AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i5-7400 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A8-7600 vs Intel Core i5-7400
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD A8-7600 | Intel Core i5-7400 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Steamroller | Kaby Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Steamroller | Kaby Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | A8-7000 | Core i5-7000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AD7600YBI44JA, |
CM8067702867050, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2014 | Q1 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm+ | ||||||
| Transistors | 2. 410.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,1 GHz | 3,0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,8 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,1 / 3,8 GHz |
4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,0 / 3,5 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-2133 |
DDR4-2133/2400, |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 38,4 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri) | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 351 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 720 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 553 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 71. 3°C |
100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 208 | 367 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 696 | 1. 451 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 84 | 138 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 291 | 526 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.425 | 2.008 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3.197 | 5.505 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.246 | 4.095 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.812 | 11.600 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
53,86 GFLOPS | 216,7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
89 pts / W | 178 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A8-7600 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-7400 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
367 1.451 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
208 696 |
In single core, the difference is 76%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 108%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
138 526 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
84 291 |
In single core, the difference is 64%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 81%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
2.008 5.505 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
1.425 3.197 |
In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 72%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.095 11.600 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
2.246 5.812 |
In single core, the difference is 82%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 100%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.  49010.779 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
2.236 5.713 |
In single core, the difference is 101%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 89%.
On Mac OS X:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-7400 |
4.450 12.783 |
| AMD A8-7600 |
2.084 5.502 |
In single core, the difference is 114%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 132%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD A8-7600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-7400 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-7400T
Comparison AMD A8-6500 vs Intel Core i5-3470 what is better?
Home / CPU / AMD A8-6500 vs Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A8-6500
3%
DeviceList score
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
31%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of AMD A8-6500 and Intel Core i5-3470 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023 year.
AMD A8-6500 benefits
|
Base frequency |
|
3.5 GGz 0.3 GGz (9.4%) better
vs
3.2 GGz
|
|
Maximum frequency |
|
4.  1 GGz
0.5 GGz (13.9%) better
vs
3.6 GGz
|
|
Price-quality ratio |
|
89.4 % 17.6 % (24.5%) better
vs
71.8 %
|
|
Power Consumption (TDP) |
|
65 Wt -12 Wt (-15.6%) better
vs
77 Wt
|
Intel Core i5-3470 benefits
Winner in comparison
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better
vs
32 nm
|
|
64 bit support |
|
vs
|
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
67 °C -4 °C (-5.
vs
71 °C
|
|
Passmark |
|
4666 1880 (67.5%) better
vs
2786
|
|
AVX |
|
vs
|
6%) better| General information | |
|
Type |
|
| Десктопный | Десктопный |
|
Architecture codename |
|
| Richland | Ivy Bridge |
|
Number of cores A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications.
|
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
Number of threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
Base frequency |
|
| 3.5 GGz
0.3 GGz (9.4%) better
|
3.2 GGz |
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
| 32 nm | 22 nm
-10 nm (-31.2%) better
|
|
Crystal size |
|
| 246 мм2 | 132.8 мм2 |
|
Transistor count |
|
| 1 million | no data |
|
Maximum frequency Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 4.1 GGz
0.5 GGz (13.
|
3.6 GGz |
|
64 bit support |
|
|
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| FM2 | FCLGA1155 |
|
AMD-V |
|
|
Series |
|
| no data | Intel Core i5 (Desktop) |
|
Start price |
|
| no data | 184 USD |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
89. 4 %
17.6 % (24.5%) better
|
71.8 % |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| 71 °C | 67 °C
-4 °C (-5.6%) better
|
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| 2.0 | 3.0 |
|
Secure Key |
|
|
Identity Protection |
|
| no data | + |
|
Quick Sync |
|
| no data | + |
|
HDMI |
|
| + | no data |
|
FMA |
|
| FMA4 | no data |
|
PowerNow |
|
| + | no data |
|
PowerGating |
|
| + | no data |
|
VirusProtect |
|
| + | no data |
|
IOMMU 2. |
|
| + | no data |
|
Number of shader processors |
|
| 256 | no data |
|
Enduro |
|
| + | no data |
|
Switchable graphics |
|
| + | no data |
|
UVD |
|
| + | no data |
|
VCE |
|
| + | no data |
|
FDI |
|
| no data | + |
|
Anti-Theft |
|
| no data | + |
|
L1 Cache More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 192 Кб | 64 Кб (на ядро) |
|
L2 Cache |
|
| 4096 Кб | 256K (на ядро) |
|
L3 Cache |
|
| no data | 6 Мб (всего) |
|
Maximum Case Temperature (tcase) |
|
| 71 °C | 67 °C |
|
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
| 65 Wt
-12 Wt (-15.6%) better
|
77 Wt |
|
EDB |
|
| no data | + |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| no data | + |
|
DisplayPort |
|
| + | no data |
Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
9%) better
0
| Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| 2786 | 4666
1880 (67.
