A9-9425 [in 18 benchmarks]
AMD
A9-9425
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD A9-9425 sales 1 June 2016. This is Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 28 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3700 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket FT4 processor with a TDP of 15 Watt and a maximum temperature of 74 °C. It supports DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.51%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A9
9425
vs
EPYC
7h22
General info
A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 2130 | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (6 years ago) | |
| Current price | $561 | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state.
These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | |
| Threads | 2 | |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K) |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | of 12 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ) |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | of 57000 (Apple M1 Max) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc.
Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
| Socket | FT4 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A9-9425. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization, | |
| AES-NI | + | |
| FMA | + | |
| AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies.
Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9425’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into A9-9425.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A9-9425. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A9-9425
1.51
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- WinRAR 4.0
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation.
There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A9-9425
1519
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A9-9425
319
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A9-9425
479
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D.
Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A9-9425
2686
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A9-9425
4338
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A9-9425
2314
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads.
A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A9-9425
2
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A9-9425
125
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A9-9425
76
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.
5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A9-9425
0.9
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A9-9425
1
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data.
Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A9-9425
891
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A9-9425
10
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A9-9425
51
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A9-9425
3323
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A9-9425
2039
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
A9-9425
4518
Relative perfomance
Overall A9-9425 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
Intel Core i5-4210Y
101.99
VIA C7-M C7-M-1200
101.32
Intel Pentium 4405Y
100
AMD A9-9425
100
AMD A9-9410
99.34
Intel Core i5-4300Y
99.34
Intel Celeron 1017U
99.34
Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A9-9425 from Intel is Pentium 4405Y, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Pentium
4405Y
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A9-9425:
Intel Pentium 3560M
101.
99
Intel Core i5-4210Y
101.99
Intel Pentium 4405Y
100
AMD A9-9425
100
Intel Celeron 1017U
99.34
Intel Core i5-4300Y
99.34
Intel Celeron 2970M
98.68
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Pentium
4405Y
Compare
Core i5
4300Y
Compare
Celeron
1017U
Compare
A9
9410
Compare
A9
9420
Compare
Pentium
3560M
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with A9-9425 according to our statistics.
Radeon R5
Graphics
39.5%
HD
Graphics 4000
6.1%
Radeon
530
4.8%
GeForce GTX
660
3.7%
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
2.9%
Radeon
520
2.5%
Radeon RX
Vega 8
2.3%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
2.
2%
UHD
Graphics 620
2%
Radeon R5
M435
1.9%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD A9-9425 RADEON R5; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G (2T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022
AMD A9-9425 RADEON R5; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G (2T)
Back to validation
Intel Celeron G5905
Intel Pentium G4400
Intel Pentium G3260
Intel Pentium G3258
Intel Pentium G3420
Intel Pentium G3250
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Intel Celeron G4900
Intel Pentium G3240
Intel Pentium G3220
Intel Pentium G2130
Intel Celeron G3930
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Intel Celeron G1840
Intel Pentium G2030
Intel Pentium G860
Intel Pentium G2020
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
Intel Celeron G1820
Intel Pentium G645
Intel Pentium G2010
Intel Pentium G850
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Intel Celeron G1620
Intel Pentium G840
Intel Pentium G640
Pentium E5800
Intel Pentium G630
Pentium E6700
Intel Celeron G1610
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Pentium E6600
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Pentium E5700
Intel Pentium G620
Intel Celeron G550
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Pentium E6500
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Pentium 2020M
Intel Celeron G540
AMD 3020e
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Pentium E5500
Intel Celeron G530
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
Intel Pentium B980
Pentium E5400
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Pentium E5300
Intel Celeron E3400
Intel Celeron N4020
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Celeron E3300
Pentium E5200
Intel Core 2 6600
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Intel Celeron 4205U
Intel Core 2 Duo E4600
Intel Celeron 3865U
AMD A6-9500 RADEON R5; 8 COMPUTE CORES 2C+6G
Intel Celeron N4000
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
AMD A6-7480
Pentium E6300
