Nvidia gtx 1650 4gb benchmark: Please click the green button to continue.

7 июля, 2023

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 benchmarks: chronic underperformer

The GTX 1650 completes Nvidia’s initial trio of GTX 16-series graphics cards, at a lower price than the GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1660. The result is an inexpensive card that can still deliver good performance at 1080p, although it struggles at higher resolutions. The GTX 1650 is also a power-efficient card, meaning Nvidia’s partners can create compact custom designs with slim coolers that occupy only one or two slots and don’t require extra PCI-e power. For builds with limited space and a weak PSU, like prebuilt desktops designed for office use, the GTX 1650 can be a major drop-in upgrade for only £140/$150.

The one fly in the ointment is the existence of a competing card, which is capable of significantly better performance in most games while costing the same price or less. This is the £125/$130 AMD Radeon RX 570, an older GPU that has seen considerable price drops over recent months. In this article, we’ll see exactly how big of a performance differential there is between the two cards, as we test nine recent games at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. We have also included the £130/$170 GTX 1050 Ti and the £180/$210 GTX 1060 6GB, two other potential competitors.

Before we get into the numbers, it’s worth considering the GTX 1650’s feature set too. The card doesn’t support hardware-accelerated ray tracing or deep learning super sampling like its RTX brothers and sisters, but it does pack support for other Turing features like variable rate shading (VRS), which should make it a little more future-proof than the last-gen GTX 1050 Ti.

If you want to get a better idea of the decisions Nvidia made to differentiate the GTX 1650 from the GTX 1660 and the last-gen GTX 1060, take a look at the specifications below. We’re looking at fewer CUDA cores, only 4GB of VRAM and a paltry 128-bit memory bus; cuts across the board.

The Palit GTX 1650 StormX card we tested operates at stock speeds, uses a single slot and doesn’t require extra PCI-e power.

GTX 1650 GTX 1060 GTX 1660 RX 570 RX 580
GPU cores 896 1280 1408 2048 2304
VRAM 4GB GDDR5 6GB GDDR5 6GB GDDR5 4GB GDDR5 8GB GDDR5
Memory Bus 128-bit 192-bit 192-bit 256-bit 256-bit
Bandwidth 128GB/s 192GB/s 192GB/s 224GB/s 256GB/s
Boost Clock 1665MHz 1708MHz 1785MHz 1244MHz 1340MHz
Processor TU117 GP106 TU116 Polaris 20 Polaris 20

Our test results are shown below for each of the games and resolutions we benchmarked. We’ve chosen some interesting comparisons by default, but you can use the controls to the right of each video to choose your own data points too. Press play on the video, and you’ll see how each card handles the test scene as it plays out. If you prefer a single glanceable summary, we have more traditional bar charts as well — and this is all you’ll get on mobile. If you’re on a desktop, these bar charts gain some extra features — you can mouse over to see each card’s worst, best and average performance, and you can click on the chart to swap between frame-rate numbers and percentages. Now let’s see some results!

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is a difficult game to run, thanks to its complex open world and richly detailed landscape. The game is particularly CPU intensive for a modern title, which typically helps Nvidia cards pull ahead of their AMD counterparts at 1080p thanks to a more efficient driver. Even this strong scenario, the GTX 1650 is two percentage points behind the RX 570 at 1080p. At 1440p, the RX 570 is able to pull out to a small four per cent lead.

AC Odyssey: Ultra High

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Assassin’s Creed Unity

Assassin’s Creed Unity is another game that the RX series struggles with, thanks to the depth of field effect used liberally in our test scene (and the game as a whole). Generally we see AMD cards have an unusually wide range of frame-rates, dropping low when the effect is used and shooting back up when the effect is muted. Despite these challenges, the RX 570 still strides to a heavy victory over the GTX 1650, with a 14 per cent advantage at 1080p and a 15 per cent lead at 1440p.

AC Unity: Ultra High, FXAA

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1 offers something of a worse case scenario for the GTX 1650 against the RX 570, as this DirectX 12 test heavily favours AMD. We can see that the RX 570 comes within striking distance of the significantly more expensive GTX 1060 here, something it doesn’t manage in most other games. That also means that the RX 570 far outstrips the GTX 1650, with a 33 per cent lead at 1080p and 1440p. The GTX 1650 still produces playable results at both resolutions we tested, it’s not a great result regardless. This is particularly true if we also consider Battlefield 5, which shows a similar AMD/Nvidia dynamic and requires significantly more horsepower.

