Intel Core i3 8130U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i3 8130U
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 2.2 GHz Intel Core i3 8130U against the 2.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 3 2200U. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i3 8130U
40
Ryzen 3 2200U
30
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i3 8130U
9
Ryzen 3 2200U
8
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i3 8130U
58
Ryzen 3 2200U
58
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i3 8130U
31
Ryzen 3 2200U
28
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2200U and 8130U
Advantages of Intel Core i3 8130U
- 12% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 836 vs 744 points
- Around 1.
74 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i3 8130U
+77%
903
Ryzen 3 2200U
509
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i3 8130U
+50%
2158
Ryzen 3 2200U
1441
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i3 8130U
+14%
1935
Ryzen 3 2200U
1700
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i3 8130U
3652
Ryzen 3 2200U
+2%
3708
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i3 8130U
+13%
843
Ryzen 3 2200U
749
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i3 8130U
+6%
1789
Ryzen 3 2200U
1687
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i3 8130U and AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | February 12, 2018 | January 8, 2018 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake | Raven Ridge |
| Model number | i3-8130U | — |
| Socket | BGA-1356 | FP5 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon Vega 3 |
Performance
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Frequency | 2. 2 GHz |
2.5 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24x | 25x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 4MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Transistors | — | 4.9 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon Vega 3 |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 12 |
| ROPs | 3 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 24 | 3 |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
| Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i3 8130U
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 3 2200U
0.54 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2400 |
| Memory Size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 35.76 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i3 8130U official page | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i3 8130U
4 (44.4%)
Ryzen 3 2200U
5 (55.6%)
Total votes: 9
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 2200U or Intel Core i3 8130U?
Name
Message
Intel Core i3-8130U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i3-8130U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-8130U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the mid-range laptop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,4GHz. The second is used on the thin and light laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i3-8130U | AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Mid-range laptop | Thin and light laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Kaby Lake | Zen | ||||||
| Core name | Kaby Lake Refresh | Raven Ridge | ||||||
| Family | Core i3-8000 | Ryzen 3 2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FJ8067703282227, SR3W0 |
YM2200C4T2OFB | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2018 | Q1 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm+ | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 4. 940.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,2 GHz | 2,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,4 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2400 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 37,5 GB/s | 35,76 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake) | AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Raven) | ||||||
| GPU cores | — | 3 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 441,6 GFLOPS | 684 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1356 | FP5 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 336 | 329 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 969 | 1. 007 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 140 | 120 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 296 | 310 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.953 | 1.684 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3.660 | 3.681 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.582 | 3.051 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
6.869 | 5.968 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
116,4 GFLOPS | 69,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
458 pts / W | 398 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
329 1.007 |
| Intel Core i3-8130U |
336 969 |
In single core, the difference is 2%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
120 310 |
| Intel Core i3-8130U |
140 296 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
1.684 3.681 |
| Intel Core i3-8130U |
1.953 3.660 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8130U |
3.582 6.869 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
3.051 5.968 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
3. 6.475 |
| Intel Core i3-8130U |
3.779 6.446 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-8130U |
3.684 7.590 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200U |
3.017 6.345 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.