Intel vs AMD: Full Comparison
The battle for hardware supremacy has already been long and drawn out. Yet, it continues to rage on. While IBM and other processor manufacturers have dropped out of the top ranks, Intel and AMD are still fighting for the title of king. For the longest time, AMD has had a split focus on designing CPUs they named APU, for accelerated processing unit, and designing GPUs. This divide of focus and attention gave Intel the space it needed to dominate the CPU market for a long time. Intel’s dominance earned AMD’s APUs the reputation of being “the poor man’s option”.
Intel had the weight of its history to help it succeed. The success of the 8086 chipset and the programming languages and ISAs that evolved from their technology changed the world. In so doing, they had a head start in what could be done to make it even better. Early stock value pushed their investment opportunities and helped to fund further research that eventually created their cycle of nearly yearly releases of improvements on either chipset architecture or programming instructions.
AMD never gave up. They continued to work on the APU, knowing that it had the potential to make small devices incredibly powerful. AMD’s APUs were adopted by console gaming. While this had little effect in the PC market, it did give AMD the financial power to keep going against the giant Intel had become with some stock value of their own. Intel’s main line of Intel Core processors (i3, i5, i7, and i9) was growing in popularity.
As a graphics processor manufacturer, AMD has held its place in competition against Nvidia. The PC gaming community preferred Nvidia’s GTX offerings, followed by the RTX lineup, over AMD’s Radeon cards. Then along came Zen. The Zen architecture created by AMD for their APUs and GPUs changed the game. As Nvidia’s cards became more expensive with new features like Ray-Tracing, AMD was able to keep up and adapt their cards to share the Ray-Tracing technology without jumping their GPU prices to Nvidia levels.
Why does that matter when it comes to the Intel vs AMD comparison? Because the APUs Advanced Micro Devices creates take advantage of their more powerful integrated graphics.
It is often compared to having a dedicated graphics card without dedicated graphics memory or cooling. This allowed AMD to enter the laptop arena more competitively than it had before. The Ryzen chipset offers a decent top-shelf performer with the Ryzen 7 series, but the mid-range Ryzen mobile chipset is the real heavy hitter. Gaming laptops have long been a separate category from 2-in-1s, clamshells, and workhorses like the ThinkPad. This is because the hardware required to run modern AAA titles on a laptop is bulky and power-hungry. The Ryzen chipset allows for better power management in mobile computing along with an entry-level gaming laptop performance in the mid-range of laptop costs, around $500-$800.
AMD still doesn’t hold the title of the fastest processor on the market like Intel, but it did secure its place in the market as a great performer at a lower cost.
Intel vs AMD: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Intel | AMD | |
| What it is | Processor Developer and Manufacturer | Processor Developer and Manufacturer |
| Primary Purpose | Design microprocessors for computers | Design microprocessors for computers |
| Name | Integrated Electronics | Advanced Micro Devices |
| Influential products | Intel Core Processors | AMD Radeon GPUs, Ryzen APUs |
| Technologies influenced | desktops, components, laptops, smartphones, tablets | gaming consoles, tablets, desktops, laptops, components, smartphones |
Intel vs AMD: 9 Must Know Facts
- Intel offers overall more powerful chipsets than AMD has available but at a much higher price.
- AMD’s processors are called APUs because they mix the technology of CPUs and integrated GPUs together.
- AMD has supplied the processors for gaming consoles like the Xbox One and Sony Playstation 4.
- Neither AMD nor Intel has yet to successfully penetrate the mobile processing market dominated by Qualcomm.
- Intel and AMD use different physical structures for their chips. This means that the sockets they use to connect to the motherboard are specific to the chip.
- Intel owns the rights to Thunderbolt technology.
- Intel chips are better suited for AI tasks.
- AMD’s laptop chips have created budget gaming laptops with decent performance.
- Intel is short for integrated electronics.
Intel’s Top Performer vs AMD’s Top Performer
Here’s a quick breakdown of Intel’s top laptop CPU and desktop CPU against AMD’s top laptop APU and desktop APU:
Desktop
There are arguably more powerful chips available by each manufacturer than the two chosen to compare, but these chips are top-shelf and have stable results for heavy home applications and gaming.
Intel i7-11800H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
• Intel’s I7-11800H consistently outperforms the Ryzen 7 5800H with the same component set up in nearly every benchmark test.
• The Ryzen 7 5800H has better power management which leads to longer battery life in a product like a gaming laptop and less power usage on a desktop. This may be the contributing factor to Intel’s performance advantage.
