Amd ryzen 5 3600 vs 1600: Please click the green button to continue.

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1060 6GB Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1060 6GB with

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Just Cause 4

GTX 1060 6GB with

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 3600

Multi-Thread Performance

12265 Pts

19634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1821 Pts

2900 Pts

Just Cause 4

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1060 6GB — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 3600

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	47. 0 FPS
1080p	58.6 FPS
1440p	34.7 FPS
1440p	41.1 FPS
2160p	18.1 FPS
2160p	21.4 FPS
w1440p	28.2 FPS
w1440p	33.4 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	82.9 FPS
1080p	100. 2 FPS
1440p	63.9 FPS
1440p	73.9 FPS
2160p	36.3 FPS
2160p	42.0 FPS
w1440p	53.4 FPS
w1440p	61.8 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	118.9 FPS
1080p	141.7 FPS
1440p	93. 0 FPS
1440p	106.7 FPS
2160p	54.4 FPS
2160p	62.5 FPS
w1440p	78.5 FPS
w1440p	90.2 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	190.7 FPS
1080p	224.8 FPS
1440p	151.3 FPS
1440p	172. 3 FPS
2160p	90.7 FPS
2160p	103.7 FPS
w1440p	128.8 FPS
w1440p	146.9 FPS

Ryzen 5 1600

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600
Codename	Zen	Zen 2
Generation	Ryzen 5 (Zen)	Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	DDR4
Part#	YD1600BBM6IAEYD1600BBAEBOX	unknown
Production Status	Active	Active
Released	Apr 2017	Jul 2019

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600
Cache L1	96K (per core)	96K (per core)
Cache L2	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Cache L3	16MB (shared)	32MB (shared)

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600
# of Cores	6	6
# of Threads	12	12
Integrated Graphics	N/A	N/A
SMP # CPUs	1	1

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3. 2 GHz	3.6 GHz
Multiplier	32.0x	36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	Yes	Yes
TDP	65 W	65 W
Turbo Clock	up to 3.6 GHz	up to 4.2 GHz
Voltage	unknown	variable

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical

	Ryzen 5 1600	Ryzen 5 3600
Die Size	192 mm²	unknown
Foundry	GlobalFoundries	TSMC
Package	µPGA
Process Size	14 nm	7 nm
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	AMD Socket AM4
Transistors	4800 million	4,800 million
tCaseMax	unknown	unknown

Share Your Comments 0

Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity

2016

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Hitman

2016

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016

The Division

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

DiRT Rally

2015

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

The Witcher 3

2015

Total War: Attila

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Civilization: Beyond Earth

2014

Dragon Age: Inquisition

2014

Far Cry 4

2014

GRID Autosport

2014

Shadow of Mordor

2014

The Talos Principle

2014

Thief

2014

Battlefield 4

2013

Bioshock Infinite

2013

Company of Heroes 2

2013

Crysis 3

2013

GRID 2

2013

Metro: Last Light

2013

Total War: Rome 2

2013

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Crysis: Warhead

2008

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Summary

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

139%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600

100%

Relative performance

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

140%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600

100%

Relative performance

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

138%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600

100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Much higher single threaded performance (around 40% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 38% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).

Around 39% higher average synthetic performance.

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 1600

None

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

AMD Ryzen 5 3600			AMD Ryzen 5 1600
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
3DNow!
CnQ
NX bit

Architecture

	AMD Ryzen 5 3600		AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Architecture	AMD Zen 2	vs	AMD Zen
Market	Desktop	vs	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	vs	DDR4
Codename	Zen 2	vs	Zen
Release Date	Mar 2019	vs	Apr 2017

Cores

	AMD Ryzen 5 3600		AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Cores	6	vs	6
Threads	12	vs	12
SMPs	1	vs	1
Integrated Graphics	No	vs	No

Cache

	AMD Ryzen 5 3600		AMD Ryzen 5 1600
L1 Cache	96K (per core)	vs	128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	vs	512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache	16MB (shared)	vs	16384 KB (shared)

Physical

	AMD Ryzen 5 3600		AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Socket	AMD Socket AM4	vs	AMD Socket AM4
Max Case Temp	unknown	vs	unknown
Package		vs	uPGA
Die Size	unknown	vs	192mmÂ²
Process	7 nm	vs	14 nm

Performance

	AMD Ryzen 5 3600		AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Cpu Frequency	3600 MHz	vs	3200 MHz
Turbo Clock	4400 MHz	vs	3600 MHz
Base Clock	100 MHz	vs	100 MHz
Voltage	variable	vs	unknown
TDP	65 W	vs	65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

