R7 m265 benchmark: AMD Radeon R7 M265 — NotebookCheck.net Tech

13 июня, 2021

Radeon R7 M265 [in 6 benchmarks]

Summary

AMD started Radeon R7 M265 sales 7 January 2014. This is a GCN architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 4 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1000 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 32 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at


1.37%

of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce RTX4090

Compare

General info


Some basic facts about Radeon R7 M265: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking 917
Value for money 0.03
Architecture GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name Opal XT / Mars
Market segment Laptop
Release date 7 January 2014 (9 years old)
Current price $585 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs


Radeon R7 M265’s specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R7 M265’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 825 MHz of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed 825 MHz of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors 1,550 million of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Texture fill rate 23. 52 of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility


Information on Radeon R7 M265’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it’s notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory


Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R7 M265: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width 128 Bit of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Memory bandwidth 32 GB/s of 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory —

Video outputs and ports


Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R7 M265. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors No outputs

Technologies


Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R7 M265. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration —
Enduro —
FreeSync 1
HD3D +
PowerTune +
DualGraphics 1
TrueAudio —
ZeroCore +
Switchable graphics 1

API support


APIs supported by Radeon R7 M265, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX DirectX® 11
Shader Model 6.3
OpenGL 4.4 of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL Not Listed
Mantle +

Benchmark performance


Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon R7 M265. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


R7 M265
1.37

    Passmark

    This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

    Benchmark coverage: 25%


    R7 M265
    537

    3DMark Vantage Performance

    3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

    Benchmark coverage: 16%


    R7 M265
    6175

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU

    3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

    Benchmark coverage: 16%


    R7 M265
    1882

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    Benchmark coverage: 13%


    R7 M265
    1211

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

    Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

    Benchmark coverage: 13%


    R7 M265
    1336

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

    Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

    Benchmark coverage: 13%


    R7 M265
    8402

    Mining hashrates


    Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R7 M265. Usually measured in megahashes per second.


    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 68 Mh/s  

    Gaming performance


    Let’s see how good Radeon R7 M265 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

    Average FPS across all PC games

    Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

    Full HD 14

    Performance in popular games

    Relative perfomance


    Overall Radeon R7 M265 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


    Intel HD Graphics 5000
    101.46


    ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830
    100.73


    AMD Radeon HD 6570M
    100.73


    AMD Radeon R7 M265
    100


    Intel HD Graphics 510
    99. 27


    Intel HD Graphics 515
    99.27


    ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
    99.27

    NVIDIA equivalent


    According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon R7 M265 is GeForce GT 630M, which is faster by 1% and higher by 6 positions in our ranking.

    GeForce GT630M

    Compare


    Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 M265:


    NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
    106.57


    NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
    105.84


    NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
    101.46


    AMD Radeon R7 M265
    100


    NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
    97.81


    NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
    97. 08


    NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
    94.16

    Similar GPUs

    Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.



    HD
    Graphics 510




    HD
    Graphics 515


    GeForce GT630M

    Compare



    HD
    Graphics 5000


    HDGraphics 4400

    Compare

    Radeon R5M255

    Compare

    Recommended processors

    These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R7 M265 according to our statistics.



    Core i5
    4200U

    25.1%



    Core i7
    4500U

    11. 1%



    A10
    7300

    8.6%



    Core i7
    4700MQ

    8.1%



    Core i7
    5500U

    6.1%



    Core i7
    4510U

    3.5%



    Core i3
    4010U

    3.1%



    Core i5
    4210U

    3.1%



    Core i5
    5200U

    2.8%



    Core i5
    4200M

    2.8%

    User ratings: view and submit


    Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

    Questions and comments


    Here you can ask a question about Radeon R7 M265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

    Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

    Radeon R7 M265 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 : Which one is better?

