Amd geode lx800 benchmark: AMD Geode LX 800 vs Intel Core i3-380UM

EEMBC Announces First Results for Industry-Standard Power/Performance EnergyBench Test

EEMBC Announces First Results for Industry-Standard Power/Performance EnergyBench Test

EEMBC Announces First Results for Industry-Standard Power/Performance EnergyBench Test

AMD Geode [email protected] Processor Is First to Show EnergyBench Certified Scores for Digital Imaging Workloads

EL DORADO HILLS, Calif.—Aug. 7, 2006—The Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium (EEMBC) today announced publication of the first certified embedded processor benchmark scores using EnergyBench, a new standard that provides data on the amount of energy a processor consumes while running EEMBC’s performance benchmarks.

The device benchmarked for these landmark scores is the 500-MHz AMD Geode [email protected]* processor, which was tested in an out-of-the-box environment simultaneously with EnergyBench and ConsumerBench Version 1.1, an EEMBC benchmark suite that allows users to approximate the performance of processors in digital still cameras, printers, and other embedded systems that handle digital imaging tasks.

Across the ConsumerBench battery of tests, performance results for the AMD Geode [email protected] processor ranged from 18 iterations per second for JPEG compression to 204 iterations per second for RGB-to-CMYK conversion, while the EnergyBench scores for each of the kernels indicated an average power consumption range of 2.34 W (for RGB-to-YIQ conversion) to 2.58 W (for JPEG decompression). Overall, the results show that the power consumed by the processor depended on what workload the processor was handling and that this could vary within the ConsumerBench tests by as much as 10 percent.

«As a metric, EnergyBench will be most useful when we are able to compare results from multiple processors side by side, but these results for the AMD Geode LX processor are sufficient to demonstrate the rationale behind EnergyBench — namely that there is no such thing as ‘typical’ power consumption,» said Markus Levy, EEMBC president. «This fact won’t come as news to veteran systems designers, but now they’ll have a tool that will help them avoid any surprises about the power consumption behavior of embedded processors in situ. «

The AMD Geode [email protected] processor is specifically designed to provide a high level of performance with low power consumption. Typical applications include small form-factor products such as thin clients, interactive set-top boxes, single-board computers (SBCs), personal access devices (PADs), and mobile Internet and entertainment devices.

«It is fitting that the AMD Geode [email protected] processor should be the first embedded processor to be tested with EnergyBench, since this processor family was designed from the ground up to enable both high performance and low power consumption,» said Erik Salo, director of AMD’s Embedded Computing Solutions division. «The EEMBC ConsumerBench and EnergyBench scores clearly demonstrate the excellent performance per watt offered by AMD Geode LX processors.»

EEMBC has implemented EnergyBench using the LabVIEW platform and a data acquisition (DAQ) card, both from National Instruments. While the performance benchmarks are running on the target board, EnergyBench calculates the average energy per iteration using multiple unaliased sampling frequencies and an adaptive statistical process. The DAQ card samples the voltage levels as well as a trigger channel and writes the samples to a file. The result of the EnergyBench test is the average energy for one iteration of the workload represented by the performance benchmark kernel running on the target. Users can also use the EEMBC setup to examine minimum and maximum power while the benchmark is running.

A detailed ConsumerBench score report for the AMD Geode [email protected] processor, which has been verified and certified by the EEMBC Technology Center, is available for free from the EEMBC Web site at www.eembc.org.

EnergyBench is available for license in conjunction with any EEMBC performance benchmark suite. For further information, visit www.eembc.org.

# # #

About EEMBC
EEMBC, the Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium, develops and certifies real-world benchmarks and benchmark scores to help designers select the right embedded processors for their systems. Every processor submitted for EEMBC benchmarking is tested for parameters representing different workloads and capabilities in communications, networking, consumer, office automation, automotive/industrial, embedded Java, and network storage-related applications. With members including leading semiconductor, intellectual property, and compiler companies, EEMBC establishes benchmark standards and provides certified benchmarking results through the EEMBC Technical Center.

EEMBC’s members include Adaptec, Altera, AMCC, AMD, Analog Devices, ARC International, ARM, Artifex Software, Atmel, Broadcom, Code Sourcery, Esmertec, Faraday, Freescale Semiconductor, Fujitsu Microelectronics, Green Hills Software, IAR Systems, IBM, Imagination Technologies, Improv Systems, Infineon Technologies, Intel, IPFlex, LSI Logic, Marvell Semiconductor, Matsushita Electric Industrial, Mentor Graphics, Microchip Technology, MIPS Technologies, MQX Embedded, National Instruments, NEC Electronics, Nokia, Oki Electric Industry, Patriot Scientific, Philips Semiconductors, PMC-Sierra, Qualcomm, Red Hat, Renesas Technology, Sandbridge Technologies, Sony Computer Entertainment, STMicroelectronics, Stretch, Sun Microsystems, Tensilica, Texas Instruments, Toshiba, VIA Technologies, and Wind River Systems.

