AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R3 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark.
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.
5x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 256 vs 128
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 153.6 gflops
- 2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 2908 vs 1423
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 vs 3.343
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 106.771
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.35
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 8.234
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 21.88
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 587
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 750
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1745 - Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 587
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 750
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1745
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 28 January 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 153.6 gflops |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 2908 vs 1423 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.331 vs 3.343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 vs 106.771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 vs 0.35 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 vs 8.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 vs 21.88 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 750 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
1915 vs 1745 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1745 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 267 MHz vs 200 MHz
| Core clock speed | 267 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 2908 | 1423 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.331 | 3.343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 106.771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.35 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 8.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 21.88 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 587 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1363 | 750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1745 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1745 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 300 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 95 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | GCN 3. 0 |
GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Wani | Beema |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 28 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1522 | 1569 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 267 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 388. 1 gflops |
153.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,410 million | 930 million |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Interface | IGP | IGP |
| DirectX | 12. 0 (12_0) |
12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/radeon-r5-graphics-vs-radeon-r3-graphics%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
12400F
vs
Core i5
13400F
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
specs and benchmarks in 28 games and 14 benchmarks
AMD started shipping the Radeon R3 on January 28, 2015.
This is a graphics card for laptops based on the GCN 2.0 architecture, with a 28 nm process technology. It does not have its own memory and uses the system memory, so the performance depends on the characteristics of the RAM.
Connected via IGP interface. Power is not specified, the declared maximum power consumption is 15 watts.
Specifications
GPU
- Architecture
- GCN 2.0
- Manufacturer
- GlobalFoundries
- Process
- 28 nm
- Number of transistors
- 930 million
- Crystal area
- 107 mm²
Graphic card
- Release date
- January 28, 2015
- Generation
- Mullins (Rx 200 Mobile)
- Predecessor
- Richland
- Descendant
- Carrizo
- Data bus interface
- IGP
Frequencies
- GPU Clock
- 600 MHz
- Memory frequency
- Uses system
Memory
- Memory capacity
- Uses system
- Memory type
- Uses system
- Memory bus
- Uses system
- Memory bandwidth
- Uses system
Learn more about memory usage of the integrated video card, how to increase or decrease the amount and where to view it.
Render configuration
- Shader units
- 128
- Compute modules
- 2
- Texture blocks
- 8
- Screen blocks
- 4
Rated capacity
- Pixel fill rate
- 2.400 HP/s
- Texture Fill Rate
- 4.800 GT/s
- Performance FP32
- 153.6 GFlops
- Performance FP64
- 9.6 GFlops
Graphics capabilities
- DirectX
- 12 (12_0)
- OpenGL
- 4.
6
- OpenCL
- 2
- Vulcan
- 1.2
- Shader model
- 6.3
Video Card Design
- Heat Sink Requirements
- 15W
- Outlets
- None
Game FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
(2012)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 7420G, but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 610.
|
1024×768 / Low / 52.8 |
1366×768 / Medium / 40.8 |
1366×768 / Tall / 28. |
5
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
(2011)
Better than Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 6470M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 17 |
1366×768 / Medium / 11.3 |
1366×768 / Tall / 7.2 |
Dirt Rally
(2015)
Better than AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L), but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell).
|
1024×768 / Low / 49.7 |
1366×768 / Medium / 14. |
8
Dragon Age: Inquisition
(2014)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 4400, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).
|
1024×768 / Low / 15.6 |
1366×768 / Medium / 10.4 |
Battlefield 4
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 505, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).
|
1024×768 / Low / 20.2 |
1366×768 / Medium / 14.7 |
1366×768 / Tall / 10. |
1
Metro: Last Light
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 5300, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell).
|
1024×768 / Low / 13.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 10.4 |
1366×768 / Tall / 5.8 |
BioShock Infinite
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 4400, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8450G.
|
1280×720 / Low / 30.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 15. |
1366×768 / Tall / 13.3 |
5
Crysis 3
(2013)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 8570M, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4400.
|
1024×768 / Low / 13.3 |
1366×768 / Medium / 8.5 |
Alien: Isolation
(2014)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 405, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).
|
1024×768 / Low / 19.9 |
1366×768 / Medium / 12. |
3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
(2014)
Better than Intel UHD Graphics 605, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L).
|
1280×720 / Low / 14.7 |
7680×4320 / Medium / 9 |
Tomb Raider
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 600.
