AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Intel Core i5-3330
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Intel Core i5-3330 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Security & Reliability, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-3330
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 3.
7 GHz vs 3.20 GHz
- Around 41% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 67.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm FinFET vs 22 nm
- Around 36% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 77 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2060 vs 1718
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6792 vs 4087
- 9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.611 vs 3.047
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 398.506 vs 73.477
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.304 vs 0.362
- 24.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.
605 vs 1.704
- 28.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 130.649 vs 4.579
Launch date | 10 May 2018 vs September 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.20 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 67.4°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET vs 22 nm |
L1 cache | 348 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 77 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2060 vs 1718 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6792 vs 4087 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
28.611 vs 3.047 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 398.506 vs 73.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.304 vs 0.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.605 vs 1.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 130.649 vs 4.579 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3330
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 4 MB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3330
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2060 | 1718 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6792 | 4087 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
28.611 | 3.047 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 398.506 | 73.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.304 | 0.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.605 | 1.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 130.649 | 4.579 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 656 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2156 | |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
968 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 968 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G | Intel Core i5-3330 | |
---|---|---|
Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | |
Launch date | 10 May 2018 | September 2012 |
OPN Tray | YD220BC5M4MFB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 147 | 2383 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $360 | |
Price now | $309.![]() |
|
Processor Number | i5-3330 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.64 | |
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
L1 cache | 348 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 67.![]() |
Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Die size | 133 mm | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.![]() |
|
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 1333/1600 | |
Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
iGPU core count | 8 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
Device ID | 0x152 | |
Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.![]() |
|
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
Sockets supported | AM4 | FCLGA1155 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 77 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | 2011D |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.![]() |
|
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 | |
AMD SenseMI | ||
The «Zen» Core Architecture | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.![]() |
|
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 — Project CARS dengan RX 570 Perbandingan Kinerja
RX 570 with
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Project CARS
RX 570 with
Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3. 00GHz
Ryzen 3 2200G
i5-3330
Multi-Thread Performance
7434 Pts
5931 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1854 Pts
1699 Pts
Project CARS
Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 di Project CARS menggunakan RX 570 — Perbandingan Kinerja CPU pada Pengaturan Kualitas Ultra, Tinggi, Sedang, dan Rendah dengan resolusi 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
Ryzen 3 2200G
i5-3330
Kualitas ultra
Resolusi | Frame Per detik |
---|---|
1080p |
54.8 FPS
|
1080p |
48.5 FPS
|
1440p |
41.8 FPS
|
1440p |
37.
|
2160p |
29.5 FPS
|
2160p |
26.1 FPS
|
w1440p |
38.1 FPS
|
w1440p |
33.7 FPS
|
Kualitas tinggi
Resolusi | Frame Per detik |
---|---|
1080p |
94.6 FPS
|
1080p |
85.2 FPS
|
1440p |
75.0 FPS
|
1440p |
67.5 FPS
|
2160p |
55.
|
2160p |
49.9 FPS
|
w1440p |
69.2 FPS
|
w1440p |
62.3 FPS
|
Kualitas suara sedang
Resolusi | Frame Per detik |
---|---|
1080p |
134.4 FPS
|
1080p |
121.9 FPS
|
1440p |
108.2 FPS
|
1440p |
98.0 FPS
|
2160p |
81.5 FPS
|
2160p |
73.
|
w1440p |
100.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
90.8 FPS
|
Kualitas rendah
Resolusi | Frame Per detik |
---|---|
1080p |
213.9 FPS
|
1080p |
195.3 FPS
|
1440p |
174.5 FPS
|
1440p |
159.0 FPS
|
2160p |
133.4 FPS
|
2160p |
121.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
162.
|
w1440p |
148.0 FPS
|
Ryzen 3 2200G
- Ryzen 3 2200G memiliki Level 2 Cache yang lebih tinggi. Data / instruksi yang harus diproses dapat diambil dari L2 yang cepat dan CPU tidak harus menunggu untuk RAM DDR yang sangat lambat
- Untuk beberapa game, cpu dengan kecepatan clock lebih tinggi, atau dengan nama teknis IPC (Instruksi per jam), memiliki hasil yang lebih baik daripada CPU lain dengan jumlah inti lebih tinggi dan kecepatan inti lebih rendah.
- Ryzen 3 2200G lebih hemat daya dan menghasilkan lebih sedikit panas.
- Ryzen 3 2200G memiliki dorongan jam turbo yang lebih tinggi. Turbo Boost adalah fitur CPU yang akan menjalankan kecepatan jam CPU lebih cepat dari jam dasarnya, jika ada kondisi tertentu. Ini akan memungkinkan perangkat lunak yang lebih lama yang berjalan pada core lebih sedikit, untuk berkinerja lebih baik pada perangkat keras yang lebih baru.
Karena game juga perangkat lunak, itu juga berlaku untuk mereka.
- Ryzen 3 2200G memiliki ukuran proses yang lebih kecil. Semakin cepat transistor dapat hidup dan mati, semakin cepat ia dapat bekerja. Dan transistor yang hidup dan mati dengan lebih sedikit energi lebih efisien, mengurangi daya pengoperasian, atau «konsumsi daya dinamis,» yang dibutuhkan oleh prosesor.
i5-3330
- i5-3330 memiliki Level 3 Cache yang lebih tinggi. Ini berguna ketika Anda memiliki beban kerja multiproses yang substansial, banyak proses simultan yang intensif secara komputasi. Lebih mungkin di server, lebih sedikit di komputer yang digunakan secara pribadi untuk beban kerja desktop interaktif.
Compare Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 Architecture
Ryzen 3 2200G | i5-3330 | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Raven Ridge | Ivy Bridge |
Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen (Raven Ridge)) |
Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Part# | YD2200C5M4MFB | SR0RQ |
Production Status | Active | unknown |
Released | Feb 2018 | Sep 2012 |
Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 Cache
Ryzen 3 2200G | i5-3330 | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 128K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 4MB (shared) | 6MB (shared) |
Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 Cores
Ryzen 3 2200G | i5-3330 | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 4 | 4 |
# of Threads | 4 | 4 |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | Intel HD 2500 |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 3 2200G vs i5-3330 Features
Ryzen 3 2200G | i5-3330 | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4. ![]() |