A4-5000 [in 18 benchmarks]
AMD
A4-5000
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD A4-5000 sales 23 May 2013. This is Kabini architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1500 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is FT3 processor with a TDP of 15 Watt and a maximum temperature of 90 °C. It supports DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.28%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A4
5000
vs
EPYC
7h22
General info
A4-5000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 2218 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Series | AMD A-Series | |
| Architecture codename | Kabini (2013−2014) | |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (9 years ago) | |
| Current price | $248 | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
| Threads | 4 | |
| Boost clock speed | 1. 5 GHz |
of 5.5 (Core i9-12900KS) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ) |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | of 57000 (Apple M1 Max) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on A4-5000 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc.
Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
| Socket | FT3 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A4-5000. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600 | |
| AES-NI | + | |
| FMA | FMA4 | |
| AVX | + | |
| PowerTune | — | |
| TrueAudio | — | |
| PowerNow | + | |
| PowerGating | + | |
| Out-of-band client management | — | |
| VirusProtect | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies.
Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + | |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A4-5000’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
| Max memory channels | 1 | of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into A4-5000.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8330 | |
| Enduro | + | |
| Switchable graphics | 1 | |
| UVD | + | |
| VCE | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000’s integrated GPU.
| DisplayPort | + | |
| HDMI | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-5000’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
| Vulkan | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A4-5000. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A4-5000
1.28
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation.
There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A4-5000
1291
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-5000
176
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-5000
576
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D.
Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A4-5000
1207
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-5000
4165
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-5000
2039
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads.
A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A4-5000
1
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A4-5000
119
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-5000
33
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.
5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-5000
0.4
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-5000
1
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more.
Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-5000
9
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-5000
41
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-5000
1078
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A4-5000
2762
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A4-5000
870
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
A4-5000
3041
Relative perfomance
Overall A4-5000 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
AMD A8-3500M
101.56
Intel Pentium A1020
100
AMD A6-9220
100
AMD A4-5000
100
Intel Core i5-460M
99.22
AMD A6-3420M
99.22
Intel Celeron 2950M
99.22
Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A4-5000 from Intel is Pentium A1020, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Pentium
A1020
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A4-5000:
Intel Core i5-480M
101.
56
Intel Pentium 3550M
101.56
Intel Pentium A1020
100
AMD A4-5000
100
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
99.22
Intel Core i7-660UM
99.22
Intel Celeron 2950M
99.22
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Pentium
A1020
Compare
Core i7
660UM
Compare
Core i5
460M
Compare
Celeron
2950M
Compare
A8
3500M
Compare
Pentium
3550M
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with A4-5000 according to our statistics.
Radeon HD
8330
63.6%
Radeon HD
8670M
2.6%
Radeon
Graphics
2.6%
Radeon HD
8570M
2.2%
Radeon HD
8470D
1.5%
Radeon R5
235 OEM
1.4%
Radeon R5
M230
1.3%
HD
Graphics 4000
1.
3%
GeForce GT
1030
1.1%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
1%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about A4-5000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD A4-5000 processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
A4-5000 processor released by AMD; release date: 23 May 2013. The processor is designed for laptop, tablet-computers and based on Kabini microarchitecture.
CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 4, threads — 4. Maximum operating temperature — 90°C. Manufacturing process technology — 28 nm. Cache size: L1 — 256 KB, L2 — 2 MB.
Supported memory types: DDR3.
Supported socket types: FT3. Maximum number of processors in a configuration — 1. Power consumption (TDP): 15 Watt.
The processor has integrated graphics AMD Radeon HD 8330 with the following parameters: maximum frequency — 500 MHz, cores count — 128.
Benchmarks
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1. Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4. T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 510 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1291 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 175 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 580 |
| CompuBench 1. |
2.119 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 5.104 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0.111 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 0.240 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 1.373 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 479 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1133 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2123 Frames |
| GFXBench 4. |
479.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1133.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2123.000 Fps |
| Core clock speed | 497 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 3.976 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,178 million |
Games performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
3. World of Warships (2015)
4. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
5. Dirt Rally (2015)
6. Far Cry 4 (2014)
7. Alien: Isolation (2014)
8. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
9. Sims 4 (2014)
10. Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
11. The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
12. Thief (2014)
13. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
14. Battlefield 4 (2013)
15. Total War: Rome II (2013)
16. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
17. Metro: Last Light (2013)
18. BioShock Infinite (2013)
19. StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
20. SimCity (2013)
21. Tomb Raider (2013)
22. Crysis 3 (2013)
23. Hitman: Absolution (2012)
24. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012)
25. Dirt Showdown (2012)
26. Diablo III (2012)
27. Mass Effect 3 (2012)
28. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
29. Battlefield 3 (2011)
30. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
31. StarCraft 2 (2010)
32. Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
33. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 43.25 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 35.25 |
| High, 1366×768 | 26.80 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 29.00 |
World of Warships (2015)
| Low, 1366×768 | 24.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 16.30 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280×720 | 27.10 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 48.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.90 |
Far Cry 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 9.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 6. |
Alien: Isolation (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 16.70 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.30 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
| Low, 1280×720 | 12.70 |
| Medium, 1344×756 | 7.70 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 55.30 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 18.50 |
Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
| Low, 1280×720 | 13.80 |
The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 24.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.20 |
| High, 1366×768 | 7.80 |
Thief (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 9.15 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 4.55 |
| High, 1366×768 | 4.50 |
X-Plane 10.
