AMD FX-8300 vs Ryzen 5 1600
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
YD1600BBAEBOX
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 458,667 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
405,849 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 65% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 65%
Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 320th / 1368
Gaming 72% Battleship |
Desktop 74% Battleship |
Workstation 65% Battle cruiser |
52,818 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4. 25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 49% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 49%
Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 555th / 1368
Gaming 59% Gunboat |
Desktop 62% Destroyer |
Workstation 45% Yacht |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
71.7 % | Faster effective speed. +21% |
59.2 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
72.7 Pts | 81.3 Pts | Lower memory latency. +12% |
|||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
105 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +68% |
62.5 Pts | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
204 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +77% |
115 Pts | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
381 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +88% |
203 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
623 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +97% |
316 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
79. 6 Pts | 90.4 Pts | Lower OC memory latency. +14% |
|||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
115 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. +56% |
73.7 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
227 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +64% |
138 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
431 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. +73% |
249 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
704 Pts | Much faster OC octa-core speed. +75% |
402 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 56,303,280 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.15 % | Hugely higher market share. +650% |
0.02 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
79.7 % | Better value. +17% |
68 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
72 % | Much more popular. +33% |
54 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$190 | $168 | Cheaper. +12% |
Age Newest |
66 Months | Much more recent. +35% |
102+ Months | |||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
920 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +127% |
406 Pts | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
806 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +151% |
321 Pts |
ADVERTISEMENT
The Ryzen 5 1600 is one of four new Ryzen 5 processors released this month. Based on the AMD Zen architecture, which is comparable to Intel in terms of IPC, the Ryzen 5 1600 has six cores which is more than the vast majority of games are able to use (most games cannot use more than four cores). Ryzen 5 CPUs offer gamers better value for money than the eight core Ryzen 7 models released last month. With six cores the 1600 is approximately 75% better at multi-threaded tasks than Intel’s quad core i5 flagship – the similarly priced i5-7600K, the 1600 however, has 25% lower single and 33% lower quad core scores. The 1600 has stock base/boost clock speeds of 3.2/3.6 GHz and its price tag of $219 includes a cooler. Assuming a modest overclock of 10% brings the 1600 within striking range of the 1600X which is the Ryzen 5 flagship. The 1600X sports stock base/boost clocks of 3.6/4.0 GHz but costs $30 more than the 1600 and ships without a cooler included in the box. The Ryzen 5 1600 is the best value for money six core CPU we have seen to date. [Apr ’17 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Right now it is outdated so much, but if you find super cheap one why not using it. Also even little overclocking helps a lot. [Apr ’22 leonkennedy35]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (645)
- MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) (592)
- Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING (477)
- Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF (449)
- MSI B350 PC MATE (MS-7A34) (314)
- Asrock AB350 Pro4 (303)
- MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) (267)
- Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (149)
- Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (134)
- Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (130)
- MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (90)
- Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6. 0 (71)
- Asus M51BC (65)
- Asus M5A97 R2.0 (64)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD FX-8300
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
187%
-
AMD FX-8300
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
158%
-
AMD FX-8300
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
216%
-
AMD FX-8300
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 58% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 116% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Around 87% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-8300 |
None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
3DNow! | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSE4A | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
CnQ | ||||
NX bit | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
SMT | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 1 | ||||
SSE4.2 | ||||
SSE4a | ||||
AES | ||||
AVX | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
CVT16 | ||||
EVP | ||||
FMA4 | ||||
XOP | ||||
Turbo Core | ||||
HT3.1 |
Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Zen | vs | AMD Piledriver | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
Codename | Zen | vs | Vishera | |
Release Date | Apr 2017 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 8 | |
Threads | 12 | vs | 8 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 384 KB | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 8192 KB | |
L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA | |
Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 315mm² | |
Process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3200 MHz | vs | 3300 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 3600 MHz | vs | 3900 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | |
Voltage | unknown | vs | 1. 425 V | |
TDP | 65 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
3960 points
-
AMD FX-8300
2379 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
25766 points
-
AMD FX-8300
13205 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Intel Core i5-11400 |
VS | ||
AMD FX-8300 | AMD Ryzen 5 3580U |
VS | ||
AMD FX-8300 | Intel Core i7-10710U |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-11800H | Intel Core i7-11700F |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-11700F | Intel Core i7-11700 |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.