Battlefield 1: Ultra, TAA

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Crysis 3

Crysis 3 is the oldest benchmark we still use, and for good reason: this game is an absolute beast. The frantic sequence we’ve chosen to benchmark stresses the GPU heavily, allowing us to show the difference between our four cards clearly. At 1080p the GTX 1650 is a confident 15 per cent faster than the GTX 1050 Ti, but much worse than the RX 570, which sits 33 percentage points ahead. Meanwhile, the old GTX 1060 is 45 per cent faster at the same resolution, despite costing approximately £30/$40 more.

Crysis 3: very high, SMAA T2X

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5 is another recent title that should offer a fair or even favourable fight for the GTX 1650. However, the little card isn’t up to snuff once again, delivering less than 56fps at 1080p and 37fps at 1440p. By comparison, the RX 570 is able to provide a 66fps 1080p average and a 47fps 1440p average — a significantly better performance, especially given that the AMD card is usually cheaper to buy.

Far Cry 5: Ultra, TAA

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands is a few years old now, but its ludicrous ultra preset still provides a massive task for even capable GPUs to take on. The GTX 1650, a rather incapable card, doesn’t manage to hit 30fps at 1080p and only averages 22fps at 1440p. Meanwhile, the golden child RX 570 manages 33fps at 1080p and 27fps at 1440p — still not great, but a darned sight better! The difference does narrow slightly at more sane graphical presets, but the RX 570 consistently provides a better experience at both resolutions.

Ghost Recon Wildlands: Ultra, TAA

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

We go now to Rise of the Tomb Raider, which comes with a pretty tripartite benchmark that unfortunately isn’t as challenging as the full game. The GTX 1650 shows a strong disadvantage at both Full HD and Quad HD, with the RX 570 leading by 22 per cent at the lower resolution and 28 per cent at the upper one. Regardless, the slow-paced nature of the game means that the game is more or less playable even at 1440p on the GTX 1650.

Rise of the Tomb Raider: Very High, SMAA

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider improves on ‘Rise’ in several key areas; for our purposes it is superior by merit of offering an integrated benchmark that is both longer and much more representative of in-game performance. Unfortunately, the change in scenery here hasn’t improved the fortunes of the unlucky GTX 1650. Its nemesis, the RX 570, remains ahead by nearly 20 per cent at 1080p and 28 per cent at 1440p.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider DX12: Highest, TAA

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

The Witcher 3

We conclude with The Witcher 3, the last big release from Cyberpunk 2077 developer CD Projekt Red. The Novigrad benchmark, which sees Geralt and Roach riding through the mucky streets, remains a good test of GPU horsepower four years on. The GTX 1650 amazingly snaps the streak here, comprehensively beating… wait! Actually, I was pulling your leg — the RX 570 remains significantly better, with a 28 per cent and 36 per cent advantage at 1080p and 1440p, respectively.

The Witcher 3: Ultra, POST-AA, No Hairworks

Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.

That’s the end of the benchmarks! We’ll add a link to our GTX 1650 review once it’s released, but for now enjoy a look at 2019’s best graphics cards — a list that does not, you’ll note, include the GTX 1650.

GTX 1650 benchmark with i7-8700K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality


Compare To
Select..AMD Radeon 530 Mobile — $ 636AMD Radeon 540 Mobile — $ 1,086AMD Radeon 610M — $ 500AMD Radeon 660M — $ 550AMD Radeon 680M — $ 600AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile — $ 600AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile — $ 600AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile — $ 600AMD Radeon HD 6850 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6870 — $ 199AMD Radeon HD 6950 — $ 250AMD Radeon HD 6970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 6990 — $ 699AMD Radeon HD 7750 — $ 140AMD Radeon HD 7750M — $ 858AMD Radeon HD 7790 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7850 — $ 249AMD Radeon HD 7850M — $ 964AMD Radeon HD 7950 — $ 149AMD Radeon HD 7950M — $ 1,023AMD Radeon HD 7970 — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition — $ 299AMD Radeon HD 7970M — $ 1,079AMD Radeon HD 7990 — $ 999AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile — $ 1,959AMD Radeon R5 — $ 710AMD Radeon R5 — $ 701AMD Radeon R7 250 — $ 95AMD Radeon R7 265 — $ 149AMD Radeon R7 370 — $ 202AMD Radeon R9 270 — $ 275AMD Radeon R9 280 — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 280X — $ 350AMD Radeon R9 285 — $ 380AMD Radeon R9 290 — $ 310AMD Radeon R9 290X — $ 399AMD Radeon R9 295X2 — $ 1,499AMD Radeon R9 380 — $ 299AMD Radeon R9 380X — $ 229AMD Radeon R9 390 — $ 465AMD Radeon R9 390X — $ 495AMD Radeon R9 FURY — $ 549AMD Radeon R9 FURY X — $ 649AMD Radeon R9 M270X — $ 1,016AMD Radeon R9 M280X — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — $ 1,070AMD Radeon R9 M290X — $ 1,209AMD Radeon R9 M380 — $ 1,074AMD Radeon R9 Nano — $ 1,529AMD Radeon RX 460 — $ 140AMD Radeon RX 470 — $ 342AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile — $ 1,203AMD Radeon RX 480 — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — $ 1,275AMD Radeon RX 5300M — $ 650AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — $ 645AMD Radeon RX 550 — $ 74AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — $ 169AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — $ 199AMD Radeon RX 5500M — $ 700AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — $ 923AMD Radeon RX 560 — $ 99AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $ 279AMD Radeon RX 5600M — $ 1,220AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $ 641AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $ 987AMD Radeon RX 570 — $ 123AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile — $ 1,260AMD Radeon RX 5700 — $ 349AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 5700M — $ 1,300AMD Radeon RX 580 — $ 151AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — $ 1,307AMD Radeon RX 590 — $ 214AMD Radeon RX 6300M — $ 700AMD Radeon RX 6450M — $ 900AMD Radeon RX 6500M — $ 800AMD Radeon RX 6550M — $ 1,000AMD Radeon RX 6550S — $ 1,100AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT — $ 379AMD Radeon RX 6600M — $ 1,350AMD Radeon RX 6600S — $ 900AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT — $ 399AMD Radeon RX 6650M — $ 1,100AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT — $ 1,200AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — $ 479AMD Radeon RX 6700M — $ 1,450AMD Radeon RX 6700S — $ 1,200AMD Radeon RX 6800 — $ 579AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — $ 649AMD Radeon RX 6800M — $ 1,650AMD Radeon RX 6800S — $ 1,700AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT — $ 1,700AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $ 999AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT — $ 1,099AMD Radeon RX 7600 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT — $ 899AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX — $ 999AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $ 632AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $ 567AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $ 1,119AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $ 601AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $ 269AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile — $ 1,579AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — $ 419AMD Radeon VII — $ 664ATI Radeon HD 4870 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — $ 1,282NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — $ 1,062NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — $ 129NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,270NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — $ 876NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — $ 170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — $ 159NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — $ 1,106NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — $ 1,559NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — $ 503NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — $ 522NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — $ 1,955NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — $ 1,857NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — $ 807NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — $ 1,239NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — $ 1,151NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — $ 160NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — $ 229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — $ 1,758NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — $ 649NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — $ 199NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — $ 153NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — $ 220NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — $ 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — $ 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — $ 169NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — $ 299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — $ 987NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — $ 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — $ 1,058NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — $ 485NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — $ 1,083NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — $ 439NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — $ 279NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — $ 320NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — $ 1,036NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — $ 179NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — $ 355NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — $ 410NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — $ 1,162NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — $ 89NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — $ 1,066NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — $ 449NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — $ 1,249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — $ 619NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — $ 1,345NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — $ 650NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — $ 999NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — $ 1,099NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $ 349NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — $ 1,104NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh — $ 1,200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — $ 400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — $ 469NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — $ 1,516NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh — $ 1,300NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — $ 1,724NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh — $ 1,400NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — $ 693NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — $ 1,772NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — $ 1,942NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile — $ 1,800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — $ 1,187NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB — $ 750NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $ 249NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile — $ 830NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q — $ 1,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q — $ 1,200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile — $ 1,300NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — $ 599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile — $ 1,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — $ 699NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile — $ 1,800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q — $ 2,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile — $ 2,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — $ 1,499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti — $ 1,999NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — $ 200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile — $ 800NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 — $ 329NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q — $ 1,000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile — $ 1,100NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB — $ 399NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — $ 499NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile — $ 1,700NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — $ 1,199NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q — $ 1,900NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile — $ 1,900NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — $ 799NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — $ 1,599NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q — $ 2,500NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile — $ 2,500NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $ 2,499NVIDIA TITAN V — $ 2,999NVIDIA TITAN Xp — $ 1,199