25 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 17.70 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 9.00 |
Battlefield 4 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 18.90 |
Total War: Rome II (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 19.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.20 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 8.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 5.70 |
| High, 1366×768 | 2.80 |
Metro: Last Light (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 12.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 3.00 |
| High, 1366×768 | 2.70 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280×720 | 24.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.01 |
| High, 1366×768 | 10.00 |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 64. |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 26.75 |
| High, 1366×768 | 13.55 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 6.30 |
SimCity (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 26.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.10 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 25.60 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.20 |
| High, 1366×768 | 9.10 |
Crysis 3 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 13.90 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 8.30 |
| High, 1366×768 | 5.10 |
Hitman: Absolution (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 14.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 11.90 |
| High, 1366×768 | 5.70 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 28.50 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 19. |
| High, 1366×768 | 8.70 |
Dirt Showdown (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 27.70 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 20.70 |
| High, 1366×768 | 16.20 |
Diablo III (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 33.20 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 22.40 |
| High, 1366×768 | 19.20 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 12.00 |
Mass Effect 3 (2012)
| Low, 1280×720 | 18.70 |
| High, 1366×768 | 14.10 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280×720 | 18.20 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.40 |
| High, 1366×768 | 8.40 |
Battlefield 3 (2011)
| Low, 1024×768 | 15.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 9.80 |
| High, 1366×768 | 8. |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
| Low, 1024×768 | 36.40 |
| High, 1366×768 | 17.20 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
| Low, 1024×768 | 51.00 |
| Medium, 1360×768 | 24.00 |
| High, 1360×768 | 19.00 |
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
| Low, 640×480 | 72.10 |
| High, 1024×768 | 22.20 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
| Low, 800×600 | 71.00 |
| Medium, 1024×768 | 40.00 |
| High, 1280×1024 | 10.60 |
Specifications (specs)
| Architecture codename | Kabini |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM5000IBJ44HMD |
| Place in performance rating | 2283 |
| Series | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops |
| Vertical segment | Laptop, Tablet |
| 64 bit support | |
| Base frequency | 1. |
| Die size | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C |
| Number of cores | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | |
|
|
|
| Max memory channels | 1 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 |
| Enduro | |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 128 |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8330 |
| Switchable graphics | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | |
| DisplayPort | |
| HDMI | |
| DirectX | 12 |
| Vulkan | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FT3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt |
| PCI Express revision | 2. |
| AMD App Acceleration | |
| AMD Elite Experiences | |
| AMD HD3D technology | |
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | |
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | |
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
| Intel® AES New Instructions | |
| PowerGating | |
| PowerNow | |
| VirusProtect | |
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | |
| IOMMU 2. |
|
AMD A4-5000 APU review | TechRadar
Skip to main content
TechRadar is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s why you can trust us.
A Kabini laptop with AMD’s Jaguar CPU cores, as found in the new Xbox One and PS4…
Meow: Our first taste of AMD’s Jaguar cores, as found in the latest games consoles
TechRadar Verdict
Pros
- +
Revised cores are an improvement
- +
Good battery life
- +
AMD’s latest graphics technology
- +
Good 2H HD video performance
- +
Your laptop is almost a PS4
Cons
- —
CPU performance firmly in ultramobile territory
- —
Not enough graphics cores for proper gaming
- —
Doesn’t dramatically move the APU game on
- —
Has us worrying about next-gen CPU performance
The last five years or so for AMD CPUs have been sub-spectacular to say the least. But things are looking up and one of the good news stories very much revolves around the new AMD A4-5000 APU, codenamed Kabini.
More precisely, it’s the new Jaguar cores inside this APU that are making waves. That’s because they’re found in both Microsoft’s new Xbox One console and the PlayStation 4 from Sony. Yup, AMD’s Jaguar architecture is a very big deal.
So what exactly is it? Our first taste of Jaguar comes in the form of the quad-core AMD A4-5000 APU. It’s fitted to what’s known as a whitebook laptop. That’s basically a non-branded system that exists primarily for the likes of us to assess the new chip and its associated platform (chipset etc) and tell you all about it. So, you can’t buy this laptop off the shelf.
As for the A4-5000, it’s a variant of what’s known as the Kabini APU or Accelerated Processing unit. Thus it has four Jaguar cores and an AMD Radeon HD 8330 integrated graphics core.
The main thing to appreciate about this chip — and one of the things that makes for an intriguing thought in the context of those new games consoles — is that it’s very much a mobile processor. In fact, it’s pretty much an ultra-mobile processor.
Those Jaguar cores are a replacement for AMD’s earlier Bobcat cores and that makes them more a competitor for Intel’s ultra-mobile Atom processors than any full-power desktop or laptop CPU. The main difference with Jaguar and thus Kabini being that it’s not designed to squeeze into devices as small as smartphones, as the latest low-power Atoms are.
Instead, super thin-and-light laptops and tablets are essentially the limit for Kabini. That’s fine by us. There are plenty of alternatives in the smartphone CPU market. What we want from AMD is something to keep Intel honest in its core market and also provide an alternative in the burgeoning market for tablet PCs running the x86 version of Windows 8, including Microsoft’s Surface Pro.
It would also be nice if Kabini could help provide a cut price alternative to Intel’s sexy but pricey Ultrabooks — you know, systems like the Asus Zenbook Prime UX31A or Acer Aspire S7. And that’s exactly what it promises. Time to find out more.
Let’s get the specs of AMD’s reference whitebook sorted and then we can concentrate on that fascinating AMD A4-5000 APU, eh?
It’s a thin-an’-slim 13-inch laptop with a 1080p display. Storage-wise, we’re talking 320GB of old school magnetic hard drive sadly, so we’ll do our best to exclude that from our performance assessments. This chip really wants an SSD.
There’s 4GB of RAM, 512MB of it reserved for the A4-5000’s integrated graphics, more on which in a moment. As for the battery pack, it’s a 3,000mAh unit.
And so to the A4-5000 itself. The fun starts with four AMD Jaguar cores running at 1.5GHz. Jaguar is the follow up to AMD’s Bobcat low-power CPU architecture. It’s in roughly the same ballpark as Intel’s Atom CPU core, but isn’t intended for smartphones. The limit in terms of mobile devices is tablets and super slim laptops.
Anywho, AMD has targetted a range of improvements with the transition from Bobcat to Jaguar. Highlights include increased IPC or instructions per clock, increased frequency at any given voltage and more finely grained power management.
As for the graphics part of the equation, AMD is calling the A4-5000’s 3D core the AMD Radeon HD 8330. It runs at 496MHz and sports AMD’s latest GCN graphics architecture. All told, it packs 128 of AMD’s latest graphics shaders.
At this stage, two pressing comparisons hove into view. Firstly, we have the next-gen consoles from Microsoft and Sony, both of which sport precisely the same CPU core and graphics arhcitecture. Then there’s Brazos, AMD’s Bobcat-based APU and the A4-5000’s progenitor.
Intriguingly, both the Xbox One and the PS4 have Jaguar cores running at 1.6GHz, so pretty much the same speed as the AMD A4-5000. Of course, they have twice as many cores, but there’s a good chance some of those console cores may be reserved for non-gaming functionality. So in gaming terms, this chip might be almost level pegging with the latest consoles. Quite a thought.
Things aren’t nearly as evenly matched on the graphics side where the PS4 has 1,152 graphics shaders, the Xbox One is thought to have 768 shaders and the A4-5000 has just 128 shaders.
As for the match up with Brazos, well, you get double the number of CPU cores and around a 50 per cent up tick in graphics cores plus an upgrade from AMD’s older VLIW graphics architecture to the latest GCN graphics spec.
