Intel core i5 vs amd a10: Error 403 (Forbidden)

Intel Core i5-650 vs AMD A10-7850K

Intel Core i5-650 vs AMD A10-7850K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-650 on one side and the AMD A10-7850K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	Intel Core i5-650	AMD A10-7850K
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Westmere	Steamroller
Core name	Clarkdale	Kaveri
Family	Core i5-600	A10-7000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80616I5650, BXC80616I5650, CM80616003174AH, Q3GN, Q4DC, SLBLK, SLBTJ	AD785KXBJABOX, AD785KXBI44JA
Release date	Q1 2010	Q1 2014
Lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Transistors	382. 000.000	2.410.000.000
Cores	2	4
Threads	4	4
Base frequency	3,2 GHz	3,7 GHz
Turbo frequency	3,5 GHz	4,0 GHz
Cache memory	4 MB	4 MB
Max memory capacity	16,38 GB	8 GB
Memory types	DDR3 1066/1333	DDR3-2133
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	34,1 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	16	16
TDP	73 W	95 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 512 Cores (Kaveri)
GPU cores	—	8
GPU execution units	12	—
GPU shading units	96	512
GPU clock	733 MHz	720 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	102,3 GFLOPS	737,3 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1156	FM2+
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard	Socket FM2+ Motherboard
Maximum temperature	72. 6°C	72.4°C
Crypto engine	AES New Instructions	—
Security	Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit	—
CPU-Z single thread	255	256
CPU-Z multi thread	718	878
Cinebench R15 single thread	102	91
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	239	325
Cinebench R20 single thread	231	294
Cinebench R20 multi-thread	548	670
PassMark single thread	1. 371	1.511
PassMark CPU Mark	2.174	3.424
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	2.433	2.495
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	4.805	6.488
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core	528	542
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core	1.170	1.687
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	34 GFLOPS	56,52 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	66 pts / W	68 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD A10-7850K has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD A10-7850K is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Core i5-650 is lower. The AMD A10-7850K was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A10-7850K	256 878
Intel Core i5-650	255 718

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 22%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A10-7850K	91 325
Intel Core i5-650	102 239

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A10-7850K	294 670
Intel Core i5-650	231 548

In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 22%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD A10-7850K	1.511 3.424
Intel Core i5-650	1.371 2.174

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
AMD A10-7850K	2.495 6.488
Intel Core i5-650	2.433 4.805

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-650	2.560 4.761
AMD A10-7850K	2.406 4.738

In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD A10-7850K	2.336 6.075
Intel Core i5-650	2.096 4.170

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 46%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD A10-7850K	542 1.687
Intel Core i5-650	528 1.170

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD A10-7850K	667 1.739
Intel Core i5-650	530 1.180

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 47%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
AMD A10-7850K	564 1.472
Intel Core i5-650	570 1.214

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i5-650 AMD equivalentAMD A10-7850K Intel equivalent

Intel Core i5-6500 vs AMD A10-9700

Intel Core i5-6500 vs AMD A10-9700

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-6500 on one side and the AMD A10-9700 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specifications:

Processor	Intel Core i5-6500	AMD A10-9700
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Skylake	Excavator
Core name	Skylake-S	Bristol Ridge
Family	Core i5-6000	A10-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec	CM8066201920404, BX80662I56500, BXC80662I56500, SR2L6	AD9700AGABBOX, AD9700AGM44AB
Release date	Q3 2015	Q3 2017
Lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Transistors	—	3. 100.000.000
Cores	4	4
Threads	4	4
Base frequency	3,2 GHz	3,5 GHz
Turbo frequency	3,6 GHz	3,8 GHz
Cache memory	6 MB	2 MB
Max memory capacity	64 GB	32 GB
Memory types	DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600	DDR4-2400
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	34,1 GB/s	38,4 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	16	8
TDP	65 W	65 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	Intel HD Graphics 530	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri)
GPU cores	—	6
GPU execution units	24	—
GPU shading units	192	384
GPU base clock	350 MHz	351 MHz
GPU boost clock	1050 MHz	1029 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	403,2 GFLOPS	553 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	71°C	90°C
Cinebench R15 single thread	137	90
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	540	301
PassMark single thread	2. 114	1.633
PassMark CPU Mark	5.631	3.585
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	4.089	2.355
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	11.376	5.789
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	220,1 GFLOPS	59,82 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	175 pts / W	89 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD A10-9700 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD A10-9700 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-6500	137 540
AMD A10-9700	90 301

In single core, the difference is 52%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 79%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-6500	2.114 5.631
AMD A10-9700	1.633 3.585

In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 57%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-6500	4. 089 11.376
AMD A10-9700	2.355 5.789

In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 97%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-6500	4.803 13.500
AMD A10-9700	2.281 5.039

In single core, the difference is 111%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 168%.

