Heavens benchmark: Heaven Benchmark Download (2022 Latest)

Unigine Heaven Benchmark — Fastest and Latest 2021

An introduction to GPU testing: what is it and how do you do it.

A GPU benchmark is a test of how well your GPU works under pressure, usually in the form of a piece of software that subjects your GPU to a series of graphically intensive tasks. When faced with a difficulty in a 3D environment, you have the option of altering parameters like resolution and quality to make it more or less taxing.

However, many gamers will take no less than 144 fps or even 244 fps in order to keep up with their top-of-the-line gaming displays as the absolute minimum acceptable frame rate.

If your GPU can run a demanding test at 60 frames per second without crashing, it should be able to handle whatever you throw at it. As a result, your gaming experiences will be fluid and reliable, allowing you to take pleasure in games the way the creators had intended.

The more graphical detail and resolution you choose in benchmarks and games, the greater the demand on your GPU will be. The Nvidia RTX 3080 or 3090 should be able to run most games at Ultra settings if you have one of these cards.

Let’s move on to how to benchmark your graphics card now that that’s out of the way.

Table of Contents

Heavenly Standard

To push graphics cards to their absolute boundaries, use Heaven Benchmark. Using Heaven Benchmark for PC, you can test the stability of a graphics card and see how well its cooling system performs when subjected to high heat loads.

User enters a wonderful steampunk world of bright brass, wood, and gears with this benchmark. With its cosy, sun-heated cobblestone alleys and magnificent dragon in the centre plaza, a little town perched on a floating island provides a real feeling of adventure. The cutting-edge UNIGINE Engine, which utilises the most sophisticated capabilities of graphics APIs, transforms this bench into a visual masterpiece via an interactive experience with fly-by and walk-through modes.

PC hardware components such as video cards, power supplies, and cooling systems are pushed to the limit in Heaven Benchmark. With a real-world load, test your rig’s performance in both stock and overclocked settings. There’s also an interactive element in a stunningly realistic setting.

Features

A thorough evaluation of hardware stability
Accurate findings as a consequence of just using GPU-accelerated tests
Using benchmarking presets to compare results quickly
DirectX 9, DirectX 11, and OpenGL 4.0 are all included in this.
Support for many operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X
Use of hardware tessellation in its entirety, with a wide range of parameters
Dynamic clouds and a day-night cycle may be customised in this 3D sky.
Global lighting in real time and ambient occlusion in screen space
Fly/walk-through camera options for cinema and interaction
Assistance with multi-monitor setups
There are many stereo 3D settings to choose from.
Monitoring of the GPU’s temperature and clock
Support for scripting through the command line
CSV-based reporting with extensive customizability
Support for DirectX 11’s software rendering mode as a benchmark
English, Russian, and Chinese languages are all supported.

With hardware tessellation, a technique for automatically subdividing polygons into smaller and finer bits, games may have a much more realistic and elaborated appearance without having to spend a lot of money on processing power.

When using this benchmark, you may choose between three different tessellation modes:

Moderate Mode

A broad variety of DX11 hardware should be able to run this mode with acceptable performance.

Normal Mode

The benchmark’s default quality-to-performance ratio is optimum. Hardware tessellation technology allows for dramatic visual changes to be achieved in this manner.

Extreme Mode

Because of this, future DX11-capable hardware will be expected to push the tessellation level to its limit in the next 1-2 years.

System Requirements

Hardware GPU:

Intel HD 3000 or above, or an ATI Radeon HD 4xxx or an NVIDIA GeForce 8xxx
512 megabytes of video RAM are available.
1 GB of free disc space is required.

INPUT/OUTPUT SYSTEM

MS Windows XP/Vista/Windows 7/Windows 8 and above Microsoft Visual Studio 2010
Redistributable Package for Linux (proprietary video drivers required)
Mac OS X 10.8 or higher required (Mountain Lion)

Other RECOMMENDED GPU Testing Software

AIDA64 Extreme

There’s a GPU benchmark programme called AIDA64 Extreme that may provide you a lot of information about your computer’s components. It is possible to store the data provided by this programme in CSV, HTML, or XML forms.