Cinebench 11: 1.45pts
Battery Eater 05: 235 minutes
3D Mark Ice Storm: 23,718
3D Mark Cloud Gate: 2,226
3D Mark Fire Strike: 231
Much of the subjective experience with this new AMD A4-5000 APU was spoiled by the use of a super sluggish magnetic hard drive in the test whitebook laptop provided by AMD. That’s a pity, because it makes it very hard to get a proper feel for what it has to offer as a full-on Windows 8 chip.
But it’s not a complete write off. Once applications and benchmarks have loaded, disk performance becomes much less of an issue, so what have we discovered?
Cinebench 11 is a good starting point. A score of 1.45pts is not hugely impressive. That makes the A4-5000 less than half as grunt as a quad-core AMD FX CPU. As for the match up with something like a quad-core Intel Core i7 chip, it’s gruesome. The i7 is about six times faster.
It’s not an even remotely fair comparison, we grant you, but it puts the A4-5000 in context. A fairer contest is with Intel’s Atom. The Intel Atom D2700 dual core model typically scores around 0.75pts, so the AMD A4-5000 has it pretty much licked.
In the graphics department, well, there’s really only so much you can do with 128 AMD GCN shaders. Remember, AMD’s hottest desktop graphics chip, as found in the AMD Radeon 7970 board, packs 2,048 shaders clocked roughly twice as fast, which works out to a raw performance advantage of 32 times. Yikes.
For the most part, our testing reflects that modest graphics firepower. The more demanding passages in 3DMark are a genuine slide show, with frames taking multiple seconds to update.
This is not a true gaming chip. However, it does have just enough grunt for casual 3D gaming, especially with older titles. Just Don’t expect to fire up Crysis 3 and experience free-flowing and fluid fragging. It ain’t gonna happen.
More of an unambiguous upside is the A4-5000’s battery life. We have to be careful to draw too many conclusions as this is not a retail notebook. But in the context of the modest 3,000mAh battery pack, the AMD A4-5000 looks like it should make for some impressively long lasting systems.
HD video playback is another strong point. CPU decoding of really high bitrate 1080p flash video is executed smoothly, albeit with the CPU cores dangerously close to maximum load. Normal bitrate 1080p video has the cores loaded to about 60 per cent, leaving a healthy amount of headroom.
AMD’s new A4-5000 is an intriguingly little chip in its own right. But the knowledge that it shares much of its architecture with the Microsoft Xbox One and Sony Playstation 4 really ramps up the intrigue. So what have we learned?
We liked
2D HD video playback is strong. That’s a critical metric for a modern mobile chip and arguably more important than gaming, even if the latter is what marketing suits prefer to talk about.
We’re encouraged by the A4-5000’s battery performance too. Whitebook’s such as these are rarely the last work in finely honed power management, so our good experience with this laptop will likely only get even better with final retail systems based on AMD’s new APU.
We disliked
Perhaps unsurprisingly, AMD hasn’t worked miracles with the new Jaguar CPU core design. Clocked here at 1.5GHz, you’re looking at cores with less than one fifth the performance of the best current desktop CPU cores.
For the A4-5000 itself, that’s not a major issue. It’s not a full-one desktop chip and with four cores, it makes up for modest single-threaded throughput with a decent amount of multi-threading. But make no mistake, this is a low-power processor architecture. It’s a long way off the pace of AMD’s own full-power laptop processors, much less Intel’s.
More generally, the fact that AMD specified this test whitebook with a 5,200rpm magnetic drive rather than a solid state drive obscured the APU’s ability as a proper Windows 8 chip. Put another way, we’re not completely sure how responsive it will feel configured with an SSD. Our guess is that it will make for a pretty nice Windows 8 chip. It’s just a shame AMD didn’t see fit to show it in its best light.
The graphics performance of the A4-5000 is similarly non-whelming. Based on AMD’s successful and familiar GCN architecture, the limitations are down to the number of functional units AMD has squeezed in.
By today’s standards, 128 graphics shaders is a modest count in a gaming context and there’s no getting round that.
Final verdict
Despite those limitations, we’re generally upbeat about the prospects of the AMD A4-5000 as a laptop and tablet processor. Battery life looks good, 2D video is strong and the CPU cores are likely just good enough.
What this chip reveals about the new games consoles, which share much of its technology, is much more worrying.
Put simply, games developers will desperately need to get to grips with multi-threading if they’re to have any hope of getting good performance out of these new Jaguar cores. And even with threading fully optimised, we guestimate based on this chip that the PS4 and Xbox will have roughly half the CPU performance of a good Intel desktop processor. And that’s assuming all cores are available to a given application or game. Yikes.
TODAY’S BEST DEALS
Contributor
Technology and cars. Increasingly the twain shall meet. Which is handy, because Jeremy (Twitter) is addicted to both. Long-time tech journalist, former editor of iCar magazine and incumbent car guru for T3 magazine, Jeremy reckons in-car technology is about to go thermonuclear. No, not exploding cars. That would be silly. And dangerous. But rather an explosive period of unprecedented innovation. Enjoy the ride.
TechRadar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site .
©
Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street,
New York,
NY 10036.
AMD A4-5000 review | 64 facts and highlights
31points
AMD A4-5000
AMD A4-5000
Why is AMD A4-5000 better than the average?
- GPU clock speed?
497MHzvs420.71MHz - Thermal Design Power (TDP)?
15Wvs46.75W - L1 cache?
512KBvs280.91KB
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD A4-5000
vs
Intel Core i5-3230M
AMD A4-5000
vs
Intel Core i3-3130M
AMD A4-5000
vs
Intel Core i3-3227U
AMD A4-5000
vs
AMD E1-2500
AMD A4-5000
vs
AMD A8-4500M
AMD A4-5000
vs
Intel Core i3-2350M
AMD A4-5000
vs
Intel Core i3-3110M
AMD A4-5000
vs
Intel Core i3-4340TE
AMD A4-5000
vs
AMD A4-9125
AMD A4-5000
vs
AMD A6-5200
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1. CPU speed
4 x 1.5GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD A4-5000
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
12.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A4-5000
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖AMD A4-5000
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD A4-5000
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD A4-5000
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD A4-5000
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD A4-5000
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD A4-5000
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD A4-5000 Full Specifications — CPUAgent
The AMD A4-5000 is a Laptop processor with 4 cores, launched in 2013. It is part of the A4 lineup, using the Jaguar architecture with Socket FT3. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 4 threads. A4-5000 has 2.00MB of L3 cache and operates at 1.5 GHz by default, but can boost up to 1.5 GHz, depending on the workload. AMD is building the A4-5000 on a 28 nm production process. AMD’s processor supports DDR3 memory with a dual-channel interface.