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
| no data | 5006 |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
| no data | 17192 |
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
|
| no data | 9721 |
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
| no data | 6179 |
|
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
|
| no data | 5660 |
5%) better| Technologies and extensions | |
|
Advanced instructions |
|
| no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| no data | 2. 0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
|
AES-NI More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| + | + |
|
AVX The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding
|
|
| RAM parameters | |
|
Supported memory types |
|
| DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 |
|
Maximum memory size The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| no data | 32 Gb |
|
Max memory channels |
|
| 2 | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | |
|
VT-x |
|
|
EPT |
|
|
VT-d Intel’s virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|
| Graphics specifications | |
|
maximum frequency of the graphics core |
|
| no data | 1.10 ГГц |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| no data | 3 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Integrated graphics The presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card. |
|
| + | + |
|
DirectX |
|
| DirectX® 11 | no data |
AMD A8-3850 vs Intel Core i5-3330: comparison
AMD A8-3850
Intel Core i5-3330
VS
AMD A8-3850
Rating: 2 points
WINNER
Intel Core i5-3330
Rating: 4 points
Test results
Technology
Performance
Memory specification 90 003
Interfaces and communications
Key features
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Number of threads
- CPU base clock
- Technological process
PassMark CPU score
AMD A8-3850: 2337
Intel Core i5-3330: 3822
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
AMD A8-3850: 100 W
Intel Core i5-3330: 77 W
Number of threads
AMD A8-3850: 4
Intel Core i5-3330: 4
CPU base clock
AMD A8-3850: 2.
9 GHz
Intel Core i5-3330: 3 GHz
Process
AMD A8-3850: 32 nm
Intel Core i5-3330: 22nm
Description
AMD A8-3850 runs at 2.9Hz, second Intel Core i5-3330 runs at 3Hz. AMD A8-3850 is capable of overclocking to 2.9Hz and the second up to 3.2 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 100W, while that of the Intel Core i5-3330 is 77W.
Regarding the architecture, AMD A8-3850 is based on 32 nm technology. Intel Core i5-3330 on 22 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. AMD A8-3850 can support DDR No data available. Maximum supported size N/A MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 29.8. The second Intel Core i5-3330 processor is capable of supporting DDR3. The throughput is 25.6. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is 32 MB.
Graphics. AMD A8-3850 has a graphics core No data available. The frequency of which is — 600 MHz.
The Intel Core i5-3330 received the Intel HD Graphics 2500 video core. Here the frequency is 650 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the AMD A8-3850 scored 2337. And the Intel Core i5-3330 scored 3822.
Why Intel Core i5-3330 is better than AMD A8-3850
- L1 cache size 512 KB vs. 256 KB, 100% more
- L2 cache size 4 MB vs 1 MB, 300% more
- Max. memory bandwidth 29.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s, 16% more
AMD A8-3850 vs. Intel Core i5-3330 Comparison: Highlights 2 PassMark score CPU
write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
2337
max 104648
Average: 6033.5
3822
max 104648
Average: 6033.5
Benchmark Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 benchmark that measures the multi-threaded performance of a processor.
Show all
1227
max 25920
Average: 5219.
2
2088
max 25920
Average: 5219.2
Benchmark Geekbench 5
377
max 2315
Average: 936.8
634
max 2315
Average: 936.8
Benchmark Cinebench 10 / 32bit (Multi-Core)
9334
max 84673
Average: 1955
max 84673
Average: 1955
3DMark06 score
3942
max 21654
Average: 3892.6
max 21654
Average: 3892.6
Cinebench 10 / 32bit test score (Single-Core)
2593
max 24400
Average: 3557.7
max 24400
Average: 3557.7
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)
3
max 70
Mean: 5.3
max 70
Mean: 5.
3
Supports hardware virtualization technology
Hardware virtualization makes it much easier to achieve high image quality.
Full text
Yes
Yes
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
Large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in CPU and system performance tuning
Show all
512KB
max 6144
Average: 299.3 KB
256KB
max 6144
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 Cache Size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
4MB
max 512
Average: 4.