• Both chips are nearly the same price.
• Intel’s i7 is built on a 10 nm architecture while the Ryzen 7 is on a 7 nm architecture.
Laptops
CPUs in a laptop are valued slightly differently. Power is definitely a plus, but performance over extended battery life is the main goal. This is difficult to achieve already with laptop devices powering built-in features like touchscreens, pen digitizer, speakers, keyboard backlighting, microphones, fingerprint readers, and traditional computer components like the CPU, integrated graphics, storage, and RAM.
Intel i7- 10510U vs Ryzen 7 5800U
In the laptop market, the Ryzen 7-5800U dominates the Intel i7-10510U in nearly every benchmark. If it weren’t for Intel-specific features like Thunderbolt and AI task processing, AMD’s Ryzen would be the undeniably clear winner of the bout. Ryzen 7 has better power management and graphical performance than the i7-10510U. To spill salt on the wound, Ryzen 7 equipped devices are priced in the range of $700-$900 while Intel i7 laptops price range from $800-$1800.
Power Per Cost
AMD has always offered more power for the cost of its components. However, Intel has always offered a faster top performance. This makes AMD an overall better option for budget gamers and shoppers alike.
Consumer Electronics
Due to AMD’s accessible pricing, gaming consoles from Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo all feature AMD processors. While the chipsets in gaming consoles are custom-made, they are still using the same technology developed for laptops and desktop PCs.
Fans of the Xbox One, Nintendo Wii U, or Sony Playstation 4 have already experienced what AMD brings to the game. The 7 nm architecture used for their chipsets has also allowed AMD to enter the fray of mobile processing in their partnership with Samsung to introduce more powerful graphics to their smartphone lineup.
FAQ
Sources:
https://www.ultrabookreview.com/48487-intel-i7-amd-7-comparison/#:~:text=Intel%20Core%20i7-11800H%20vs%20AMD%20Ryzen%207%205800H,real-use%20frequencies%20are%20always%20influenced%20by%20Turbo%20Boost.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/393505/the-best-cpu-for-laptops-intel-vs-amd.html
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-5800U-vs-Intel-Core-i7-10510U/m1433044vsm891469
Intel vs AMD: Full Comparison FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
Is Intel or AMD better?
This is the question, isn’t it? If you mean to ask ‘which company has the faster microprocessor”, It’s Intel. If you mean to ask ‘which company offers an affordable processor with power”, It’s AMD.
There are many other differences and comparisons that can be made that sway the battle back and forth. In 2021, either can provide powerful components that are reliable. Both can be expensive.
Better come down to what the user needs to build a computer for. Things like budget, system requirements, and component availability will all affect what goes into a person’s build. Better will be determined by what someone needs when they design a computer to solve their problem.
Is AMD Ryzen better than Intel?
Ryzen is better than Intel’s chipsets in some aspects and yet, worse in others. If your definition of better is outlined by benchmark performance, then Intel’s most expensive processors are what you would consider better. It comes down to the purpose of the computer being built.
In everyday performance, the average user may be hard-pressed to note the difference in performance between a laptop running on Ryzen against a laptop running on Intel. This is a top contributor to AMD’s increased stock value over Intel.
They designed their processors to be more versatile. In turn, AMD’s products saw adoption by more than just desktop and laptop manufacturers. During a press release by Samsung in 2021, it was revealed that AMD would be contributed gpu power to Samsung’s new smartphone lineup. Yet another big score for AMD’s stock.
Do people prefer Intel or AMD?
Historically, Intel has been the preferred consumer brand for CPUs. This is due to both marketing and performance. In the earlier years, Intel was leaps and bounds ahead of the competition. AMD was more known for its dedicated GPUs than its CPUs. In those days, AMD was shown more love by consumers due to the company’s reputation. In modern times, Intel still has the weight of popularity, but AMD’s fan base is steadily growing.
Programming professions that specialize in AI research and development often prefer Intel for Its AI specific features.
Does AMD vs Intel matter?
It absolutely matters.
Competition in the marketplace is what drives technological innovation. Without it, the world would be a much different place. The increased heat of steady competition between AMD, Intel, and now Qualcomm and Apple will push these companies to further innovate. While It’s hard to say what the next big technology leap will be, the battle between companies will surely be one of the driving factors behind it.