    Home

    GPU Comparison



    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

    VS


    AMD Radeon R7 M265
    AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

    We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

    Main Differences

    AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16’s Advantages


    Released 4 years and 10 months late


    Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1190MHz vs 825MHz)


    More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)


    Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)


    640 additional rendering cores

    Benchmark


    FP32 (float)


    Radeon R7 M265

    0. 633 TFLOPS


    Radeon Pro Vega 16
    +284%

    2.437 TFLOPS


    Radeon R7 M265

    VS


    Radeon Pro Vega 16

    Graphics Processor


    Opal


    GPU Name


    Vega 12


    Opal XT


    GPU Variant


    Vega 12 XLA


    GCN 1.0


    Architecture


    GCN 5.0


    TSMC


    Foundry


    GlobalFoundries


    28 nm


    Process Size


    14 nm


    950 million


    Transistors


    Unknown


    77mm²


    Die Size


    Unknown

    Graphics Card


    Jan 2014


    Release Date


    Nov 2018


    Gem System


    Generation


    Radeon Pro Mac


    Mobile


    Type


    Mobile


    PCIe 3. 0 x8


    Bus Interface


    PCIe 3.0 x16

    Clock Speeds


    725MHz


    Base Clock


    815MHz


    825MHz


    Boost Clock


    1190MHz


    900MHz


    Memory Clock


    1200MHz

    Memory


    2GB


    Memory Size


    4GB


    DDR3


    Memory Type


    HBM2


    128bit


    Memory Bus


    1024bit


    28. 80 GB/s


    Bandwidth


    307.2 GB/s

    Render Config


    384


    Shading Units


    1024


    -


    SM Count


    -


    -


    Tensor Cores


    -


    -


    RT Cores


    -


    16 KB (per CU)


    L1 Cache


    16 KB (per CU)


    256KB


    L2 Cache


    1024KB

    Theoretical Performance


    6. 600 GPixel/s


    Pixel Rate


    38.08 GPixel/s


    19.80 GTexel/s


    Texture Rate


    76.16 GTexel/s


    -


    FP16 (half)


    4.874 TFLOPS


    633.6 GFLOPS


    FP32 (float)


    2.437 TFLOPS


    -


    FP64 (double)


    152. 3 GFLOPS

    Board Design


    Unknown


    TDP


    75W


    -


    Suggested PSU


    -


    Portable Device Dependent


    Outputs


    No outputs


    -


    Power Connectors


    -

    Graphics Features


    12 (11_1)


    DirectX


    12 (12_1)


    4. 6


    OpenGL


    4.6


    2.1 (1.2)


    OpenCL


    2.1


    1.2.170


    Vulkan


    1.2


    -


    CUDA


    -


    6.5 (5.1)


    Shader Model


    6.3

    Related GPU Comparisons

    1


    Intel HD Graphics 5500 vs
    AMD Radeon R7 M265

    2


    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

    3


    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
    AMD Radeon R7 M265

    4


    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M

    5


    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs
    AMD Radeon HD 8750M

    6


    NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs
    AMD Radeon R7 M265

    7


    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
    AMD Radeon R7 M265

    8


    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs
    AMD Radeon HD 7690M

    9


    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs
    NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

    10


    AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs
    AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile


    © 2023 — TopCPU. net  

    Contact Us
    Privacy Policy

    performance overview and gaming performance tests

    The Radeon R7 M265 graphics card was released by AMD, release date: 20 May 2014. The graphics card is designed for desktop computers and is based on the GCN 3.0 architecture, codenamed Topaz.

    Core frequency — 900 MHz. The core frequency in Boost mode is 825 MHz. Texturing speed — 19.8 GTexel / s. Number of shader processors — 384. Floating point performance — 633.6 gflops. Technological process — 28 nm. The number of transistors is 3,100 million.

    Memory type: DDR3. The maximum memory size is 4 GB. The memory bus width is 128 bit. Memory frequency — 1000 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 32 GB/s. Shared memory — 0.

