AMD Radeon R7 240 — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs
AMD Radeon R7 240 graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 616 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card AMD Radeon R7 240 runs with the minimal clock speed . It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to 780 MHz. The manufacturer has equipped AMD with GB of 2 GB memory, clock speed 1150 MHz and bandwidth 72 GB/s.
The power consumption of the graphics card is 50 Watt, and the fabrication process is only 28 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.
3.8
Out of 81
Hitesti score
Popular graphics cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
AliExpress
General info
The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card AMD Radeon R7 240 release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.
| Place in performance rating: | 699 | |||
| Value for money (0-100): | 13.47 | |||
| Architecture: | GCN 1.0 | |||
| Code name: | Oland | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | 8 October 2013 (8 years ago) | |||
| Launch price (MSRP): | $69 | |||
| Price now: | $261 (3. 8x MSRP) |
|||
| Design: | reference | |||
| Value for money: | 0.22 | |||
| GPU code name: | Oland | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Technical specs
This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).
| Pipelines: | 320 | |||
| Boost Clock: | 780 MHz | |||
| Transistor count: | 950 million | |||
| Manufacturing process technology: | 28 nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
| Texture fill rate: | 14. 00 |
|||
| Floating-point performance: | 499.2 gflops | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 320 | |||
| Boost clock speed: | 780 MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 950 million | |||
| Thermal design power (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.
| Interface: | PCIe 3. 0 x8 |
|||
| Length: | 168 mm | |||
| Supplementary power connectors: | N/A | |||
| Bus support: | PCIe 3.0 | |||
Memory
The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for AMD Radeon R7 240.
| Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 2 GB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 128 Bit | |||
| Memory clock speed: | 1150 MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 72 GB/s | |||
Video outputs and ports
As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports.
Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.
| Display Connectors: | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |||
| HDMI: | + | |||
| DisplayPort support: | — | |||
Technologies
Each graphic card manufacturer complements its products with branded technologies that are used both in games and in the working process. Below is the list of peculiar features that you may find rather useful.
| AppAcceleration: | — | |||
| CrossFire: | 1 | |||
| FreeSync: | 1 | |||
| HD3D: | — | |||
| PowerTune: | — | |||
| TrueAudio: | — | |||
| ZeroCore: | — | |||
| DDMA audio: | + | |||
| Enduro: | — | |||
API support
All API-supported AMD Radeon R7 240 are listed below.
| DirectX: | DirectX® 12 | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | |||
| Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
| OpenCL: | 1.2 | |||
| Mantle: | — | |||
Overall gaming performance
All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place AMD Radeon R7 240 has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).
Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. |
May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. |
|
| 30 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
| May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates. | |
| ? | Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value. | |
Benchmark
Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for AMD Radeon R7 240. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.
Overall benchmark performance
AMD Radeon HD 6650A
Intel HD Graphics 520
AMD Radeon R7 240
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result.
Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
AMD Radeon R7 240
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
AMD Radeon HD 6650A
Intel HD Graphics 520
AMD Radeon R7 240
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
3.
8
Out of 81
Hitesti score
Share on social network:
In order to leave a review you need to log in
Reviews of AMD Radeon R7 240
Compare AMD Radeon R7 240
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
AMD Oland
AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
AMD Bonaire
AMD Baffin
AMD Fiji
AMD Radeon R7 240 in 2 Benchmarks
It is time to review AMD Radeon R7 240 benchmark performance. The base clock speed is , whilst its speed in turbo boost and supplementary overclocking (maximum) is 780 MHz.
AMD Radeon R7 240 process technology is 28 nm that is a good result of the release date.
AMD manufacture has equipped graphic chips with 72 GB/s bandwidth and clock speed. AMD Radeon R7 240 maximum memory is 2 GB.
We recommend you learn all technical specifications in separate sections for a common understanding and high-speed of AMD Radeon R7 240.
3.8
Out of 78
CMPTEK score
Compare AMD Radeon R7 240
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 600 (217 views)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 (213 views)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (205 views)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (204 views)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (202 views)
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (200 views)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M (200 views)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (199 views)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (197 views)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 (192 views)
General Information
Here is the release date, code name, core architecture, launch and current price.