On a product note, there is still a difference between Ryzen chips and Intel’s core processors. While the average user may not see it, it is still a difference responsible computer owners should be aware of. Components affect compatibility with other hardware components along with driver management and maintenance.
More from History-Computer
- Available here: https://www.ultrabookreview.com/48487-intel-i7-amd-7-comparison/#:~:text=Intel%20Core%20i7-11800H%20vs%20AMD%20Ryzen%207%205800H,real-use%20frequencies%20are%20always%20influenced%20by%20Turbo%20Boost.
- Available here: https://www.pcworld.com/article/393505/the-best-cpu-for-laptops-intel-vs-amd.html
- (1970) https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-5800U-vs-Intel-Core-i7-10510U/m1433044vsm891469
AMD Vs. Intel for Business Laptops | Small Business
By James Lee Phillips
The eternal question with CPUs — AMD or Intel? — takes on a unique importance in the business world. Whether outfitting your workforce or selecting your own business laptop, the choice of processors will determine the overall speed of your mobile PC. The processor also affects power handling, efficiency, battery life and heat issues, among other things. CPU choice will therefore make a big difference on how well your laptop withstands the constant rigors of traveling.
History Favors Intel
-
Up until around 2008, AMD was not a serious mobile contender for business laptops. The sizable cost savings over Intel CPUs couldn’t make up for a major lack in efficiency and performance.
Once mobile AMD processors began to catch up, common knowledge was that AMD chips were less expensive but tended to draw more power and run hotter. You paid more for notebooks with Intel CPUs but gained noticeable performance and durability benefits — not always the deciding factors when choosing your personal laptop, but something that the business user had to take more seriously.
AMD Closes the Gap
-
Although the price difference is still significant, AMD’s mobile variants haven’t been excessively power-hungry for some time, making the choice a little less clear-cut. Performance-wise, higher-end AMDs compare well with the majority of Intel’s mobile range. However, Intel’s current generation of mobile CPUs also demonstrate sophisticated on-chip graphics capabilities, which negates the need for an extra GPU and therefore increases system efficiency and power use for the laptop as a whole.
Intel’s Slight Advantage
-
AMD’s Bulldozer chips were an attempt to reclaim a competitive edge in desktop performance, and the size and power requirements effectively kept it out of the running for laptops.
This means that Intel was able to continue leading the mobile market in performance, especially in the coveted Ultrabook and MacBook Air arena, while AMD-powered notebooks were still runners-up in everything except price.
Next-Gen Developments
-
AMD addressed this disparity by introducing the A-series (Trinity) processors, which compete well with current-generation Intel CPUs on performance and price, as well as offering decent onboard graphics capabilities. Less desirable is the lower-end Brazos line, which AMD hoped would reclaim the netbook end of the market. Unless your business has a specific need for thin-client ultraportables, this will not be a compelling option. Even if you do fit that niche, there is an ongoing third-party threat from ARM-based options such as the Chromebook.
Conclusions
-
At the time of this writing, Intel is still relying upon current-generation CPUs while AMD is making advances in mobile processor design.
Still, although AMD is well worth considering as a near-future and/or lower-cost option, Intel-based laptops currently present more compelling choices for the business user. Performance and efficiency results favor Intel’s mobile line, especially among the lightweight Ultrabooks and comparable laptop models.
References
- TechRadar: Intel vs AMD: which processor is best?
- CNet: Intel vs. AMD: Who’s got the fastest chip now?
- The Verge: An Ivy Bridge too far? AMD may have finally lost the battle against Intel’s juggernaut
- TechRadar: AMD A10 Review
- Notebook Review: AMD Versus Intel Mobile Processor Review (2007)
Writer Bio
James Lee Phillips has been a writer since 1994, specializing in technology and intellectual property issues. He holds a Bachelor of Science in communications and philosophy from SUNY Fredonia.
Comparison of Intel and AMD processors
There has been a long-standing debate about which processor is better, AMD or Intel, in which no unambiguous solution has been found.
This is because processors work differently. Their performance and architecture differ. Therefore, the processor should take into account its rating number.
To begin with, it is worth making a comparison of Intel processors, which have occupied the top lines in the ratings over the past few years. The top one is the new Intel Core i7-3770X for Socket LGA1155, the cores of which are called Ivy Bridge. It has become a tradition to ship the oldest of the processors with unlocked multipliers. This allows overclocking enthusiasts to get creative freedom. The Core i5-3570K processor has a lower frequency (by 100 MHz), and its main difference is the absence of hyper-threading, which is important for tasks such as rendering. Conducting such a comparison of Intel processors, we can conclude that their lineup contains devices that satisfy any wallet and taste. Moreover, the creation of new Intel models does not make major changes to the microarchitecture. Therefore, old and new processors are similar in internal structure and frequency.
