Intel Pentium D 925 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium D 925 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium D 925
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium D 925
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 198 vs 195
| Launch date | October 2006 vs May 2006 |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 198 vs 195 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
- 9.
1x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 356 vs 341
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 28 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 356 vs 341 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium D 925
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium D 925 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 198 | 195 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 341 | 356 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.912 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.694 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.054 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.981 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium D 925 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Presler | Windsor |
| Launch date | October 2006 | May 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 2703 | 2727 |
| Processor Number | 925 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 00 GHz |
|
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 162 mm2 | 220 mm |
| L1 cache | 28 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 63.4°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 376 million | 154 million |
| VID voltage range | 1. 200V-1.3375V |
|
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | PLGA775 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 89 Watt |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium D 925 with others
Intel
Pentium D 925
vs
Intel
Pentium D 930
Intel
Pentium D 925
vs
AMD
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Intel
Pentium D 925
vs
AMD
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Intel
Pentium D 925
vs
Intel
Pentium D 935
Intel
Pentium D 925
vs
AMD
Athlon 64 2000+
Intel
Pentium D 925
vs
Intel
Atom 330
Athlon XP 2500+ vs Pentium D 925
Table of Contents
- Physical Specifications
- Performance
- Architecture Details
- Cores
- Cache
- Features & Technologies
- Notes
Physical Specifications
| Socket | AMD Socket A | Intel Socket 775 |
|---|---|---|
| Process size | 130 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | 63 million | 376 million |
| Die size | 101 mm² | 140 mm² |
| Package | µPGA | FC-LGA4 |
| Foundry | — | Intel |
Performance
| Frequency | 1833 MHz | 3 GHz |
|---|---|---|
| Turbo clock | — | — |
| Base clock | 166 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Multiplier | 11. 0x |
15.0x |
| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |
| Voltage | 1.65 V | 1.33 V |
| TDP | 68 W | 95 W |
Architecture Details
| Vertical Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Production status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Release date | Feb 10th, 2003 | Oct 1st, 2006 |
| Codename | Barton | Presler |
| Generation | Athlon XP | Pentium D |
| Part | AXDA2500DKV4D | SL9KA |
| Memory support | unknown | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Dual-channel |
| ECC memory | No | No |
| PCI Express | — | Gen 2 |
Cores
| Total Cores | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Threads | 1 | 2 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 2 |
| Integrated graphics | — | — |
Cache
| Cache L1 | 128K | 28K |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L2 | 512K | 4MB |
Features & Technologies
| 3DNow! | Yes | — |
|---|---|---|
| EIST | — | Yes |
| Intel 64 | — | Yes |
| MMX | Yes | Yes |
| SSE | Yes | Yes |
| SSE2 | — | Yes |
| SSE3 | — | Yes |
Notes
| Notes | — | D0 Stepping |
|---|
Compare
Comparison of AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Pentium D 945
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 640 and Intel Pentium D 945 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
nine0003
AMD Athlon II X4 640
versus
Intel Pentium D 945
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Athlon II X4 640
- Newer processor, release dates difference 3 year(s) 10 month(s)
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- L1 cache is 18.3 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access -Core 3.
1 times bigger: 1191 vs 389
more applications at the same time: 4 vs 2
| Release date | May 2010 vs July 2006 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Process | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 28 KB |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 358 vs 220 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1191 vs 389 |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium D 945
- Approximately 13% more clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 2 times more L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
| Maximum frequency | 3. 4 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 4096 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 640
CPU 2: Intel Pentium D 945
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | nine0032 | |||
| CPU 1 | ||||
| CPU 2 |
| Name | AMD Athlon II X4 640 | Intel Pentium D 945 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1206 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2208 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 358 | 220 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 389 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.052 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Athlon II X4 640 | Intel Pentium D 945 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Propus | Presler |
| Production date | May 2010 | |
| Price at first issue date | $80 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2421 | 2697 |
| Price now | $239. 95 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 4.07 | |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | 945 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Crystal area | 169mm | 162 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 28KB |
| Level 2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4096KB |
| Process | 45nm | 65nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3. 4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 376 million |
| Base frequency | 3.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 63.4°C | |
| Permissible core voltage | 1.200V-1.3375V | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Supported sockets | AM3 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Parity FSB | nine0035 | |
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
Comparison Intel Pentium D 915 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ which is better?
| General | |
|
Type |
|
| Desktop | Desktop |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Presler | |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Process |
|
| 65 nm
-25 nm (-27.8%) better than |
|
|
Chip size |
|
| 140 mm2 | 220 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 376 million
222 million (144.2%) better than |
154 million |
|
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. nine0003 |
|
2. 8GHz
Better than at 0.6 GHz (27.3%) |
2.2 GHz |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. number of processors in configuration |
|
| 2 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| PLGA775 | 939 |
|
Release price |
|
| n/a | 309 $ |
|
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| n/a | |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| 63 °C | n/a |
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
| — | n/a |
|
PAE |
|
| 32bit | n/a |
|
FSB parity |
|
| — | n/a |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. nine0003 |
|
| 28 Kb | 256K |
|
Level 2 cache |
|
| 4 MB | 512 Kb |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 95W | 89 W
-6 W (-6.3%) better than |
|
EDB |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Permissible core voltage |
|
1.
| |