Change CPU To
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — $ 100AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — $ 30AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — $ 130AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ — $ 60AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ — $ 360AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — $ 460AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — $ 331.5AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — $ 53.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+ — $ 53AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+ — $ 150AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — $ 25AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — $ 46AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — $ 260AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — $ 60AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core — $ 148.7AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core — $ 209.7AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 95AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 12AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 32.2AMD Athlon II X2 240 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 245 — $ 35AMD Athlon II X2 250 — $ 39AMD Athlon II X2 255 — $ 65.2AMD Athlon II X2 260 — $ 20AMD Athlon II X2 265 — $ 82.9AMD Athlon II X2 270 — $ 24AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — $ 36AMD Athlon II X2 B24 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X2 B28 — $ 49.1AMD Athlon II X3 425 — $ 104. 2AMD Athlon II X3 435 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X3 440 — $ 47AMD Athlon II X3 445 — $ 91AMD Athlon II X3 450 — $ 40AMD Athlon II X3 455 — $ 116.9AMD Athlon II X3 460 — $ 50AMD Athlon II X4 620 — $ 60AMD Athlon II X4 630 — $ 43AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 70AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 80AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 91.5AMD Athlon II X4 645 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core — $ 277AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — $ 46AMD Athlon X4 840 — $ 78.7AMD Athlon X4 845 — $ 50AMD Athlon X4 860K — $ 64AMD Athlon X4 870K — $ 80AMD Athlon X4 880K — $ 90AMD Athlon X4 950 — $ 60AMD E2-3200 APU — $ 8AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core — $ 76AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core — $ 100AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — $ 228.2AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — $ 53.4AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — $ 130AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — $ 340AMD FX-6300 Six-Core — $ 59AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — $ 130AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — $ 100AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — $ 383.5AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — $ 80.6AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core — $ 79.5AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — $ 98. 9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — $ 80AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — $ 135AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — $ 180AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core — $ 178.9AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core — $ 122AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — $ 47AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — $ 30AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — $ 53AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — $ 3382.1AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — $ 105AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — $ 40AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — $ 147.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — $ 55AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core — $ 60AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core — $ 50AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core — $ 180AMD Phenom II X2 545 — $ 44AMD Phenom II X2 550 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X2 555 — $ 142.1AMD Phenom II X2 565 — $ 30AMD Phenom II X2 B55 — $ 48AMD Phenom II X3 705e — $ 152.3AMD Phenom II X3 710 — $ 84.5AMD Phenom II X3 720 — $ 70AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 805 — $ 174AMD Phenom II X4 810 — $ 116AMD Phenom II X4 820 — $ 75AMD Phenom II X4 840 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X4 905e — $ 212. 4AMD Phenom II X4 910 — $ 100AMD Phenom II X4 910e — $ 157AMD Phenom II X4 920 — $ 67AMD Phenom II X4 925 — $ 160AMD Phenom II X4 940 — $ 120AMD Phenom II X4 945 — $ 50AMD Phenom II X4 955 — $ 130.2AMD Phenom II X4 960T — $ 135AMD Phenom II X4 965 — $ 59.5AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — $ 73AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — $ 90AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — $ 189AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — $ 175AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — $ 185AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — $ 260AMD Phenom II X6 1090T — $ 396.1AMD Phenom II X6 1100T — $ 200AMD Phenom X3 8550 — $ 170AMD Ryzen 3 1200 — $ 95AMD Ryzen 3 1300X — $ 125AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — $ 98AMD Ryzen 3 3100 — $ 90AMD Ryzen 3 3200G — $ 99AMD Ryzen 3 3300X — $ 120AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 134AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 144.9AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 155AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 178.4AMD Ryzen 5 2400G — $ 159AMD Ryzen 5 2600 — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 2600X — $ 210AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — $ 150AMD Ryzen 5 3500 — $ 148AMD Ryzen 5 3500X — $ 160.5AMD Ryzen 5 3600 — $ 199AMD Ryzen 5 3600X — $ 249AMD Ryzen 5 5500 — $ 160AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 5 7600X — $ 299AMD Ryzen 7 1700 — $ 190AMD Ryzen 7 1700X — $ 200AMD Ryzen 7 1800X — $ 250AMD Ryzen 7 2700 — $ 249. 2AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — $ 305AMD Ryzen 7 3700X — $ 330AMD Ryzen 7 3800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — $ 300AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — $ 450AMD Ryzen 7 7700X — $ 399AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — $ 750AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — $ 499AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — $ 710AMD Ryzen 9 7900X — $ 549AMD Ryzen 9 7950X — $ 699AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — $ 350AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — $ 420AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — $ 680AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — $ 900AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — $ 1720Intel Core i3-10100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-10300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-11100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-11300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-12100 — $ 122Intel Core i3-12300 — $ 143Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — $ 60Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — $ 58Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — $ 199Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 70Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 34.9Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 100Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3. 40GHz — $ 46Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 80Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 95Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz — $ 260Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz — $ 140Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — $ 150Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $ 450Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $ 20Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $ 21Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $ 180Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — $ 30Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — $ 133.7Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — $ 166.1Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — $ 143Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz — $ 160Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz — $ 210Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz — $ 174.8Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz — $ 230Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 130Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz — $ 179.4Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.00GHz — $ 184Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz — $ 170Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3. 60GHz — $ 105Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 162Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 224Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-10400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-10600K — $ 236.8Intel Core i5-11400 — $ 182Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 262Intel Core i5-12400 — $ 143Intel Core i5-12600K — $ 290Intel Core i5-13600K — $ 319Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — $ 80Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — $ 195.3Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — $ 84Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz — $ 65.7Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $ 164.4Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz — $ 124Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — $ 75Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — $ 130Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — $ 95Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz — $ 262Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz — $ 150Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 128Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3. 20GHz — $ 125Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — $ 140.1Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — $ 143.5Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.30GHz — $ 330Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz — $ 341Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz — $ 140Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — $ 144Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — $ 285Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — $ 180Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz — $ 160Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 463Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz — $ 660Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz — $ 175Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $ 221.6Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $ 185Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $ 198Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz — $ 188Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — $ 276Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz — $ 269.9Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.10GHz — $ 400Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 190Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3. 20GHz — $ 234.4Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — $ 60Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — $ 49Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — $ 220Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.9Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — $ 90Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 213.5Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz — $ 160.5Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 210Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 100Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 240Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz — $ 251Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $ 250Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $ 239Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz — $ 244.5Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz — $ 377.7Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz — $ 170Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 280Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz — $ 215Intel Core i7-10700K — $ 409.1Intel Core i7-11700K — $ 410Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 470Intel Core i7-13700K — $ 409Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz — $ 198Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2. 80GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 179Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 249Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — $ 800Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — $ 954Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — $ 240Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz — $ 285Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz — $ 250Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz — $ 279Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz — $ 307Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz — $ 342.6Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — $ 500Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — $ 399Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz — $ 450Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — $ 300Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — $ 499Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — $ 770Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — $ 433.7Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz — $ 335Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — $ 420Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — $ 550Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz — $ 1200Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3. 00GHz — $ 1576Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — $ 325.1Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — $ 355Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz — $ 349Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz — $ 370Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz — $ 930Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — $ 553Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz — $ 290Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.53GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.93GHz — $ 310Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz — $ 454.5Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz — $ 369.9Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz — $ 583Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz — $ 174Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz — $ 60Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $ 70.7Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $ 245Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $ 100Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 140Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 150Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 330Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz — $ 368Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz — $ 410Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — $ 180Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — $ 200Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — $ 220Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz — $ 350Intel Core i9-10900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-11900K — $ 488Intel Core i9-12900K — $ 590Intel Core i9-13900K — $ 589Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3. 30GHz — $ 1380Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz — $ 1096.7Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz — $ 1192.1Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz — $ 2000Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz — $ 2005.5Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz — $ 440Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz — $ 835Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz — $ 9Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 158Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz — $ 100Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 30Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66GHz — $ 13Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz — $ 75Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz — $ 29Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz — $ 15Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz — $ 120Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2. 83GHz — $ 20Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz — $ 9.8Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 1125Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz — $ 1496Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz — $ 263.6Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 909Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1609Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz — $ 1806Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40GHz — $ 40Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz — $ 45Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz — $ 23Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 99.5Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz — $ 50Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz — $ 34Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz — $ 335Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz — $ 35Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz — $ 190Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz — $ 49Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz — $ 69.8Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz — $ 34.9Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz — $ 32.9Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz — $ 41Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3. 10GHz — $ 46Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz — $ 50Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz — $ 120Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz — $ 178.3Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.30GHz — $ 105Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz — $ 110Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz — $ 90Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz — $ 159.9Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz — $ 288.2Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz — $ 104.3Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz — $ 80Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz — $ 85.3Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz — $ 110.9Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz — $ 103.1Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz — $ 100Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz — $ 105.9Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz — $ 25Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz — $ 95Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.80GHz — $ 35Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz — $ 30Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz — $ 97Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz — $ 123.9Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3. 80GHz — $ 100.3Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz — $ 100.9