Features:

There are almost 50 pages of information about installed applications, software licences, and more in this GPU benchmarking software.
Opening it reveals nothing but a bare shell of the computer’s workings.
Supports memory and cache multi-threading for the analysis of RAM bandwidth in the system.
It includes a display panel with various graphs and custom graphics connected to sensor data that may be utilised.
AIDA64 Extreme is capable of displaying data on LCD or VFD devices (Variable Frequency Drive).

PassMark

PassMark is an excellent GPU benchmarking tool for comparing your PC’s performance to that of other, similarly configured machines. It makes it simple to do searches on public datasets that have been provided by others.

Features:

You may conduct GPU performance tests straight from a USB drive with this video card benchmark programme.
Use different caching settings, file and block sizes to test the disk’s performance.
This free 3D video card benchmark tool lets you see how fast your 3D video card is working.
TCP/IP may be used to check the speed of a network connection between two machines.
With this GPU Benchmark Software, you can see how fast your RAM can read and write.

Geekbench

Using Geekbench, you can check your computer’s speed with just a single click of the mouse. You can find out how powerful a CPU is by using this free benchmarking programme.

Features:

There are features like as image processing and game testing in Geekbench.
You may share your test results with others using this GPU benchmark, making it one of the finest.
Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, and Android are all supported.

FurMark

You can check the temperature of your graphics processing unit using FurMark, a stress test for GPUs. For video card benchmarks, it employs a rendering technique that measures the GPU’s performance.

Features:

Full screen and windowed modes are available for this GPU benchmark test application.
Enables graphics card stability and stress testing.
When the GPU temperature rises beyond a particular threshold, an alert sounds.
This is one of the finest benchmarks for graphics cards since it allows you to adjust the performance of the test to your liking.

Basemark GPU

Basemark GPU is an evaluation and comparison tool for your graphics card. It is compatible with various types of PCs, including desktops, tablets, and laptops.

Features:

You may compare the performance of your GPU with that of other computers with this GPU test programme.
Allows you to do thorough benchmarking with specific settings.
Makes it simple to choose a test.
The settings may be altered by the user.

FAQ

What is it about graphics cards that makes them so expensive?

The price of that GPU you’ve been eyeing lately has risen for a number of reasons. Now is a good time to buy if demand is strong. For example, the silicon chip shortage that’s impacting several sectors in 2021 may cause supply problems. When demand exceeds supply, this may lead to the practise of scalpers buying up all available goods and raising the price accordingly.

What is the best method for overclocking a video card?

First and foremost, carry out extensive research. Check your GPU’s performance on a site like Overclock.net to make sure it can handle the additional stress. Install Afterburner and Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0, and then update your drivers and run both programmes to see how much faster your PC can go. Steady your GPU’s clock rates by increasing them and then testing them.

How can you switch between graphics cards?

Even if your computer only has one GPU, it will generally be smart enough to recognise when to utilise one over the other if you have two. However, there are occasions when you’ll want to explicitly choose which GPU an application utilises. Nvidia Settings and AMD Radeon Settings are two examples of apps that make this easy.

Also check our article “Download Super Smash Bros Game for PC Using the Latest Yuzu Emulator 2021“

I am Snehalraj Chugh, content writer. I have been writing for the last two years and love it!

My work is characterized by a concise style that avoids unnecessary words or phrases. My articles are well researched with extensive use of facts, statistics and quotes from experts in the field to back up my arguments. I believe in using plain language which is easy to read and understand.

UNIGINE’s Heaven Benchmark Releases Version 4.0 And Extended Editions

10 years ago

Click for larger image

UNIGINE Corp. has released a new, enhanced version 4.0 of Heaven Benchmark, the GPU intensive benchmark that gained massive popularity among overclockers and hardware manufacturers for hammering their graphics cards to the limits. This powerful tool can be effectively used to determine the stability of a GPU under extremely stressful conditions, as well as check the cooling system’s potential under maximum heat output. It provides completely unbiased results and generates true in-game rendering workloads across all platforms, such as Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.