5 MB
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
2.9GHz
max 5.7
Average: 3.2 GHz
3.2GHz
max 5.7
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
The number of processor cores indicates the number of independent computing units that can execute tasks in parallel. More cores allow the processor to handle more tasks at once, which improves overall performance and the ability to handle multi-threaded applications.
Show all
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
2.9GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
3 GHz
max 4.
7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Crystal size
228
max 513
Mean value:
133
max 513
Mean value:
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
29.8GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
25.6GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
OpenCL version
Newer version of OpenCL means more features, improved performance and compatibility with the latest applications using OpenCL
Show all
1.2
max 4.6
Mean: 4.1
max 4.6
Mean: 4.1
Instructions MMX
MMX is required to speed up tasks such as adjusting volume and adjusting contrast.
Show all
Yes
Yes
Socket
Connector on the motherboard for installing the processor.
FM1
FCLGA1155
AMD Virtualization Technology
Support for virtualization and virtual machine execution for security and performance
Full text
Yes
No data
Process technology
The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.
32 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
22 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
1178 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
1200 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system.
The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
100W
Average: 67.6 W
77W
Average: 67.6W
Crystal size
228
max 513
Mean value:
133
max 513
Mean value:
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
600 MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
650MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all
Yes
Yes
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the unit, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
3
Mean: 2.9
3
Mean: 2.
9
Code name
Llano
Ivy Bridge
Purpose
Desktop
Desktop
Series
A-Series (Desktop)
N/A
FAQ
Can AMD A8-3850 and Intel Core i5-3330 work in 4K mode?
AMD A8-3850 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3330 — Not available.
How many PCIe lanes
AMD A8-3850 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3330 — Not available.
How much RAM is supported?
AMD A8-3850 supports No GB data. Intel Core i5-3330 supports 32GB.
How fast are the processors?
AMD A8-3850 runs at 2.9 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
AMD A8-3850 has 4 cores. Intel Core i5-3330 has 4 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
AMD A8-3850 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3330 — does not.
Does the AMD A8-3850 have integrated graphics?
AMD A8-3850 — Not available.
Intel Core i5-3330 — Intel HD Graphics 2500
What RAM do 9 support0009
AMD A8-3850 supports DDR No data available. The Intel Core i5-3330 supports DDR3.
What is the socket of the processors?
FM1 is used to install AMD A8-3850. The FCLGA1155 is used to install the Intel Core i5-3330.
What architecture is used?
AMD A8-3850 is based on the Llano architecture. The Intel Core i5-3330 is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture.
Is the AMD A8-3850 multiplier unlocked?
AMD A8-3850 — Not available. Intel Core i5-3330 — does not.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, AMD A8-3850 scored 2337 points. Intel Core i5-3330 scored 3822 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of the AMD A8-3850 reaches 2.9 Hz. The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i5-3330 reaches 3.2 Hz.
How much energy do they consume?
The power consumption of the AMD A8-3850 can be up to 100 watts.
The Intel Core i5-3330 has up to 100 watts.
AMD A8-3850
VS
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i7-5820K
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i3-2370M
VS
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
Intel Core i5-4670K
VS
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i3-8100
VS
Intel Core m3-8100Y
Intel Core i3-3225
VS
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i5-6600K
VS
Intel Core i5-9300H
Intel Core i5-4690K
VS
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i7-3820
VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i3-10100
VS
Intel Core i3-7350K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
VS
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-3470
VS
Intel Core i5-6600K
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
VS
Intel Core i7-5960X
Intel Core i3-6320
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
VS
Intel Core i9-7900X
Intel Core i7-7700
VS
Intel Core i7-7740X
Meet the 6th Generation Intel Core Processor (Skylake) / Sudo Null IT News0001
6th generation Intel Core processors (Skylake) introduced in 2015.
With a host of core, system-on-a-chip and platform-level enhancements over the previous generation 14nm (Broadwell) processor, the Skylake processor is hugely popular in a wide variety of device types for work, creativity and play. This article provides an overview of key Skylake features and enhancements, as well as new usage models such as Wake by Voice and Biometric Login in Windows 10.
Skylake architecture
The 6th generation Intel Core processors are manufactured using 14nm technology, with a more compact processor size and overall platform for use in a variety of device types. At the same time, the performance of the architecture and graphics has also been improved, and advanced security tools have been implemented. On fig. 1 shows these new and improved features. Actual configuration in OEM devices may vary.
Figure 1. Skylake Architecture and Enhancement Summary[1]
Processor Highlights
▍Performance
The increase in performance is directly due to the provision of more instructions to the execution unit: more instructions are executed per clock cycle.
This result is achieved through improvements in four categories [Ibid].
