Intel Core i7-7700K vs AMD FX-6300
Summary
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
226%
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
205%
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
237%
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-7700K |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 105% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 137% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-6300. |
Around 126% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6300 |
None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-7700K
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-7700K
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4.2 | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
HTT | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
TSX | ||||
TXT | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
F16C | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
Boost 2. 0 | ||||
SSE4.1 | ||||
SSE4a | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
AES | ||||
CVT16 | ||||
EVP | ||||
FMA4 | ||||
XOP | ||||
Turbo Core | ||||
HT3.1 |
Architecture
Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Intel_Kabylake | vs | AMD Piledriver | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
Codename | Kaby Lake | vs | Vishera | |
Release Date | Sep 2016 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 4 | vs | 6 | |
Threads | 8 | vs | 6 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 | vs | No |
Cache
Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 288 KB | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 6144 KB | |
L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ | |
Max Case Temp | 72°C | vs | unknown | |
Package | vs | uPGA | ||
Die Size | unknown | vs | 315mm² | |
Process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
Intel Core i7-7700K | AMD FX-6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 4200 MHz | vs | 3500 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4500 MHz | vs | 4100 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | |
Voltage | unknown | vs | 1. 4 V | |
TDP | 95 W | vs | 95 W |
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
5400 points
-
AMD FX-6300
2501 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
24192 points
-
AMD FX-6300
10504 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
2097
-
AMD FX-6300
978
points per second — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
27343
-
AMD FX-6300
15918
MIPS — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
150.72
-
AMD FX-6300
71.98
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
882.98
-
AMD FX-6300
267.49
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-7700K
972
-
AMD FX-6300
417
points — higher is better
amd-fx-8370 — Google Suche
AlleShoppingBilderVideosMapsNewsBücher
Suchoptionen
FX-8370 — AMD
www. amd.com › products › cpu › fx-8370
FX-8370 ; Plattform. Boxed Processor ; Produktfamilie. AMD FX-Series Processors ; Produktlinie. AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors ; Anzahl der CPU-Kerne. 8.
Ähnliche Fragen
Ist AMD FX gut?
Wann kam der FX 8350 raus?
Wie gut ist der AMD FX 6300?
Wann kam der AMD FX 6300?
Suchergebnis Auf Amazon.de Für: AMD FX-8370
www.amazon.de › AMD-FX-8370 › k=AMD+FX-8370
Ergebnissen 1 — 16 von 57 · AMD fx-8370 Eight-core Prozessor 4.0 GHz Sockel AM3 +, Retail. Hersteller des CPU-Modells: AMD. CPU-Geschwindigkeit:
CPUs & Prozessoren mit FX AMD FX-8370 online kaufen — eBay
www.ebay.de › … › CPUs & Prozessoren
Große Auswahl neuer und gebrauchter CPUs & Prozessoren mit FX AMD FX-8370 online entdecken bei eBay.
AMD FX-8370 CPUs & Prozessoren mit Sockel AM3 FX — eBay
www.ebay.de › … › CPUs & Prozessoren
Große Auswahl neuer und gebrauchter AMD FX-8370 CPUs & Prozessoren mit Sockel AM3 FX online entdecken bei eBay.
AMD FX Series FX-8370 8x 4.00GHz So.AM3+ BOX — | Mindfactory.de
www.mindfactory.de › product_info.php › AMD-FX-Series-FX-8370-8x-4…
Bewertung 4,8
(59)
Der AMD FX8370 Prozessor gehört zur neuen AMD Prozessorfamilie. Er ist der perfekte Prozessor in der schnellen Leistungsklasse. Dieser Prozessor bietet die …
Prozessor Serie: FX Series
Max. Turbotakt: 4.30GHz
AMD FX 8370 — Desktop-Prozessor — PC-Erfahrung.de
www.pc-erfahrung.de › fileadmin › php-skripte › cpu_tabelle_info
FX 8370 Logo Mit der neuen Piledriver-Mikroarchitektur, die im Jahr 2012 erstmals in den neuen FX-Modellen Einzug erhalten hat, konnte AMD die Leistung um …
Max. CPUs: 1
Transistoren: 1.200,0 Mio
Fx 8370 — eBay Kleinanzeigen
www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de › s-fx-8370
Mainboard AM3 MSI 970A Gaming PRO Carbon /AMD FX 8370E/ 8GB Ram. Mühlhausen. Gestern, 23:53 · GAMING PC/AMD FX-8370 8×4. 00GHz/ Radeon HD 7950 3GB/. Limburg · AMD …
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition — alle 3 Versionen im Vergleich
www.hardwareschotte.de › produkt-vergleich › AMD-FX-8370-Black-Edit…
AMD FX-8370 (8x 4,0-4,3GHz / 16MB / 125W). CPU-Generation. FX (Vishera). FX (Vishera). FX (Vishera). Mikroarchitektur-Info. Vishera 8-Cores (4-Modules).