Change Variant To
Select..ASL GTX 1650 WarhawkASL GTX 1650 WarsawASUS DUAL GTX 1650ASUS DUAL GTX 1650 OCASUS PHOENIX GTX 1650ASUS PHOENIX GTX 1650 OCASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1650 GAMINGASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1650 GAMING ADVANCEDASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1650 GAMING OCColorful GTX 1650 Gaming GTColorful Tomahawk GTX 1650Colorful iCafe GTX 1650 E-SportsColorful iCafe GTX 1650 GreenColorful iGame GTX 1650 AD Special OCColorful iGame GTX 1650 UltraEMTEK GTX 1650 StormX Dual OCEVGA GTX 1650 SC UltraEVGA GTX 1650 SC Ultra BlackEVGA GTX 1650 XCEVGA GTX 1650 XC BlackEVGA GTX 1650 XC UltraEVGA GTX 1650 XC Ultra BlackGALAX GTX 1650GALAX GTX 1650 EX 1-Click OCGALAX GTX 1650 GeneralGIGABYTE GTX 1650 GAMING OCGIGABYTE GTX 1650 MINI ITX OCGIGABYTE GTX 1650 OCGIGABYTE GTX 1650 WindForce OCGainward GTX 1650 Chasing WindGainward GTX 1650 GhostGainward GTX 1650 Ghost OCGainward GTX 1650 Glare OCGainward GTX 1650 PegasusGainward GTX 1650 Pegasus DVIGainward GTX 1650 Pegasus OCGainward GTX 1650 Pegasus OC DVIInno3D GTX 1650Inno3D GTX 1650 Twin X2KFA2 GTX 1650 EX 1-Click OCKUROTOSHIKOU GTX 1650Leadtek WinFast GTX 1650MAXSUN GTX 1650 ChallengerMAXSUN GTX 1650 TerminatorMAXSUN GTX 1650 TransformersMSI GTX 1650 AERO ITX OCMSI GTX 1650 GAMING XMSI GTX 1650 Low ProfileMSI GTX 1650 Low Profile OCMSI GTX 1650 VENTUS XSMSI GTX 1650 VENTUS XS OCManli GTX 1650ONDA GTX 1650 AegisPNY XLR8 GTX 1650 Gaming OCPalit GTX 1650 DualPalit GTX 1650 Dual OCPalit GTX 1650 StormXPalit GTX 1650 StormX OCPalit GTX 1650 StormX+Palit GTX 1650 StormX+ OCZOTAC GTX 1650 AMPZOTAC GTX 1650 Destroyer PAZOTAC GTX 1650 Low ProfileZOTAC GTX 1650 OC