EnergyBench and ConsumerBench are trademarks and EEMBC is a registered trademark of the Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium. AMD, Geode, and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All other trademarks appearing herein are the property of their respective owners.

* This processor operates at 500 MHz.

AMD Geode LX 800 vs Intel Core i5-8257U — VsRank

Advantages
General information
Technical specifications
RAM Built-in GPU Advanced technologies
Cinebench tests Geekbench tests Other tests

AMD Geode LX 800

AMD Geode LX 800 lost!

Number of points: 2056

Intel Core i5-8257U

Intel Core i5-8257U win!

Number of points: 7580

  1. By 11 W less power consumption
  2. By 3 cores more
  3. By 7 threads more
  4. +900 MHz processor clock speed advantage
  5. +3900 MHz processor turbo clock advantage
  6. +872 KB advantage L2 cache
  7. +6 MB advantage L3 cache
  8. By 51 nm less technological process
  9. +32 GB RAM advantage
  10. +2400 MHz RAM clock advantage
  11. By 2 channels more for RAM
  12. Supports virtualization technology
  13. Has a dynamic processor frequency
  14. There is an extension to the AES command system
  15. Supports AVX command system extension

Information about the series and architecture of AMD Geode LX 800 and Intel Core i5-8257U, as well as the release date of these processors.

Geode LX

Core i5

Castle

Coffee Lake

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

2019-07-10

3.0

3.0

The main technical characteristics of AMD Geode LX 800 and Intel Core i5-8257U processors.

1

4

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)

1

8

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)

500 MHz

1400 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz

No data

3900 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)

128 KB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)

No data

6 MB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7742
256 MB

4 W

15 W

Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)

65 nm

14 nm

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)

Information about the type and the maximum possible RAM capacity support, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.

No data

32 GB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)

No data

2400 MHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)

No data

2

Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)

No data

DDR4

Characteristics of an integrated graphics processing unit. Support of 4K, clock speed, as well as video core memory capacity.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

Iris Plus Graphics 645

350 MHz

300 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-8706G (931)

1.15 GHz

1.15 GHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 MHz

64 GB

No data

Leader — Intel Xeon E-2176G (128)

4096×2304@24Hz

4096×2304@30Hz

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

12_1

12_1

4. 4

4.6

Support by processors of such advanced technologies as multithreading, Turbo mode, AES cryptographic algorithm, and x86 AVX command system extension.

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

AMD Geode LX 800

Intel Core i5-8257U

Cinebench benchmark is a widely known and free computer performance test (testing a CPU and a video card). The program has been developed based upon MAXON Cinema 4D – a professional application for creating 3D animation.

No data

1494

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (8857)

No data

388

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (514)

No data

637. 97

Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)

No data

159.33

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)

134.5

No data

Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)

Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a number of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer has to deal with in everyday work.

No data

4181

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (16376)

No data

989

Leader — Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1301)

No data

16580

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (55569)

No data

4608

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6308)

A number of different tests including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many others.

372

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)

No data

5.28

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (27)

No data

714

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (111)

No data

4083

Leader — Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9643)

No data

19620

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (93099)

No data

40071

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)

No data

124. 1

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980HK (158)

No data

110

Leader — Intel Core i9-9880H (134)

AMD LX800 Replacement — UK Electronic Design Experts DSL Ltd

Introduction

Whilst the end of life (EOL) date for the AMD LX800 has again recently been pushed back, the time will approach when the end of life will be announced, though worryingly to embedded hardware manufacturers, few equivalent alternatives exist.

Intel would push their latest Atom range as a migration path, though whilst you’ll benefit from substantial performance increase, the OEM must also suffer a vast increase in overall power consumption. AMD’s latest offering, the G-Series, whilst an exceptional CPU with lightning graphical performance, still represents a significant increase in required power.

The reality is that more often than not the AMD LX800’s performance is ample for single usage embedded applications. When the LX800’s end of life does arrive, a large gap will be left in the hardware market, for OEMs wishing to continue benefiting from the advantages of x86 products.

Plugging that gap, the new VDX2 CPU from DMP/ICOP Technology addresses this issue.

With a scalable core, at 800MHz (maximum 1GHz) the VDX2 outperforms the LX800 in every area whilst keeping the power footprint to a minimum. The VDX2 actually integrates 5 additional functions into the CPU, so whilst the CPU isn’t directly comparable, the focusing purely on the vCore TDP for comparative purposes – the LX800’s is 3.6W to the VDX2’s 3.45W.

Actually, as the VDX2 is a true System-On-Chip, even integrating graphics and Ethernet, the power savings are even more substantial, due to the negation of external components to satisfy both functions.

The below benchmarks demonstrate the VDX2’s prowess – though don’t take our word for it, DSL are happy to provide evaluation kits for any LX800 migration candidates to test themselves!