On Android 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i5-6500	3.034 6.144
AMD A10-9700	2. 304 5.880

In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i5-6500 AMD equivalentAMD A10-9700 Intel equivalent

Intel Core i5-4200M vs.

AMD A10-5750M

Intel Core i5-4200M

The Intel Core i5-4200M operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.10 GHz base 3.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 37 W.The processor is attached to the PGA 946 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM, DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Haswell H Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2013

AMD A10-5750M

The AMD A10-5750M operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.50 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the FS1r2 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Richland (Piledriver) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2013

Intel Core i5-4200M

AMD A10-5750M

Compare Detail

2.50 GHz	Frequency	2.50 GHz
2	Cores	4
3.10 GHz	Turbo (1 Core)	3.50 GHz
3.10 GHz	Turbo (All Cores)	3.50 GHz
Yes	Hyperthreading	No
No	Overclocking	No
normal	Core Architecture	normal
Intel HD Graphics 4600	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 8650G
1.15 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	0.72 GHz
22 nm	Technology	32 nm
1.15 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	0.72 GHz
11.1	DirectX Version	11
3	Max. displays	2
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM	Memory	DDR3-1866
2	Memory channels	2
	Max memory
No	ECC	No
—	L2 Cache	—
3. 00 MB	L3 Cache	4.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version
16	PCIe lanes
22 nm	Technology	32 nm
PGA 946	Socket	FS1r2
37 W	TDP	35 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	AMD-V
Q4/2013	Release date	Q2/2013
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i5-4200M		AMD A10-5750M
37 W	Max TDP	35 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Comparison Intel Core i5-5250U vs AMD A10-9620P which is better?

Home / Intel Core i5-5250U VS A10-9620p

Intel Core i5250u 9000u

45%

Devicelist

AMD A10-9620p

We compared the specifications of Intel Core i5-5250U and AMD A10-9620P and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits Intel Core i5-5250U

Comparison winner

Process

14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than

28 nm

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

4104

1827 (80.2%) better than

2277

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

8721

1301 (17.5%) better than

7420

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

107

35 (48.6%) better than

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

260

30 (13%) better than

230

WinRAR 4. 0

2423

1094 (82.3%) better than

1329

x264 encoding pass 1

11 (14.3%) better than

Advantage AMD A10-9620P

Core

2 (100%) better than

Maximum frequency

3.4 GHz

0.7 GHz (25.9%) better than

2.7 GHz

Number of transistors

3100 million

1200 million (63.2%) better than

1900 million

Maximum core temperature

90°C

-15°C (-14. 3%) better than

105 °C

Passmark

2670

169 (6.8%) better than

2501

General information
Type
For laptops	For laptops
Architecture code name
Broadwell-U	Bristol Ridge
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
2	4 2 (100%) better than
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
4	4
Base frequency
1.6 GHz	n/a
Process
14 nm -14 nm (-50%) better than	28 nm
Chip size
133 mm2	250 mm2
Number of transistors
1900 million	3100 million 1200 million (63.2%) better than
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
2.7GHz	3.4 GHz Better at 0.7 GHz (25.9%) than
Support 64 bit

Max. number of processors in the configuration
1	n/a
Socket
FCBGA1168	FP4
AMD-V

Series
Intel Core i5	Bristol Ridge
Release price
315 $	n/a
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
74.1%	n/a
Maximum core temperature
105 °C	90°C -15 °C (-14.3%) better than
vPro

TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision
2.0	n/a
Number of PCI-Express lanes
12	n/a
Secure Key

Identity Protection
+	n/a
OS Guard
+	n/a
Flex Memory Access
+	n/a
Quick Sync
+	n/a
eDP
+	n/a
HDMI
+	n/a
FDI
+	n/a
Fast Memory Access
+	n/a
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
64K (per core)	n/a
L2 cache
256K (per core)	2 Mb
L3 cache
3 MB (total)	n/a
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
105 °C	n/a
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
15W	15W
EDB
+	n/a
Video memory size
16 GB	n/a
Clear Video
+	n/a
InTru 3D
+	n/a
DisplayPort
+	n/a
Smart Response
+	n/a

Benchmarks
Passmark
2501	2670 169 (6. 8%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
4104 1827 (80.2%) better than	2277
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
8721 1301 (17.5%) better than	7420
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
107 35 (48.6%) better than	72
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
260 30 (13%) better than	230
WinRAR 4.0
2423 1094 (82.3%) better than	1329
x264 encoding pass 1
88 11 (14.3%) better than	77
x264 encoding pass 2
16	16
TrueCrypt AES
2	n/a
3DMark06 CPU
3393	n/a
Geekbench 2
6769	n/a
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
2638	n/a
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
5216	n/a

Technologies and Advanced Instructions
Advanced Instructions
Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® 0 0X02	no data
Turbo Boost
2.0	n/a
Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows you to reduce the frequency of the processor to a minimum value to save power when the processor is idle.

Thermal Monitoring

Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.
+	n/a
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations applications.

RAM parameters
Types of RAM
DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, LPDR3-1600, LPDDR3-1866	n/a
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
16 GB	n/a
Number of memory channels
2	n/a

Virtualization technologies
EPT

VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics
Max GPU clock
950 MHz	n/a
Maximum number of monitors
3	n/a
Clear Video HD

Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.
+	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) (- 758 MHz)
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4
2560X1600@60Hz	n/a
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort
3840×2160@60Hz	n/a
DirectX
11.2/12	n/a
OpenGL
4.3	n/a

AMD A10-5750M vs Intel Core i5-4300U — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors

AMD A10-5750M

Intel Core i5-4300U

Which to choose?

It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD A10-5750M vs Intel Core i5-4300U comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!

Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor

Who will win in the comparison of AMD A10-5750M and Intel Core i5-4300U. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.

2.50 GHZ

Cabbit Frequency

1.90 GHZ

4,0003

Nuclei

3.50 GHZ

turbo

2.90 GHZ

The number of flows

9000 4000 4000

TURBO (2 Cores)

2.90 GHZ

Hypertureuding

YES

Acceleration

3.50 GHZ

Turbo (4 Cores)

No Data

Processor family and generation

Internal graphics

It’s hard to compare AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-4300U when graphics card function and specs matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.

AMD Radeon HD 8650G

GPU name

Intel HD Graphics 4400

0.53 GHz

GPU frequency

0.20 GHZ

0.72 GHZ

GPU (TURBO)

1.10 GHZ

Generation

7.5

version DirectX

.1 9000

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

Number of Shaders

160

2 GB

Maximum Memory

2 GB

Number of Monitors

0003

Technology

22 nm

Q2/2013

Release date

Q2/2013

Hardware codec support

Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

Decode

h364

Decode / Encode

JPEG

Decode

H365 8BIT

H365 10BIT

VP8

VP9

Decode 9000 VC-1

Decode 9000 000 000 ducode 9000 000 000 ducode

Decode

AVC

Decode / Encode

RAM and PCIe

These are the memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.

DDR3-1866

Memorial type

DDR3L-1600 SO-Dimm

Memory channels

ECC

2.0

PCIE 9000 PCIE Linius 9000 PCIE 2 12

Encryption

Support for data encryption

Yes

AES-NI

Yes PCIe

Thermal management and TDP

Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD A10-5750M and Intel Core i5-4300U, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).