Intel Pentium Dual E2220
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
AMD A4-7300
AMD A6-6400K
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Intel Pentium B940
Intel Celeron 1005M
Pentium T4500
Intel Pentium P6200
AMD A6-7400K
AMD A4-6300
(YOU) AMD A9-9425 RADEON R5; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
Intel Celeron 3205U
Intel Pentium 2117U
Intel Pentium 3558U
Intel Celeron 1000M
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Pentium T4400
Intel Pentium Dual E2200
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
AMD A6-5400K
Intel Pentium B960
Intel Celeron 1037U
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Intel Core 2 6400
Intel Celeron B830
Celeron T3500
Intel Pentium P6100
Pentium T4300
AMD A9-9420 RADEON R5; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Intel Pentium Dual T3400
AMD A4-5300B
AMD A4-5300
Intel Pentium B950
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
Pentium T4200
Intel Core 2 T7200
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
Intel Core 2 4400
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
AMD Athlon II X2 270
Intel Celeron B820
Intel Pentium Dual E2180
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750
AMD A9-9425 RADEON R5; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Intel Celeron B815
Intel Core 2 6300
AMD A4-4000
Intel Pentium Dual T2390
AMD Phenom II X2 555
AMD Athlon II X2 260
Intel Celeron 2957U
Intel Celeron 1007U
AMD Phenom II X2 550
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
AMD Athlon II X2 255
Intel Core 2 4300
Intel Celeron B800
AMD Athlon II X2 250
AMD Athlon II X2 B24
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
AMD Athlon II X2 245
AMD A6-4400M
AMD Athlon II X2 240
AMD Athlon II X2 220
AMD A6-9220 RADEON R4; 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
AMD A4-3400
AMD Athlon II X2 215
AMD A4-4300M
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3; 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
AMD Athlon 7750
AMD A4-9120 RADEON R3; 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
AMD A4-3300
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Intel Pentium D 3.
40GHz
AMD A4-3330MX
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
AMD E2-9000 RADEON R2; 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
Intel Celeron 847
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
AMD A4-3305M
Intel Celeron N2840
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Intel Celeron J1800
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Athlon II P320
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Celeron J3060
Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
AMD E2-9000e RADEON R2; 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
AMD E1-2500
Intel Celeron N3050
AMD E1-6010
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
AMD E2-1800
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
AMD E-450
AMD E-350
AMD E1-2100
AMD E1-1500
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz
AMD E1-1200
AMD C-60
AMD E-300
AMD C-70
AMD C-50
Intel Atom N450
Intel Atom N455
AMD A9-9425 — review.
CPU Benchmark & Specs
The processor AMD A9-9425 is developed on the 28 nm technology node and architecture Stoney Ridge (Excavator). Its base clock speed is 3.10 GHz, and maximum clock speed in turbo boost — 3.70 GHz. AMD A9-9425 contains 2 processing cores. To make a right choice for computer upgrading, please get familiar with the detailed technical specifications and benchmark results. Check socket compatibility before choosing.
3.6
Out of 11
Hitesti score
TOP-10 CPU
Most viewed
Intel Celeron N4020
2x 1.
10 GHz (2.80 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6x 2.10 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8x 1.
80 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
2x 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
2x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4x 2.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
6x 3.
70 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT
Intel Celeron N4500
2x 1.10 GHz (2.90 GHz)
Buy here:
AliExpress
General info
The base and maximum clock speed of the CPU AMD A9-9425, number of processing cores and threads.
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check VRM on the motherboard).
| Frequency: | 3.10 GHz | CPU Cores: | 2 | |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | CPU Threads: | 2 | |
| Turbo (2 Cores): | 3. 10 GHz |
Hyperthreading: | No | |
| Overclocking: | No |
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops.
The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better.
| GPU name: | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | |||
| GPU frequency: | 0.85 GHz | GPU (Turbo): | No turbo | |
| Generation: | 7 | DirectX Version: | 12 | |
| Execution units: | 3 | Shader: | 192 | |
Max. Memory: |
2 GB | Max. displays: | 3 | |
| Technology: | 28 nm | Release date: | Q2/2016 | |
Hardware codec support
Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers.
These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.
| h364: | Decode | |||
| JPEG: | Decode / Encode | |||
| h365 8bit: | Decode | |||
| h365 10bit: | Decode | |||
| VP8: | Decode | |||
| VP9: | Decode | |||
| VC-1: | Decode | |||
| AVC: | Decode / Encode | |||
Memory & PCIe
These are memory standards supported by CPUs.
The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.
| Memory type: | DDR4-2133 | Max. Memory: | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels: | 1 | ECC: | No | |
| PCIe version: | 3. 0 |
PCIe lanes: | 8 |
Encryption
Data encryption support
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal Management
| TDP: | 15 W | Tjunction max. : |
90 °C | |
| TDP up: | 25 W | TDP down: | 10 W |
Technical details
These are key parameters that will help you determine which CPU is better. Pay special attention to the release date, technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers), and the third-level cache (L3).
| L3-Cache: | 2.00 MB | Technology: | 28 nm | |
| Architecture: | Stoney Ridge (Excavator) | Virtualization: | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | |
| Socket: | FP4 | Release date: | Q2/2017 |
Devices using this processor
You probably know already what devices use CPUs.
