AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition
Written by
James Gorbold
April 27, 2010 | 05:05
Tags: #benchmark #best #compare #compared #core-i7 #how-to-overclock #overclocking #performance #phenom-ii #rated #review #reviewed #should-i-buy #six-core #socket-am3 #tested #thuban #x6
Companies: #amd #test
1 — AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition2 — What makes Thuban tick3 — Test setup, Overclocking the Phenom II X6 1090T BE4 — Cinebench and WPrime5 — Gimp Image Editing, Handbrake Video Encoding6 — Multi-tasking, Overall Media Benchmark Score7 — Power consumption, AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE8 — Gaming Performance: Crysis9 — Gaming Performance: X3: Terran Conflict10 — Performance Analysis and Conclusion
For all of the performance tests, we disable all power saving technology in order to give us a consistent set of results, and also best-case performance numbers — even though technologies such as Intel’s SpeedStep might only take microseconds to kick in, that can make a difference in some tests.
However, for the power consumption tests we re-enable everything in order to get a real-world power draw. The power draw is measured via a power meter at the wall, so the numbers below are of total system power draw from the mains, not the power consumption of a CPU itself. Measuring the power draw of any individual component in a PC is tricky-to-impossible to acheive.
Idle Power Consumption
For this test, we leave the PC doing nothing but displaying the Windows 7 desktop (with Aero enabled) for a few minutes and record the wattage drawn from the wall via a power meter.
- AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (3.4GHz)
- AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (3.99GHz)
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition (3.2GHz)
- Intel Core i7-930 (2.8GHz)
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition (3.87GHz)
- Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition (3. 33GHz)
- Intel Core i7-930 (4.3GHz)
- Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition (4.4GHz)
-
83
-
92
-
104
-
124
-
127
-
143
-
176
-
177
50
100
150
200
Watts, lower is better
Read the Overclocking page to see how we acheived our overclocks, and the Performance Analysis page for what these results mean.
Load Power Consumption
For this test, we want to only stress the CPU, so use the smallfft stress test of Prime95 to fully load all available processors (logical as well as physical). We leave Aero enabled, and wait a few minutes for any power saving technology to kick in and for the power consumption to level out before taking our reading.
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition (3.2GHz)
- AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (3.4GHz)
- Intel Core i7-930 (2.8GHz)
- AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (3.99GHz)
- Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition (3.33GHz)
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition (3.87GHz)
- Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition (4.4GHz)
- Intel Core i7-930 (4.3GHz)
-
195
-
207
-
216
-
246
-
256
-
338
-
368
-
396
100
200
300
400
Watts, lower is better
Read the Overclocking page to see how we acheived our overclocks, and the Performance Analysis page for what these results mean.
1 — AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition2 — What makes Thuban tick3 — Test setup, Overclocking the Phenom II X6 1090T BE4 — Cinebench and WPrime5 — Gimp Image Editing, Handbrake Video Encoding6 — Multi-tasking, Overall Media Benchmark Score7 — Power consumption, AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE8 — Gaming Performance: Crysis9 — Gaming Performance: X3: Terran Conflict10 — Performance Analysis and Conclusion
More Cores, Less Price • Jagat Review
Power Consumption
Under full-load condition, Phenom II X6 1090T BE consumes only 4 watts more electricity, compared to its slower-clocked sibling. The 400 MHz clockspeed gap does not set both processor too far apart, when it comes to power consumption. When idle, 1090T BE’s power usage is 3 watts lower than the 1055T.
Multi core processors are the future of desktop computing. We’re in the second half of 2010 and it has been an exciting year indeed. Thanks, in part, to the six-core processors which made their debut earlier this year. Now, we have the Phenom II X6, which brings even more processing power to the mainstream segment.
Aside from the higher core-count, the Thuban-based Phenoms from AMD are not entirely different from their previous generation cousins. Before releasing the desktop version, AMD had first introduced the server versions of their six-core processor under the codename “Istanbul”. Although they are actually based on the same architecture as the earlier Phenoms, AMD’s implementation of the Turbo CORE feature in these hexa-core CPUs could potentially increase their performance in single-threaded scenarios, or in applications that do not utilize too many processor threads.
Speaking of performance, both the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T and the 1090T BE showed remarkable results across various benchmarking programs, according to our test. They are best suited to newer applications with native multi-threading support that can take advantage of the extra two cores, such as video encoders, 3D-rendering applications, and some of the more recent games. In older programs, which depends more on clockspeed rather than the amount of available thread, both six-core Phenoms lagged behind the “Phenom II X4 965”, due to their lower-clocked cores. To further increase the speed, you can overclock them to raise the frequency a notch or two… or even some more, way more. The newer Phenoms are relatively easy to overclock. Our HSF is nothing too extraordinary, yet we managed to push both of them beyond 4 GHz quite easily. If you want it easier, the 1090T BE’s unlocked multiplier can help reducing the complications.
With its US$ 199 price tag, the Phenom II X6 1055T is the one of the cheapest six-core processors available in the market today. Phenom II X6 1090T BE retails at around US$ 289.
