Ryzen 5 3400g cpu benchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (8T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — June 2023

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (8T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i7-9700

Intel Core i7-9700F

Intel Core i3-12100

Intel Core i3-12100F

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core

AMD Ryzen 3 4300G

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

AMD Ryzen 3 4100 4-Core

AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE

Intel Core i7-11370H

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

Intel Core i7-7740X

Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i3-10105

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i5-11320H

Intel Core i5-1155G7

(YOU) AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-11300H

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i7-1195G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i5-1145G7

Intel Core i7-11390H

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4

Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i7-5775C

Intel Core i5-1135G7

Intel Core i7-7700

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3350G

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel Core i3-1125G4

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

AMD Ryzen 5 1500X

Intel Core i5-10200H

Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3

Intel Core i5-1130G7

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Xeon W-2123

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5

Intel Core i5-8259U

Intel Core i3-10100T

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3

Intel Core i5-10310U

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3

Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3

Intel Core i7-7700T

Intel Core i7-4771

Intel Core i7-10610U

Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE w/

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

Intel Core i7-8665U

Intel Core i7-4790S

Intel Core i5-8279U

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-7820HK

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3

Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2

Intel Core i7-6700T

Intel Core i7-10510U

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-4770

Intel Core i5-9300H

Intel Core i7-4770S

Intel Core i5-10210U

Intel Core i5-9300HF

Intel Core i7-8565U

Intel Core i7-4820K

Intel Core i5-8300H

Intel Core i7-3770K

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2

Intel Core i7-5700HQ

Intel Core i7-7820HQ

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-1065G7

Intel Core i5-8350U

Intel Core i7-3940XM

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5

Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2

Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2

Intel Core i5-1035G4

Intel Core i5-8365U

Intel Core i7-3820

Intel Core i7-6820HK

Intel Xeon E5-1620

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i7-4900MQ

Intel Core i7-4910MQ

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD FX -9590

Intel Core i7-3770S

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i7-2700K

Intel Core i7-8650U

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i7-3740QM

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3

Intel Core i7-6820HQ

Intel Core i5-1035G7

Intel Xeon E31270

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Xeon X5687

Intel Core i7-3720QM

Intel Xeon E31245

Intel Xeon E31240

Intel Core i7-3840QM

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U w/

Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with

Intel Core i7-4800MQ

Intel Core i7 975

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i7-4710MQ

Intel Core i7-4720HQ

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U w/

Intel Xeon E31230

Intel Core i7-3630QM

Intel Core i7-4810MQ

Intel Core i7-4710HQ

AMD FX-8370

AMD FX -8350

AMD FX -9370

Intel Core i7-2860QM

Intel Core i7-3610QM

Intel Core i7-4700HQ

Intel Xeon W3565

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U with

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with

Intel Core i7 960

Intel Core i7-4700MQ

Intel Core i7-4712MQ

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U with

Intel Core i7 950

Intel Xeon W3550

Intel Core i7-3632QM

Intel Xeon X3470

Intel Core i7-4702MQ

Intel Core i7 K 875

Intel Core i7 870

Intel Core i7-2600S

Intel Core i7-3612QM

AMD FX -8320

Intel Core i7-4750HQ

Intel Xeon X3460

Intel Core i7 930

Intel Core i7 860

AMD FX -8150

AMD FX-8370E

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core i7-2760QM

Intel Core i7 920

Intel Core i7-2820QM

Intel Xeon W3520

Intel Xeon X3450

Intel Core i7-2720QM

AMD FX-8320E

Intel Xeon X3440

Intel Core i7-2630QM

Intel Xeon E31260L

Intel Core i7-2670QM

AMD FX -8120

Intel Xeon E5620

Intel Core i7 Q 740

Intel Core i7 Q 720

CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — June 2023

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i7-13700K

Intel Core i9-12900KS

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Core i7-12700K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i7-12700F

Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Core i7-12700H

Intel Core i5-12500

Intel Core i5-12500H

Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel Core i5-12490F

Intel Core i5-12400

Intel Core i3-12100

Intel Core i5-12400F

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Intel Core i3-12100F

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-11700K

Intel Core i7-11700KF

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Core i5-11600K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i7-10700KF

Intel Core i5-11400

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i5-11400H

Intel Core i7-10700K

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i9-9900K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i5-10600KF

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i5-11300H

Intel Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel Core i5-9600K

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Intel Core i5-8600K

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Core i7-10750H

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i3-10105F

(YOU) AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i5-9400

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i3-10100F

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i5-8400

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i5-4690K

Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i7-10510U

Intel Core i5-8300H

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i5-1035G1

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Intel Core i5-6500

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i3-7100

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3

Intel Core i3-10110U

Intel Core i5-2500K

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Pentium G4560

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4160

Intel Xeon E5-2689

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i5-3330

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i5-3210M

AMD FX -8350

Intel Core i5-2450M

AMD FX -8320

AMD FX -6300

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i5-4210U

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core i3-7020U

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-6006U

Intel Core i3-4005U

90,000 thunderstorm online projects! GECID. com. Page 1

> Gameplay testing of Radeon Vega 11 in Ryzen 5 3400G: a storm of online projects!