Desired Quality Setting
Select. .Ultra Quality — MSAA, HBAO, and advanced shadowsHigh Quality — No MSAA, HBAO, or advanced shadowsMedium QualityLow Quality

is the youngest in the Turing GECID.com family. Page 1

::>Video cards
>2021
> NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 gaming test in 22 games: the youngest in the Turing family

01-05-2021

Page 1
Page 2
One page

In order to understand this issue, we launched a whole series of materials on popular video cards of past generations. Previously, we have already tested the GTX 1060 at 3 and 6 gigabytes, as well as the GTX 1050 Ti. Today, let’s look at what the GeForce GTX 1650 is capable of. Steam statistics say that it takes an honorable third place in terms of popularity.

At one time, NVIDIA released several modifications of the GTX 1650, but some are only for the Asian market, and we will omit them. Initially, the GTX 1650 received a TU117-300 GPU and 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. This GPU has 896 CUDA cores, 56 texture units and 32 raster units. Later, a version with the same GPU but faster GDDR6 memory was introduced. The GPU clock speeds have been lowered slightly to keep power consumption at 75W. Otherwise, there are no differences.

GTX 1650 modifications with GDDR5 have practically disappeared from stores today, while GDDR6 versions are available in a wide range. Prices for them start at $270, and the recommended one was only $149. «Forgive us, Marty, we’re all about…»

We armed ourselves with a couple of graphics cards to put the GTX 1650 into practice. The original version is represented by the model Palit GeForce GTX 1650 StormX OC . It has compact dimensions, a simple single-fan cooler and 4% GPU overclocking.

Up a notch is the MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 GAMING X . She received a factory overclocked dynamic frequency from 1590 to 1710 MHz, as well as a proprietary TWIN FROZR 7 cooler. The latter consists of an S-shaped heat pipe, an aluminum radiator and a pair of TORX FAN 3.0 axial fans.

At the beginning of the article, we will compare these video cards with each other and with internal competitors in the face of the GTX 1050 Ti from Colorful, the 3 and 6 GB GTX 1060 from Maxsun and the same Colorful, as well as the GTX 1650 SUPER from GYGABYTE .

Now to the test stand. At its heart is a 65W 12-thread Core i5-10600 with good gaming performance and a dynamic frequency of up to 4.8GHz.

In our case, it is interesting by the presence of a pair of M.2 slots at once.

2-section dropsy ID-COOLING DashFlow 240 not only provides comfortable temperatures, looks beautiful and works quietly, but also makes it easier for us to work with the test bench, due to the freeing of near-socket space. In other words, you can rearrange video cards without problems.

The RAM is represented by a 2-channel 16 GB DDR4-2400 HyperX Fury RGB kit, which was manually launched at a frequency of 2666 MHz.

For OS and software, we took not the fastest, but very affordable M.2 SSD Kingston A400 480 GB. The SATA interface promises us 500 MB / s when reading and 450 when writing. In reality, both indicators exceed 500 MB / s.

Games were thrown on the fastest 2 terabyte Kingston KC2500 NVMe drive with PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. Its write and read speeds reach 2900 and 3500 MB / s, respectively. In practice, the speed indicators correspond to the declared ones.

We never skimp on quality food, and we advise you to do the same. The Seasonic FOCUS G X-650 is perfect for all our requirements with a power of 650 W and with a «gold» certification 80 PLUS. A 10-year warranty speaks for the high reliability of the unit.

The system was assembled in a spacious case Antec Dark Phantom DP502 FLUX . Inside it can easily accommodate up to five drives, video cards up to 405 mm long, tower coolers up to 175 mm high, and even a 3-section dropsy.

AOC U2790PQU professional monitor was used to display the picture. Gameplays recorded by external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K , i.e. without loss of performance.

Let’s move on to the tests. Let’s start with the most interesting: we will compare different versions of the GTX 1650 with each other and with internal opponents in five current gaming benchmarks in Full HD resolution.

B Assassin’ s Creed Valhalla at a medium preset, the newer version of the GTX 1650 is ahead by 11-16%. But even the presence of GDDR6 does not allow it to overtake the GTX 1066 and catch up with the GTX 1650 SUPER. Both cards are faster than her by a maximum of 10%.

In Godfall at the medium preset, the maximum difference between the GTX 1650 with GDDR6 and GDDR5 reaches 26%. Thanks to the 6 GB video buffer, the GTX 1060 managed to take the lead and significantly outperform the GTX 1650 SUPER in terms of drawdowns.

But in Horizon Zero Dawn GTX 1650 SUPER returns to the yellow jersey of the leader. It outperformed the GTX 1066 and GTX 1650 with GDDR6 by up to 12% and 21%, respectively. The difference between different versions of the GTX 1650 reaches 20%.

B Total War Saga: Troy with a high preset in the top again GTX 1650 SU PER and 6 GB GTX 1060. GTX 1650 with GDDR6 breaks away from its progenitor by a maximum of 12% . The difference between GTX 1650 SUPER and GTX 1050 Ti is space 58-69%.

In Watch Dogs: Legion the GTX 1650 SUPER confidently takes the first line of the rating. The GTX 1650 with GDDR6 was able to overtake the 6 GB GTX 1060 for the first time. True, the latter has better statistics on very rare events.

In general, for five games, the picture is as follows: GeForce GTX 1650 with GDDR6 memory is faster than the version with GDDR5 by 10-16% on average. If you find a GTX 1650 SUPER, then it is 14-19% faster than the accelerated GTX 1650. But the 6 GB GTX 1060 is faster than the last one by 9-14%. GTX 1650 with GDDR6 outperforms GTX 1063 and GTX 1050 Ti by 8-16% and 47-51% respectively.

GeForce GTX 1650 [in 27 benchmarks]

NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1650

  • PCIe 3.0 x16 interface
  • Core frequency 1485
  • Video memory size 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory frequency 8000
  • Maximum resolution

Description

NVIDIA started GeForce GTX 1650 sales on April 23, 2019 at a suggested price of $149. This is a desktop graphics card based on the Turing architecture and 12 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at gamers. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 8 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 128.0 Gb / s.

In terms of compatibility, this is a two-slot PCIe 3.0 x16 card. Reference version length — 229mm. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 75 W.

It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of

19.97%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 181

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the GeForce GTX 1650, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

Rank in performance 215
Rank in popularity 9 0200 1
Value for money 16.39
Architecture TURING (2018−2021)
Graphic processor TU1117
Type Desktop
Release date 9 0215

April 23, 2019 (4 years ago)
Release price 149 $
Price now $313 (2. 1x) of 158889 (A100 PCIe) 9 0201

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher the better.

Features

GeForce GTX 1650’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about GeForce GTX 1650’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Number of Stream Processors 896 of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core Clock 1485MHz on RX 6500 XT)
Boost frequency 1665 MHz of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors 4.700 million 9 0200 of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile))
Process 12nm of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) ) 75 W of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texturing speed 93. 24 of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB)

Compatibility and dimensions

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 902 00 229 mm
Thickness 2 slots
Additional connectors power supply no

RAM

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 1650 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.