So, which one of these will suit you best? These six-core Phenoms are interesting, but before you set off to buy one, it might be good to check on your applications first. If you use a lot of multi-threaded apps or spend plenty of time in a multi-tasking environment, the extra two cores could speed up your programs or allows even more tasks to run at once. If your applications cannot utilize that many cores, you will only experience a marginal increase in performance, compared to the previous flagship, the Phenom II X4 965 BE. Nevertheless, their price points are simply too interesting for most people to ignore. The Phenom II X6 1055T in particular, is a remarkably affordable 6-core CPU. Couple that with the AMD 800 series motherboard –also an affordable choice, sometimes costing less than US$ 100- along with a kit of of DDR3 memory, and you’ll get yourself a relatively cheap, dependable, multi-threaded machine able to crunch through anything you can throw at it.
As for the Phenom II X6 1090T BE, it’s a good pick for overclockers and PC enthusiast alike. It has everything the 1055T has, plus a higher clockspeed (3,2 Ghz vs. 2,8 GHz), and an unlocked multiplier, which makes overclocking a breeze. You’ll have to pay some extra money though, but the six, unlocked cores are still well worth it.
Original Article by: Gatot
Translated by: Oik Yusuf
Daftar Isi
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)- Technical characteristics
Home / AMD / AMD / AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
- General information
- Benchmark
- RAM parameters 9000
Construction Quality 96. 9 %
Core 6
Base Frequency 2.8 GHz
Maximum Frequency 3.3 GHz
Power Consumption 95 W
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) was released in 2010 and by 2023 it has mediocre performance (better than 4% of all processors).
The main advantages of this model are: Value for money: 96.9, Cores: 6, Base frequency: 2.8, Maximum frequency: 3.3, Power consumption (TDP): 95.
The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. nine0003
49th place in the rating Price / Quality
Type
Architecture code name
Cores
A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications.
At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance. nine0003
Base frequency
L2 cache
L3 cache
Workflow
Crystal size
nine0044 346 mm2
Threads
More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
Maximum frequency
Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. nine0003
Level 1 Cache
The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
Number of transistors
64 bit support
Max. number of processors in configuration
Socket
Power consumption (TDP)
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
RAM parameters
RAM types |
DDR3 Dual-channel |
Phenom II X6 1045T [in 1 benchmark]
AMD
Phenom II X6 1045T
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD Phenom II X6 1045T sales on September 1, 2010 for a suggested price of $175. This is a desktop processor based on the Thuban architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 6 cores and 6 threads and is manufactured using 45 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3200 MHz, the multiplier is locked.
Compatibility is a socket processor
AMD socket AM3
with TDP 95W. It supports DDR3 memory. nine0003
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.47%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of Phenom II X6 1045T, as well as sales start time and cost at that time. nine0312 (12 years ago)
Value for money
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of other processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors. nine0003
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Phenom II X6 1045T quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
RAM | DDR3 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
periphery
9000
Phenom II X6 1045T supported peripherals and how to connect them.
Aviation PCI Express | 2.0 | of 5 (EPYC 9654) |
Tests in benchmarks
22
These are the results of the Phenom II X6 1045T performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. nine0003
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Phenom II X6 1045T
2.47
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. nine0003
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Phenom II X6 1045T
3064
Mining hashrates
Phenom II X6 1045T performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 5. 4 Mh/s |
Relative capacity
Overall Phenom II X6 1045T performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.
AMD PRO A12-8870E
100
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
100
AMD A10-6790K
100
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
100
AMD FX-4170
99.19
AMD FX-4320
99.19
AMD A10-9700E
99.19
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Phenom II X6 1045T from Intel is Pentium Silver J5005, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating. nine0003
Pentium Silver
J5005
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Phenom II X6 1045T:
Intel Core i7-875K
100. 81
Intel Core i7-880
100.4
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
100
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
100
Intel Core i5-2405S
97.17
Intel Core i5-3470T
96.36
Intel Pentium G4520
96.36
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. nine0003
Core i7
880
Compare
FX
4320
Compare
Core i7
875K
Compare
FX
4170
Compare
Core i7
nine0250 870
Compare
Core i3
4330T
Compare
Best graphics cards for Phenom II X6 1045T
There are 557 configurations based on Phenom II X6 1045T in our database.
Statistically, the most commonly used graphics cards with Phenom II X6 1045T are:
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
6.1%
GeForce GT
520
5.4%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
5%
GeForce GTX
660
4.8%
GeForce GT
730
nine0214
3.8%
GeForce GTS
450
3.2%
GeForce GTX
1050
3.1%
GeForce GT
1030
3.1%
GeForce GTX
650
nine0002 2. 9%
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
2.7%
Here are the most powerful video cards used with Phenom II X6 1045T according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
0.2% (1/557)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
nine0002 0.4% (2/557)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.7% (4/557)
Quadro RTX
8000
0.2% (1/557)
GeForce RTX
2080 Super
0.2% (1/557)
Radeon RX
6700
nine0214
0.2% (1/557)
GeForce GTX
1080 Ti
0.