Page 1
Page 2
One page

If you are with us for the first time or missed the previous materials of this cycle, then we briefly recall that AMD Ryzen 5 3400G received 4 cores in 8 threads with a base speed of 3700 MHz and dynamic overclocking to 4200 MHz. This time we didn’t overclock it. Who is interested in the topic of overclocking — welcome to one of the previous materials. Here we assume that you are too lazy or scared to do this, or maybe the budget fee does not allow.

The RAM controller is guaranteed to support DDR4-2933 modules in dual-channel mode. But if you’re lucky with overclocking, you can get even higher values.

The integrated video core Radeon RX Vega 11 received 704 stream processors with a clock frequency of 1400 MHz. It does not have its own memory, so it all depends on the speed and operating mode of the operative.

Now let’s go over the rest of the test bench configuration. Based on the board MSI B450M MORTAR MAX microATX format. Its audio subsystem is based on the Realtek ALC892 8-channel codec, and Chemicon audio capacitors are used in the harness. The entire audio path is electrically isolated from other components. The left and right audio channels are located on different layers of textolite to improve sound quality.

CPU cooling was assigned to the cooler Aerocool Verkho 5 Dark . Its fan is based on a hydraulic bearing with a claimed lifespan of 60,000 hours. For a cheaper plain bearing, this figure is usually 2 times lower. The noise level is in the range of 15-27 dBA. That is, it is a reliable and not too noisy solution.

For the iGPU test, the choice of RAM is very important. The 16 GB Series 9 kit helped us close this issue.0007 Team Group DARK Z Alpha with stylish aluminum heatsinks. At your request, we have reduced its frequency from 4000 to 3200 MHz. Thanks to the 2-channel mode, the bus width reached 128 bits and the throughput exceeded 51 GB / s. With one bar it would be 2 times less.

One terabyte 2.5-inch SSD PATRIOT P200 was not enough for the operating system and all games. I had to add PATRIOT BURST of a similar form factor, but with a capacity of 960 GB. During active work, the first was heated up to 40°C, and the second — up to 33°C.

«Platinum» power supply Seasonic FOCUS PX-650 pleased us not only with high power, quality and reliability, but also with ease of use. It uses a fully modular design and easy-to-stow cables. A total of four 8-pin PCIe connectors and ten SATA connectors are available, so you don’t deny yourself anything.

All of these components fit easily and comfortably into the RIOTORO CR400 . Although this is a budget option with an average price tag of about $ 50, it pleased with the ventilation holes on the bottom, front and top panels with dust filters. By the way, at the top there is one USB 3.0 port, two USB 2.0 and two audio ports for easy connection of peripherals and headphones.

All pieces of iron presented — it’s time to move on to the test.

Dota 2 can be run in Full HD at maximum speed if you are ready to put up with constant twitching of the video sequence. They made us nervous, so we took a step back in the settings to get a smooth and enjoyable gameplay. The average speed slightly fell short of the coveted 60 FPS, but this did not spoil the impression.

Fans of tank drifting and one-shots War Thunder will appreciate the comfortable gameplay with a high profile. There were no lags in the video sequence or delays in control. Only the indicator of very rare events is reduced to 35 frames / s, but this does not lead to discomfort.

World of Tanks can be run at a high preset if image quality is important to you. The average speed rises above 50 frames / s, but the statistics of very rare events around 24 FPS are slightly annoying. On a fast light tank, the gameplay doesn’t feel entirely pleasant and responsive, although you can still be very effective in combat in this mode.

For the sake of experiment we went down to the middle profile and exhaled with relief. The video sequence is completely smooth, it is very comfortable to aim and shoot. Yes, and the indicators rise by at least 36%. If you play with maximum efficiency for the result, then it is better at medium settings.

In ARK Survival Evolved there was a glitch in the menu: select and apply the minimum preset, but the game shows «Custom». Otherwise, everything is expected: the picture is ugly, like a reflection in the mirror after the holidays, friezes slip through and the average speed does not exceed 50 frames / s. But if you really want to, then you can play.