    Benchmarks

    PassMark
    G3D Mark
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    PassMark
    G2D Mark
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    Geekbench
    OpenCL
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    323268
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop
    Face Detection
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    1153.132 mPixels/s
    8.160 mPixels/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    Ocean Surface Simulation
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    14101.507 Frames/s
    282.111 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    T-Rex
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    95. 851 Frames/s
    1.454 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    Video Composition
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    391.061 Frames/s
    21.704 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
    Bitcoin Mining
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    4429.590 mHash/s
    68. 392 mHash/s
    GFXBench 4.0
    Car Chase Offscreen
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    34770 Frames
    1551 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0
    Manhattan
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    27823 Frames
    1264 Frames
    GFXBench 4. 0
    T-Rex
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    69225 Frames
    2424 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0
    Car Chase Offscreen
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    34770.000 Fps
    1551.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0
    Manhattan
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    27823. 000 Fps
    1264.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0
    T-Rex
    Top 1 GPU
    This GPU
    69225.000 Fps
    2424.000 Fps
    Name Meaning
    PassMark — G3D Mark 537
    PassMark — G2D Mark 141
    Geekbench — OpenCL 5587
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection 8.160 mPixels/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation 282.111 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex 1.454 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition 21.704 Frames/s
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining 68.392 mHash/s
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen 1551 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan 1264 Frames
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex 2424 Frames
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen 1551.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan 1264.000 Fps
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex 2424.000 Fps

    Gaming performance

    1. World of Warships (2015)
    2. The Witcher 3 (2015)
    3. Dirt Rally (2015)
    4. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
    5 Far Cry 4 (2014)
    6 Assassin’s Creed Unity (2014)
    7. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014)
    8 Alien: Isolation (2014)
    9. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
    10 Sims 4 (2014)
    11 Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
    12. The Elder Scrolls Online (2014)
    13. Thief (2014)
    14. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
    15. Battlefield 4 (2013)

    16. Total War: Rome II (2013)
    17. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
    18. Metro: Last Light (2013)
    19 BioShock Infinite (2013)
    20 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
    21 SimCity (2013)
    22. Tomb Raider (2013)
    23. Crysis 3 (2013)
    24 Hitman: Absolution (2012)
    25. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012)
    26. Diablo III (2012)
    27. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
    28. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
    29. Starcraft 2 (2010)
    30. World of Warcraft (2005)

    World of Warships (2015)

    90 013 Medium, 1366×768
    Low, 1366×768 83.20
    56.40
    High, 1920×1080 28.10

    The Witcher 3 (2015)

    Low, 1024×768 22.90 8 15.90
    High, 1920×1080 8.80

    Dirt Rally (2015) 4×768

    136.60 Medium, 1366×768 40.60 High 13 21.30 Ultra, 1920×1080 12.60

    Low, 1024×768 42.00 Medium, 1366×768 28.70 High, 1920×1080 10.70 900 13 Ultra, 1920×1080 7. 00

    Far Cry 4 (2014)

    13 39.00
    Medium, 1366×768 022

    Ultra, 1920×1080 10.00

    Assassin’s Creed Unity (2014)

    Low, 1024×768 17.30
    Medium, 1366×768 900 15

    		12.90
    High, 1920×1080 8.00

    (2014)

    Low, 1024×768 45.80
    Medium, 1366×768 28.70 900 15
    High, 1920×1080 14.70
    Ultra, 1920×1080 7.90

    Alien: Isolation (2014) 1366×768

    28.30 High, 1920×1080

    90 013 17.60 Ultra, 1920×1080 13.80

    1

    Low, 1280×720 31.30 Medium, 1344×756 27

    Sims 4 (2014)

    Low, 1024×768 90. 00
    Medium, 1366×768 9001 5

    		33.70
    High, 1920×1080 0022

    Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)

