Quadro K4100M [in 27 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
Quadro K4100M
Buy
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 706
- Max video memory 4GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 3200
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started Quadro K4100M sales 23 July 2013 at a recommended price of $1,499. This is Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 3.2 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 100 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
9. 03%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
Quadro
K4100M
vs
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General info
Of Quadro K4100M’s architecture, market segment and release date.
Place in performance rating | 440 | |
Value for money | 0.85 | |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | |
GPU code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
Release date | 23 July 2013 (9 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Current price | $323 (0. 2x MSRP) | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Quadro K4100M’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K4100M’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1152 | of 18432 (AD102) |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 3,540 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
Texture fill rate | 67. 78 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K4100M’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it’s notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K4100M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Memory bandwidth | 102. 4 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Shared memory | — |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K4100M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 |
Technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K4100M. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Optimus | + |
API support
APIs supported by Quadro K4100M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | + | |
CUDA | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of Quadro K4100M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
K4100M
9.03
- Passmark
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
- Unigine Heaven 3. 0
- Octane Render OctaneBench
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
K4100M
2669
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
K4100M
4957
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
K4100M
19909
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K4100M
24685
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K4100M
3505
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K4100M
3654
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
K4100M
5215
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4100M
7058
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4100M
6821
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4100M
48
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc. , available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
K4100M
26
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
59
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
43
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
12
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
45
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
23
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
1.9
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
23
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
45
SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
59
SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
43
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
12
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
1. 9
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K4100M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s |
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good Quadro K4100M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 48 | |
4K | 13 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9−10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9−10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9−10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9−10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9−10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9−10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10 | |
Metro Exodus | 9−10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9−10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9−10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9−10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10 | |
Metro Exodus | 9−10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9−10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9−10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9−10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10 | |
Metro Exodus | 9−10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9−10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9−10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10 |
Relative perfomance
Overall Quadro K4100M performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
102.66
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
102.1
AMD Radeon Pro 450
101.99
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
100
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
97.79
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
92.69
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
85.27
AMD equivalent
The nearest Quadro K4100M’s AMD equivalent is Radeon Pro 450, which is faster by 2% and higher by 6 positions in our rating.
Radeon Pro
450
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K4100M:
AMD Radeon Pro 555
117. 72
AMD Radeon Pro 455
116.61
AMD Radeon Pro 450
101.99
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
100
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
97.79
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
92.69
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
82.83
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Quadro
K5000M
Compare
Quadro
M1000M
Compare
Quadro
K3100M
Compare
FirePro
W5170M
Compare
FirePro
W7170M
Compare
Quadro
M600M
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Quadro K4100M according to our statistics.
Core i7
4810MQ
23.3%
Core i7
4800MQ
22.2%
Core i7
4910MQ
6.7%
Core i7
4710MQ
5.6%
Core i7
4900MQ
5.6%
Core i7
4700MQ
4.4%
Core i7
3740QM
3.3%
Core i7
4790
3. 3%
Core i7
4940MX
3.3%
Core i7
3770
2.2%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Quadro K4100M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 363 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card NVIDIA Quadro K4100M runs with the minimal clock speed 706 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to . The manufacturer has equipped NVIDIA with GB of 4 GB memory, clock speed 3200 MHz and bandwidth 102.4 GB/s.
The power consumption of the graphics card is 100 Watt, and the fabrication process is only 28 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.
4.4
Out of 18
Hitesti score
Popular graphics cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
AliExpress
General info
The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card NVIDIA Quadro K4100M release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.
Place in performance rating: | 408 | |||
Value for money (0-100): | 13.50 | |||
Architecture: | Kepler | |||
Code name: | GK104 | |||
Type: | Mobile workstation | |||
Release date: | 23 July 2013 (8 years ago) | |||
Launch price (MSRP): | $1,499 | |||
Price now: | $323 (0. 2x MSRP) | |||
Value for money: | 2.39 | |||
GPU code name: | N15E-Q3-A2 | |||
Market segment: | Mobile workstation |
Technical specs
This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).
Pipelines: | 1152 | |||
Core clock speed: | 706 MHz | |||
Transistor count: | 3,540 million | |||
Manufacturing process technology: | 28 nm | |||
Power consumption (TDP): | 100 Watt | |||
Texture fill rate: | 67. 78 | |||
Floating-point performance: | 1,627 gflops | |||
Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 1152 | |||
Number of transistors: | 3,540 million | |||
Thermal design power (TDP): | 100 Watt |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.
Interface: | MXM-B (3.0) | |||
Laptop size: | large |
Memory
The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for NVIDIA Quadro K4100M.
Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
Maximum RAM amount: | 4 GB | |||
Memory bus width: | 256 Bit | |||
Memory clock speed: | 3200 MHz | |||
Memory bandwidth: | 102.4 GB/s | |||
Shared memory: | — |
Video outputs and ports
As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports. Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.
Display Connectors: | No outputs | |||
Display Port: | 1.2 |
Technologies
Each graphic card manufacturer complements its products with branded technologies that are used both in games and in the working process. Below is the list of peculiar features that you may find rather useful.
CUDA: | + | |||
Optimus: | + | |||
3D Vision Pro: | + | |||
Mosaic: | + | |||
nView Display Management: | + |
API support
All API-supported NVIDIA Quadro K4100M are listed below.
DirectX: | 12 | |||
OpenGL: | 4.5 | |||
Vulkan: | + | |||
Shader Model: | 5 | |||
OpenCL: | 1.2 |
Overall gaming performance
All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place NVIDIA Quadro K4100M has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).
Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Legend | |
5 | Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. |
May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. | |
30 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more |
40 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
60 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates. | |
? | Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene. |
Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category. | |
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value. |
AMD equivalent
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Compare
Benchmark
Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for NVIDIA Quadro K4100M. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.
Overall benchmark performance
NVIDIA GeForce 9400
NVIDIA GRID K280Q
10.94%
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
10.83%
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book
10.83%
ATI Radeon HD 5870
10.77%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon R9 M470
AMD Radeon RX 540
3DMark Fire Strike Score is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
AMD Radeon Pro 560
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD FirePro M6100
AMD Radeon Pro 455
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
AMD Radeon R9 M470
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile
3DMark 11 Performance GPU is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
AMD Radeon RX 640
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
3DMark Vantage Performance is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD FirePro M6100
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA Quadro P620
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro P600
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
AMD Radeon Pro 555
SPECviewperf 12 — Medical is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Medical test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA Quadro P600
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 — Maya is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Maya test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Energy test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIA Quadro P520
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Creo test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check SPECviewperf 12 — Catia test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
AMD FirePro M6100
NVIDIA Quadro P600
Passmark is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check Passmark test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
NVIDIA GRID K280Q
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
ATI Radeon HD 5870
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Unigine Heaven 3.0 is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Octane Render OctaneBench is a special Benchmark that is made for testing GPU and its components. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results for any graphic card on Hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
4.4
Out of 18
Hitesti score
Share on social network:
In order to leave a review you need to log in
Reviews of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Intel HD Graphics P4600
Intel HD Graphics 500
AMD Radeon R5 M255
AMD Radeon R9 270
AMD Cayman
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
AMD Baffin
Quadro K3100M vs Quadro K4100M Graphics cards Comparison
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K3100M
Check Price
Quadro K4100M
Check Price
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M or Quadro K4100M here:
Quadro K3100M Laptops
Quadro K4100M Laptops
Main Specs
Quadro K3100M | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Both cards are used in Laptops.
- Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M is 3200 MHz.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 4% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
Quadro K3100M and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K3100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3100M | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 102. 4 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | large |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
3D Vision Pro | + | + |
Mosaic | + | + |
nView Display Management | + | + |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K3100M vs GRID K280Q
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Quadro K4100M vs GRID K280Q
- Quadro K4100M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Quadro K3100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K3100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
Quadro K4100M video card [in 27 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
Quadro K4100M
- MXM-B interface (3. 0)
- Core frequency 706
- Video memory size 4GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory frequency 3200
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started Quadro K4100M sales on July 23, 2013 at a suggested price of 1.499$. This is a laptop video card based on the Kepler architecture and 28 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at designers. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 3.2 GHz, and coupled with a 256-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 102.4 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a card connected via the MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption — 100 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
9.03%
from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
Quadro
K4100M
or
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General information
Information about the Quadro K4100M type (desktop or laptop) and architecture, as well as sales start time and cost at that time.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Quadro K4100M’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about Quadro K4100M’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on Quadro K4100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For laptop video cards, this is the estimated size of the laptop, the bus and the connection connector, if the video card is connected through the connector, and not soldered on the motherboard.
Notebook size | Large | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
interface | MXM-B (3.0) Parameters of the memory installed on Quadro K4100M — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Video execution
|
Video connectors | No Outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 |
Technology
1
1
1
Technology solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K4100M are listed here. You will need this information if your graphics card is required to support specific technologies.
Optimus | + | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Optimus | + |
API support
APIs supported by Quadro K4100M, including their versions.
