Amd single core e 240: AMD E-240 Notebook Processor — NotebookCheck.net Tech

AMD E-240 vs. Intel Xeon W-2225

AMD E-240

The AMD E-240 operates with 1 cores and 1 CPU threads. It run at — base — all cores while the TDP is set at 18 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2011

Intel Xeon W-2225

The Intel Xeon W-2225 operates with 4 cores and 1 CPU threads. It run at 4.60 GHz base 4.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2066 CPU socket. This version includes 8.25 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake W Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2019

AMD E-240

Intel Xeon W-2225

Compare Detail

1.50 GHz	Frequency	4.10 GHz
1	Cores	4
—	Turbo (1 Core)	4.60 GHz
—	Turbo (All Cores)	4.60 GHz
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking	No
normal	Core Architecture	normal
AMD Radeon HD 6310	GPU	no iGPU
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
32 nm	Technology	14 nm
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
11	DirectX Version
2	Max. displays
DDR3-1066	Memory	DDR4-2933
1	Memory channels	4
	Max memory
No	ECC	Yes
—	L2 Cache	—
1. 00 MB	L3 Cache	8.25 MB
	PCIe version	3.0
	PCIe lanes	48
32 nm	Technology	14 nm
BGA 413	Socket	LGA 2066
18 W	TDP	105 W
AMD-V	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q1/2011	Release date	Q4/2019
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD E-240		Intel Xeon W-2225
18 W	Max TDP	105 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

AMD E-240 Review — CPUAgent

The E-240 is one of AMD’s low-power Laptop processors. It was released in 2011 with 1 cores and 1 threads. With base clock at 1.5GHz, max speed at 1.5GHz, and a 18W power rating. The E-240 is based on the Zacate 40nm family and is part of the E series.

AMD’s Bobcat series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we’ve ever seen. As a result, Intel’s commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven’t seen in over a decade.

As we’ve seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel’s processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.

The AMD E-240 is essentially the best processor for most people. It won’t overpower the E-300, especially in multi-threaded workloads, but it’s so much more affordable and needs less robust cooling. Most people will find a lot to love with the E-240, and we’re sure the inevitable processor deals will only help.

So which should you buy? Let’s get that out of the way. Before this comparison review we updated our Best CPU feature and we said you should go with the Pentium B940 as it comes with a better stock cooler, can be overclocked, and the PGA988 platform offers a significantly better upgrade path.

When it comes to gaming it’s fair to say there’s no wrong option here and the Pentium B940 and E-240 are evenly matched. The E-240 is at times faster thanks to better game support and lower latencies, but the Pentium B940 is often able to ensure smoother frame rates thanks to its support for twice as many threads.

If you’re mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the Intel chip if you don’t tune up the Pentium processor. The base performance we showed for the E-240 can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Pentium B940 will require $110 — $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.

One of the nice things about the AMD E-240 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD E-240 up for $189.86 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.

The AMD E-240 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 18W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.

That said, AMD still lags behind in frequency when the Pentium B950 operates at 2.1GHz at any given moment and 2.1GHz when push comes to shove.

The E-240 clocks up to 1.5Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 1.6GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.

Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD E-240.

AMD E-240 — processor overview. Tests and Specs

The AMD E-240 processor is based on a 40 nm process and the Zacate architecture. The base clock is 1.50 GHz and the maximum turbo clock is No turbo. AMD E-240 contains 1 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check your motherboard socket compatibility before choosing. nine0003

0.0
From 1
Hitesti Score

TOP 10 processors

General information

AMD E-240 base and maximum clock speed, number of processor cores and threads. The more the better (marked in green).

CPU cores, base and turbo frequencies

The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of processor cores and threads, as well as the clock speed in standard mode and turbo. The more GHz, cores and L2-L3 cache a processor has, the better. Please note that high specs require a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check the VRM on the motherboard). nine0003

nine0056 1

nine0056 Number of threads:

nine0056 Acceleration:

nine0066

Clock frequency:	1.50 GHz	Number of cores:
Turbo (1 core):	No turbo	1
Hyper trading:	No.	No.
Turbo (1 Cores):	No turbo

Internal graphics

Some manufacturers (most often Intel) supplement processors with graphics chips, such a solution is especially popular in laptops, but ineffective in workstations and gaming stations. The higher the clock speed of the video card and the more memory on board, the better.