It is the general information to start learning AMD Radeon R7 240.
| Place in performance rating: | 714 | |||
| Value for money (0-100): | 13.47 | |||
| Architecture: | GCN 1.0 | |||
| Code name: | Oland | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | 8 October 2013 (8 years ago) | |||
| Launch price (MSRP): | $69 | |||
| Price now: | $487 (7. 1x MSRP) |
|||
| Design: | reference | |||
| Value for money: | 0.11 | |||
| GPU code name: | Oland | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — Technical Specifications
Here are key features that determine AMD Radeon R7 240 performance in benchmarks and other apps. The higher the figures are, the better it is. Please pay attention to all the characteristics provided. For example, the clock frequency directly affects the high-speed, and processing data and performing calculations (e.g, for mining) depend on the number of transistors. Also, check the TDP figure, because modern graphics cards may require a powerful PSU.
| Pipelines: | 320 | |||
| Boost Clock: | 780 MHz | |||
| Transistor count: | 950 million | |||
| Manufacturing process technology: | 28 nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
| Texture fill rate: | 14.00 | |||
| Floating-point performance: | 499.2 gflops | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 320 | |||
| Boost clock speed: | 780 MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 950 million | |||
| Thermal design power (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — Dimensions and Compatibility
Nowadays, it is very important to know the dimensions — length, width and height of a desktop graphics card — and understand which power connector is included in the package.
Also, please pay attention to the PCIe interface.
| Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |||
| Length: | 168 mm | |||
| Supplementary power connectors: | N/A | |||
| Bus support: | PCIe 3.0 | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — GPU RAM Frequency and Speed
Graphics Card Ram is a key element in computing and data storage — type, size, clock frequency and bandwidth — that directly affect the speed of work in gaming and working apps, which are currently quite demanding on graphics card resources. Note please the memory standard. The higher it is, the better it is. Let’s learn more about AMD Radeon R7 240 video memory specifications.
| Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 2 GB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 128 Bit | |||
| Memory clock speed: | 1150 MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 72 GB/s | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — Port and Display Support
In most cases, today all the problems connector compatibility can be solved with adapters or backwards-compatible cables such as HDMI / DVI. But, for general information, you learn below which ports are supported by AMD Radeon R7 240.
| Display Connectors: | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |||
| HDMI: | + | |||
| DisplayPort support: | — | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — Technologies
Healthy competition drives progress, so each manufacturer tries to surprise its consumer with special technologies available in this graphics card.
This can be useful in graphics or gaming apps.
| AppAcceleration: | — | |||
| CrossFire: | 1 | |||
| FreeSync: | 1 | |||
| HD3D: | — | |||
| PowerTune: | — | |||
| TrueAudio: | — | |||
| ZeroCore: | — | |||
| DDMA audio: | + | |||
| Enduro: | — | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — API support
Here are general standards for DirectX and other unified complexes for the development of 3D images supported by AMD Radeon R7 240 .
| DirectX: | DirectX® 12 | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | |||
| Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
| OpenCL: | 1.2 | |||
| Mantle: | — | |||
AMD Radeon R7 240 — Mining hashrates
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto): | 2.5 Mh/s | |||
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256): | 62 Mh/s | |||
Overall AMD Radeon R7 240 Gaming Performance
Find out to what extent AMD Radeon R7 240 is suitable for gaming! We have compiled a database of popular games and their system requirements* that allows you to quickly and easily estimate its gaming performance at different screen resolutions.
Graphics card gaming test is based on FPS. * There is a little margin error in the estimation of data.
Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timedemo
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. |
| May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. | |
| 30 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more. |
| 40 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more. |
| 60 | Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more. |
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag. |
|
| ? | Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate. |
| Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible. | |
| The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. | |
AMD Radeon R7 240 in Benchmarks
Let’s sum up the review by comparing the benchmarks results of AMD Radeon R7 240 5 competitive models similar in technical specifications. The first block is the overall result for all benchmarks, then all the others, which this particular model was tested on.
The higher the benchmark score, the faster a video card performs in graphics apps and modern games. If you have any additional questions, please leave them in the comments, we will definitely help!
Overall benchmark performance
AMD Radeon HD 6650A
Intel HD Graphics 520
AMD Radeon R7 240
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Fire Strike for Graphics Cards helps you determine performance in a state-of-the-art synthetic test that consists of two levels — physical and combined testing.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
AMD Radeon R7 240
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Passmark GPU
Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.