    Low, 1280×720 46.30
    Medium, 1280×720 2

    		High, 1920×1080 18.50
    Ultra, 1920×1080 10.10

    The El (Der Scrolls Online) 2014)

    9
    Low, 1024×768 61.90
    Medium, 1366×768 41.45 900 15
    High, 1366×768 27.15
    Ultra, 1920×1080 7.30 Medium, 1366×768 12.90
    High, 1366×768 12.00
    Ultra, 1920×1080 3.40 12

    		Low, 1024×768 53.60
    26.30
    High, 1366×768 11.25
    Ultra, 1920×108 0 4. 20

    Battlefield 4 (2013)

    Low, 1024×768 34.48
    Medium, 1366×768 26.40
    High, 1366×768 24 Total War: Rome II (2013)
    Low, 1024×768 9 51.10
    High, 1366×768 42.4 0
    Ultra, 1920×1080 7.50

    Company of Heroes 2

    90 013 Low, 1024×768
    30.09
    Medium, 1366×768 24.04
    Ultra, 1920×1080 900 15

    		13.80

    Metro: Last Light (2013)

    9002 2

    Low, 1024×768 32.40
    Medium, 1366×768 24.80
    High, 1366×768 15.85
    Ultra, 1920×1080 6.40

    906 24 BioShock Infinite (2013) )

    9 0022

    Low, 1280×720 68. 00
    Medium, 1366×768 39.92
    High, 1366×768 33.20
    Ultra, 1920×1080 10.95

    StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)

    Low, 1024×768 156.90
    Medium, 1366×768 77.60
    High, 1366×768 44.20
    Ultra, 1920×1080 15.00

    SimCity (2013)

    Low, 1024×768 141.50
    Medium, 1366×768 34.30
    High, 1366×768 7

    Tomb Raider (2013)

    90 022

    Low, 1024×768 71.50
    Medium, 1366×768 45.40
    High, 1366×768 31.15
    Ultra, 1920×1080 14.80

    Crysis 3 (2013)

    Low, 1024×768 32. 89
    Medium, 1366×768 21.00

    9062 4 Hitman: Absolution (2012)

    Low, 1024×768 28.79
    Medium, 1366×768 24. 85
    High, 1366×768 18.15 27

    Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012)

    9001 Diablo III (2012) 3 High, 1366×768

    900 13 37.00

    Low, 1024×768 79.80
    Medium, 1366×768 46.54
    26.60
    Ultra, 1920×1080

    900 12

    Low 1024×768 84.75
    Medium 1366×768 55.15
    High, 1366×768 46.75
    Ultra 1920×1080 29.53

    The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)

    Low 55.10
    Medium, 1366×768 38.51
    High, 1366×768 28. 67
    Ultra, 1920×1080 16.65

    Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)

    90 011

    High, 1366×768 52.00
    Ultra, 1920×1080 23.00

    StarCraft II (2010) 1360×768

    		55.00
    High, 1360×768
    Ultra, 1920×1080 22.00 3 Low, 800×600 94.00
    Medium, 1024×768 94.00
    High, 1280×1024 29.30

    900 08 Features

    Architecture GCN 3.0
    Codename Topaz
    Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
    Issue date 20 May 2014
    Place in the ranking 1363
    Type Desktop
    Boost core clock 825MHz
    Number of Compute 9 conveyors0015

    		 6
    Core frequency 900MHz
    Floating point performance 633. 6 gflops
    Process 28nm
    Number of shader processors 384
    Texturing speed 19.8 GTexel/s
    Number of transistors 3,100 million
    Video connectors No outputs
    Tire PCIe 3.0 x8
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
    Notebook size medium sized
    DirectX 11
    Mantle
    OpenCL Not Listed
    OpenGL 4. 4
    Maximum memory size 4GB
    Memory bandwidth 32 GB/s
    Memory bus width 128bit
    Memory frequency 1000MHz
    Memory type DDR3
    Shared memory 0
    DualGraphics
    FreeSync
    HD3D
    PCIe 3.0
    PowerTune
    Switchable graphics
    Zero Core
    ZeroCore

    AMD Radeon R7 M265 graphics card

    • Edelmark rating 5. 6 out of 10;
    • Release date: January, 2014;
    • Video card memory size: 2048 MB;
    • Video memory type: DDR3;
    • GPU clock: 725 MHz.

