AMD A10-5700 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
Summary
-
AMD A10-5700
100%
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
254%
Relative performance
-
AMD A10-5700
100%
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
201%
Relative performance
-
AMD A10-5700
100%
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
306%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD A10-5700 |
| None |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4790K |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 101% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 206% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Around 154% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-4790K
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-4790K
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD A10-5700 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 |
||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| HTT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
| Boost 2.0 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD A10-5700 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Piledriver | vs | Intel_Haswell | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Trinity | vs | Haswell | |
| Release Date | Oct 2012 | vs | May 2014 |
Cores
| AMD A10-5700 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 8 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 7660D | vs | Intel HD 4600 |
Cache
| AMD A10-5700 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD A10-5700 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FM2 | vs | Intel Socket 1150 | |
| Max Case Temp | 71°C | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | ||
| Die Size | 246mm² | vs | 177mm² | |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| AMD A10-5700 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4000 MHz | vs | 4400 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | 1. 475 V |
vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 88 W |
-
AMD A10-5700
2440 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
4928 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-5700
6802 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
21504 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-5700
5160
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
15488
points — higher is better
-
AMD A10-5700
1892
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
4016
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
Intel Core i7-11370H vs AMD A10-7700K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-11370H and AMD A10-7700K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i7-11370H
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD A10-7700K
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-11370H
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 4.
80 GHz vs 3.8 GHz - Around 38% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 72.40°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm
- Around 25% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2956 vs 1434
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 11814 vs 3198
| Launch date | 11 Jan 2021 vs 14 January 2014 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.80 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 72. 40°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin vs 28 nm |
| L1 cache | 320 KB vs 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 5 MB vs 4 MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2956 vs 1434 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 11814 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7700K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-11370H
CPU 2: AMD A10-7700K
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-11370H | AMD A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2956 | 1434 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 11814 | 3198 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3740 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 461 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1337 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
4.9 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.008 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.292 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.727 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5312 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-11370H | AMD A10-7700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake | Kaveri |
| Launch date | 11 Jan 2021 | 14 January 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $426 | $152 |
| Place in performance rating | 768 | 1850 |
| Processor Number | i7-11370H | |
| Series | 11th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD770KXBJABOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD770KXBI44JA | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 320 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 5 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm SuperFin | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 72. 40°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.80 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Die size | 245 mm | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Transistor count | 2410 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Device ID | 0x9A49 | |
| Execution Units | 96 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 35 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 720 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12. 1 |
12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Configurable TDP-down | 28 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 35 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 3.30 GHz | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 46. 5×25 |
|
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1449 | FM2+ |
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2, Intel AVX-512 |
|
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2. 0 |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 |
Compare AMD A10-7800 and Intel Core i7-2600
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-7800 and Intel Core i7-2600 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Technology, Virtualization, Peripherals, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
AMD A10-7800
versus
Intel Core i7-2600
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD A10-7800
- About 3% more clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.80 GHz 9 0020
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor makes it more powerful , but with lower power consumption: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- L2 cache is 4 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 2% higher: 4.473 vs 4.393
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.80 GHz |
| Process | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Level 2 cache | 4 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
4.473 vs 4.393 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2600
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- About 2% more max core temperature: 72.6°C vs 71.30°C
- Benchmark performance PassMark — Single thread mark about 19% more: 1739 vs 1459
- About 67% more performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark: 5330 vs 3190
- About 53% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 727 vs 476
- Benchmark performance chmarke Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core about 96% more: 2727 vs 1390
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop benchmark — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6.9x more: 74.312 vs 10.821
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop benchmark — T-Rex (Frames/s) 3 times bigger: 0.54 vs 0.18
- 3.2 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.109 vs 0.668
- About 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.019 vs 4.524
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.6°C vs 71.30°C |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1739 vs 1459 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 5330 vs 3190 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 727 vs 476 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2727 vs 1390 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.312 vs 10.821 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
0.54 vs 0.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.109 vs 0.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.019 vs 4.524 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD A10-7800
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2600
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
| Name | AMD A10-7800 | Intel Core i7-2600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1459 | 1739 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3190 | 5330 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 476 | 727 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1390 | 2727 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
4.473 | 4.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 | 74.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 | 0.54 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 | 2.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 | 5.019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3000 |
Performance comparison
| AMD A10-7800 | Intel Core i7-2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD7800YBI44JA | |
| Place in the ranking | 1864 | 2061 |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture name | Sandy Bridge | |
| Production date | January 2011 | |
| Price at first issue date | $247 | |
| Price now | $148. 99 |
|
| Processor Number | i7-2600 | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 16.20 | |
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| Level 1 cache | 256KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 4MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Process | 28nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71. 30°C |
72.6°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Crystal area | 216 mm | |
| Level 3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Number of transistors | 1160 million | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133MHz | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | |
| Enduro | ||
| Maximum GPU clock | 720MHz | 1. 35 GHz |
| Number of iGPU cores | 512 | |
| Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x102 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 850MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 35 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | |
| WiDi support | ||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulcan | ||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Supported sockets | FM2+ | LGA1155 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2. 0 |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) |
AMD A10-7890K vs Intel Core i7-3770K
comparison
Intel Core i7-3770K
AMD A10-7890K
VS
WINNER
Intel Core i7-3770K
Rating: 11 points
AMD A10-7890K
Rating: 6 points
Test results
Technology
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications 9 0003
Key features
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
PassMark CPU score
Intel Core i7-3770K: 6829
AMD A10-7890K: 3309
Cinebench21.