Click for larger image

Heaven Benchmark immerses a user into a magical steampunk world of shiny brass, wood and gears. Nested on flying islands, a tiny village with its cozy, sun-heated cobblestone streets, an elaborately crafted dirigible above the expanse of fluffy clouds, and a majestic dragon on the central square gives a true sense of adventure. An interactive experience with fly-by and walk-through modes allows for exploring all corners of this world powered by the cutting-edge UNIGINE Engine that leverages the most advanced capabilities of graphics APIs and turns this benchmark into a visual masterpiece.

Key Features

Extreme hardware stability testing
Accurate results due to 100% GPU-bound benchmarking
Support for DirectX 9, DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0
Multi-platform support for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X
Comprehensive use of hardware tessellation, with adjustable settings
Cinematic and interactive fly/walk-through camera modes
Dynamic sky with volumetric clouds and tweakable day-night cycle
Real-time global illumination and screen-space ambient occlusion
Support for multi-monitor configurations and different stereo 3D modes

Click for larger image

What’s New in Heaven 4. 0?

Benchmarking presets for convenient comparison of results
GPU temperature and clock monitoring
Drastic improvement of SSDO
Stars at nighttime
Improvement of lens flares
New, improved version of UNIGINE Engine under the hood
Detection of multiple GPUs
Anti-aliasing support on Mac OS X
Enhancement of automation scripts in Pro version
New Advanced edition (see details below)
Russian and Chinese localization

Click for larger image

Editions of Heaven Benchmark 4.0
Heaven Benchmark comes in three editions: Basic (available for free), Advanced and Pro, each aimed to meet the needs of different users.

Advanced Edition
The Advanced Edition is intended for personal use by overclocking enthusiasts, as well as for hardware reviewers. It allows for robust stability testing of overclocked systems, one-click batch testing, and thorough reports output into a convenient format.

The Advanced Edition exclusive features include:

Command line automation for full control over run tests
Stress testing mode (benchmark looping)
Highly customizable reports in CSV format

The Heaven Benchmark Advanced Edition is available for purchase in the official UNIGINE online store.

Click for larger image

Professional Edition
The Professional Edition is a reliable and highly customizable tool of choice for hardware vendors and OEM companies that seek to test their products. As the benchmark uses an extended, full-fledged set of graphics features, it is excellent for debugging new video drivers and graphics cards by hardware manufacturers and software developers.

The Professional Edition exclusive features include:

Licensed for commercial use (for one PC, site licensing option is available on request)
Command line automation for full control over run tests
Stress testing mode (benchmark looping)
Highly customizable reports in CSV format
Rendering of a specified frame
Software rendering mode in DirectX 11 for reference purposes
Technical support

The Heaven Benchmark Pro Edition is available for purchase in the official UNIGINE online store.

Tags: 4, benchmark, Extended Edition, hardware, Heaven, News, stability test, steampunk, tessellation, TheOverclocker, Unigine, Version 4, volumetric clouds

Standard accuracy

11/24/2017 |
Author: Moiseeva N.P. | Polemic notes |
Number of views: 9451
| Comments (4)

No matter how much they criticize the “certification of standards” introduced in 2014, this procedure continues to operate throughout the country. As of November 2017, more than 4,500 temperature standards have already been added to the register of approved standards. Just think about it! Not so long ago there was one primary standard and several regional working standards of zero rank. Now the concept of “standard” has been brought down from heaven to earth, or, they say, “leveled to the ground” or even “mixed with mud”. Judging by the data published in the register of «standards», the attestation process has become a pure formality. It is only required to obtain a certificate of verification or calibration for a thermometer, issue a pack of additional papers and send them to VNIIMS for approval. And now a new “standard” has already been registered. We already wrote about this bureaucracy in the 2013 article “Paper Standards”. It all worked out that way. A mountain of new papers is the whole result of «certification». Let’s take a look at the registry. (I do not give reference numbers, but there are a lot of similar examples, those who wish can check). So, descriptions of some standards approved in September and October 2017

Example #1. Standard temperature unit 2 digits in the range of values from minus 50 ^o C to plus 232 ^o C

— Characteristics of the accuracy of the standard: confidence error 0.02 ° C.