AMD A4-5000 General
| Series | AMD A-Series |
|---|---|
| Type | Laptop |
| Architecture | Kabini |
| Achitecture codename | Kabini |
| Market price | $ 115 |
| Release date | on May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1067 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
AMD A4-5000 Compatibility
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt |
|---|---|
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 |
| PCIe lanes | |
| PCIe revision | 2. |
| PCIe version | |
| PowerGating | + |
| PowerNow | + |
| Socket | FT3 |
AMD A4-5000 Benchmarks
| CPU Cores | 4 |
|---|---|
| CPU Threads | 4 |
| Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| Hyperthreading | No |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB |
| TDP | 15 W |
| TDP down | — |
| TDP up | — |
| Turbo (1 Core) | No turbo |
| Turbo (4 Cores) | No turbo |
AMD A4-5000 Memory Specifications
| ECC | No |
|---|---|
| Max memory channels | 1 |
| Memory channels | 2 |
| Memory type | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
| Supported memory types | Not Listed |
| Max. |
AMD A4-5000 Technical Specs
| 64 bit support | + |
|---|---|
| Die size | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C |
| Number of cores | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 |
| Overclocking | Yes |
| Technology | 28nm |
| Tjunction max. | — |
| Transistor count | 1178 million |
AMD A4-5000 Integrated Graphics
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 |
|---|---|
| DirectX Version | |
| DisplayPort | + |
| Enduro | + |
| Execution units | |
| GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| GPU frequency | 0. |
| Generation | |
| HDMI | + |
| Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8330 |
| Max. displays | 2 |
| Switchable graphics | + |
AMD A4-5000 Security Technologies
| VirusProtect | + |
|---|
AMD A4-5000 Technologies and Extensions
| AES-NI | + |
|---|---|
| AVX | + |
| FMA | FMA4 |
AMD A4-5000 Virtualization Technologies
| AMD-V | + |
|---|---|
| Virtualization | AMD-V |
AMD A4-5000 Other
| UVD | + |
|---|---|
| VCE | + |
| Vulkan | + |
AMD A4-5000 []
| IOMMU 2. |
+ |
|---|
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5000 4GB/ 500GB/ Win8.1/ 1GB Graph) Best Price in India 2022, Specs & Review
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5000 4GB/ 500GB/ Win8.1/ 1GB Graph) Best Price in India 2022, Specs & Review | Smartprix
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5000 4GB/ 500GB/ Win8.1/ 1GB Graph) price in India starts from ₹28,339. It was launched on January 06, 2014. It was available at lowest price on Amazon in India as on Sep 08, 2022. Take a look at HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5000 4GB/ 500GB/ Win8.1/ 1GB Graph) detailed specifications and features.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Display | 15.6 inches |
| CPU | AMD APU Quad Core A4 A4-5000 |
| GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8670M |
| RAM | 4 GB DDR3 |
| HDD | 500 GB |
Show More
- Compare Prices
- Specifications
- User Reviews
- Discussions
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Prices
| Seller | Seller Rating | Shipping | Price | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Products | ||||
| Out of Stock |
₹28,339 |
Out of Stock |
||
| Out of Stock |
₹31,599 |
Out of Stock |
||
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Price In India
is ₹28,339. You Can
Buy HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Online
After Finding Lowest Price Here.
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Updated
On September 17, 2022.
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Specifications
41
Specs Score
Below Average
Group: ₹25,000 to ₹35,000
This Laptop:
Average:
Maximum:
62Lenovo V15 82KDA01EIH Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3 5300U/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win11 Home)
Group Rank: #231 out of 243 laptops
Overall Rank: #2486 out of 2493 laptops
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Quick Specifications
[See Full Specifications]
- General
-
- OS: Windows 8
- Everyday Use
- Display
-
- 15.6 inches
- 1366 x 768 pixels
- 100 PPI
- 16:9 Aspect Ratio
- Processor
-
- AMD APU Quad Core A4
- 1.5 GHz, Quad Core
- 1 GB, AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- Memory
-
- 4 GB DDR3 RAM
- 500 GB Hard Disk
- Connectivity
-
- Ethernet (LAN)
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- 2 x USB 3.
0
- HDMI
- Multi Card Reader
- Input
-
- DTS Sound+ with 2 speakers
- Inbuilt Microphone
- Optical (DVD) Drive
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop… Analysis
Group Range: ₹25,000 to ₹35,000
Open all Groups
Technical
CPU Score
Below Average
This Device:
Group Avg:
Group Best:
…
- Products With Best CPU Score
- HP 240 240-F6Q29PA Laptop32
- HP 250-E8D87PA Laptop32
- Dell Inspiron 3542 Notebook (354…29
- Dell Inspiron 14 3442 344234500iB…26
- Asus X200LA-KX034D Netbook26
RAM
Average
This Device:
Group Avg:
Group Best:
…
- Products With Best RAM
- Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 82R10049IN …8 GB
- Asus M515DA-EJ351WS Laptop8 GB
- Infinix INBook X1 XL11 Laptop8 GB
- Asus VivoBook 15 X515EA-BR391W La…8 GB
- Asus VivoBook 15 X515JA-EJ382WS L…8 GB
GPU Memory
Worst
This Device:
Group Avg:
Group Best:
. ..
- Products With Best GPU Memory
- Asus VivoBook 15 X509FL Laptop2 GB
- Asus VivoBook 14 X409FL Laptop2 GB
- Dell Vostro 3446 Notebook2 GB
- Dell Vostro 14 V3446 Notebook 34…2 GB
- Asus X552CL-XX220D X Series Laptop1 GB
Display
Display Size
Best
This Device:
15.6 in
Group Avg:
15.6 in
Group Best:
15.6 in
…
- Products With Best Display Size
- Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 82R10049IN …15.6 in
- Dell Inspiron 3525 Laptop15.6 in
- HP 255 G8 64Q84PA Laptop15.6 in
- HP 15s-eq1559AU Laptop15.6 in
- Honor MagicBook X15 Laptop15.6 in
Display Resolution
Average
This Device:
1366 x 768 pixels
Group Avg:
1366 x 768 pixels
Group Best:
1920 x 1200 pixels
. ..