- Improved external interface. With more accurate branch prediction and increased capacity, instruction decoding speed is improved, and prefetching is faster and more efficient.
- Improved instruction parallelization. More instructions are processed per cycle, and instruction parallel execution is improved with more efficient buffering.
- Improved execution units (IB). Performance of executing units has been improved compared to previous generations due to the following measures:
- Latency has been shortened.
- Increased the number of IS.
- Improved power efficiency by shutting down unused units.
- The speed of execution of security algorithms has been improved.
- Improved memory subsystem. In addition to improving the front end, parallel processing of instructions and execution units, the memory subsystem has also been improved in accordance with the bandwidth and performance requirements of the above components.
The following measures were used for this:
- Increased load and save bandwidth.
- Improved prefetching module.
- Storage at a deeper level.
- Fill and write back buffers.
- Improved handling of page misses.
- Improved throughput on L2 cache misses.
- New cache management instructions.
Figure 3 shows the improvement in parallel processing in Skylake processors compared to previous generations of processors (Sandy Bridge is the second, and Haswell is the fourth generation of Intel Core processors).
Figure 3. Improved parallelism over previous generations of processors 3, CPU performance has increased by 60% compared to a five-year-old PC, while video transcoding is 6 times faster, and graphics performance has been increased by 11 times.
Figure 4. 6th Generation Intel Core Processor Performance Compared to Five Year Old PC
- Source: Intel Corporation.
Based on SYSmark* 2014 results for Intel Core i5-6500 and Intel Core i5-650 processors. - Source: Intel Corporation. Based on the results of the Intel Core i5-6500 and Intel Core i5-650 processors in the Handbrake test with QSV.
- Source: Intel Corporation. Based on 3DMark* Cloud Gate scores for Intel Core i5-6500 and Intel Core i5-650 processors.
For detailed desktop vs. laptop performance comparison results, see the following links:
- Desktop performance
- Notebook performance
▍Energy saving
Resource setting based on dynamic demand
Legacy systems use Intel SpeedStep technology to balance performance and power consumption with an on-demand resource connection algorithm. This algorithm is controlled by the operating system. This approach is not bad for a constant load, but is not optimal for a sharp increase in load. With Skylake processors, Intel Speed Shift technology transfers control to the hardware instead of the operating system and allows the processor to reach its maximum clock speed in approximately 1 ms, providing more precise power management[3].
Figure 5. Comparison of Intel Speed Shift Technology and Intel SpeedStep Technology
The numbers below show the responsiveness of an Intel Core i5 6200U processor with Intel Speed Shift Technology compared to Intel SpeedStep Technology.
- Response speed increased by 45%.
- 45% faster photo processing.
- Graphing is 31% faster.
- Local notes are 22% faster.
- Average response time increased by 20%.
Based on Principled Technologies* WebXPRT* 2015, which measures the performance of web applications in general and in specific areas such as photo processing, note-taking, graphing. See website for more information.
Additional power optimization is achieved by dynamically tuning resources based on their consumption: by reducing the power of unused resources by limiting the power of the Intel AVX2 Vector Extensions when they are not in use, and by reducing the power consumption when idle.
▍Multimedia and graphics
The Intel HD Graphics provides a host of enhancements in terms of 3D processing, media processing, display, performance, power, customization, and scalability. This is a very powerful device in the family of integrated graphics adapters (first introduced in the second generation Intel Core processors). On fig. Figure 6 compares some of these enhancements, delivering over 100x improvement in graphics performance[2].
Figure 6. Graphics capabilities across processor generations
Figure 7. Graphics and media processing improvements across generations
9th generation microarchitecture
The 9th generation graphics architecture is similar to the 8th generation graphics microarchitecture of Intel Core Broadwell (5th generation) processors, but improved in terms of performance and scalability. On fig. Figure 8 shows a block diagram of the generation 9 microarchitecture[8], which consists of three main components.
- Screen. Left side.
- Out of cut. L-shaped part in the middle. Includes a threaded command handler, a global thread manager, and a graphical user interface (GTI).
- Cut. Includes execution units (IBs).
Compared to the 8th generation, the 9th generation microarchitecture features higher peak performance per watt, increased bandwidth, and a separate power/clock circuit for the off-cut component. This allows for more efficient power management in usage modes such as media playback. The slicer is a custom component. For example, GT3 supports up to two slices (each slice with 24 execution units), GT4 (Halo) can support up to 3 slices (the number after the letters GT indicates the number of execution units based on their usage: GT1 supports 12 execution units, GT2 supports 24, GT3 — 48, and GT4 — 72 execution units). The architecture is configurable enough to use a minimum number of execution units in low load scenarios, so power consumption can range from 4W to over 65W.