    Features AMD Radeon R7 M265

    GPU

    processors

    GPU manufacturer AMD
    GPU name Opal
    Platform Laptop
    Clock frequency 725MHz
    Turbo clock speed 825MHz
    Two No
    Reference card No

    Performance

    Number of shaders 384
    Number of texture units (TMU) 24
    Number of ROPs 8
    Computer units 6
    Pixel fill rate 6.6GPixel/s
    Texture Fill Rate 19. 8 GTexel/s
    Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) 633.6GFLOPS

    Memory

    Memory clock 900MHz
    Effective memory frequency 1.800 MHz
    Memory bus width 128bit
    Video memory size 2.048MB
    Memory type DDR3
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s

    Comparison of Radeon R7 M265 with similar video cards

    Performance in games

    Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

    Radeon R7 M265 5.4 out of 10
    GeForce 840M 5.4 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.2 out of 10

    Working with graphics

    Tested with: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.

    Radeon R7 M265 5.5 out of 10
    GeForce 840M 5.8 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.8 out of 10

    Computing power

    Tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.

    Radeon R7 M265 5.5 out of 10
    GeForce 840M 5.6 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.4 out of 10

    Performance per Watt

    Video card tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.

    Radeon R7 M265 n/a
    GeForce 840M 7.4 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 6.9 out of 10

    Price-performance ratio

    Tested with: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070 , Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, Amazon System Price.

    Radeon R7 M265 6.5 out of 10
    GeForce 840M 5.7 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5. 3 out of 10

    Noise and Power

    Tested at: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.

    Radeon R7 M265 n/a
    GeForce 840M 9.6 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 9.4 out of 10

    Overall graphics card rating

    Radeon R7 M265 5.6 out of 10
    GeForce 840M 6.0 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.8 out of 10

    Benchmarks Radeon R7 M265

    Bitcoin mining

    Radeon R7 M265 68.39 mHash/s
    GeForce 840M 94.68 mHash/s
    GeForce GT 740M 44.7 mHash/s

    Face Recognition

    Radeon R7 M265 12.03 mPixels/s
    GeForce 840M 22. 54 mPixels/s
    GeForce GT 740M 9.37 mPixels/s

    Ocean surface simulation

    Radeon R7 M265 282.11 frames/s
    GeForce GT 740M 157.01 frames/s
    GeForce 840M 159.36 frames/s

    T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)

    Radeon R7 M265 2,520.68
    GeForce 840M 3,366.34
    GeForce GT 740M 3,345.16

    Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)

    Radeon R7 M265 1,641.6
    GeForce 840M 3,715.22
    GeForce GT 740M 3,698.22

    Thief

    Radeon R7 M265 3.4
    GeForce 840M 9.1
    GeForce GT 740M 6.6

    Bioshock Infinite

    Radeon R7 M265 10. 9
    GeForce 840M 13.55
    GeForce GT 740M 9.2

    Metro: Last Light

    Radeon R7 M265 27
    GeForce GT 740M 6.1
    GeForce 840M 11.1

    Video Reviews

    AMD Radeon R7 M265 Review

    The AMD Radeon R7 265 (by Sapphire) is the most affordable 256-bit graphics card. Overview

    AMD RADEON R7 M265 GTA 5

    Radeon R7 M265 reviews

    Turn off the throttling ULPS and Powerplay power savers in Afterburner — you will see a more significant difference
    Maximum fps will not increase, but the average will be more stable and high
    In addition , you can raise the voltage by 15mV.

    2024 © All rights reserved