- Products With Best Display Resolution
- Acer Aspire 3 A315-23 UN.HVTSI.01…1920 x 1200 pixels
- Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15IML05 81WB01EC…1980 x 1080 pixels
- Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 82R10049IN …1920 x 1080 pixels
- Asus M515DA-EJ351WS Laptop1920 x 1080 pixels
- Infinix INBook X1 XL11 Laptop1920 x 1080 pixels
Display PPI
Below Average
This Device:
100 ppi
Group Avg:
141 ppi
Group Best:
157 ppi
…
- Products With Best Display PPI
- Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1 82R10049IN …157 ppi
- Infinix INBook X1 XL11 Laptop157 ppi
- Infinix INBook X1 Neo XL22 Laptop157 ppi
- Infinix INBook X1 Slim Series XL2…157 ppi
- Asus VivoBook 14 X415JA-BV301WS L…157 ppi
Memory And Battery
Hard Drive Size
Below Average
This Device:
500 GB
Group Avg:
Group Best:
. ..
- Products With Best Hard Drive Size
- Asus M515DA-EJ351WS Laptop1 TB
- Asus VivoBook 15 X515EA-BR391W La…1 TB
- Asus VivoBook 14 X415JA-BV301WS L…1 TB
- HP 255 G8 64Q84PA Laptop1 TB
- HP 247 G8 67U77PA Laptop1 TB
Battery Backup
Worst
This Device:
3 hours
Group Avg:
6 hours
Group Best:
14 hours
…
- Products With Best Battery Backup
- Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15IGL05 81WQ00MQ…14 hours
- Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IGL05 81WH001N…14 hours
- Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15IGL05 81WH007Y…14 hours
- Lenovo IdeaPad 3 81WQ0099IN Laptop14 hours
- Honor MagicBook X14 Laptop13.2 hours
General
Thickness
Below Average
This Device:
226 mm
Group Avg:
19.9 mm
Group Best:
1.99 mm
. ..
- Products With Best Thickness
- Lenovo V14 G2 ITL 82KA00FLIH Laptop1.99 mm
- Asus X552CL-XX220D X Series Laptop2.48 mm
- HP 240 240-F6Q29PA Laptop3.55 mm
- Lenovo Ideapad D330 81h4S01S00 La…8.5 mm
- Lenovo Ideapad D330 81h4S01W00 La…9.5 mm
Weight
Below Average
This Device:
2.28 kg
Group Avg:
1.8 kg
Group Best:
…
- Products With Best Weight
- Lenovo Ideapad D330 81h4S01S00 La…510 g
- Lenovo Ideapad D330 81h4S01W00 La…510 g
- HP Stream 11-ak0010nr Laptop1.05 kg
- Asus Vivobook E210M-GJ002W Laptop1.05 kg
- Asus X200LA-KX034D Netbook1.2 kg
Show More ▼
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Advantages
Display In Groups
| Processor | |
|
Quad Core CPU |
|
| Graphics | |
|
Dedicated Graphics Memory 1 GB |
|
| Memory | |
|
Lots Of Storage Capacity 500 GB |
|
|
Lots of RAM 4 GB |
|
|
Expandable RAM 8 GB |
|
| General | |
|
Popular OS Windows |
|
| Input | |
|
Has Web Cam |
|
|
Has Optical Drive |
|
| Connectivity | |
|
Has USB 3. 2 USB 3.0 Ports |
|
|
Has Card Reader |
|
|
Has Lock Port |
|
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Disadvantages
Display In Groups
| General | |
|
Older OS Version |
|
|
Basic Windows OS |
|
| Display | |
|
No Anti Glare Screen |
|
|
Not Very Sharp Screen 100 ppi |
|
| Connectivity | |
|
No VGA Port |
|
|
Less USB Ports 2 Ports |
|
| Battery | |
|
Short Battery Backup 3 hours |
|
HP Pavilion 15-n207AX Laptop (AMD A4-5… Full Specifications
Report An Error
| General | |
| Series | Pavilion |
| Utility | Everyday Use |
| OS | Windows 8. |
| Dimensions | 258 x 385.6 x 226 mm |
| Weight | 2.28 kg |
| Warranty | No Warranty |
| Display | |
| Type | HD BrightView LED-backlit |
| Touch | No |
| Size | 15.6 inches |
| Resolution | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| PPI | ~ 100 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Anti Glare Screen | No |
| Connectivity | |
| Ethernet | Integrated 10/100 BASE-T Ethernet LAN |
| WiFi | 802.11 b/g/n |
| Bluetooth | v4 |
| USB Ports | 2 x USB 3.0 |
| HDMI | 1 x HDMI Port |
| Card Reader | 1 multi-format SD media card reader |
| Security Lock Port | Yes |
| Input | |
| Camera | HP TrueVision HD Webcam (front-facing) with Integrated Dual Digital Microphones |
| Touchpad | Yes |
| Inbuilt Microphone | Yes |
| Speakers | DTS Sound+ with 2 speakers |
| Optical Drive | SuperMulti DVD burner |
| Processor | |
| Processor | AMD APU Quad Core A4 A4-5000 |
| CPU Score | 20 out of 100 |
| Speed | 1. |
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | APU Quad Core |
| Model | A4-5000 |
| Graphics | |
| GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8670M |
| Dedicated Memory | DDR3 1 GB |
| Brand | AMD |
| Memory | |
| RAM | 4 GB DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM Supported | Upto 8 GB |
| Hard Disk Capacity | 500 GB |
| Battery | |
| Adapter Type | 65 W AC power adapter,4-cell (41 WHr) Li-ion |
| Battery Backup | Upto 3 hours |
| Extra | |
| Sales Package | Laptop, Charger, Battery |
Write a Review
Heading
Summary *
Rating *
Click to Upload Images No file chosen
TOP ↑
Loading …
Processor A4-5000 [in 18 benchmarks]
AMD
A4-5000
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD A4-5000 sales 23 May 2013. This is Kabini architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 1500MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FT3 socket processor with a TDP of 15W and a maximum temperature of 90°C. It supports DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.28%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A4
5000
or
EPYC
7h22
General information
Information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of the A4-5000, as well as the time when sales began and the cost at that time.
| place in performance rating | 2218 | |
| for laptops | ||
| AMD A-Series | ||
| COOD Name of Architecture | Kabini (2013-2014) | |
| May | May | May |
| Price now | 248 $ | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
characteristics
A4-5000 quantitative parameters: number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state.
They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
| Expanded instructions | 86x SSE (1, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, DDR3L-1600 | AES-Ni | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FMA | FMA4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AVX | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PowerTune | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TrueAudio | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PowerNow | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PowerGating | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Out-of-band | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| VirusProtect | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMD-V | + | |
| Immu 2.0 | + | |
9021
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A4-5000. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
| DisplayPort | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HDMI | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DirectX | DirectX®12 | |
| Vulkan0041 |
Peripherals
A4-5000 supported peripherals and how to connect them.
| CHILDER PCI Express | 2.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Tests in the benchmarks
These are the results of the A4-5000 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A4-5000
1.28
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.