Benchmark tests
These are the results of Quadro K4100M rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
K4100M
9.03
- Passmark
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulcan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
- Unigine Heaven 3.0
- Octane Render OctaneBench
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
Passmark
This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
K4100M
2669
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
K4100M
4957
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of which is a girl running away from some kind of military base located in a sea cave, and the other is a space fleet attacking defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
K4100M
19909
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is a legacy benchmark that uses DirectX 11 feature level 10, used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K4100M
24685
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K4100M
3505
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K4100M
3654
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Khronos Group’s OpenCL API.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
K4100M
5215
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Vulkan API from AMD and the Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4100M
7058
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses NVIDIA’s CUDA API.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4100M
6821
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 based benchmark using the Unigine 3D game engine from the Russian company of the same name. It depicts a medieval fantasy city spread over several floating islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012 and was replaced by Heaven 4.0 in 2013, which introduced several minor improvements, including a newer version of the Unigine engine.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K4100M
48
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a dedicated benchmark for measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine created by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program or as a plug-in for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other applications. It renders four different static scenes and then compares the render times to the reference card, which is the GeForce GTX 9 at the moment.80. This benchmark does not measure gaming performance and is intended for professional 3D artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
K4100M
26
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
59
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
43
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
12
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
45
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
23
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
This part of the SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses the Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero power plant with over 700,000 polygons in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
1.9
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
23
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
45
SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
59
SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
43
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
35
SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
12
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
Benchmark coverage: 2%
K4100M
1. 9
Mining hashrates
Quadro K4100M performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s |
Game tests
FPS in popular games on Quadro K4100M, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Average FPS
Here are the average fps for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:
Full HD | 48 | |
4K |
Popular games
9000 FULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9-10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9-10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9-10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9-10 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9-10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9-10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9-10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9-10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9-10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9-10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9-10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9-10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9-10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9-10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9-10 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9-10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9-10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9-10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9-10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9-10 | |
Metro Exodus | 9-10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9-10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9-10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9-10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9-10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9-10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9-10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9-10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9-10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9-10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9-10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9-10 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9-10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9-10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9-10 | |
Metro Exodus | 9-10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9-10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9-10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9-10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9-10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9-10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9-10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9-10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9-10 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9-10 | |
Hitman 3 | 9-10 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9-10 | |
Metro Exodus | 9-10 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9-10 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9-10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9-10 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 9-10 | |
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 9-10 | |
Battlefield 5 | 9-10 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry 5 | 9-10 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 9-10 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9-10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9-10 |
Relative capacity
Overall Quadro K4100M performance compared to its closest competitors in mobile workstation graphics cards.
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
102.66
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
102.1
AMD Radeon Pro 450
101.99
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
100
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
97.79
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
92.69
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
85.27
AMD competitor
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro K4100M from AMD is Radeon Pro 450, which is slower by 2% and higher by 6 positions in our rating, on average.
Radeon Pro
450
Compare
Here are some of AMD’s closest Quadro K4100M competitors:
AMD Radeon Pro 555
117.72
AMD Radeon Pro 455
116. 61
AMD Radeon Pro 450
101.99
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
100
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
97.79
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
92.69
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
82.83
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Quadro
K5000M
Compare
Quadro
M1000M
Compare
Quadro
K3100M
Compare
firepro
W5170M
Compare
firepro
W7170M
Compare
Quadro
K5100M
Compare
Recommended processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the Quadro K4100M.
Core i7
4810MQ
23.3%
Core i7
4800MQ
22.2%
Core i7
4910MQ
6.7%
Core i7
4710MQ
5.6%
Core i7
4900MQ
5.6%
Core i7
4700MQ
4.4%
Core i7
3740QM
3.3%
Core i7
4790
3.3%
Core i7
4940MX
3.3%
Core i7
3770
2. 2%
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about Quadro K4100M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
performance overview and gaming performance tests
The Quadro K4100M video card was released by NVIDIA, release date: 23 July 2013. At the time of release, the video card cost $1,499. The video card is designed for mobile workstation computers and is based on the Kepler architecture codenamed GK104.
Core frequency — 706 MHz. Texturing speed — 67.78 GTexel / s. Number of shader processors — 1152. Floating point performance — 1,627 gflops. Technological process — 28 nm. The number of transistors is 3,540 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 100 Watts.
Memory type: GDDR5. The maximum memory size is 4 GB. Memory bus width — 256 Bit. Memory frequency — 3200 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB / s. Shared memory — 0.