nine0066

nine0056 DirectX version:

nine0056 Number of shaders:

nine0056

nine0056 40 nm

nine0066

GPU name:		AMD Radeon HD 6310
GPU frequency:	0.49 GHz		GPU (Turbo):	No turbo
Generation:	3		11
Execution units:	1		80
Maximum memory:	1GB	Number of monitors:	2
Technology:		Release date:	Q4/2010

Hardware codec support

Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

nine0066

h364:		Decode
JPEG:		Decode/Encode
h365 8bit:		No.
h365 10bit:		No.
VP8:		No.
VP9:		No.
VC-1:		Decode
AVC:		Decode

RAM and PCIe

These are the memory standards supported by processors. The higher the standard and clock frequency with the amount of RAM, the better the performance and speed of the processor. It is also worth considering the possibility of memory operation in multichannel mode. nine0003

nine0066

Memory type:	DDR3-1066		Memory channels:	1
ECC:	No.

Encryption

Data encryption support

AES-NI:

Yes

nine0046 Thermal management and TDP

nine0056 Maximum temperature:

TDP:	18W		—
Maximum TDP:	—		TDP down:	—

Technical details

These are key parameters that will help you determine which processor is best. Pay special attention to the release date, the technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers) and the third level (L3) cache. nine0003

nine0056 Virtualization:

nine0056 Release date:

L3-Cache:		Technology:	40nm
Architecture:	Zacate	AMD-V
Socket:	BGA 413	Q1/2011

Devices compatible with this processor

You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

nine0108 Unknown

Used in:

Cinebench R11.5 conducts simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD

processor

Intel Atom D2500
2x 1.86 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

Intel Atom E3815
1x 1. 46 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-240
1x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results

Intel Atom D2700
2x 2.13 GHz (No turbo) HT

nine0003

AMD E1-2100
2x 1. 00 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-240
1x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

AMD E1-1200
2x 1.40 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Pentium D1507
2x 1.20 GHz (1.20 GHz)

nine0003

Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the

processor

Intel Celeron N4000
2x 1.10 GHz (2.60 GHz)

nine0003

Intel Atom E3815
1x 1.46 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-240
1x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.

Intel Atom D2500
2x 1.86 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

Intel Atom E3815
1x 1.46 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-240
1x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

AMD C-30
1x 1. 20 GHz (No turbo)

AMD G-T52R
1x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32

Intel Pentium 2129Y
2x 1.10 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

AMD E-450
2x 1. 65 GHz (No turbo)

AMD E-240
1x 1.50 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

Intel Pentium 957
2x 1.20 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Celeron 847
2x 1.10 GHz (No turbo)

nine0003

0. 0
From 1
Hitesti Score

Share on social networks:

In order to leave a review, you need to login

Review AMD E-240

Compare AMD E-240

AMD E-240 — CPU Specs and Benchmarks

AMD E-240 runs with 1 and CPU threads 1 It runs on — basic — all cores while TDP is set to 18 W . The processor plugs into the CPU socket BGA 413 This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 1 to support DDR3-1066 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, the Zacate (Bobcat) architecture has been advanced over 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q1/2011

Frequency	1. 50 GHz
CPU cores	1
CPU Threads	1
Turbo (1 core)	—
Turbo (1 cores):	—

nine0066

Hyper Threading	No.
Acceleration	No.
Basic architecture	normal

Where to buy?

Buy AMD E-240

Memory & PCIe

Memory type	DDR3-1066
Maximum memory
Memory channels	1
ECC	No.
Bandwidth	—
PCIe

Encryption

AES-NI

Yes

Internal graphics

Memory type	DDR3-1066
GPU name	AMD Radeon HD 6310
GPU frequency	0. 49 GHz
GPU (Turbo)	No turbo
Generation	3
DirectX version	11
Units	1
Shader	80
Maximum memory	1GB
Max. displays	2
Technology	32 nm
Release date	Q4/2010

Technical details

Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Architecture	Zacate (Bobcat)
L2-Cache	—
L3-Cache
Technology	32 nm
Release date	Q1/2011
Connector	BGA 413

Temperature control

TDP (PL1)	18W
TDP (PL2)	—
TDP Up	—
TDP Down	—
Tjunction max	—

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second. nine0003

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.