|
1024×768 / Low / 31.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 15.8 |
1366×768 / Tall / 10. |
8
The Sims 4
(2014)
Better than Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8400.
|
1024×768 / Low / 70.1 |
1366×768 / Medium / 25.5 |
Thief
(2014)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 5300, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).
|
1024×768 / Low / 9.6 |
1366×768 / Medium / 7 |
1366×768 / Tall / 5. |
8
Far Cry 4
(2014)
Better than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4000.
|
1024×768 / Low / 13.1 |
1366×768 / Medium / 9.2 |
Assassin’s Creed Unity
(2014)
Better than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 M255.
|
1024×768 / Low / 8 |
1366×768 / Medium / 5.3 |
Wolfenstein: The New Order
(2014)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8400.
|
1280×720 / Low / 15.5 |
1280×720 / Medium / 13.8 |
Hitman: Absolution
(2012)
Better than Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7670M.
|
1024×768 / Low / 15.6 |
1366×768 / Medium / 12.1 |
1366×768 / Tall / 5.8 |
Company of Heroes 2
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 3000, but worse than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema).
|
1024×768 / Low / 9.7 |
1366×768 / Medium / 7.3 |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm
(2013)
Better than AMD Radeon 530, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8400.
|
1024×768 / Low / 71.6 |
1366×768 / Medium / 24.4 |
1366×768 / Tall / 14.9 |
Diablo III
(2012)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce G210M, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell).
|
1024×768 / Low / 38.2 |
1366×768 / Medium / 25.4 |
1366×768 / Tall / 20.3 |
Mass Effect 3
(2012)
Better than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), but worse than NVIDIA GeForce G210M.
|
1280×720 / Low / 22.9 |
1366×768 / Tall / 16.8 |
Battlefield 3
(2011)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 7470M, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5300.
|
1024×768 / Low / 16.2 |
1366×768 / Medium / 12.2 |
1366×768 / Tall / 9.1 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution
(2011)
Better than Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 6470M.
|
1024×768 / Low / 28.7 |
1366×768 / Tall / 12 |
Trackmania Nations Forever
(2008)
Better than ATI Radeon HD 4250, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8330.
|
640×480 / Low / 70.8 |
1024×768 / Tall / 19.6 |
Total War: Rome II
(2013)
Better than Intel HD Graphics 5300, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4000.
|
1024×768 / Low / 26.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 19.2 |
1366×768 / Tall / 15.3 |
X-Plane 10.25
(2013)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 3000.
|
1024×768 / Low / 17.8 |
1366×768 / Medium / 10.7 |
1366×768 / Tall / 5.1 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
(2012)
Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4400.
|
1024×768 / Low / 30.5 |
1366×768 / Medium / 21.5 |
1366×768 / Tall / 10.3 |
Dirt Showdown
(2012)
Better than AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4400.
|
1024×768 / Low / 31.2 |
1366×768 / Medium / 21.3 |
1366×768 / Tall / 17 |
Benchmark tests
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 3049 Better than Intel HD Graphics 500 but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7520G.
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 2391 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8450G but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8400.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 419.5 Better than Intel HD Graphics 505 but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4200.
3DMark Fire Strike Score: 396.5 Better than Intel HD Graphics 4200 but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 600.
3DMark Vantage P: 1814.5 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8330, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 320M.
3DMark06: 4010 Better than NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M.
3DMark11 P: 686 Better than AMD Radeon HD 6490M, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8400.
3DMark11 P GPU: 620 Better than Intel HD Graphics 505 but worse than AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5.
Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 2908 Better than Intel HD Graphics 500 but worse than NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M.
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 14.36 Better than Intel HD Graphics 405 but worse than AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge).
ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 379 Better than Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 505.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 11.7 Worse than Intel HD Graphics (Braswell).
GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen OGL: 11.7 Worse than AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L).
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only: 108 Better than AMD Radeon HD 8400, but worse than AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge).
Interesting information:
How to do an online webcam test
Comparison with other video cards
Map 1:
Map 2:
Video Reviews and Tests
A6 5200 Radeon R3 Game Test
A6 5200 Radeon R3 Game Test
❕DO NOT BUY RAM AND SSD FROM AMD RADEON ❕
HOW TO OVERCLOSE THE BUILT-IN VIDEO CARD even on a laptop | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon
Laptop freezes (mouse cursor) — AMD Radeon HD 8200 / R3 Series (SOLVED)
SSD drive AMD 2.