Intel Core i7 8700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.2 GHz Intel Core i7 8700 with 6-cores against the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 5800X with 8-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 8700
64
Ryzen 7 5800X
84
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 8700
37
Ryzen 7 5800X
73
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 8700
44
Ryzen 7 5800X
64
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 8700
49
Ryzen 7 5800X
77
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 5800X and 8700
Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than the Ryzen 7 5800X – 65 vs 105 Watt
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Has 20 MB larger L3 cache size
- Newer — released 3-years and 1-month later
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- 39% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1626 vs 1172 points
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.
0
- Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.7 GHz vs 4.6 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700
1230
Ryzen 7 5800X
+30%
1603
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700
7188
Ryzen 7 5800X
+114%
15348
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700
2667
Ryzen 7 5800X
+31%
3490
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700
13121
Ryzen 7 5800X
+117%
28517
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700
1183
Ryzen 7 5800X
+38%
1628
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700
6270
Ryzen 7 5800X
+69%
10626
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700 and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | October 5, 2017 | October 8, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Vermeer |
| Model number | i7-8700 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 2 GHz |
3.8 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 32x | 38x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 105 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 90°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 7 5800X
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 8700 official page | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
— |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 8700
0 (0%)
Ryzen 7 5800X
9 (100%)
Total votes: 9
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i7 8700 or Intel Core i7 12700K
2.
Intel Core i7 8700 or Intel Core i5 12400F
3.
Intel Core i7 8700 or Intel Core i3 12100
4.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or Apple M1 Max
5.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or Apple M1 Pro
6.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
7.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or Intel Core i5 12600K
8.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or AMD Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i7-8700
Availability
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy on Amazon
$269.
99
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy on Amazon
$339.99
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
-
Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone than Core i7-8700 — 201 vs 188 FPS
-
Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-8700 — $269.99 vs $339.99
-
Up to 26% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone than Core i7-8700 — $1.34 vs $1.81 per FPS
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 — 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
Call of Duty: Warzone
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.
34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
188
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
74%
Price, $
$339.99
79%
Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
1252
FPS
1046
FPS
League of Legends
349
FPS
286
FPS
Apex Legends
316
FPS
261
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
550
FPS
456
FPS
VALORANT
1662
FPS
1395
FPS
Minecraft
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Single-Core
1671
100%
Multi-Core
10337
100%
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1155
55%
Multi-Core
5811
22%
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
vs |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
|---|---|---|
|
Nov 5th, 2020 |
Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
8 |
Cores | 6 |
|
16 |
Threads | 12 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
|
4.7 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP |
65 W |
|
7 nm |
Process Size | 14 nm |
|
38.0x |
Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
|
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
8 GHzBuilds Using Ryzen 7 5800X or Core i7-8700
Call of Duty: Warzone, 1080p, High
Skytech Prism II Gaming PC
188 FPS
$10.64/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,999.99
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Velztorm Galax CTO SFF Gaming Desktop PC
137 FPS
$13.35/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Ryzen 7 5800X
32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,829
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
ROG Strix GA15DK Gaming Desktop PC
165 FPS
$9.
03/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,489.99
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC
201 FPS
$12.94/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Ryzen 7 5800X
64 GB, 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,599.99
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
HP OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
188 FPS
$9.84/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,849
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
HP OMEN Gaming Premium Desktop PC
188 FPS
$7.98/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Velztorm Galax CTO SFF Gaming Desktop PC
154 FPS
$12.85/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 7 5800X
32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,979
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
HP OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
188 FPS
$9.
84/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,849
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC
199 FPS
$11.81/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Ryzen 7 5800X
64 GB, 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,349.99
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Thermaltake LCGS View 390 AIO Liquid Cooled CPU Gaming PC
201 FPS
$40.74/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$8,188.54
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Ryzen 5 5600X
$193.89
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 5 3600
$137.95
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.
99
Ryzen 9 5900X
$398.99
Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 5 3600X
Core i5-12600K
$277.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Core i7-6700K
Ryzen 7 5800X
$269.99
Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H vs Intel Core i7-8700
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H vs Intel Core i7-8700
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H on one side and the Intel Core i7-8700 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the ultrabook sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,4GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,6 GHz.
The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | Intel Core i7-8700 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Ultrabook | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen 3 | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Cezanne | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 7 5000 | Core i7-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | 100-000000295 | BX80684I78700, BXC80684I78700, CM8068403358316, BOC80684I78700, BO80684I78700, SR3QS |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2021 | Q4 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 1. 800.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,4 GHz | 4,6 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 | DDR4-2666 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 68,27 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 45 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | — | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 184 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 400 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 2000 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1. 792 GFLOPS |
423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP6 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 105°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | Advanced Encryption Standard instructions | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection |
Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
||||||
| Max display resolution | — | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1. 406 |
1.151 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 12.176 | 8.956 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 3.095 | 2.665 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 21.632 | 13.082 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
6.159 | 5.288 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
30.890 | 23.378 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.376 | 1.174 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
7.197 | 5. 116 |
||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
453,5 GFLOPS | 406,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
686 pts / W | 360 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-8700 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
1.406 12.176 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
1.151 8.956 |
In single core, the difference is 22%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
3.095 21.632 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
2.665 13.  082 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 65%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
6.159 30.890 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
5.288 23.378 |
In single core, the difference is 16%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
1.376 7.197 |
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
1.  1745.116 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 41%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700 |
1.155 4.060 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
1.220 3.637 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.
Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-8700 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 5800AMD Ryzen 7 5800GAMD Ryzen 7 5800HSAMD Ryzen 7 5800UAMD Ryzen 7 5800XAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Intel Core i7-870Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706G
Intel Core i7 8700 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Which is better: Intel Core i7 8700 at 3.2 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.6) or AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.2)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 8700
64
Ryzen 5 3600
66
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Core i7 8700
37
RYZEN 5 3600
47
Energy efficiency
Energy consumption chip
Core i7 8700
44
RYZEN 5 3600
RITING NANEVIEW
Core i7 8700
49
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3600 and 8700
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 10% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.
6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- New competitor 1 year and 901 later than standard 901 PCI Express — 4.0
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 8700
1230
Ryzen 5 3600
+6%
1304
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700
7188
Ryzen 5 3600
+33%
9562
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 8700
+3%
2667
Ryzen 5 3600
2589
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 8700
13121
3 Ryzen 5
+37%
17944
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 8700
1183
Ryzen 5 3600
+6%
1257
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700
6270
Ryzen 5 3600
+14%
7154
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 8700 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | October 5, 2017 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| Model number | i7-8700 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3. 2 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 32x | 36x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700
0.38 teraflops
Ryzen 5 3600
n/a
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Site Intel Core i7 8700 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 website | |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 8700
34 (29.
6%)
Ryzen 5 3600
81 (70.4%)
Total votes: 115
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 12600K vs i7 8700
2.
Intel Core i7 12700KF vs i7 8700
3.
Intel Core i3 12100F vs i7 8700
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U vs Ryzen 5 3600
5.
Apple M1 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
6.
Intel Core i5 12400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
7.
Intel Core i3 12100F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
8.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500 vs Ryzen 5 3600
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i7 8700?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H vs Intel Core i7-8700: What is the difference?
61 Ballla
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
55 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
Intel Core I7-8700
9000
better than Intel Core i7-8700?
- 20.
83% higher CPU speed?
8 x 2.9GHz vs 6 x 3.2GHz - 1600MHz faster memory speed?
4266MHz vs 2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16 vs 12 - Smaller 7nm semiconductors?
7nm vs 14nm - 2.5MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 1.5MB - 23.83% higher PassMark result?
19115 vs 15437 - 20W below TDP?
45W vs 65W - 128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB
- 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.6GHz vs 4.2GHz - 4MB more L3 cache?
12MB vs 8MB - 1MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2MB/core vs 1MB/core
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD RYZEN 7 4800H
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
VS 9000 VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Intel Core i7-8700
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
VS
Intel Core i7-10750h
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Apple M1
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
VS
Intel Core i7-1165g7
Intel Core
.
0002
VS
Intel Core i7-8700k
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600h
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core I7-6700
AMD Ry vs
Intel Core i5-11400H
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i7-8700T
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
VS
Intel Core i5-12500h
Intel Core i7-8700
VS 9000 VS
AMD Ry 3600
AMD RYZEN 7 4800H
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800h
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD RYZEN 7 4800H
VS 9000 VS
VS
AMD Ry Intel Core i7-8700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
VS
Intel Core i5-10300h
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel
COMPLESS Users
General rating
AMD RYZEN 7 4800H
7 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 4800h
/10
003
0 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-8700
0.0 /10
0 Reviews of Users
Functions
The cost and quality ratio
/10 9000 9000 7 VOTES
reviews still no reviews
Games
10.
0 /10
7 Votes
reviews yet not
performance
10.0 /10
7 Votes
reviews yet there is no
Reliability
9.7 /10
7 Votes
reviews yet there are no
Energy efficiency
10.0 /10
7 Votes
reviews so far
9000 2 reviews are still not 9000
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 2.9GHz
6 x 3.2GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.2GHz
4.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✖Intel Core i7-8700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
4266MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
68.3GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✖Intel Core i7-8700
The memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1.
PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor.
(Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
207.84seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
637.97seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✔Intel Core i7-8700
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✔Intel Core i7-8700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✔Intel Core i7-8700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✔Intel Core i7-8700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
✖Intel Core i7-8700
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i7-8700 vs.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i7-8700 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to socket CPU LGA 1151-2 This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X runs with 8 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.40 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM4 This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C. In particular, the Matisse (Zen 2) architecture is advanced beyond 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q3/2019
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
60 GHz Intel UHD Graphics 630
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS.
GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula.