AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?
52points
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
52points
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5+8400
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than Intel Core i5+8400?
- 21.43% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.4GHzvs6 x 2.8GHz - 267MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs2666MHz - 6 more CPU threads?
12vs6 - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs1.5MB - 13.03% higher PassMark result?
13207vs11685 - 7MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs9MB - 192KB bigger L1 cache?
576KBvs384KB
Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - Has integrated graphics?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i5-8400T
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-10105
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
10. 0/10
4 User reviews
Intel Core i5+8400
1 User reviews
Intel Core i5+8400
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.4GHz
6 x 2.8GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2.67MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
295.1seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i5+8400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5+8400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-9400F: What is the difference?
52points
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
50points
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5-9400F
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than Intel Core i5-9400F?
- 17.
24% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.4GHzvs6 x 2.9GHz - 267MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs2666MHz - 6 more CPU threads?
12vs6 - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs1.5MB - 37.72% higher PassMark result?
13207vs9590 - 7MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs9MB - 192KB bigger L1 cache?
576KBvs384KB
Why is Intel Core i5-9400F better than AMD Ryzen 5 2600?
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - 10.56% higher PassMark result (single)?
2492vs2254 - 64GB larger maximum memory amount?
128GBvs64GB - 13.1% higher Cinebench R20 (single) result?
423vs374 - 10.46% higher single-core Geekbench 5 result?
1067vs966 - 23.
38% cheaper?
163.57 €vs213.49 €
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
10.
0/10
4 User reviews
Intel Core i5-9400F
2 User reviews
Intel Core i5-9400F
10.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
4 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
4 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.4GHz
6 x 2.9GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.9GHz
4.1GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-9400F
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2.67MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-9400F
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400F)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400F)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
295.1seconds
374.1seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
1161.7seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-9400F
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-9400F
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-9400F
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-9400F
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400F)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-9400F
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-9400F
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9400F)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Ryzen 5 2600 vs. Core i5-8400: 36 Game Benchmark
For the past few weeks we’ve been busy benchmarking two CPUs in over 30 games: AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel’s Core i5-8400. Before we get into the benchmark results — and I promise there’s a boatload of them — here are a few quick notes on the test setup.
The Core i5-8400 rig features the MSI B360 Gaming Plus, a high quality B360 board that has no trouble getting the most out of the hexa-core CPU. Of course, we are limited to DDR4-2666 on this board, but we’ve gone with G.Skill’s high quality and very low latency FlareX CL14 memory. Cooling the i5-8400 is Intel’s stock unit.
Then for the Ryzen 5 2600 we used the Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero and we have two configurations: a stock out of the box configuration using the Wraith Stealth box cooler and G.
Skill FlareX CL14 memory clocked at 2933 MHz. And a second test setup, running with a 4.2 GHz all-core overclock using aggressively-tuned G.Skill Sniper X DDR4-3400 memory with tightened sub timings. Here the cooler was upgraded to the Corsair h215i Pro.
For testing we have 36 games on the menu. Each game has been tested at 720p, 1080p and 1440p resolutions using the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. I would have liked to include the Vega 64 Liquid as well, but considering we had already ran 324 individual tests, three times each… almost 1,000 benchmark runs later, we weren’t super keen to make that 2,000. For now let’s just focus on the CPU comparison and let the 1080 Ti work on the backdrop, so grab a drink, some snacks and get comfortable. Let’s get into it.
ARK: Survival Evolved, ARMA 3, Ashes of the Singularity, Assassin’s Creed, Battlefield 1
First up we have ARK: Survival Evolved and this isn’t a title I often test but due to popular request it’s been included in the slue of games tested.
It’s often listed in the top 10 most played games on Steam so I imagine there’s a few of you keen to see the results.
I was expecting this one to go poorly for Ryzen but the results are very surprising. We’re mostly GPU bound though at 720p we do see Ryzen edging ahead. Still due to the GPU limits the overclocked Ryzen 5 2600 was no faster than the stock configuration.
Another game that’s quite popular on Steam and always heavily requested is ARMA 3. In the past this game has run horribly on AMD processors, including Ryzen but I’ve been told the games been updated recently to better utilize the Ryzen CPUs, or at least CPUs with more than a single core and that certainly appears to be the case.
