Amd ryzen 3 2500u benchmark: UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

23 мая, 2021

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,5GHz. The second is used on the thin and light laptop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Market (main)

Notebook

Thin and light laptop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen+

Zen
Core name

Picasso

Raven Ridge
Family

Ryzen 3 3000

Ryzen 5 2000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YM3200C4T2OFG

YM2500C4T4MFB
Release date

Q1 2019

Q4 2017
Lithography

14 nm

14 nm
Transistors

4. 940.000.000

4.950.000.000
Cores

2

4
Threads

4

8
Base frequency

2,6 GHz

2,0 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,5 GHz

3,6 GHz
High performance cores

—

4 Cores 8 Threads @ 2,0 / 3,6 GHz
Cache memory

4 MB

4 MB
Max memory capacity

32 GB

32 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2400

DDR4-2400
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

35,76 GB/s

35,76 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

12

12
TDP

15 W

15 W
GPU integrated graphics

AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Picasso)

AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven)
GPU cores

3

8
GPU shading units

192

512
GPU base clock

300 MHz

300 MHz
GPU boost clock

1200 MHz

1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

384 GFLOPS

1. 126 GFLOPS
Socket

FP5

FP5
Maximum temperature

105°C

95°C
Crypto engine

—

Advanced Encryption Standard instructions
Security

—

Enhanced Virus Protection
CPU-Z single thread

134

337
CPU-Z multi thread

402

1.818
Cinebench R15 single thread

130

137
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

320

609
Cinebench R23 single thread

756

786
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

1. 772

2.824
PassMark single thread

1.830

1.831
PassMark CPU Mark

3.933

6.568
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

3.054

3.138
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

5.874

8.623
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

56,4 GFLOPS

116,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

392 pts / W

575 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500U has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

337

1.818
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

134

402

In single core, the difference is 151%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 352%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

137

609
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

130

320

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 90%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

786

2.824
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

756

1.772

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 59%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

1.831

6.568
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

1.830

3.933

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 67%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

3.138

8.623
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

3.054

5.874

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 47%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

3. 016

8.517
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

2.946

5.082

In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 68%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 2500U Intel equivalent

See also:

AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAMD Ryzen 3 3200GE

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs Ryzen 3 3200U: performance comparison

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2. 0 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with 4-cores against the 2.6 GHz Ryzen 3 3200U with 2-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 5 2500U

36

Ryzen 3 3200U

34

Multi-Core Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 5 2500U

11

Ryzen 3 3200U

7

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 5 2500U

50

Ryzen 3 3200U

55

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 5 2500U

32

Ryzen 3 3200U

28

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 3200U and 2500U

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 14% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 787 vs 693 points
  • 3% higher Turbo Boost frequency (3. 6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

  • Newer — released 1-year and 3-months later
  • More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
  • More than 10° C higher critical temperature

Promotion

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 2500U
+5%

795

Ryzen 3 3200U

760

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 2500U
+61%

2855

Ryzen 3 3200U

1774

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 2500U
+1%

1822

Ryzen 3 3200U

1805

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 2500U
+68%

6468

Ryzen 3 3200U

3840

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 5 2500U
+13%

780

Ryzen 3 3200U

690

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 5 2500U
+75%

2723

Ryzen 3 3200U

1556

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 3 3200U

General

Vendor AMD AMD
Released October 26, 2017 January 6, 2019
Type Laptop Laptop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen (Raven Ridge) Zen+ (Picasso)
Integrated GPU Radeon Vega 8 Radeon Vega 3
Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 2
P-Threads 8 4
Base Frequency (P) 2. 0 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 3.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Total
Total Cores 4 2
Total Threads 8 4
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 26x
L1 Cache 128K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 512K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 4MB (shared) 4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Transistors 4. 9 billions 4.9 billions
Fabrication process 14 nm 12 nm
TDP (PL1) 15 W 12-25 W (configurable)
Socket FP5 FP5
Peak temperature 95°C 105°C
Integrated Graphics Radeon Vega 8 Radeon Vega 3
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1100 MHz 1200 MHz
Shading Units 512 192
TMUs 32 12
ROPs 8 8
Execution Units 8 3
TGP 65 W 15 W
Max. Resolution 3840×2160 — 60 Hz 3840×2160 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Ryzen 5 2500U

1.13 TFLOPS

Ryzen 3 3200U

0.54 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory types — DDR4-2400 — DDR4-2400
Memory Size 32 GB 32 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 35.76 GB/s 35.76 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes
Official site AMD Ryzen 5 2500U official page AMD Ryzen 3 3200U official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 12

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 5 2500U

14 (66.