These can be a desktop or a laptop.
| Used in: | Unknown | |||
This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios
Intel Pentium 4405U
2x 2.10 GHz (No turbo) HT
AMD A10-7850K
4x 3.
70 GHz (4.00 GHz)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
AMD A10-7800
4x 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz)
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
4x 1.
50 GHz (2.80 GHz)
Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2x 2.80 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A6-6400K
2x 3.90 GHz (4.10 GHz)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.
10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Celeron N2940
4x 1.83 GHz (2.25 GHz)
Intel Celeron 2950M
2x 2.00 GHz (No turbo)
The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn’t count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
6x 2.
80 GHz (3.30 GHz)
AMD Athlon X4 835
4x 3.10 GHz (3.40 GHz)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Celeron G1610T
2x 2.
30 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A9-9420
2x 3.00 GHz (3.60 GHz)
Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
Intel Pentium N3520
4x 2.17 GHz (2.42 GHz)
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2x 2.
80 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Celeron N2940
4x 1.83 GHz (2.25 GHz)
Intel Celeron 3865U
2x 1.
80 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.
Intel Core i5-4210U
2x 1.70 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U
2x 2.30 GHz (No turbo) HT
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.
10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
AMD A8-5600K
4x 3.60 GHz (3.90 GHz)
Intel Core M-5Y10c
2x 0.80 GHz (2.00 GHz) HT
It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 — the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.
Intel Celeron J1900
4x 2.00 GHz (2.42 GHz)
AMD A8-4500M
4x 1.90 GHz (2.80 GHz)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2x 0.
90 GHz (2.20 GHz) HT
Intel Atom x7-E3950
4x 1.60 GHz (2.00 GHz)
Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.
Intel Celeron G1610
2x 2.60 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A8-7600
4x 3.
10 GHz (3.80 GHz)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
AMD A8-6500
4x 3.50 GHz (4.10 GHz)
Intel Pentium 4405U
2x 2.
10 GHz (No turbo) HT
Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.
AMD A8-3510MX
4x 1.80 GHz (2.50 GHz)
Intel Pentium 4405Y
2x 1.50 GHz (No turbo) HT
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.
10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Core i3-2330M
2x 2.20 GHz (No turbo) HT
AMD A10-7300
4x 1.90 GHz (3.20 GHz)
It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.
AMD A6-6420K
2x 4.
00 GHz (4.20 GHz)
AMD A6-5200
4x 2.80 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
Intel Celeron G1620T
2x 2.
40 GHz (No turbo)
AMD A6-6310
4x 2.00 GHz (2.40 GHz)
This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2x 0.90 GHz (2.20 GHz) HT
AMD A8-4555M
4x 1.
60 GHz (2.40 GHz)
AMD A9-9425
2x 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz)
AMD A8-7200P
4x 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz)
Intel Core i7-3820QM
4x 2.
70 GHz (3.70 GHz) HT
3.6
Out of 11
Hitesti score
Share on social network:
In order to leave a review you need to login
Reviews of AMD A9-9425
Compare AMD A9-9425
VS
AMD A8-7650K
AMD Epyc 7232P
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T
AMD A6-9220C
AMD A10-5700
Intel Core i5-5257U
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Intel Xeon W-3223
Intel Core i5-11500
Processor A9-9425 [in 18 benchmarks]
AMD
A9-9425
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD A9-9425 sales 1 June 2016.
This is Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3700MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket FT4 processor with a TDP of 15W and a maximum temperature of 74°C. It supports DDR4 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.51%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A9
9425
or
EPYC
7h22
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the A9-9425, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
| place in performance rating | 2130 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Type | 0002 A9-9425 quantitative parameters: number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state.  They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
Virtualization technologiesA9-9425 supported technologies that speed up virtual machines are listed.
Memory support
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A9-9425.
Video — characteristicsGeneral parameters of the integrated video card in A9-9425.
Benchmark tests2
These are the results of tests A9-9425 for performance in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. 
5 64-bit multi-core 
Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package. 
The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights. 