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition im Test ▷ Testberichte.de-∅-Note
www.testberichte.de › … › Prozessoren › AMD Prozessoren
Im Test: »Gut« urteilen »Computer Bild« & Co ⭐ Was ist beim FX-8370 Black Edition von AMD gut und was nicht? Jetzt Testfazits lesen ➤ bei Testberichte.de!
AMD FX Series FX-8370 (8x 4.00GHz) FD8370FRW8KHK Sockel …
computerstoreberlin.de › AMD-FX-Series-FX-8370-8x-400GHz-FD8370F…
166,32 € Auf Lager
Computer Store Berlin AMD FX Series FX-8370 (8x 4.00GHz) FD8370FRW8KHK Sockel AM3+ #81164 in CPU-AM2 AM2+ AM3, AMD, CPU (Prozessoren)
Ähnliche Suchanfragen
amd fx-8370 release date
AMD FX-8370 vs Ryzen 5 3600
amd fx-8370 test
amd fx-8370 benchmark
AMD FX 8370 Windows 11
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition
amd fx-8370 eight-core processor
AMD FX 8370 eBay
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i7-4770K: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic wire headphones
43 BALLLA
AMD FX-6300
49 BALLA
Intel Core i7-4770K
Winner when compared to
9000 VS
66 facts in comparing
AMD FX-6300 9000 4770K
Why is AMD FX-6300 better than Intel Core i7-4770K?
- 1. 5x higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.5GHz vs 4 x 3.5GHz - 266MHz higher memory speed?
1866MHz vs 1600MHz - 5MB more L2 cache?
6MB vs 1MB - 32KB more L1 cache?
288KB vs 256KB - 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core - 0.4GT/s higher transfer rate?
5.4GT/s vs 5GT/s - Has FMA4?
Why is Intel Core i7-4770K better than AMD FX-6300?
- 2 more CPU threads?
8 vs 6 - Smaller 10nm semiconductors?
22nm vs 32nm - 11W below TDP?
84W vs 95W - 1.71x higher PassMark score?
7042 vs 4125 - Has integrated graphics? nine0031
- 4.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
25.6GB/s vs 21GB/s - 45. 23% higher PassMark score (single)?
2148 vs 1479 - 0.67MB/core more L3 cache per core?
2MB/core vs 1.33MB/core
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs
Intel Core i7-4790k
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-4770K
VS
AMD A10-7850K
9000 AT FX-6300 9000 9000 AMD FX-6300 9000 AM Core i5-7400
Intel Core i7-4770K
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 2200G
Intel Core 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000. -8350
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-4770k
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core I5-3302
Intel Core
Intel Core2702 INTE
VS
Intel Core i5-11400H
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
Intel Core i7-4770k
AMD Ryzen 3 2200g
AMD FX-6300 9
AMD FX-4300
Intel Core i7-4770k
VS
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD FX-6300
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core I7-4770K
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
Intel Core2-
AMD FX-6300
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i7-4770K
VS
Intel Core i7-3770k
Reviews of users
nine0002 3 reviews of users
AMD FX-6300
6. 7 /10
3 reviews of users
Intel Core i7-4770K
0 Reviews of Users
Intel Core i7-4770k
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 0 Reviews of Users
Functions
Price and Quality ratio
6.3 /10
9000 3 Votes
Reviews yet there are no
Games
5.7 /10 9 9
3 votes
reviews yet there is no
performance
6.0261 /10
3 Votes
Reviews yet not
Reliability
6.0 /10
9000 3 Votes
reviews so far so far. no
Energy efficiency
5.3 /10
3 votes
No reviews yet
CPU speed
3 Performance
20003
6 x 3.5GHz
4 x 3.5GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.1GHz
3.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Unlocked
✔AMD FX-6300
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications. nine0003
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. nine0003
L2 core
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
1.33MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This test measures CPU performance using multithreading. nine0003
PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
440.7seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
result Blender (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
1376.9seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used. nine0003
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
N/A
350MHz
Graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
∅
N/A
1250MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU actuators
∅
N/A
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics. nine0003
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
textured units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs imaging units
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics. nine0003
Memory
RAM speed
1866MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
21GB/s
25. 6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient. nine0003
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✖AMD FX-6300
✖Intel Core i7-4770K
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB. nine0003
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multi-threading
Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time. nine0003
Has AES
✔AMD FX-6300
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD FX-6300
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements. nine0003
Has F16C
✔AMD FX-6300
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening. nine0003
Has MMX
✔AMD FX-6300
✔Intel Core i7-4770K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD FX-6300
✖Intel Core i7-4770K
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming. nine0003
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4770K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
Comparison of Intel Core i7-3770 and AMD FX-8120
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-3770 and AMD FX-8120 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
nine0003
Intel Core i7-3770
versus
AMD FX-8120