— Composition of the standard: Resistance thermometer platinum vibration resistant reference PTSV-4-2

Example #2. Standard temperature unit of the 2nd category in the range of values from minus 30 ° to plus 20 °

— Accuracy specifications: amendment 0.05°C (range -30 to 0°C), 0.1°C (range 0 to 20°C)

— Composition of the standard: Exemplary glass mercury thermometer TL-4

Example #3. Working standard of temperature unit 3 digits in the range of values (-50…300) °

— Accuracy specifications: NSP 0.05°C (range -50 to 199.99°C), 0.2°C (range 200 to 300°C)

— Composition of the standard: Laboratory electronic thermometer, LT-300

Example #4. State working standard of temperature unit 3 digits in the range of values from 40 ˚ to 600 ˚

— Accuracy Specifications: Accuracy : ±(0.2+0.003 t)

— Composition of the standard: Surface temperature calibrator KTP-1

As you can see, any temperature measuring instruments are now approved as standards: platinum thermometers, mercury thermometers, electronic thermometers and temperature calibrators. The reference in all the above examples is given to our verification scheme GOST 8.558-2009. Please note that the accuracy of the standards is normalized quite arbitrarily. This can be a confidence error, and an amendment, and an NSP, and, most often, just an “error”. It is obvious that thermometers and other instruments are certified as standards or not certified, but simply verified — this will not affect the accuracy of verification of working measuring instruments using these «standards».

When I think about what the idea was when introducing mandatory certification of all measuring instruments as standards, I come to the assumption that perhaps the point was in the transition to a competent assessment of measurement accuracy when transferring the size of a temperature unit, which includes an assessment of the measurement capabilities of a particular laboratory. The concept of standard is given in resolution No. 734 rather vaguely. According to the definition «The composition of the standards of units of quantities may include the main technical means, including measuring instruments that are used in the reproduction, storage and transmission of units of quantities, monitoring compliance with the requirements for the conditions of their maintenance and use, as well as auxiliary technical means «The question arises: «may be included» or «should be in»? In my opinion, only in the case when all measuring instruments that affect the result are included in the standard, the new «certification» makes at least some sense. By making the standard complex, we introduce a new method for estimating its accuracy, which, in fact, will no longer be just the error of the main measuring instrument, but the error (or uncertainty) in transferring the size of a unit of magnitude from the standard to the verified measuring instruments in a particular laboratory.

Indeed, the main function of the temperature standard is to transfer the size of the temperature unit to lower-level standards or working measuring instruments. Therefore, the accuracy of the standard should be expressed through the uncertainty of measurements carried out during the verification (calibration) of MI using this standard. As an additional argument, I want to refer to GOST 8.381-2009 “GSI. Standards. Ways of expressing accuracy”, which is given in Order No. 36, as the main document regulating the calculation of the accuracy of the standard. According to this standard, in order to correctly calculate the measurement uncertainty when reproducing and transmitting the size of a quantity, it is necessary to take into account all the equipment whose characteristics affect the result.

We have a good example in thermometry, namely GOST 8.461-2009. This standard provides an estimate of the uncertainty of measurements when calibrating working resistance thermometers. A 3 digit reference thermometer is just one part of the uncertainty budget. Using the same thermometer in different laboratories using different measuring setups and different thermostats, you can get an expanded verification uncertainty that differs by a factor of two or more.

Why, when certifying the standard of the 3rd category, it is not required to calculate its accuracy, i.e. measurement uncertainty when transferring the size of the temperature unit? One of the reasons is the inability to correlate the result obtained with the current verification scheme. On the one hand GOST 8.381-2009, which should be used during certification, prescribes the use of a comprehensive assessment of the total error or measurement uncertainty during verification, on the other hand, there is nothing like this in the verification scheme. There are only rectangles with errors of exemplary SI and between them ovals with errors of transmission methods, which are generally unknown how to calculate. I think that in other areas of measurement there is a similar problem.