5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A4-5000
1291
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-5000
176
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A4-5000
576
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A4-5000
1207
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-5000
4165
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-5000
2039
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A4-5000
1
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A4-5000
119
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-5000
33
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-5000
0.4
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A4-5000
1
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-5000
9
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-5000
41
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A4-5000
1078
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A4-5000
2762
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A4-5000
870
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
A4-5000
3041
Relative performance
Overall performance of the A4-5000 compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.
AMD A8-3500M
101.56
Intel Pentium A1020
100
AMD A6-9220
100
AMD A4-5000
100
Intel Core i5-460M
99.22
AMD A6-3420M
99.22
Intel Celeron 2950M
99.22
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the closest competitor of A4-5000 from Intel is Pentium A1020, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Pentium
A1020
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A4-5000:
Intel Core i5-480M
101.56
Intel Pentium 3550M
101.56
Intel Pentium A1020
100
AMD A4-5000
100
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
99. 22
Intel Core i7-660UM
99.22
Intel Celeron 2950M
99.22
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Pentium
A1020
Compare
Core i7
660UM
Compare
Core i5
460M
Compare
Celeron
2950M
Compare
Core i3
3227U
Compare
A8
3500M
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
According to our statistics, these graphics cards are most often used with A4-5000:
Radeon HD
8330
63. 6%
Radeon HD
8670M
2.6%
Radeon
Graphics
2.6%
Radeon HD
8570M
2.2%
Radeon HD
8470D
1.5%
Radeon R5
235 OEM
1.4%
Radeon R5
M230
1.3%
HD
Graphics 4000
1.3%
GeForce GT
1030
1.1%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
1%
User rating
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the A4-5000 processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD A4-5000 APU features, price, test, competitors
- Main page
- >
- Processors
- >
- AMD
- >
- A4-5000 APU
A4-5000 APU
Number-4.
Basic frequency of nuclei APU APU APU — 1.5 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 1.5 GHz.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy A4-5000 APU cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- A4-5300 APU
Benchmarks AMD A4-5000 APU
Game performance
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum | Average | Maximum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 | Memory: 45 |
|
Memory 47.3 |
||
| 15 | 1 core: 24 | 26 |
|
1 core 11. |
||
| 30 | 2 cores: 48 | 52 |
|
2 cores 11.9 |
||
Demanding games and tasks |
||
| Minimum | Average | Maximum |
| 50 | 4 cores: 87 | 60 |
|
4 cores 10.9 |
||
| 58 | 8 cores: 89 | 104 |
|
8 cores 5. |
Extreme |
||
| Minimum | Average | Maximum |
| 59 | All cores: 90 | 103 900 |
|
All cores 1.7 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R11.5 Igpu, Opengl
Intel Celeron N3150
13.3
Intel Celeron N3160
13.3
Intel Core i7-37770 9000 9000 13.2
INTEL CORE0005
13.2
Intel Celeron 2957U
13.1
AMD A4-5000 APU
13.1
Intel Celeron J4105
12.9
Intel Core i5-3570K
12.8
Intel Core i5-3570
12.8
Intel Core i3-4010U
12.7
Intel Core i3-4030U
12.7
Passmark
Intel Core i3-4012Y
1305
Intel Pentium G850
1303
AMD Phenom II X2 555
1294
Intel Pentium G630
1294
Intel Core i3-3227U
1275
AMD A4-5000 APU
1275
Intel Core i3-3227U
1275
Intel Pentium G6950
1262
AMD A6-3420M APU
1254
AMD A8-3500M APU
1252
Intel Core i3-23505
1247
Tests in games FPS measured in popular games at AMD APU APU and AP system requirements.
Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
RAM
- No data
SSD
We collected the list of most frequent ones, who are the most frequent list. choose when assembling a computer based on the A4-5000 APU. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.
The most popular config: motherboard for AMD A4-5000 APU — HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC, graphics card — Quadro 4000, SSD — A400 240GB.
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
| Manufacturer | AMD |
| Date of release The month and year the processor was released. |
09-2016 |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 4 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 1.5GHz |
| Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. |
1.5GHz |
| Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No |
Video core
RAM
PCI
Data protection
Design
Competitors
Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.
Compare
AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Celeron J4005
AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Pentium Dual T2310
AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Pentium Dual T3200
AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Core i3 U 330
AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Pentium M processor 1. 86GHz
AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel T2400
AMD A4-5000 processor review: specifications, benchmark tests
The A4-5000 processor was released by AMD, release date: 23 May 2013. The processor is designed for laptop, tablet computers and is built on the Kabini architecture.
Processor unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 4, threads — 4. Maximum temperature — 90°C. Technological process — 28 nm. Cache size: L1 — 256 KB, L2 — 2 MB.
Supported memory type: DDR3.
Supported socket type: FT3. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 15 Watt.
AMD Radeon HD 8330 graphics are integrated into the processor with the following graphics parameters: maximum frequency — 500 MHz, number of cores — 128.