4928 points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600

3960 points

Points — higher is better

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

29514 points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600

25766 points

Points — higher is better

points — higher is better

	VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	VS	Intel Core i7-11800H

	VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600	VS	Intel Core i7-11700F

	VS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600	VS	AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

	VS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600	VS	Intel Core i5-11400

	VS
Intel Core i5-12600K	VS	Intel Core i5-12600KF

	VS
Intel Core i5-12600KF	VS	AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Page not found

We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/ryzen-5-1600-protiv-ryzen-5-3600%23technologies

Popular processors

EPYC
9654

Ryzen 5
5500U

Core i3
1115G4

Core i5
12400F

Core i5
1135G7

Ryzen 5
3600

How does the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 compare to regular $200 processors? • Okie Doki

In 2017, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was a popular choice among PC enthusiasts due to its incredible price-performance ratio for gaming and workloads. Not only did AMD’s offering outperform Intel’s rival Kaby Lake line, it also redefined what value processors should be in the long run.

With significant improvements in microprocessor architecture over the past five years, the Ryzen 5 1600 is now more of an entry-level option. In any case, how does it compare to the conventional processors released by AMD and Intel in 2022? Let’s find out!

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Specifications and Overview

In terms of compute, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen microarchitecture and built using GlobalFoundries’ 14nm manufacturing node. With a base clock of 3.2 GHz and a maximum clock of 3.6 GHz, the Ryzen 5 1600 is priced at 219dollars had to compete with the Intel Core i5-7500 and i5-7600K.

Unlike its «X» SKU, the Ryzen 5 1600 has a TDP (thermal power rating) of just 65W and comes bundled with a 95W AMD Wraith Spire cooler capable of overclocking this processor well above its stock frequency. However, both options benefit from 16MB of L3 cache and support for XFR (extended frequency range), a feature that uses AMD’s SenseMI technology to boost core clock speeds based on available thermal headroom.

Windows apps, mobile apps, games — EVERYTHING FOR FREE, in our private telegram channel — Subscribe 🙂

In addition, one of the main advantages of the Ryzen 5 1600 over its direct competitors was the inclusion of an unlocked ratio multiplier. Paired with a low-cost but powerful B350 motherboard and high-speed DDR4 memory, the overclocked Ryzen 5 1600 matched Intel’s per-core performance and was a tough competitor to its own lineup.

Despite apparent issues with memory compatibility and power management modes at launch, the Ryzen 5 1600 has become an exceptional value for budget-conscious gamers and content creators. Following its success, AMD has continued to expand its Ryzen 5 processor lineup by releasing affordable mainstream CPUs with generation after generation upgrades each year thereafter.

While similarly priced 1600 alternatives such as the Ryzen 5 2600, 3600, and 5600 delivered significant performance and efficiency gains over their predecessors, the same cannot be said for AMD’s Zen 4 processors, specifically the Ryzen 5 7600X. Architectural improvements aside, when you factor in the cost of moving to an entirely new platform, the 7600X’s value proposition seems a little underwhelming compared to expensive AM5 motherboards and DDR5 memory kits.

On the other hand, mainstream Intel processors such as the Core i5-12400 and i5-12600K show how competitive pricing can affect the average consumer. Also, when comparing 12th generation Intel Alder Lake processors with AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, it becomes clear that Ryzen has the edge in terms of platform compatibility, while Alder Lake’s dominance lies in its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory configurations.

However, when we compare the Ryzen 5 1600 to $200 current-gen products like the Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i5-12400, it’s interesting to see how far CPU architecture has come in the last few years. Take a look at their specs below to better understand the design philosophy behind each of these mid-range chips.

Specs

Ryzen 5 1600

Ryzen 5 5600

Core i5-12400

Cores/Threads

6/12

9000 2 6/12

6/12

Base/boost clock

3 .2GHz/3.6GHz

3.5GHz/4.4GHz

2.5GHz/4.4GHz

L3 cache size

16MB

32MB

18MB

TDP default

65 W

Lithography

14 nm

7 nm

10 nm

Connector type System memory type

DDR4

DDR4/DDR5

Maximum memory speed

Up to DDR4-2667

Up to DDR4-3200

Up to DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800

Memory channels

Integrated graphics

None

None 9Yes

Yes

Included Cooler

AMD Ghost Spire

AMD Ghost Stealth

Intel Laminar RM1

Launch Date

Q2’17

Q2’22

Q1’22

MSRP

219$

$199 $

Ryzen 5 1600 vs.