5 score (single) UBER
Intel Core i7-3770K: 8
AMD A10-7890K:
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Intel Core i7-3770K: 77 W
AMD A10-7890K: 95 W
Process technology
Intel Core i7-3770K: 22 nm
AMD A10-7890K: 28 nm
Number of transistors
Intel Core i7-3770K: 1200 million
AMD A10-7890K: 1178 million
Description
Intel Core i7-3770K runs at 3.5Hz, second AMD A10-7890K runs at 4.1Hz. Intel Core i7-3770K capable of overclocking to 3.9Hz and the second to 4.3 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 77W, while the AMD A10-7890K has 95W.
Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i7-3770K is built on 22 nm technology. AMD A10-7890K on 28 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i7-3770K can support DDR3. The maximum supported volume is 32 MB.
It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 25.6. The second processor AMD A10-7890K is capable of supporting DDR3. The bandwidth is 34.1. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. The Intel Core i7-3770K has an Intel HD Graphics 4000 graphics core. Its frequency is 650 MHz. AMD A10-7890K received the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics video core. Here the frequency is 866 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i7-3770K scored 6829. And the AMD A10-7890K scored 3309.
Why Intel Core i7-3770K is better than AMD A10-7890K
- PassMark CPU score 6829 vs 3309, 106% more
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 77 W vs. 95 W, -19% less
- Process 22 nm vs 28 nm, -21% less
- Number of transistors 1200 million vs 1178 million, up 2%
Comparison of Intel Core i7-3770K and AMD A10-7890K: highlights 4
PassMark CPU score
write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
6829
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
3309
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
3204.88
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
Geekbench score 5
817.504
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
3DMark06 score
7554
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)
7.2688
max 45.3622
Mean: 5.3
max 45.3622
Mean: 5.3
AES
Yes
Yes
Thermal Control Technologies
Yes
9 0002 N/A
Intel Privacy Protection Technology
Yes
N/A
Function Execute Cancel Bit
Yes
No data
Intel Trusted Execution Technology
No
N/A
Anti-Theft Technology
Yes
9000 2 n/a
Number of threads
The more threads, the better the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform multiple tasks at the same time.
Show all
8
max 256
Average: 10.7
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
256KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
256KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
4MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
L3 cache size
A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
8MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
3.9GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
4.3GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
3.5GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
4.1GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Frequency with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0
3.9GHz
max 5.1
Average: 3.5 GHz
GHz
max 5.1
Average: 3.5 GHz
PCI Express configurations
up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8 & 2×4
N/A
Idle States
Yes
N/A
Unlocked CPU Multiplier 9000 3
Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, thanks to which they work faster and improve the quality in games and other applications .
Show all
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost technology
Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all
2
Mean: 1.9
Mean: 1.9
Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Max. graphics system frequency
1.15GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
Max. number of processors in the configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
3
Average: 3.5
3
Average: 3.5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
25.6GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.
4 GB/s
34.1GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
Memory frequency
RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all
1600MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
2133MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
Max. number of memory channels
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
Max. memory size
The largest amount of RAM memory.
32GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
System bus frequency
Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all
5 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.
1 GT/s
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
N/A
N/A
Intel Flexible Display Interface (Intel FDI)
Yes
N/A
vPro
N/A EIST)
Yes
N/A
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading Technology
Many Intel processors use modern hyper-threading technology. Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Show all
Yes
N/A
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Full text
Yes
Yes
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show in full
4.2
max 4.2
Mean: 4.1
4.2
max 4.2
Mean: 4.1
Socket
FCLGA1155
FM2+
Thermal Monitoring
Yes
N/A 9 0003
TSX
No
No data data
EDB
Yes
n.a. 2 Identity Protection
Yes
No data
VT-d
No
No data
VT-x
Yes
No data
EPT
Yes
No data
Quick Sync Video
Yes
n.a. 0002 InTru 3D
Yes
No data
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
22 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
28 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher the number, the more powerful the processor is
1200 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
1178 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
77W
Average: 67.6 W
95W
Average: 67.6 W
PCI Express Edition
3
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
Status
Discontinued
n.a.
Embedded options available
N/A
N/A
Cooling system specifications
2011D
N/A
Case size
900 02 37.
5mm x 37.5mm
N/A
Device ID
0x162
N/A data
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
650MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
866MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Full text
Yes
No data
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, then to improve performance, it can go to a high clock speed.
Show all
1150MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
3
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
Code name
Ivy Bridge
Godaveri
Maximum temperature Tcase
67.4°C
max 105
Average: 75.1 °C
74°C
max 105
Average: 75.1 °C
Purpose
Desktop
Boxed Processor
FAQ
Can Intel Core i7-3770K and AMD A10-7890K work in 4K mode?
Intel Core i7-3770K — Not available. AMD A10-7890K — No data.
How many PCIe lanes
Intel Core i7-3770K — Not available. AMD A10-7890K — No data.
How much RAM is supported?
Intel Core i7-3770K supports 32 GB. AMD A10-7890K supports N/AGB.
How fast are the processors?
Intel Core i7-3770K runs at 3.5 GHz.1 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
Intel Core i7-3770K has 4 cores. AMD A10-7890K has 4 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
Intel Core i7-3770K — no.
AMD A10-7890K — No data.
Does the Intel Core i7-3770K have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i7-3770K — Intel HD Graphics 4000. AMD A10-7890K — AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
1262
Intel Core i7-3770K supports DDR3. AMD A10-7890K supports DDR3.
What is the socket of the processors?
FCLGA1155 is used to install the Intel Core i7-3770K. AMD A10-7890K is installed using FM2+.
Which architecture is used?
The Intel Core i7-3770K is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. AMD A10-7890K is based on the Godaveri architecture.
Is the multiplier unlocked on the Intel Core i7-3770K processor?
Intel Core i7-3770K — has. AMD A10-7890K — has.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, the Intel Core i7-3770K scored 6829 points. AMD A10-7890K scored 3309 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i7-3770K reaches 3.