How can the situation be improved? If the task is to make the procedure for certification of standards informal, then it is necessary, first, to give an accurate definition of the standard as a set of tools, second, to train metrologists and experts capable of assessing the uncertainty of measurements made using the SI complex, third, to develop competent methods for calculating uncertainty measurements for each type of measurement, fourth, to rework the verification schemes so that they include requirements not for single instruments, but for a set of measuring instruments used in transferring the size of a unit of quantity.

And in conclusion, the main question: is certification of standards necessary at all? In my opinion, it is not needed. The assessment of the laboratory’s measurement capabilities and the calculation of measurement uncertainty when transferring the size of a unit of quantity should be carried out during the laboratory accreditation procedure for the right to verify / calibrate according to GOST 17025. It is during accreditation, i.e. actually obtaining permission to calibrate specific measuring instruments, experts must assess whether the laboratory is equipped with verification tools that allow obtaining an expanded verification uncertainty that satisfies the characteristics of these measuring instruments. The procedure for attestation and approval of standards is redundant and not justified in any way. Especially in the form in which it is carried out at the present time.

51 new buildings, 111 reviews, information about the company

Year of establishment:
1987

Address:
St. Petersburg, Bogatyrsky prospect, 3

New buildings of the company Etalon Group

thirty

one

Etalon Group

Under construction

Completed

Galaxy quarter

St. Petersburg, Admiralteisky

Frunzenskaya

8 min.

8 800 000 ₽

Studio from 32.30 m ²

9 353 267 ₽

from 31.00 m ²

14 756 596 ₽

from 52.50 m ²

19 456 349 ₽

3-room from 75.20 m ²

no data

Etalon Group

LCD «Etalon on the Neva»

St. Petersburg, Nevsky

Elizarovskaya

5 minutes.

10 231 728 ₽

Studio from 36.90 m ²

9 400 000 ₽

1-room from 36.20 m ²

14 881 788 ₽

from 58.30 m ²

17 935 439 ₽

from 72. 70 m ²

29 461 210 ₽

from 106.70 m ²

one

Etalon Group

LCD «Ohta House»

St. Petersburg, Krasnogvardeisky

Ladozhskaya

24 min.

11 365 059 ₽

from 59.10 m ²

14 240 747 ₽

3-room from 80.20 m ²

n/a

Etalon Group

Under construction

LCD ILONA (Ilona)

St. Petersburg, Kalininsky

Vyborgskaya

5 minutes.

7 473 199 ₽

Studio from 24.95 m ²

9261 407 ₽

from 33.40 m ²

13 297 918 ₽

from 49. 76 m ²

17 626 340 ₽

3-room from 72.57 m ²

23 988 421 ₽

from 91.81 m ²

View all new buildings Etalon Group

How to get here?

View all special offers

Company news

Etalon Group commissioned three residential properties in St. Petersburg

Etalon Group received permission to commission three residential properties at once in various districts of St. Petersburg.

In the Admiralteisky district, the State Construction Supervision and Expertise Service of St. Petersburg issued a permit for commissioning. ..

December 09

Expert of Etalon Group entered the TOP-3 of the rating of the best speakers

Alexey Onishchuk, Head of Automation and Implementation of Information Systems Department of Etalon Group, was recognized as the best speaker at the Third Conference “Digitalization in the Construction Business”.

The best reports and speeches were determined by the portal…

November 10, 2021

Data-driven approach of the Etalon Group

An expert of the Etalon Group shared his experience in implementing marketing tools and trends in the developer’s online advertising.

Timofey Zhulev, Head of the Placement and Promotion Planning Group at Etalon Group in Moscow, spoke at a key conference…

November 01, 2021

Etalon Group announces partnership with Ozon

Etalon Group, one of the largest and oldest development and construction companies in the Russian market, announces the signing of a cooperation agreement with the leading Russian marketplace Ozon.