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-3770
- Newer processor, 6 month(s) difference in release dates
- Approx. vs 61°C
- Newer process technology to make the processor more powerful but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- About 62% less power consumption: 77 Watt vs 125 Watt
- About 55% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 2072 vs 1334
- About 37% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 6398 vs 4657
- About 66% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 798 vs 480
- About 47% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3074 vs 2092
- 4. 5 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 80.961 vs 18
- About 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.585 vs 0.38
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark is 2.4 times greater: 2.179 vs 0.898
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) is about 8% faster more: 6.05 vs 5.613
Issue date | April 2012 vs October 2011 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 61°C |
Process | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt vs 125 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2072 vs 1334 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6398 vs 4657 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 798 vs 480 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3074 vs 2092 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 80.961 vs 18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.585 vs 0.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.179 vs 0.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.05 vs 5.613 |
Reasons to choose AMD FX-8120
- Unlocked CPU, unlocked multiplier makes it easy to overclock
- 4 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 4
- About 3% more clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
- About 50% more L1 cache, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache 8 times more, means more data can be saved in it for quick access
- Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score about 21% better: 2399 vs 1988
- Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark about 62% better: 7.468 vs 4.603
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4 GHz vs 3.90 GHz |
Level 1 cache | |
Level 2 cache | 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2399 vs 1988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.468 vs 4.603 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-3770
CPU 2: AMD FX-8120
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
nine0719 | ||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | nine0715 | |||
CPU 1 | ||||
CPU 2 |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0719
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0718
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
80.961 |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0718
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0722
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
Name | Intel Core i7-3770 | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2072 | 1334 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6398 | 4657 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 480 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3074 | 2092 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 1988 | 2399 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.603 | 7.468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 80.961 | 18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.585 | 0.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.179 | 0.898 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.05 | 5.613 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | ||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2876 |
Performance comparison
Intel Core i7-3770 | AMD FX-8120 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Ivy Bridge | Zambezi |
Issue date | April 2012 | October 2011 |
Price at first issue date | $324 | |
Place in rating | 1658 | 2223 |
Price now | $159.99 | $99. 99 |
Processor Number | i7-3770 | |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 17.10 | 19.43 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | FD8120FRGUBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8120FRW8KGU | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 40 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Crystal area | 160mm | 315 mm |
Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384KB |
Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8MB |
Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 8MB |
Process | 22nm | 32nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 61°C |
Maximum frequency | 3. 90 GHz | 4GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Number of threads | 8 | 8 |
Number of transistors | 1400 million | 1200 million |
Voltage P0 Vcore | Min: 1.0125V — Max: 1.4125V | |
Unlocked | ||
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | nine0722 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 1333/1600 | nine0722 |
Device ID | 0x162 | |
Graphics base frequency | 650MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Maximum GPU clock | 1.15 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | nine0722 | |
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | nine0722 |
Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
WiDi support | ||
Low Halogen Options Available | nine0722 | |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | |
Supported sockets | FCLGA1155 | AM3+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 125 Watt |
Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | n/a |
PCIe configurations | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 | |
Anti-Theft Technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4.
|