GPU API 9 supportgen is available in DirectX* 12, OpenCL 2.x, OpenGL* 5.x and Vulkan*.
Figure 8. 9th Generation GPU Architecture
For more information about these components, see.
Media processing enhancements and capabilities include the following[2]:
- Less than 1W consumption, 1W video conferencing consumption.
- Accelerate raw camera video playback (RAW) with new VQE features to support playback of RAW video up to 4K60 resolution on mobile platforms.
- New New Intel Quick Sync Video Fixed Function (FF) mode.
- Support for a wide range of fixed function codecs, GPU decoding acceleration.
On fig. Figure 9 shows GPU generation 9 codecs.
Support for media codecs and processing may not be available on all operating systems and applications.
Figure 9. Skylake codec support
Screen enhancements and features include:
- Blend, scale, rotate, and compress an image.
- High pixel density support (over 4K resolution).
- Supports wireless image transmission up to 4K30 resolution.
- Self Update (PSR2).
- CUI X.X — new features, improved performance.
The Intel Core i7-6700K processors provide the following features for gamers (see Figure 10). It also supports Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0, Intel Hyperthreading Technology, and overclocking capability. The performance increase compared to a five-year-old PC reaches 80%. See this page for more information.
Figure 10. Intel Core i7-6700K Processor Features
- Source: Intel Corporation. Based on the results of the Intel Core i7-6700K and Intel Core i7-875K processors in the SPECint*_rate_base2006 test (copy factor 8).
- Source: Intel Corporation. Based on the results of Intel Core i7-6700K and Intel Core i7-3770K processors in SPECint*_rate_base2006 (copy factor 8).
- Features described are available in selected processor and chipset combinations.
Warning. Changing the clock frequency and/or voltage may: (i) result in reduced system stability and reduced system and processor life; (ii) cause failure of the processor and other system components; (iii) lead to a decrease in system performance; (iv) cause additional heat or other damage; (v) affect the integrity of the data in the system. Intel does not test or guarantee operation of processors with specifications other than those specified.
▍Scalable
The Skylake microarchitecture is a configurable core: a single design for two directions, one for client devices, the other for servers, without compromising the power and performance requirements of both segments. On fig. Figure 11 shows different processor models and their power efficiencies for use in devices of various sizes and types, from ultra-compact Compute Sticks to powerful Intel Xeon-based workstations.
Figure 11. Availability of Intel Core processors for different types of devices
▍Enhanced security features
Intel Software Guard Extensions (Intel SGX): Intel SGX is a set of new instructions in Skylake processors that enables application developers to protect sensitive data from unauthorized changes and access by unauthorized programs running with a higher level of rights.
This gives applications the ability to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive information [1], [3]. Skylake supports instructions and threads to create secure enclaves, allowing the use of trusted memory areas. For more information about Intel SGX extensions, see this page.
Intel Memory Protection Extensions (Intel MPX): Intel MPX is a new set of instructions to check for run-time buffer overflows. These instructions allow you to check the boundaries of stack buffers and heap buffers before accessing memory, so that a process accessing memory has access only to the memory area that is assigned to it. Support for Intel MPX is introduced in Windows* 10 using native Intel MPX functionality in Microsoft Visual Studio* 2015. Most C/C++ applications will be able to use Intel MPX by simply recompiling applications without changing source code or linking to obsolete libraries. When running libraries that support Intel MPX on systems that do not support Intel MPX (5th Gen Intel Core processors and earlier), performance does not change in any way: it does not increase or decrease.
You can also dynamically enable and disable Intel MPX support [1], [3].
We looked at the enhancements and enhancements to the Skylake architecture. In the next section, we’ll take a look at Windows 10 features that are optimized to take advantage of the Intel Core architecture.
What’s new in Windows 10
6th Gen Intel Core processors are enhanced with Windows 10 operating system capabilities. Following are some of the key Intel hardware and Windows 10 OS features that make Intel platforms running Windows 10 more efficient, stable, and faster[3].
Ϯ Intel and Microsoft are working together to provide further support on Windows
Figure 12 Skylake and Windows* 10 features
▍Cortana
Microsoft’s Cortana Voice Assistant is available in Windows* 10 and gives you the ability to control your PC with your voice by saying the key phrase «Hey Cortana!» The Wake on Voice feature uses the audio processing pipeline on the CPU to improve recognition fidelity, but you can outsource the feature to a hardware DSP with built-in support for Windows 10[3].