34
68
5% 
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
237 Frames/s 
717 mHash/s 
000 Fps | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1330 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1519 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 2034 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3077 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection |
7.781 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 112.324 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0.615 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 13.577 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 40.717 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 943 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1243 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3556 Frames |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen |
943.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1243.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3556.000 Fps |
| Boost Core Clock | 800MHz |
| Core frequency | 200MHz |
| Floating point performance | 388.1 gflops |
| Process | 28nm |
| Number of shaders | 256 |
| Texturing speed | 12. 13 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 2,410 million |
Gaming performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
3Metro Exodus (2019)
4 Far Cry New Dawn (2019))
5 Apex Legends (2019)
6. Just Cause 4 (2018)
7. Darksiders III (2018)
8. Farming Simulator 19 (2018)
9. Hitman 2 (2018)
10 Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)
11.
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)
12. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
13. F1 2018 (2018)
14. Monster Hunter World (2018)
15. Far Cry 5 (2018)
16.X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
17 Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
18. Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
19. Fortnite (2018)
20. Destiny 2 (2017)
21. ELEX (2017)
22. The Evil Within 2 (2017)
23. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
24. FIFA 18 (2017)
25 Ark Survival Evolved (2017)
26. F1 2017 (2017)
27.
Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
28 Team Fortress 2 (2017)
29. Dirt 4 (2017)
30 Rocket League (2017)
31. Prey (2017)
32 Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
33. Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
34. For Honor (2017)
35 Resident Evil 7 (2017)
36. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
37 Civilization VI (2016)
38 Overwatch (2016)
39 Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
40. Hitman 2016 (2016)
41. The Division (2016)
42. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
43 Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
44.
World of Warships (2015)
45. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
46. The Witcher 3 (2015)
47 Dirt Rally (2015)
48 Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
49. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014)
50 Alien: Isolation (2014)
51. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
52 Sims 4 (2014)
53 Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
54. Thief (2014)
55. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
56. Battlefield 4 (2013)
57 Total War: Rome II (2013)
58 Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
59 Metro: Last Light (2013)
60 BioShock Infinite (2013)
61 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
62.
Tomb Raider (2013)
63. Diablo III (2012)
64. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
65 Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
66. Starcraft 2 (2010)
67. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | ||
| Medium, 1366×768 | 28.High, 1366×768 | 25.00 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 30.90 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 9.90 |
Metro Exodus (2019)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 8.40 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.30 |
FAR CRY New Dawn,
| 0060 | 6.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 2. 00 |
Apex Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 15.40 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.00 |
Just CAUSE 4 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 12.30 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.00 |
Darksiders III
| Low, 1280×720 | 22.50 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 11.80 |
Farming Simulator 19 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 39.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 14.00 |
Hitman 2 (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 7.40 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 3.59 3.59 3.59 3.59 3.59 3.59 3.59 3.50 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 10. 00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.00 |
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 13.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 5.00 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
| Low, 1280×7200059 13.00 | |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.00 |
F1 2018 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 12.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 12.00 |
Monster Hunter World (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 1.00 |
FAR CRY 5 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 1.00 |
X-Plane 11.
11 (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 13.70 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 9.40 |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 7.50 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 900.0060 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 8.10 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.30 |
Fortnite (2018)
| Low, 1280×720 | 28.50068 |
ELEX (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 6.00 |
The Evil Within 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 6.00 |
Middle-earth : Shadow of War (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 8.00 |
FIFA 18 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 42. 60
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 19.40 |
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 15.00 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 6.20 |
F1 2017 (2017)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 18.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 13.00 | HIGH, 1920×1080 | 10.00 |
| Low, 1280×720 | 12.10 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 35.20 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 32.80 |
DIRT 4 (2017)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 32.80 |
ROCKET LEAGUE
| 44.60 | |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 22. 75 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 16.30 |
Prey (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 21.50 |
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 12.20 |
GHOST Recon Wildlands (2017)
| 10.90 | |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 5.20 |
For Honor (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 19.90 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.30 |