Ryzen 5 5600 vs. Core i5-12400: synthetic benchmarks

To determine the relative performance of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs. Ryzen 5 5 600 and Core i5-12400, we decided test them with several free test programs for Windows.

As for the test configuration, both AMD processors were paired with an MSI B450 TOMAHAWK motherboard, 16GB (2×8) G.Skill Flare X DDR4-3200 CL14 RAM, and an ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GPU. Meanwhile, an MSI MAG B660 TOMAHAWK motherboard with the same GPU and memory configuration was used on Intel’s test bench.

Since Ryzen 5 1600 is not natively supported on the latest version of Windows 11, we ran all tests by installing a fresh copy of Windows 10 Pro (version 21h3) on a WD_Black SN850 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD. So, without further ado, let’s get straight to the test results!

Applications

Ryzen 5 1600

Ryzen 5 5600

Core i5-12400

Cinebench R23 (Single Core)

892 900 05

1476

1664

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

6468

11126

12342

Geekbench 5 (single core)

902

1552

1636

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

5235

7895

8054

CPU-Z (single thread)

398

600

659

0005

Benchmark Open Data Benchmark (average score)

106. 14

166.69

175.92

7-zip Zip (decompression rating)

52.608 GIPS

54694 GIPS

40.522 GIPS

In CPU-intensive benchmarks such as Cinbench R23 and Geekbench 5, the Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i5-12400 outperformed AMD’s Summit Ridge processor by a wide margin. While Blender’s Ryzen 5 1600 rating seems good enough for daily workloads, creative pros might want to get their hands on a brand new Zen 3 or Alder Lake chip, especially if they’re looking to cut render times.

A similar pattern can be seen in 7-Zip’s File Compression test, where the Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i5-12400 showed significant performance gains of around 50-80% over the old Zen microarchitecture. While the i5-12400’s decompression rating is lower than any of the Ryzen processors, the former makes up for it purely in terms of compression and decompression speed.

Ryzen 5 1600, Ryzen 5 5600, Core i5-12400 Gaming Benchmarks

Now, one of the major weaknesses of 1st Gen AMD Ryzen processors has been their poor performance in single-threaded applications. In games that rely heavily on single-core performance, even the overclocked Ryzen 5 1600 couldn’t match or beat the Intel Core i5-7500 and 7600K in average frame rates.

To make sure the Ryzen 5 1600 can match the 5600 and Core i5-12400 in modern AAA games, we chose the same test rig by pairing all three processors with Nvidia’s RTX 3060 GPU. In addition, the testing methodology included running five of the most popular but demanding AAA games at 1080p and Ultra settings to create a more realistic load on both the CPU and GPU.

Games

Ryzen 5 1600

Ryzen 5 5600

Core i5 12400

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla (Ultra High, DX12)

45fps

56fps

59fps

Cyberpan to 2077 (Ultra, DX12)

43fps

56 fps

57 fps

Red Dead Redemption 2 (quality preference, Volcano)

47 fps

59 fps

61 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (high, DX12)

86 fps

109 fps

119 fps

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (High/Very High, DX9)

292 fps

390 frames per second

393 frames per second

In all of our gaming benchmarks, it’s clear that the Ryzen 5 1600 is struggling to maintain consistent frame rates compared to any of the current generation processors. For example, in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, both Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i5-12400 were at least 20-30% faster than Ryzen 5 1600, with similar performance gains in Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

While the Shadow of the Tomb Raider in-game benchmark performs well for the Ryzen 5 1600 at an average of 86fps, it falls far short of the performance of the newer Zen 3 or Alder Lake chip. Meanwhile, CS:GO puts the Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i5-12400 in completely different territory as they deliver about 100 more frames than the average Ryzen 5 1600 FPS.

For gamers with a high refresh rate display, upgrade to Ryzen 5 The 5600 or Core i5-12400 seems to be the better option as both processors will help keep your gaming experience smooth across the board. However, if you have a Ryzen 5 1600 and want to make the most of its stock gaming performance, consider investing in a FreeSync monitor that can use Nvidia’s Adaptive-Sync technology over a wide VRR range.

Ryzen 5 1600 still relevant in 2023?

Given that the Ryzen 5 5600 and Core i5-12400 are generic, mainstream chips released in 2022, the AMD Summit Ridge processor can no longer be considered a viable option for 2023.