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
CPU mark
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 118142 |
Single Core
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
Multi-Core
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
Face Detection
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 56.680 mPixels/s |
| 2.119 mPixels/s |
Ocean Surface Simulation
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 741.453 Frames/s |
| 5.104 Frames/s |
T-Rex
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 3. |
| 0.111 Frames/s |
Video Composition
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 49.002 Frames/s |
| 0.240 Frames/s |
Bitcoin Mining
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 218.231 mHash/s |
| 1. |
Car Chase Offscreen
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 9047 Frames |
| 479 Frames |
Manhattan
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 7128 Frames |
| 1133 Frames |
T-Rex
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 12887 Frames |
| 2123 Frames |
Car Chase Offscreen
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 9047.000 Fps |
| 479.000 Fps |
Manhattan
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 7128. |
| 1133.000 Fps |
T-Rex
| Top1 CPU |
| This CPU |
| 12887.000 Fps |
| 2123.000 Fps |
| Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 510 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1291 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 175 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 580 |
| CompuBench 1. |
2.119 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 5.104 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0.111 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 0.240 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 1.373 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 479 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1133 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2123 Frames |
| GFXBench 4. |
479.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1133.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 2123.000 Fps |
| Core frequency | 497MHz |
| Floating point performance | 127.2 gflops |
| Process | 28nm |
| Number of shaders | 128 |
| Texturing speed | 3.976 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 1. |
Gaming performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
3. World of Warships (2015)
4. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
5 Dirt Rally (2015)
6 Far Cry 4 (2014)
7 Alien: Isolation (2014)
8. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
9 Sims 4 (2014)
10 Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
11. The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
12 Thief (2014)
13. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
14. Battlefield 4 (2013)
15. Total War: Rome II (2013)
16. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
17. Metro: Last Light (2013)
18 BioShock Infinite (2013)
19 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
20 SimCity (2013)
21. Tomb Raider (2013)
22. Crysis 3 (2013)
23 Hitman: Absolution (2012)
24. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012)
25. Dirt Showdown (2012)
26. Diablo III (2012)
27 Mass Effect 3 (2012)
28. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
29. Battlefield 3 (2011)
30. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
31. Starcraft 2 (2010)
32 Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
33. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 43.25 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 35.25 |
| High, 1366×768 | 26.80 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 29.00 |
World of Warships (2015)
| Low, 1366×768 | 24.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 16.30 |
DOTA 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280×720 |
| Low, 1024×768 | 48.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.90 |
Far Cry 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 9. |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 6.80 |
Alien: ISOLATION (2014)
| LOW, 1024×768 | 16.70 |
| Medium, 1366×768 9005 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
| Low, 1280×720 | 12.70 |
| Medium, 1344×756 | 7.70 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 55.30 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 18.50 |
Wolfenstein: The New Oder0060
The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 24.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.20 |
| High, 1366×768 | 7.80 |
Thief ( 2014)
| LOW, 1024×768 | 9. |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 4.55 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | |
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 17.70 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 9.00 |
Battlefield 4 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 18.90 |
Total War: Rome II (2013)
| LOW, 1024×768 | 19.80 |
| Medium, 13666×768 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 8.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 5.70 |
| High, 1366×768 | 2.80 |
Metro: Last Light ( 2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 12.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medium, 1366×768 | 3.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HIIIH, 1366×768 | 2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Low, 1280×720 | 24.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.01 |
| High, 1366×768 | 10.00 |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm ( 2013)
| LOW, 1024×768 | 64.35 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 26.75 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 6.30 |
SimCity (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 26.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.10 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| LOW, 1024×768 | 25. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HIGH, 1366×768 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Low, 1024×768 | 13.90 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 8.30 |
| High, 1366×768 | 5.10 |
Hitman: Absolution (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 14.0021
Dirt Showdown (2012)
Diablo III
Mass Effect 3 (2012)
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Battlefield 3 (2011)
StarCraft 2 (2010)
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
World of Warcraft (2005)
Characteristics
AMD Phenom II X4 925: specifications, descriptions and reviews
Solution niche and its capabilitiesoccupied by quad-core central processing units of the Phenom II series. Only they belonged to the models «945» and «955». Their technical specifications were almost identical to the Phenom II 925. The difference was only in the clock frequency. For flagships, it was equal to 3.2 GHz, and for «925» — 2.8 GHz. But Phenom II 925 was immediately followed by products of the Athlon II line, which were deprived of cache memory of the 3rd level and, as a result, were significantly inferior in performance to any chip in the Phenom line. So it turns out that Phenom II 925 in terms of performance was between mid-range and premium segment solutions. On the other hand, its excellent overclocking potential made it possible to conquer the frequency of 3.4-3.5 GHz without any problems even on a boxed cooler, and due to this it could be turned into the same Phenom II 955.
Comparison of Core i5 750 vs. Phenom II X4 925 gaming and application performance.Conclusions According to the results of testing in NON-gaming applications, the conclusion is unequivocal: Intel is faster both in the nominal mode and in overclocking! Still, we have to admit some superiority of the Intel Nehalem architecture over AMD K10.5 Stars. I agree that many tests are not entirely objective for a particular architecture, but the same applies to real applications! Some applications «love» Intel, others also love «Intel» … In general, those who wish to get acquainted with the architectural features of today’s participants can safely go to the Internet and gain information. It’s time to talk about the price / quality ratio. With an average cost of the I750 processor at 220 USD. Delivery kitAMD Phenom II X4 925 was supplied in two possible configurations. One of them was called «Trail». It included the chip itself, a warranty card, a branded sticker of this line of processors for the front panel of the PC case, and a user manual. There was also a second configuration option, which was called «Boxing». In addition to all the previously listed components, it also included a cooler and thermal paste. For ordinary users and novice computer enthusiasts, the second, more expensive, configuration option in this case was quite enough to build a PC and minimally overclock the CPU. Relatively small overclocking of the processor in this case could be done. Well, the second option is more preferable for computer specialists with experience. In this case, you can additionally buy an improved CPU cooling system and thereby further increase the performance of this computer solution. Production technology In 2009, the advanced technology for the production of silicon chips was based on the 45 nm process. Cache A high level of performance in 2009 AMD Phenom II X4 925 was provided by a fast volatile memory system of 3 levels. The first level of it was divided into 4 parts of 128 Kb. That is, its total size was 512 KB. It should also be noted that 128 KB, in turn, were divided into 2 equal parts of 64 KB each. One of them contained CPU instructions, and the other contained software data. The total size of the 2nd level cache was 2MB. It is identically divided into 4 parts of 512 KB, which were also assigned to a certain computing resource. AMD Phenom X3 8750: odd oddsthere will be no miracles, only disappointments. However, it may be that a bad attitude at the beginning served, on the contrary, a good service, because on the whole we were not only not disappointed, but on the contrary, we seriously thought about the fact that someone, perhaps, would really like such a miracle. And they even came up with something, but more on that later. A brief description of our today’s hero looks very simple: this is a rejection of Phenom X4, in which one of the cores did not work as it should. Even AMD itself does not hide this (and why would it be — everything is already so obvious). Recall that unlike Intel quad-cores, which are, in fact, a «glue» of two dual-core processors placed in a case, AMD quad-cores are really a single chip. Accordingly, the area of the crystal is relatively large, and where there is a large area, there is a large percentage of defects. However, in today’s world where marketing triumphs, it’s not enough to come up with a processor, you also need to come up with positioning for it. Apparently, AMD did not think for very long, because the positioning was adopted as follows: the three-core Phenom X3 will compete with the dual-core Core 2 Duo. Say, here, a competitor in this market segment has “only” two cores, and we are not so tight-fisted, we don’t feel sorry, we have three!
9093 In fact, it has AMD Phenom II X4 925. CPU overclocking The AMD Phenom II X4 920 can boast of a phenomenal increase in performance due to the clock frequency. Overclocking it achieved an increase in performance of about 30 percent. As noted earlier, the nominal clock frequency of this chip is 2.8 GHz, and the system bus operates at real 200 MHz or effective 1400 MHz. At the same time, the voltage on the CPU is 0.875 V. After overclocking, the chip frequency can reach 3.7 GHz. In this case, the voltage on the semiconductor crystal can reach 1.