Benchmarks
PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|||||
PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
Name | Value |
---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 2670 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 338 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 5215 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection | 24.487 mPixels/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 600.985 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 2.281 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 35.452 Frames/s |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 61.984 mHash/s |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 1105 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1974 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3246 Frames |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 1105.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1974.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3246.000 Fps |
Gaming performance
1. Dirt Rally (2015)
2 Thief (2014)
3. Total War: Rome II (2013)
4 Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
5. Metro: Last Light (2013)
6. BioShock Infinite (2013)
7. Tomb Raider (2013)
8. Hitman: Absolution (2012)
9. Diablo III (2012)
10. World of Warcraft (2005)
Dirt Rally (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 457. 00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 122.00 |
High, 1920×1080 | 67.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 33.00 |
4K, 3840×2160 | 12.50 |
Thief (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 82.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 52.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 45.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 26.00 |
Total War: Rome II (2013)
LOW, 1024×768 | 191.00 | ||||
Medium, 1366×768 | 146.0 | ||||
9005EHigh, 1366×768 | 121.00 | ||||
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 22.00 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 54. 00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 47.00 |
HIGH, 1366×768 | 31.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 15.00 |
Metro: Last LIGHT (2013)
86.00 | |
Medium, 1366×768 | 73.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 44.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 24.00 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
Low, 1280×720 | 178.00 | |
Medium, 1366×768 | 115Ultra, 1920×1080 | 37.00 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 196.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 118.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 76.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 36.00 |
HITMAN: ABSOLUTION (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 64. 00 |
59.00 | |
High, 1366×768 | 52.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 38.00 |
Diablo III (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 153.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 119.00 |
HIGH, 1366×768 | 103.00 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 |
WORLD WRCRAF0059 GK104
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M — 49 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.
Top specifications and features
- Passmark score
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Vantage Performance test score
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
Passmark
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M test score:
2532
Best score:
29325
Performance
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M:
1457
Best score:
Memory
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M:
345
Best score:
General Information
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M:
528
Best score:
Features
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M:
190
Best score:
Description
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M graphics card based on Kepler architecture has 3540 million transistors, tech. process 28 nm. The frequency of the graphics core is 706 MHz. In terms of memory, 4 GB is installed here. DDR5, 800MHz frequency and 102.4Gb/s maximum bandwidth. The texture size is 67.78 GTexels/s. FLOPS is 1.6.
In tests, the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M video card showed itself as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 2532 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points. According to the 3DMark benchmark, the video card scored 3581 points out of 49575 possible.
Directx version — 12. OpenGL version — 4.6. Regarding cooling, the heat dissipation requirements here are 100 watts.
In our tests, the video card scores 24997 points.
Why NVIDIA Quadro K4100M is better than others
No merits
- Passmark score 2532 . This parameter is lower than 42%
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score 24191 . This parameter is lower than 29%
- 3DMark Vantage Performance score 19511 . This parameter is lower than 24%
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score 4858 . This setting is lower than 30%
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 3581 test score. This parameter is lower than 37%
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score 3435 . This parameter is lower than 29%
- Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score 47 . This setting is lower than 6%
- Base GPU clock speed 706 MHz. This parameter is lower than that of 61%
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M review
Performance
Memory
general information
Functions
Tests in benchmarks
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Review: Highlights
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
706MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
2457MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
800MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326. 6 MHz
16000MHz
FLOPS
A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
1.6TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
1142.32TFLOPS
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
67.78 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
756.8 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Kepler
GPU name
GK104
Shared memory
No
Memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
102.4GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
2656GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
3200 MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
19500MHz
RAM
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
128GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show all
5
Average: 4. 5
6
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
8192 bit
Release date
2013-07-23 00:00:00
Mean value:
Heat Dissipation (TDP)
The Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
100W
Average: 140.4 W
2W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
4 nm
Number of transistors
3540 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
80000 million
Purpose
Mobile Workstations
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12.2
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
3
max 4.6
Average: 1. 7
4.6
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.6
Supports Mosaic technology
Yes
Supports nView Display Management
Yes
Shader model version
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.6
Version Vulkan
1.1
CUDA version
3
Passmark test score
2532
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
29325
3DMark Cloud Gate benchmark score GPU
24191
max 1
Average: 80042. 3
1
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3435
max 38276
Average: 12463
38276
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
3581
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
49575
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
4858
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
57937
3DMark Vantage Performance score
19511
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
97887
Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score
47
max 60072
Average: 2402
60072
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks
58
max 202
Average: 62. 4
202
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
58
max 202
Average: 64
202
SPECviewperf 12 test evaluation — Siemens NX
42
max 212
Average: 14
212
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
23
max 232
Average: 121.3
232
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase
23
max 175
Average: 108.4
175
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical
12
max 107
Average: 39. 6
107
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
12
max 107
Average: 39
107
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya
34
max 177
Average: 129.8
177
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
34
max 180
Average: 132.8
180
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy 9 score0004
2
max 25
Average: 9.7
25
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
2
max 21
Average: 10. 7
21
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Creo
34
max 153
Average: 49.5
153
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
34
max 153
Average: 52.5
153
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
44
max 189
Average: 91.5
189
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Catia
44
max 189
Average: 88.6
189
Octane Render test score OctaneBench
26
max 125
Average: 47.