Memory type GDDR5
Maximum memory 9020 0 4 GB of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width 128 bit of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory frequency 8000 MHz 9 0200 out of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Memory bandwidth 128.0 Gb/s of 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory —

Video outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 1650. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI 9021 5

+

API support

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 1650, including their versions.

9021 3

90 214

DirectX 12 (12_1)
14 9OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131
CUDA 7.5

Benchmark tests

These are the results of GeForce GTX 1650 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.

Overall benchmark performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650
19.97

    Passmark

    This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation by running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the latter is done in 4K resolution if possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.

    Benchmark coverage: 24%

    GTX 1650
    7853

    3DMark Vantage Performance

    3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of which is a girl running away from some kind of military base located in a sea cave, and the other is a space fleet attacking defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.

    Benchmark coverage: 16%

    GTX 1650
    44694

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU

    3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy.

    Benchmark coverage: 16%

    GTX 1650
    13645

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    Benchmark coverage: 13%

    GTX 1650
    8795

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

    Cloud Gate is a legacy DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead.

    Benchmark coverage: 13%

    GTX 1650
    50549

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

    Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using a resolution of 1920×1080, Fire Strike demonstrates fairly realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware.

    Benchmark coverage: 13%

    GTX 1650
    9203

    GeekBench 5 OpenCL

    Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Khronos Group’s OpenCL API.

    Benchmark coverage: 9%

    GTX 1650
    39414

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU

    Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9 to render a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet at 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead.

    Benchmark coverage: 8%

    GTX 1650
    373333

    GeekBench 5 Vulkan

    Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Vulkan API from AMD and the Khronos Group.

    Benchmark coverage: 5%

    GTX 1650
    36854

    GeekBench 5 CUDA

    Geekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses NVIDIA’s CUDA API.

    Benchmark coverage: 4%

    GTX 1650
    39941

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    91

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    45

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    6

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    21

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    44

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    35

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    5

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01

    Benchmark coverage: 3%

    GTX 1650
    51

    SPECviewperf 12 — Maya

    This part of the SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses the Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero power plant with over 700,000 polygons in six different modes.

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    90

    SPECviewperf 12 — Catia

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    43

    SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    46

    SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    7

    SPECviewperf 12 — Creo

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    31

    SPECviewperf 12 — Medical

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    22

    SPECviewperf 12 — Energy

    Benchmark coverage: 2%

    GTX 1650
    3.6

    SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 3dsmax-05

    Benchmark coverage: 1%

    GTX 1650
    106

    SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max

    This part of the SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates 3DS Max by running eleven tests in various use cases, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

    Benchmark coverage: 1%

    GTX 1650
    108

    GeForce GTX 1650 in games

    FPS in popular games on the GeForce GTX 1650, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.

    Average FPS

    Here are the average FPS values ​​for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:

    9 71 1440p 38 4K 23

    Overall GeForce GTX 1650 performance compared to its nearest desktop counterparts.

    AMD Radeon R9290
    103.1

    AMD Radeon RX 470
    103.1

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
    102.2

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
    100

    AMD Radeon RX 580X
    99. 3

    AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
    99

    NVIDIA T1000
    97.85

    Competitor from AMD

    We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 from AMD is Radeon RX 580X, which is slower by 1% on average and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

    Radeon RX 580X

    Compare

    Here are some of AMD’s nearest GeForce GTX 1650 competitors:

    AMD Hawaii
    105.41

    AMD Radeon R9 290
    103.1

    AMD Radeon RX 470
    103.1

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
    100

    AMD Radeon RX 580X
    99.3

    AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
    99

    AMD Radeon RX 5300
    97.6

    Other video cards

    Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Radeon RX 470

    Compare

    Radeon RX 480

    90 205 Compare

    Radeon RX 570

    Compare

    Radeon RX 580

    Compare

    Radeon RX 5500 XT 902 01

    Compare

    T600

    Compare

    Recommended CPUs

    According to our statistics these processors are most commonly used with the GeForce GTX 1650.


    Core i5
    10300H

    6.5%


    Core i5
    10400F

    5.9%


    Core i5
    9300H

    5.2%


    Ryzen 5
    3550H

    4.2%


    Ryzen 5
    4600H

    3.9%


    Core i3
    10100F

    3.8%


    Core i5
    9400F

    3.3%


    Core i5
    1135G7

    2.