The performance increase algorithm in this case is as follows:
Opinion of chip owners.
In 2009, Phenom II 925 became an absolute bestseller from AMD. It made it possible to get a very, very productive and functional computer system for relatively little money. Separately, it is necessary to note the overclocking potential of this solution. Under certain conditions, it was possible to increase its level of productivity by 30-35 percent. But in this case, the requirements for such a system unit increased significantly. Owners opinions. CPU costThe main disadvantage of this CPU model is the low nominal frequency of 2.1 GHz. Even at the time of the release of this semiconductor solution, this value barely allowed to solve the most demanding tasks. The solution to this problem was overclocking the chip. But at the same time, more serious requirements were put forward for the components of a computer system. This, in turn, led to an increase in the cost of the PC. Among the advantages we can note the relatively low cost of this CPU model. 90,000 HP Pavilion 15-N001SR (A4 5000 1500 MHZ/15.6 «/1366×768/4096MB/500GB/DVD-RW/Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Win 8 64) Products 1005643 Related 4.5 Write a review Long out of stock and no longer expected to be available See similar products Notebook HP Pavilion 15-n001s – high-quality equipment at an affordable price! High performance Quad-core processor with 4 GB of RAM will give you a real pleasure to work with your laptop. Even the most modern programs will start very quickly. The good thing is that you can easily work in several applications at the same time! Operating system installed With Windows 8 installed, you can start working immediately after purchase. Graphics on top A bright and contrasting 15.6-inch screen will provide comfortable work on a laptop. AMD Radeon HD 8330 will please with good graphics, and you can enjoy modern games or action movies. High sensitivity touchpad Your laptop will respond quickly to your commands — see for yourself! You can also appreciate Edge Swipe gestures — it will be enough to swipe your finger from the right edge to the center on the touchpad, as the “Wonder Buttons” (hot keys for convenient work) will instantly appear on the screen. Enough room for everything! With 500 GB of memory, you can store a huge amount of your photos, favorite music, movies and videos on your laptop. Wireless Internet The laptop has built-in Wi-Fi, so you can always stay connected. Quick information exchange A large number of different ports and connectors will allow you to connect almost any modern technology to your laptop. Easy communication The built-in webcam guarantees good photo or video quality, so you can comfortably chat online or make video calls. Warranty and Certification
Have you bought this product from us? Share your experience of using the product and get 1000 bonuses to your account: 500 for text + 500 for photos. A link to write a review is available to you at Report error Product information is for reference only and is not a public offer. Characteristics, scope of delivery and appearance of the product may differ from those indicated or be changed by the manufacturer without prior notice. If you notice an error or inaccuracy in the product description, please highlight the part of the text with an error and click the «Report an error» button.
Payment by card on the site and accept the data processing conditions Thank you! Your message has been sent Infinix Printer cartridges System blocks Monoblocks Paper Paper shredders Printers Notebooks Monitors Scanners System blocks Portable speaker Keyboard and mouse kits Toners and inks Laptop bags Laminators Keyboards Headphones and headsets Printers Video projectors Office paper Video cables Price in another store: Link to a product in another store: Your application has been sent You can send a second application via: 00 : 00 What is wrong? How should it be? Thank you! Your message has been sent Price in another store: Link to a product in another store: and accept the terms of data processing Header Text The manufacturer’s warranty is usually set for a period of one or two years, but for expensive electronics this is not always enough. Purchasing an additional warranty certificate allows you to:
You can choose the time period for which you want to extend it — it can be 1, 2 or 3 years. Why does the machine manufacturer offer a warranty of one, two or, in very rare cases, three years? Everything is simple. The longer the equipment works, the higher the probability of breakdown. But you don’t throw away your refrigerator, washing machine, or laptop right after the manufacturer’s warranty expires, do you? Of course not. And what if the equipment breaks down when the warranty has already ended? You have to pay for repairs out of your own pocket. And often it’s a lot of money. The task will be solved by the certificate «Additional guarantee». AMD A4-5000 — processor overview. Benchmarks and SpecsThe AMD A4-5000 processor is based on a 28 nm process and Kabini architecture. The base clock is 1.50 GHz and the maximum turbo clock is No turbo. AMD A4-5000 contains 4 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check your motherboard socket compatibility before choosing. 5.0 TOP 10 processors Most popular on the site
Intel Celeron N4020
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Celeron J4125
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Intel Celeron N4500 Buy here:
AliExpress General informationAMD A4-5000 base and maximum clock speed, number of processor cores and threads. The more the better (marked in green). Processor cores, base and turbo speeds The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on its number of cores and threads, as well as its standard and turbo clock speeds. The more GHz, cores and L2-L3 cache a processor has, the better. Please note that high specs require a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check the VRM on the motherboard).
Internal graphics Some manufacturers (most often Intel) supplement processors with graphics chips, this solution is especially popular in laptops, but is ineffective in workstations and gaming stations.
Hardware codec support Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers.
RAM and PCIe These are the memory standards supported by processors.
EncryptionData encryption support
Thermal management and TDP
Technical details These are key parameters that will help you determine which processor is better.
Devices compatible with this processorYou probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses 9 different test scenarios0005 Intel Celeron N2815 Intel Celeron N2830 AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Atom C2750 Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD 9 processor0005 AMD A8-3550MX AMD A4-5300 AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron 3855U Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands. Intel Celeron 2981U Intel Celeron 2980U AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron J4115 Intel Celeron J4105 The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software Intel Atom x5-Z8300 Intel Celeron N2930 AMD A4-5000 Intel Atom x5-E8000 AMD E1-6010 Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. Intel Celeron N2920 Intel Celeron J1850 AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron 3205U Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results AMD Ryzen 5 2600H Intel Pentium N3510 AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron N2815 Intel Atom E3827 Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the processor AMD Sempron 3850 AMD A8-5545M AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron 1017U AMD E2-3200 Geekbench 5 is the latest software. AMD Athlon 5150 Intel Celeron N2815 AMD A4-5000 Intel Atom x5-Z8350 AMD E2-6110 Geekbench 5 shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading. AMD A6-9210 Intel Celeron 2955U AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron J3355 AMD A4-4020 It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations. AMD Phenom II X2 545 AMD A4-5150M AMD A4-5000 AMD A6-5400B Intel Celeron 3865U This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. Intel Core i7-2600 AMD E2-6110 AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron N3060 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||