AMD Radeon HD 6650A
Intel HD Graphics 520
AMD Radeon R7 240
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
3.
8
Out of 78
CMPTEK score
AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon Vega 7 on one side and AMD Radeon R7 240 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 448 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 320 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,8 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2020 | Q4 2013 | ||||||
| Model number | — | 215-0837015, Oland PRO | ||||||
| GPU name | Raven | Oland | ||||||
| Architecture | GCN 5. 0 |
GCN 1.0 | ||||||
| Generation | Vega Raved Bridge | Volcanic Islands R7 200 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 9.800.000.000 | 950.000.000 | ||||||
| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 400 MHz | 730 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1,60 GHz | 780 MHz | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 30 W | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 7 | 5 | ||||||
| Shading units | 448 | 320 | ||||||
| TMUs | 28 | 20 | ||||||
| ROPs | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Cache memory | — | 256 KB | ||||||
| Pixel fillrate | 12,8 GP/s | 6,2 GP/s | ||||||
| Texture fillrate | 44,8 GT/s | 15,6 GT/s | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 1,4 TFLOPS | 499,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
| AMD Radeon Vega 7 |
1.434 |
| AMD Radeon R7 240 |
499,2 |
The difference is 187%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Processors with the graphics card AMD Radeon Vega 7:
AMD Ryzen 5 4600GAMD Ryzen 5 5600GAMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAMD Ryzen 5 5625CAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GEAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GEAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
Equivalence:
AMD Radeon Vega 7 Nvidia equivalentAMD Radeon R7 240 Nvidia equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Radeon R7 240 OEM
Radeon R7 240 OEM
- PCIe 3.0 x8 interface
- Core clock 730 MHz
- Video memory size 2 GB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory frequency 1800 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started Radeon R7 240 OEM sales 1 November 2013. This is GCN 1.
0 architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. It has 2 GB of DDR3 memory at 1.8 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 28.80 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 3.0 x8 card. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 50 W.
We don’t have any test results for the Radeon R7 240 OEM.
General
Details of Radeon R7 240 OEM type (desktop or laptop) and architecture, as well as launch time and cost at the time.
| Price now | 271 $ | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Radeon R7 240 OEM’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon R7 240 OEM’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (mobile))
of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 TI)
Compatibility & Dimensions
Information on Radeon R7 240 OEM compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
90 ti)
of the video release
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R7 240 OEM. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Video connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| HDMI |
Support APII APII APII APIA APIA APIA
APIs supported by Radeon R7 240, including their revisions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8% | GPU manufacturer | AMD |
|---|---|
| GPU name | Oland |
| Platform | Desktop |
| Clock frequency | 730MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 780MHz |
| Two | No |
| Reference card | No |
Performance
| Number of shaders | 320 |
|---|---|
| Number of texture units (TMU) | 20 |
| Number of ROPs | 8 |
| Computer units | 5 |
| Pixel fill rate | 6. 24 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 15.6 GTexel/s |
| Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) | 499.2GFLOPS |
Memory
| Memory clock | 900MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory frequency | 1.800 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 128bit |
| Video memory size | 2.048 MB |
| Memory type | DDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
Power consumption
| Energy consumption | 30W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radeon R7 240 | 5.7 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 6.3 out of 10 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 6.4 out of 10 |
Graphics
Video card tested on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.
| Radeon R7 240 | 5.4 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 5.6 out of 10 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 6.2 out of 10 |
Computing power
Tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.
| Radeon R7 240 | no data |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 5.3 out of 10 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 6.8 out of 10 |
Output per W
Video card tests performed on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex , Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.
| Radeon R7 240 | 7.9 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 8.0 out of 10 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8.0 out of 10 |
Price-performance ratio
Tested with: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070 , Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, Best new price.
| Radeon R7 240 | no data |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | no data |
| Radeon R7 370 | no data |
Noise and Power
Tested on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.