CS: GO in the heaviest mode Danger Zone flies at the minimum from the first minutes. The average frame rate exceeds 100 fps and the rest of the statistics do not spoil the impression of the game. There are no complaints about management either. Simpler maps will be even more fun.

The Quake Champions engine itself offered a low preset with a resolution scale of 67%. It ran perfectly, nothing buggy and did not interfere. The average speed again rose over a hundred FPS, and very rare events traditionally sank below 30 at the time of the death and rebirth of the hero.

If desired, the drawing scale can be increased to 100%. The comfort of the gameplay does not suffer from this. Yes, the average frame rate drops to 80 frames / s, but the ease of shooting and the smoothness of the video sequence remain at a high level.

I didn’t want to play regular PUBG on Vega 8 because of uncomfortable gameplay. On Vega 11, you can already run at a very low quality preset. Of course, the frame rate is not exorbitant, but without jamming and jelly control. You will definitely not be an easy victim for opponents.

In the comments you asked to add PUBG Lite — accept and sign. On the ultras, the stators slipped at first, and we immediately moved to the high profile. Everything was comfortable here. The statistics of rare and very rare events rose above 40 fps. For weak systems — must have!

The Fortnite engine offered a high graphics preset, but it was awkward to play. To begin with, we went down to the middle profile. The average speed almost reached the coveted 60 FPS, the video sequence became smoother, but occasionally there were slight lags.

To completely get rid of them, we switched to a low profile. The quality of the picture suffered, but the gameplay became completely enjoyable, without friezes and stators. For a multiplayer survival game, this is much more important. Experienced gamers by manual selection of settings will achieve an even better balance between the beauty and comfort of the video sequence.

Test and Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — Fewer Changes Than Expected

Last year, Raven Ridge APUs proved to be a very worthy alternative if you needed to build an economical and inexpensive office computer. The combination of Zen processor and Vega graphics provides enough casualness for everyday scenarios. But what about new models in the form of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G? We will talk about this in the review. But since there are not so many changes, there are no surprises to be expected.

With the announcement of the Ryzen 3000 family, AMD also updated two of its APUs that combine Zen compute cores with Vega graphics. They are very attractive for building office PCs or for casual gamers. It seems that the appearance of new APUs can be welcomed, but there are not as many changes as we would like.

Newer AMD Matisse CPUs, such as the Ryzen 9 3900X or the «younger» Ryzen 5 3600, use the updated Zen 2 architecture, which allows AMD to compete with Intel on an equal footing. In the case of two APUs, you will have to be content with the Zen + architecture, so the differences from the Raven Ridge processors are very small. At the very least, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G are made on the more advanced 12LP process technology, and the clock speeds are higher.

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G operates at a base frequency of 3.7 GHz, in Boost mode it can reach 4.2 GHz, which is a good 300 MHz higher than its predecessor. In the case of the younger Ryzen 3 3200G, clock speeds have increased to 3.6 and 4.0 GHz, respectively. Both APUs are based on four Zen + cores, but only the older model has SMT support, which allows you to process eight threads simultaneously. We also note the dual-channel DDR4-2933 interface and the L3 cache cut down to 4 MB.

On the integrated graphics, we also get differences between the two models. Ryzen 5 uses Vega 11 graphics, the younger model uses Vega 8. In practice, we get a decrease in the number of stream processors from 704 to 512. In both cases, the GPU clock speeds are increased to 1.4 and 1.25 GHz, respectively. For predecessors, they were limited to 1.25 and 1.1 GHz. The TDP of both Picasso APUs is 65W. However, the thermal package can be reduced to 45 W if necessary.


Overview of the new Ryzen
Cores/Threads Base frequency/Boost L3 cache L2 cache TDP Price
Ryzen 9 3950X 16 / 32 3.5 / 4.7 GHz 64MB 8MB 105 W from 56.400 ₽
Ryzen 9 3900X 12 / 24 3.8 / 4. 6 GHz 64MB 6MB 105 W from 45.500 ₽
Ryzen 7 3800X 8 / 16 3.9 / 4.5 GHz 32MB 4MB 105 W from 28.800 ₽
Ryzen 7 3700X 8 / 16 3.6 / 4.4 GHz 32MB 4MB 65 W from 22.900 ₽
Ryzen 5 3600X 6 / 12 3.8 / 4.4 GHz 32MB 3MB 95 W from 35.400 ₽
Ryzen 5 3600 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.2 GHz 32MB 3MB 65 W from 14.800 ₽
Ryzen 5 3400G 4 / 8 3.7 / 4.2 GHz 4MB 2MB 65 W
Ryzen 3 3200G 4 / 4 3.6 / 4.0 GHz 4MB 2MB 65 W from 13.

2023 © All rights reserved