Intel Core i5 8250U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2300U: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 8250U
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
We compared two 4-core laptop CPUs: the 1.6 GHz Intel Core i5 8250U against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen 3 2300U. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 8250U
40
Ryzen 3 2300U
36
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 8250U
13
Ryzen 3 2300U
12
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 8250U
58
Ryzen 3 2300U
58
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 8250U
32
Ryzen 3 2300U
32
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2300U and 8250U
Advantages of Intel Core i5 8250U
- Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size
- 23% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 860 vs 697 points
- Around 1.
74 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+2%
899
Ryzen 3 2300U
881
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+17%
3076
Ryzen 3 2300U
2626
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+9%
1906
Ryzen 3 2300U
1750
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+6%
5843
Ryzen 3 2300U
5507
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+23%
852
Ryzen 3 2300U
690
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+17%
2837
Ryzen 3 2300U
2429
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8250U and AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | August 21, 2017 | January 8, 2018 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake R | Raven Ridge |
| Model number | i5-8250U | — |
| Socket | BGA-1356 | FP5 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon Vega 6 |
Performance
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base Frequency | 1. 6 GHz |
2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 16x | 20x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Transistors | — | 4.9 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Radeon Vega 6 |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 24 | 6 |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
| Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 8250U
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 3 2300U
0.85 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2400 |
| Memory Size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 35.76 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 8250U official page | AMD Ryzen 3 2300U official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 8250U
0 (0%)
Ryzen 3 2300U
2 (100%)
Total votes: 2
ompetitors
1.
Ryzen 5 3500U or Core i5 8250U
2.
Core i3 1115G4 or Core i5 8250U
3.
Core i7 11800H or Core i5 8250U
4.
Apple M1 or Core i5 8250U
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 2300U or Intel Core i5 8250U?
Name
Message
Promotion
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U vs Intel Core i5-8250U
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U vs Intel Core i5-8250U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 2300U on one side and the Intel Core i5-8250U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the thin and light laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,4GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz.
The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | Intel Core i5-8250U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Thin and light laptop | Notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen | Kaby Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Raven Ridge | Kaby Lake Refresh | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 3 2000 | Core i5-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YM2300C4T4MFB | FJ8067703282221, SR3LA |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2018 | Q3 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm+ | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 940.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,0 GHz | 1,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,4 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 35,76 GB/s | 37,5 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 6 (Raven) | Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 776,4 GFLOPS | 441,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP5 | BGA1356 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 322 | 381 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 556 | 1. 979 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 80 | 146 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 420 | 538 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.722 | 1.931 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 5.451 | 5.930 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.073 | 3.718 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
8.180 | 11.054 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
138,5 GFLOPS | 163,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
545 pts / W | 737 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 3 2300U was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
381 1.  979 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300U |
322 556 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 256%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
146 538 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300U |
80 420 |
In single core, the difference is 83%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
1.931 5.930 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300U |
1.722 5.451 |
In single core, the difference is 12%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
3.718 11.054 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300U |
3.073 8.180 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
3.735 8.808 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 2300U |
3.428 8.736 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.