| Radeon R7 240 | 9.9 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 9.8 out of 10 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 9.2 out of 10 |
Overall graphics card rating
| Radeon R7 240 | 6.3 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 6.4 out of 10 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 6.9 out of 10 |
Benchmarks Radeon R7 240
PassMark
| Radeon R7 240 | 966 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 4.648 |
| GeForce GT 730 | 922 |
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
| Radeon R7 240 | 2.127.8 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730 | 4,922.42 |
| Radeon R7 370 | 3,358.86 |
Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)
| Radeon R7 240 | 1,702. 96 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 3,719.58 |
| GeForce GT 730 | 3.054.11 |
Test Fire Strike
| Radeon R7 240 | 10.89 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 37 |
| GeForce GT 730 | 11.11 |
Sky Diver test
| Radeon R7 240 | 102.46 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 269.6 |
| GeForce GT 730 | 102.34 |
Cloud Gate test
| Radeon R7 240 | 9.62 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 17.05 |
| GeForce GT 730 | 9.48 |
PassMark Direct Compute
| Radeon R7 240 | 621 |
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 370 | 2.657 |
| GeForce GT 730 | 640 |
Video reviews
What is the 2013 Radeon R7 240 capable of now?
Radeon R7 240 2GB DDR3 (MSI R7 240 2GD3 LP V1).
Big test
Reviews of the Radeon R7 240
already need more.
I have a video r7 240, but it is not at all the same as in the video. Maybe because from a gigabyte. And by the way, about the games listed, I have everything in full HD at medium graphics settings. They give out about 30-35 fps in each.
+Vod Jump The line with the price got accidentally when copying the data. Thanks, corrected.
I propose to take this computer solely as a test stand. I think no one in their right mind will install i5 with such a card 🙂
Tags:2048 MB, 730 MHz, AMD, DDR3, GPU, Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon R7 240 review. Benchmarks and specs
The AMD Radeon R7 240 graphics card (GPU) is position 616 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: AMD. AMD Radeon R7 240 running at minimum clock speed. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 780 MHz. The RAM size is 2 GB GB with a clock speed of 1150 MHz and a bandwidth of 72 GB/s.
The power consumption of the AMD Radeon R7 240 is 50 Watt and the process technology is only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the AMD Radeon R7 240.
To get an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
3.8
From 81
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
A basic set of information will help you find out the release date of the AMD Radeon R7 240 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance Rating Position: | 699 | |||
| Value for money: | 13. 47 |
|||
| Architecture: | GCN 1.0 | |||
| Code name: | Oland | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | October 8, 2013 (8 years ago) | |||
| Starting price: | $69 | |||
| Current price: | $261 (3.8x MSRP) | |||
| Design: | reference | |||
| Value for money: | 0.22 | |||
| GPU code name: | Oland | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the AMD Radeon R7 240 video card. The less technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities).
The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
| Conveyors: | 320 | |||
| Acceleration: | 780MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 950 million | |||
| Process: | 28nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 50 Watt | |||
| Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 14.00 | |||
| Floating point: | 499.2 gflops | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 320 | |||
| Acceleration speed: | 780MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 950 million | |||
| Estimated heat output: | 50 Watt | |||
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions).
This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
| Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |||
| Length: | 168mm | |||
| Additional power: | N/A | |||
| Tire support: | PCIe 3.0 | |||
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for AMD Radeon R7 240 + turbo overclocking capability.
| Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 2GB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 128 Bit | |||
| Memory frequency: | 1150 MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 72 GB/s | |||
Port and display support
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI .
Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
| Display connections: | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |||
| HDMI: | + | |||
| DisplayPort support: | — | |||
Technologies
Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.
| AppAcceleration: | — | |||
| CrossFire: | 1 | |||
| FreeSync: | 1 | |||
| HD3D: | — | |||
| PowerTune: | — | |||
| TrueAudio: | — | |||
| ZeroCore: | — | |||
| DDMA audio: | + | |||
| Enduro: | — | |||
API support
All APIs supported by the AMD Radeon R7 240 graphics card are listed below.
This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | DirectX® 12 | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | |||
| Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
| OpenCL: | 1.2 | |||
| Mantle: | — | |||
General gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at how the AMD Radeon R7 240 ranks in the gaming performance test (calculated according to the game developer’s recommendations for system requirements; it may differ from actual situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates. |
|
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
AMD Radeon R7 240 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard AMD Radeon R7 240 benchmarks. We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description).