feature comparison

  	AMD FX-6300	AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE
  Architecture name	Vishera	Deneb
  Family	AMD FX-Series Processors
  Production date	October 2012	April 2009
  OPN PIB	FD6300WMHKBOX
  OPN Tray	FD6300WMW6KHK
  Place in the ranking	1982	2624
  Price now	$58. 99
  Series	AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors
  Price/performance ratio (0-100)	31.81
  Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
  Support 64 bit
  Base frequency	3.5 GHz
  Crystal area	315 mm	258mm
  Level 1 cache	288KB	128 KB (per core)
  Level 2 cache	6MB	512 KB (per core)
  Level 3 cache	8MB	6144 KB (shared)
  Process	32nm SOI	45 nm
  Maximum core temperature	70. 50°C
  Maximum frequency	3.8 GHz	3.2 GHz
  Number of cores	6	4
  Number of threads	6
  Voltage P0 Vcore	Min: 1.15V — Max: 1.3875V
  Number of transistors	1200 million	758 million
  Unlocked
  Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz
  Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
  Maximum number of processors in configuration	1	1
  Supported sockets	AM3+	AM3
  Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	125 Watt
  PCI Express revision	3.