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 28.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 13.20 |
| Low, 1280×720 | 53.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 36.10 |
Civilization VI (2016)
| Low, 1024×768 | 29. 40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.10 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280×720 | 30.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
| Low, 1280×768 | 7.00 |
Hitman 2016 (2016)
| Low, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 2.00 |
The Division (2016)
| LOW, 1280×720 | 18.20 |
| Medium, 1366×768 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024×768 | 17.03 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.70 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 26. 90 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 21.60 |
World of Warships (2015)
| LOW, 130059 LOW, 130059 LOW, 130059 LOUS, 130059 LOW0068 | |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 28.80 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280×720 | 34.15 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 21.20 |
The Witcher 3 ( 2015)
| LOW, 1024×768 |
DIRT RALY (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 59.70 9009 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 22.00 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 19.30 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 14.80 |
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 12. 00 |
Alien (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.60 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
| Low, 1280×720 | 19.15 |
| Medium, 1344×756 | 12.40 |
SIMS 4 (2014)
| LOW, 1024×768 | 111.90 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 34.30 |
Wolfenstein: the)0021
| Low, 1280×720 | 17.40 |
| Medium, 1280×720 | 13.90 |
Thief (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 9.90 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 6.80 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 5.70 |
X-PLANE 10.25 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 27. 65 9006
|
| Medium, 1366×768 | 15.45 |
| High, 1366×768 | 7.75 |
Battlefield 4 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 16.50 | |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.00 | |
| HIGH, 1366×768 |
Total War: Rome II (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 27.00 |
| 20.30 | |
| High, 1366×768 | 17.10 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 13.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.00 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 5.00 |
Metro: Last Light (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 13.95 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10. 60 |
| High, 1366×768 | 6.45 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280×720 | 40.12 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 24.13 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 19.30 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 7.50 |
Starcraft II: Heart of the Swarm
0057
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 46.53 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 24.40 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 17.47 |
Diablo III (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 50.70 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 34. 55 |
| High, 1366×768 | 27.70 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280×720 | 30.05 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 20.35 |
| HIGH, 1366×768 | 14.15 |
Deus Ex Human Revolum0057
StarCraft 2 (2010)
| Low, 1024×768 | 81.40 |
| Medium, 1360×768 | 24.30 |
| HIGH, 1360×768 | 18.60 |
| Ultra, 1920×1080 | 12.40 |
| LOW, 800×600 | 82.60 |
| Medium, 1024×768 | 43.70 |
Characteristics
| Branch | Name | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Production date | 2Q18 | |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in the ranking | 1098 | |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | |
| Applicability | Laptop | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 1 GHz |
|
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Crystal area | 124mm | |
| Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Level 2 cache | 1MB | |
| Process | 28nm | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | |
| Number of cores | 2 | |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Number of transistors | 1200 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum number of memory channels | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
| Enduro | ||
| Maximum GPU clock | 900MHz | |
| Integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulcan | ||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
|
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Amd a9 9425 test
Computers admin 0 comments
Contents
- 1 Price in Russia
- 2 Family
- 3 AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.
SR) test
- 3.1 Speed in games
- 3.2 Speed in heavy office use
- 0008
- 4 The speed of numerical operations
- 5 Technical characteristics
- 5.1 Cinebench R15 Rendering
- 6 Description
Number Number-2. — 3.1 GHz. The maximum frequency in AMD Turbo Core mode reaches 3.4 GHz.
Price in Russia
Family
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) test
Game speed
AMD A9 performance-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in rendering, video encoding, working with virtual machines and databases.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most professional applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Numeric operation speed
| Min. | Medium | Max. |
| 27 | 1 core 57 | 76 |
| 45 | 2 cores 95 | 132 |
| Min. | Medium | Max. |
| 59 | 4 cores 99 | 131 |
| 60 | 8 cores 101 | 131 |
| Min. | Medium | Max. |
| 60 | All cores 101 | 131 |
A system with few fast cores is great for gaming, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. 
Compared to the AMD A9-9420, the new clock speed is increased by 100 MHz, so it’s not worth talking about a big performance boost. 
| Manufacturer |
|---|
| AMD |
| Series |
| A9 |
| Microarchitecture |
| Stoney Ridge |
| Number of cores |
| 22 |
| Clock frequency |
| 3100 — 3700 MHz |
| Level 2 Cache |
| 1MB |
| Power input |
| 10-25W |
| Graphics core |
| AMD Radeon R5 (800 MHz) |
| Technology |
28 N. m. |
CineBench R15 rendering
CINEBENCH cross-platform benchmark benchmark is a benchmark widely used to evaluate the performance of Intel and AMD processors. It is based on the popular animation software CINEMA 4D of the German company MAXON, which is actively used by studios around the world to create 3D content. The CPU test involves rendering a certain scene in multi-threaded mode (all CPU cores are used). Rendering is the process of obtaining an image from a model using a computer program. Based on the result of the processor test, it is easy to calculate its speed — the faster the processor calculates the render, the more points it gets.
CineBench R15 CPU Single
Description
AMD started AMD A9-9425 sales on June 1, 2016. This is Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured in 28 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3700 MHz, the multiplier is locked.