CPUmark 99 version 1.0 32bit

 Ranking

1 2 3 4  5

 CPU

VDX2
CPU: 1GHz
RAM: 400MHz

 VDX2
CPU: 1GHz
RAM: 300MHz
 VDX2
CPU: 800MHz
RAM: 300MHz
LX800
CPU: 500MHz
RAM: 333MHz

VDX1
CPU: 800MHz
RAM: 300MHz

 Score  60.8 47.8 40.7 39. 1

24.5

CrystalMark 2004R3

 

VDX2 800MHz

LX800

Overall

696

579

ALU

1444

1014

Fibonacci

506

263

Napierian

271

207

Eratosthenes

219

223

Quicksort

426

299

FPU

702

751

MikoFPU

43

78

RandMeanSS

425

398

FFT

169

188

Mandelbrot

43

65

MEM

815

794

Read

239

146

Write

295

435

Read/Write

188

121

Cache

715

700

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City

We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/geode-lx-800%23characteristics

Popular video card comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

or


GeForce RTX
3060


GeForce RTX
2060

or


GeForce RTX
3050 8GB


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

or


GeForce GTX
1650


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

or


GeForce RTX
3070


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

or


GeForce RTX
3050 8GB


GeForce RTX
2060 Super

or


GeForce RTX
3060

Popular video cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti


Radeon RX
Vega 7


GeForce GTX
1650


GeForce RTX
3060


GeForce GTX
1060 6GB

Popular 9 processor comparisons0008


Ryzen 5
5600X

or


Core i5
12400F


Core i5
1135G7

or


Ryzen 5
5500U


Ryzen 5
3600

or


Core i5
10400F


Ryzen 5
5600X

or


Ryzen 5
5600G


Ryzen 5
3600

or


Ryzen 5
5600X


Ryzen 7
3700X

or


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular processors


Ryzen 5
5500U


EPYC
7h22


Core i3
1115G4


Core i5
1135G7


Ryzen 5
3500U


Ryzen 3
5300U

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City

We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/geode-lx-800%23benchmarks

Popular video card comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

or


GeForce RTX
3060


GeForce RTX
2060

or


GeForce RTX
3050 8GB


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

or


GeForce GTX
1650


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

or


GeForce RTX
3070


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

or


GeForce RTX
3050 8GB


GeForce RTX
2060 Super

or


GeForce RTX
3060

Popular video cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti


Radeon RX
Vega 7


GeForce GTX
1650


GeForce RTX
3060


GeForce GTX
1060 6GB

Popular

processor comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

or


Core i5
12400F


Core i5
1135G7

or


Ryzen 5
5500U


Ryzen 5
3600

or


Core i5
10400F


Ryzen 5
5600X

or


Ryzen 5
5600G


Ryzen 5
3600

or


Ryzen 5
5600X


Ryzen 7
3700X

or


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular processors


Ryzen 5
5500U


EPYC
7h22


Core i3
1115G4


Core i5
1135G7


Ryzen 5
3500U


Ryzen 3
5300U

CPB905 3.

5″ Single Board Computer with AMD LX800 Processor

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR NEW PROJECTS

Specifications

  • Processor: AMD Geode LX800 500 MHz (soldered)
  • RAM: 256 MB SDRAM (soldered)
  • Expansion module support: 32 bit PCI, 16 bit ISA
  • Video: CRT/TFT/STN/LVDS up to 1920×1440 pixels
  • Drives: IDE soldered flash drive up to 512 MB, 1xIDE, CompactFlash Type I/II 9 connector0532
  • Network interfaces: 2x Fast Ethernet
  • I/O ports: 3x RS232, 4x 232/422/485 isolated, 4x USB 2.0
  • FBUS port
  • Dimensions: 102 x 146 mm
  • Operating temperature range -40…+85°
  • Shock/vibration resistance: 50G/5G
  • Support: Linux, QNX, Windows XP Embedded/CE
  • MTBF: 150,000 hours

Product Consultation

Description

Download

Publications

Order

-bit ISA).All components, including the CPU and RAM, are soldered on board the CPB905 to ensure high reliability when working in vibration conditions.

CPB905 has a wide range of communication interfaces (2 FastEthernet, 7 COM ports of which 4 are galvanically isolated, 4 USB 2.0), supports displaying information on monitors with CRT, TFT, LVDS interfaces up to a resolution of 1920×1440 pixels.

The power consumption of the CPB905 is within 6 watts, which makes it suitable for use in passively cooled systems. PB905 is designed to work in the industrial temperature range (-40…+85?) and supports Linux, Windows XP Embedded, QNX.

  • Specification / PDF 0.19 MB
  • Educational environment for mobile robot lifecycle management, Dmitry Petrov / PDF 1.3 MB
  • Strategy and development of Windows XP Embedded in Russia / PDF 0.57 MB
  • Computer modules: standards, specifications and guidelines for use. Part 2 / PDF 0.78 MB
  • Fastwel Embedded Industrial Computers, Alexey Medvede.pdf / PDF 11.68 MB
  • New Embedded Processor Modules Based on Intel Atom E38xx Processors, Alexey Medvedev, Nina Kuzmina.