Out of the box the Ryzen 5 2600 had no trouble matching the Core i5-8400 and the games clearly CPU limited, as the overclocked 2600 offered impressive gains.
Even at 1440p we saw a massive 20% increase in performance when overclocking Ryzen’s cores and memory. This meant the 2600 was now 19% faster than the Core i5-8400 when comparing the average frame rate. I’m quite shocked by these results given how poorly Ryzen performed last time I tested with ARMA 3.
Come on you knew Ashes of the Benchmark was going to be included and it’s about the only game that supports DX12, that I’ve tested using DX12, with a GeForce graphics card. Here we see that the Core i5-8400 and Ryzen 5 2600 are very evenly matched out of the box. Testing at 1080p and 1440p does see us primary GPU bound with the ‘crazy’ preset enabled so overclocking Ryzen isn’t hugely beneficial. At 1440p just a 5% increase is seen, then 7% at 1080p and then a reasonably impressive 11% at 720p.
Okay so some interesting results in Assassin’s Creed Origins, let’s talk about what’s going on here. You’ll notice that the stock Ryzen 5 2600 allows for the exact same performance at 1080p that it does at 720p and this is because we’re CPU limited. Overclocking solves this and at 1080p we see 2600 able to match the 8400, however both CPUs are now GPU limited. We know this because at 720p the overclocked 2600 is able to pull ahead of the 8400 by a noteworthy margin for the average frame rate.
Then finally at 1440p we’re almost entirely GPU bound though the stock Ryzen 5 2600 configuration does still struggle to max out the GTX 1080 Ti.
Testing with Battlefield 1 shows just how good the Core i5-8400 is, out of the box with no messing around it delivers very strong performance in this demanding title. The Ryzen 5 2600 is also very respectable and while it was only 6% slower for the frame time result at 1080p, the average frame rate was 12% lower. That margin is somewhat nullified at 1440p as we become heavily GPU bound, though it is interesting to note that overclocked even at this resolution the 2600 provides a much better 1% low result.
Then at the lower resolutions we see that overclocking the 2600 improves the average frame rate by almost 20% and while that is an impressive gain it does only make the tuned Ryzen processor a few percent faster than the Core i5-8400. But again it’s the 1440p results that are the most impressive, here the 2600 was 18% faster than the 8400 for the frame time result.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-2400: What is the difference?
52 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
32 Ballla
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5-2400 9000
Why AMD RY Intel Core i5-2400?
- 1.65x higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.4GHz vs 4 x 3.1GHz - 1600MHz faster memory speed?
2933MHz vs 1333MHz - 8 more CPU threads?
12 vs 4 - 22.4°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
95°C vs 72.6°C - Semiconductor size 20nm smaller?
12nm vs 32nm - 2MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 1MB - 2.28x higher PassMark score?
13207 vs 5801 - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.
9GHz vs 3.4GHz
- Has integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 9000
VS
9000 9000
004 AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
I5-2400 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS Core i3-3220
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core I3-4130
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS 9000 9000 AMD 7 2700
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
,0004,0004,0004 AMD RYZEN 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS 9000 -2400
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 4500u
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
VS
AMD Ryzen 5
Intel Core i5-9400f
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-3570
Comparison0003
4 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
10.
0 /10
4 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-2400
3 Reviews Users
Intel I5-2400
5.3 9022 /10 9
3 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
10.0 /10
4 VOTES
6.7 /10
3 VOTES
9000
10.0 /10
4 Votes
2.0 /10
3 VOTES
performance
10.0 /10
4 VOTES
4.0 /10
000 3 VOTES
10.0 /10
4 Votes
4.7 /10
3 VOTES
Energy efficiency
10.0 /10
4 Votes
5.0 2 /10 9 9 9
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.4GHz
4 x 3.1GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.9GHz
3.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2.67MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
1333MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.
Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
295.1seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-2400
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-2400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✔Intel Core i5-2400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2600
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM) technology ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2600)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i5 10300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 10300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Which is better: 4-core laptop Intel Core i5 10300H at 2.5 GHz or desktop AMD Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores at 3.4 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one core
Core i5 10300h
61
Ryzen 5 2600
54
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus
Core 10000 23
Ryzen 5 2600
35
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption by chip
Core i5 10300h
59
Ryzen 5 2600
50
rating NanoreView
Final rating of the processor
Core I5 10300h
9000 47 9000 Ryzen 5 2200 9000 9000 47
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2600 and 10300H
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 10300H
- Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2933
- Introduced 1 year and 7 months later than rival
- 31% lower than Ryzen 5 2600 peak power consumption — 45 vs 65 Watts
- 15% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz) - Integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 13% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1176 and 1038 points
- 2.09 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Has 8 MB more L3 cache
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 physical cores more
- More modern process technology — 12 vs 14 nanometers
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 10300H
+11%
1117
Ryzen 5 2600
1007
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 10300H
4831
Ryzen 5 2600
+46%
7056
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 10300H
+16%
2598
Ryzen 5 2600
2245
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 10300H
90 Ryzen 4 8575
+53%
13078
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 10300H
+13%
1172
Ryzen 5 2600
1035
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 10300H
3785
Ryzen 5 2600
+49%
5630
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 10300H and AMD Ryzen 5 2600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | April 2, 2020 | September 11, 2018 |
| Type | For laptop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake-H | Zen+ |
| Model number | i5-10300H | — |
| Socket | BGA-1440 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2. 5 GHz |
3.4 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 25x | 34x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1050 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i5 10300h
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 5 2600
N/D
Memory Support
| Memory type | Type of memory | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 10300H | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 9 site0746 |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 10300H
25 (56.
8%)
Ryzen 5 2600
19 (43.2%)
Total votes: 44
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 10300H vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
2.
Intel Core i5 10300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3.
Intel Core i5 10300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4.
Intel Core i5 10300H vs Intel Core i5 11400H
5.
Intel Core i5 10300H vs Intel Core i5 10500H
6.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
7.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5 10400F
8.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 or Intel Core i5 10300H?
Name
Message
Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i5-3570
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i5-3570 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
versus
Intel Core i5-3570
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Newer processor, release date difference 5 year(s) 10 month(s), processor unlocked easily
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4
- 8 threads more: 12 vs 4
- About 3% more clock speed: 3.
9 GHz vs 3.80 GHz - About 41% more maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 67.4 °C power consumption: 12 nm FinFET vs 22 nm
- L1 cache is 2.3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access quick access
- L3 cache is 2.7 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- About 18% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 77 Watt
- PassMark — Single thread mark performance by about 10% more: 2251 vs 2046
- 2.7 times more performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 13246 vs 4905
- About 25% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 974 vs 779
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 5321 vs 2537
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 5742 vs 2830
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 benchmark Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4.5 times bigger: 46.475 vs 10.336
- CompuBench 1.5 performance Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.
2 times bigger: 0.922 vs 0.418
make overclocking
| Issue date | 19 April 2018 vs June 2012 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9GHz vs 3.80GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 67.4 °C |
| Process | 12nm FinFET vs 22nm |
| Level 1 cache | 576 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 3 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 16 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 77 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2251 vs 2046 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 13246 vs 4905 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 974 vs 779 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 5321 vs 2537 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 5742 vs 2830 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
46.475 vs 10.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.922 vs 0.418 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3570
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-3570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2251 | 2046 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 13246 | 4905 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 974 | 779 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 5321 | 2537 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 5742 | 2830 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
46.475 | 10.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.922 | 0.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.045 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.089 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1602 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
1602 |
Feature comparison
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-3570 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Zen+ | Ivy Bridge |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| Issue date | April 19, 2018 | June 2012 |
| OPN PIB | YD2600BBAFBOX | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in the rating | 825 | 1715 |
| Price now | $159. 99 |
$173.63 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 24.89 | 12.05 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price at first issue date | $231 | |
| Processor Number | i5-3570 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 4 GHz |
3.40 GHz |
| Crystal area | 213 mm | 133 mm |
| Level 1 cache | 576KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 3MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Process | 12nm FinFET | 22nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 67.4 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 9 GHz |
3.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 4 |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s |
|
| Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Supported sockets | AM4 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | 2011D |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 x16 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 | |
| AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD StoreMI technology | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.
|