But energy consumption has noticeably decreased: 77 W against 95 W. The memory frequency has changed to a more favorable side, which is now 1600 MHz. Previously, only the most powerful processors for LGA 2011 had it.
As a result, the performance comparison of Intel processors leads to the following results. New — Core i7-3770X turned out to be faster than the previous generation processor — Core i7-2600K, which has a lower frequency (by 100 MHz). The new model, thanks to the lower TDP, has a higher overclocking potential. Therefore, the Core i7-3770X is great for a home computer, copes with tasks such as office applications and games, but loses in rendering images in three-dimensional graphics. But even this will be within the power of a beginner if it is overclocked, and its eight threads will cope with the task no worse than the twelve threads that the Core i7-39 has.60X.
Processor performance can be judged by the amount of time it takes to complete a single task. For example, converting a WAV file to MP3 format.
Such a comparison of Intel processors leads to unexpected results. The Core i5-760, released three years ago, handles the operation faster. AMD processors perform well, which in all other respects are much inferior to Intel. The presence of a large number of threads played a bad joke on the Core i7-3770X. But when performing other tasks, the threads that turned out to be superfluous do not interfere, and in some cases they help.
There have been major changes to the integrated graphics. So, a comparison of Intel processors leads to the fact that the number of pipelines in the graphics processors of new models has increased. From twelve in the GMA HD 3000 to sixteen in the GMA HD 4000 in the top new DirectX 11 models. But the very increase in pipelines affects performance. However, in the new models, the GPU has a lower frequency than the previous generation processors.
Before comparing AMD and Intel processors, it is necessary to dwell on the former in more detail. AMD has a higher performance than Intel, this is due to the peculiarities of its architecture.
Paying attention to the rating number of such a processor as AMD Athlon 3200+, we can conclude that its performance is equal to that of Intel P4, whose frequency is 3200 MHz. With the same performance, AMD processors are cheaper than Intel. Both firms produce identical processors in terms of reliability and security. Only the tasks for which they are intended differ. So, Intel processors do an excellent job with computer-aided design and visualization programs. AMD processors are suitable for those users who are fond of computer games.
What is better to choose Intel or AMD: comparison? (2019) – keypro2.ru
Intel and AMD are competing for share of the global PC market, and the difference between manufacturers is closer than ever before.
AMD hit back at Intel with the launch of its Zen-based processors and has kept pace with the larger processor company ever since.
Since the launch of the first generation Ryzen processors, AMD has been gaining market share among gamers and enthusiasts with the impressive performance of its new chips.
Intel has responded to this attack with the release of its 8th and 9th generation desktop chips, which boast increased core counts to keep up with their Ryzen counterparts.
While performance can be important, pricing remains a deciding factor for many desktop processor buyers — and AMD has the upper hand here.
To see the comparison between Intel and AMD processors, we’ve taken a look at the best desktop processors available from the companies.
Hardware and pricing
Online retailers sell both 1st and 2nd generation AMD Ryzen chips and 8th and 9th generation Intel Core processors.
Prices for old equipment can vary greatly as some may be discounted for counter cleaning and others may be more expensive.
It’s important to note that Intel chips have integrated graphics, while only AMD Ryzen «G» suffix chips have integrated GPUs.
In addition, all 1st and 2nd generation AMD Ryzen processors can be overclocked, while only Intel chips with the «K» designation can be configured.
When comparing specifications and prices for processors, we only included processors that were available for purchase from local online retailers, excluding those that were out of stock at several stores.
Below are the specifications and prices of AMD Ryzen and Intel Core processors on the market, as of the end of March 201
2GHz 
0ghz 
4GHz Old against the new
and there is also a difference between the first and secondary generation of processors AM new and slightly older Intel processors.
However, this is only incremental in places, and older chips with discounted prices — like the $12,084 for the Ryzen 5 1600X — can be great deals for the user looking for high performance on a tight budget.
However, if you want maximum performance, you will need to look at the latest chips from both manufacturers.
Benchmarking tests show that while 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen processors outperform multi-threaded applications due to their high core count and multi-thread optimization, Intel’s single-threaded performance is significantly better than AMD’s.