Intel pentium g4560 vs amd athlon 200ge: Pentium G4560 vs Athlon 200GE [3-Benchmark Showdown]

AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Pentium G4560

Summary

  • AMD Athlon 200GE

    100%

  • Intel Pentium G4560

    110%

Relative performance

  • AMD Athlon 200GE

    100%

  • Intel Pentium G4560

    118%

Relative performance

  • AMD Athlon 200GE

    100%

  • Intel Pentium G4560

    103%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Athlon 200GE
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Reasons to consider Intel Pentium G4560
18% higher single threaded performance.
Around 10% higher average synthetic performance.

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Pentium G4560

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

No clear winner declared

Features
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel Pentium G4560
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
CLMUL
MPX
SGX

Architecture
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel Pentium G4560
Architecture AMD Zen vs Intel_Kabylake
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
Codename Zen vs Kaby Lake
Release Date Jun 2018 vs Jan 2017

Cores
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel Pentium G4560
Cores 2 vs 2
Threads 4 vs 4
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics Radeon Vega 3 vs Intel HD 610

Cache
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel Pentium G4560
L1 Cache 96 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 4096 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared)

Physical
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel Pentium G4560
Socket AMD Socket AM4 vs Intel Socket 1151
Max Case Temp unknown vs 65°C
Package µPGA vs FC-LGA1151
Die Size 192mm² vs unknown
Process 14 nm vs 14 nm

Performance
AMD Athlon 200GE Intel Pentium G4560
Cpu Frequency 3200 MHz vs 3500 MHz
Turbo Clock none vs none
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage unknown vs unknown
TDP 35 W vs 51 W
  • AMD Athlon 200GE

    3520 points

  • Intel Pentium G4560

    4200 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Athlon 200GE

    8588 points

  • Intel Pentium G4560

    10080 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Athlon 200GE (simulated)

    126. 36

  • Intel Pentium G4560 (simulated)

    149.17

points — higher is better

points — higher is better

AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Pentium G4560 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences








AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Pentium G4560

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Athlon 200GE on one side and the Intel Pentium G4560 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

AMD Athlon 200GE

Intel Pentium G4560
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen

Kaby Lake
Core name

Raven Ridge

Kaby Lake-S
Family

Athlon 200

Pentium 4000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YD200GC6M2OFB,

YD200GC6FBBOX

BX80677G4560,

BXC80677G4560,

CM8067702867064,

QKZZ, SR32Y


Release date

Q3 2018

Q1 2017
Lithography

14 nm

14 nm+
Transistors

4. 950.000.000


Cores

2

2
Threads

4

4
Base frequency

3,2 GHz

3,5 GHz
Turbo frequency


High performance cores

2 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,5 GHz


Cache memory

4 MB

3 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

64 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2666

DDR4-2133/2400,

DDR3L-1333/1600


Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

39,74 GB/s

38,4 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

12

16
TDP

35 W

54 W
Suggested PSU

550W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Raven)

Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU cores

3


GPU execution units

12
GPU shading units

192

96
GPU base clock

300 MHz

350 MHz
GPU boost clock

1000 MHz

1050 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

684 GFLOPS

201,6 GFLOPS
Socket

AM4, PGA-1331

LGA1151
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM4 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

95°C

100°C
Crypto engine

AES New Instructions,

Secure Key


Security

Software Guard Extensions,

Memory Protection Extensions,

OS Guard,

Execute Disable Bit,

Boot Guard


Max display resolution

4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI),

4096 x 2304@60Hz (DP),

4096 x 2304@60Hz (eDP)


CPU-Z single thread

247

292
CPU-Z multi thread

955

1. 028
Cinebench R15 single thread

120

143
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

360

364
Cinebench R23 single thread

769

861
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

2.060

2.340
PassMark single thread

1.810

2.102
PassMark CPU Mark

4.147

3.506
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

3.628

3.994
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

7. 137

7.715
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

88,06 GFLOPS

43,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

204 pts / W

143 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium G4560 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Athlon 200GE is lower. The AMD Athlon 200GE was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Pentium G4560

292

1.028
AMD Athlon 200GE

247

955

In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Pentium G4560

143

364
AMD Athlon 200GE

120

360

In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Pentium G4560

861

2.340
AMD Athlon 200GE

769

2.060

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Athlon 200GE

1.810

4.147
Intel Pentium G4560

2.102

3.506

In single core, the difference is -14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Pentium G4560

3.994

7.715
AMD Athlon 200GE

3.628

7.137

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Pentium G4560

4. 070

6.962
AMD Athlon 200GE

3.740

6.747

In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

On Android:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Pentium G4560

4.466

8.771
AMD Athlon 200GE

3.201

6.145

In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.

On Mac OS X:




Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
AMD Athlon 200GE

4.681

9.717
Intel Pentium G4560

3.

2024 © All rights reserved