35 W

TDP

15 W

—

Maximum temperature

—

Maximum TDP

—

TDP Download

—

9000

Technical details

4.00 MB

L3-CACHE

3.00 MB

32 32 NM

Technology

22 NM

Richland

Architecture

Haswell

AMD-V

9000 9000 9000

002 Virtualization

VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D

FS1R2

SOCK (connector)

BGA 1168

q2/2013

Exit date

Q3/2013

Price

CA. 245 $

Devices compatible with this processor

You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses various test scenarios

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

88 (77%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

114 (100%)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD 9 processor0003

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

219 (83%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1. 90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

262 (100%)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

153 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

73 (64%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

114 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2. 50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

210 (80%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

260 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. This is software used to create 3D shapes. The benchmark runs in single-core mode without considering the possibility of hyper-threading.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

184 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

This is a new version of the benchmark based on Cinebench R15 (both versions are based on Cinema 4, the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for benchmark tests of multi-core processor performance and hyper-threading capabilities.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

499 (100%)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

1732 (62%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1. 90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

2760 (100%)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the processor

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

4525 (83%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

5415 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

407 (67%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

607 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software package shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

1081 (86%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1. 90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

1253 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

3278 (85%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

3850 (100%)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32

AMD A10-5750M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)

553 (100%)

Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT

352 (63%)

Popular processor comparisons

Gaming speed

Core i5 M 460

35.5

A10-4600M APU

40.5 (+12.3%)

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed in office use

Core i5 M 460

39.7

A10-4600M APU

43.1 (+7.9%)

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed in heavy applications

Core i5 M 460

18.9

A10-4600M APU

21.4 (+11.7%)

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.

Speed of numerical operations

one.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-5200U
2.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-4300M
3.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Celeron J4115
four.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-8250U
5.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-5250U
6.		AMD A10-5750M vs. AMD A8-7650K
7.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-9400F
eight.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i3-2100T
9.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-2320
ten.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i3-3240
eleven.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i5-4310M
12.		AMD A10-5750M vs. AMD FX-8320E
13.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i3-8145U
fourteen.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i3-4010U
fifteen.		AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Celeron 1017U

Simple household tasks

Core i5 M 460

37.3 (+4.6%)

A10-4600M APU

35.6

Demanding games and tasks

Core i5 M 460

12.9

A10-4600M APU

13 (+0.8%)

Extreme

Core i5 M 460

2.5

A10-4600M APU

2.5

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Characteristics

The data is not yet complete, so the tables may be missing information or existing functions may be omitted.

Basic

AMD

Manufacturer	Intel
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.	Intel® Core™ i5-460M Processor (3M Cache, 2.53 GHz)
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.	Arrandale
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	32	No data
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability.	10-2016	10-2016
Model Official name.	i5-460M
Cores The number of physical cores.	2	4
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	4	4
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS).	Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	2.53 GHz	2.3 GHz
Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	2.8 GHz	2.7 GHz
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	3	No data
Instructions	64-bit
Extended instruction set Allow to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.	SSE4.1/4.2
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No	No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.	2.5 GT/s DMI
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	35	No data
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.	Intel® HD Graphics
GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation.	500	No data
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency.	766	No data
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.	2

RAM

Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor.	8	No data
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.	DDR3 800/1066
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.	2
RAM bandwidth	17.1 GB/s
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.	No data	No data

PCI

configuration options

PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.	2	No data
PCI	1×16	1×16
Number of PCI lanes	16	1×16

Data protection

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption.	No data	No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator.	No data	No data

Decoration

Dimensions	No data	No data
Supported sockets	No data	No data
Maximum processors per motherboard	No data	No data

Intel core i5 vs amd a10: Error 403 (Forbidden)

Intel Core i5-650 vs AMD A10-7850K

Intel Core i5-650 vs AMD A10-7850K

Specifications:

Performances :

Equivalence:

See also:

Intel Core i5-6500 vs AMD A10-9700

Intel Core i5-6500 vs AMD A10-9700

Specifications:

Performances :

Equivalence:

See also:

Intel Core i5-4200M vs.

Intel Core i5-4200M

AMD A10-5750M

Compare Detail

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Popular Comparision

Comments

Comparison Intel Core i5-5250U vs AMD A10-9620P which is better?

AMD A10-5750M vs Intel Core i5-4300U — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors

Which to choose?

Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor

Processor family and generation

Internal graphics

Hardware codec support

RAM and PCIe

Encryption

Thermal management and TDP

Technical details

002 Virtualization

Devices compatible with this processor

Popular processor comparisons

Gaming speed

Speed ​​in office use

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Demanding games and tasks

Extreme

Characteristics

Basic

Video core

RAM

PCI

Data protection

Decoration

Which is better

Intel Core i5 M 460

AMD A10-4600M APU

Speed in office use

Speed in heavy applications

Speed of numerical operations