CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (8T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — June 2023
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (8T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core i7-9700
Intel Core i7-9700F
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
AMD Ryzen 3 4100 4-Core
AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE
Intel Core i7-11370H
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core
Intel Core i7-7740X
Intel Core i7-7700K
Intel Core i3-10105
Intel Core i3-10105F
Intel Core i5-11320H
Intel Core i5-1155G7
(YOU) AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i5-11300H
Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i7-1195G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i5-1145G7
Intel Core i7-11390H
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-5775C
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
AMD Ryzen 5 3350G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i3-1125G4
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
Intel Core i5-10200H
Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3
Intel Core i5-1130G7
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Xeon W-2123
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
Intel Core i5-8259U
Intel Core i3-10100T
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3
Intel Core i5-10310U
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3
Intel Core i7-7700T
Intel Core i7-4771
Intel Core i7-10610U
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE w/
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Intel Core i7-8665U
Intel Core i7-4790S
Intel Core i5-8279U
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2
Intel Core i7-6700T
Intel Core i7-10510U
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-9300H
Intel Core i7-4770S
Intel Core i5-10210U
Intel Core i5-9300HF
Intel Core i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-4820K
Intel Core i5-8300H
Intel Core i7-3770K
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i5-8350U
Intel Core i7-3940XM
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2
Intel Core i5-1035G4
Intel Core i5-8365U
Intel Core i7-3820
Intel Core i7-6820HK
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i7-4900MQ
Intel Core i7-4910MQ
Intel Core i5-8265U
AMD FX -9590
Intel Core i7-3770S
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i7-2700K
Intel Core i7-8650U
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i7-3740QM
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
Intel Core i5-1035G7
Intel Xeon E31270
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Xeon X5687
Intel Core i7-3720QM
Intel Xeon E31245
Intel Xeon E31240
Intel Core i7-3840QM
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U w/
Intel Core i5-1035G1
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with
Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Intel Core i7 975
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with
Intel Core i7-4710MQ
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U w/
Intel Xeon E31230
Intel Core i7-3630QM
Intel Core i7-4810MQ
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX -8350
AMD FX -9370
Intel Core i7-2860QM
Intel Core i7-3610QM
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
Intel Xeon W3565
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U with
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with
Intel Core i7 960
Intel Core i7-4700MQ
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U with
Intel Core i7 950
Intel Xeon W3550
Intel Core i7-3632QM
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
Intel Core i7 K 875
Intel Core i7 870
Intel Core i7-2600S
Intel Core i7-3612QM
AMD FX -8320
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
Intel Xeon X3460
Intel Core i7 930
Intel Core i7 860
AMD FX -8150
AMD FX-8370E
AMD FX -8300
Intel Core i7-2760QM
Intel Core i7 920
Intel Core i7-2820QM
Intel Xeon W3520
Intel Xeon X3450
Intel Core i7-2720QM
AMD FX-8320E
Intel Xeon X3440
Intel Core i7-2630QM
Intel Xeon E31260L
Intel Core i7-2670QM
AMD FX -8120
Intel Xeon E5620
Intel Core i7 Q 740
Intel Core i7 Q 720
CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — June 2023
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i7-13700K
Intel Core i9-12900KS
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Intel Core i7-12700K
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i7-12700
Intel Core i7-12700F
Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Core i7-12700H
Intel Core i5-12500
Intel Core i5-12500H
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i5-12490F
Intel Core i5-12400
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-11700K
Intel Core i7-11700KF
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i9-10850K
Intel Core i7-10700KF
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i9-9900KF
Intel Core i5-11400F
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i5-11400H
Intel Core i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i7-10700
Intel Core i5-11300H
Intel Core i7-10700F
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Intel Core i5-8600K
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Core i7-10750H
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i3-10105F
(YOU) AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-8500
Intel Core i5-9400
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i5-9400F
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i5-10400F
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i3-10100F
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-8400
Intel Core i7-9750H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-8750H
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-8300H
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i7-8565U
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i5-1035G1
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i5-8265U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Core i5-6500
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
Intel Core i3-10110U
Intel Core i5-2500K
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Pentium G4560
AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i3-4160
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3330
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i5-3210M
AMD FX -8350
Intel Core i5-2450M
AMD FX -8320
AMD FX -6300
Intel Core i5-2410M
Intel Core i5-4210U
AMD FX -8300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-7020U
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core i3-6006U
Intel Core i3-4005U
90,000 thunderstorm online projects! GECID. com. Page 1
::>Processors
>2020
> Gameplay testing of Radeon Vega 11 in Ryzen 5 3400G: a storm of online projects!
12-02-2020
Page 1
Page 2
One page
If you are with us for the first time or missed the previous materials of this cycle, then we briefly recall that AMD Ryzen 5 3400G received 4 cores in 8 threads with a base speed of 3700 MHz and dynamic overclocking to 4200 MHz. This time we didn’t overclock it. Who is interested in the topic of overclocking — welcome to one of the previous materials. Here we assume that you are too lazy or scared to do this, or maybe the budget fee does not allow.
The RAM controller is guaranteed to support DDR4-2933 modules in dual-channel mode. But if you’re lucky with overclocking, you can get even higher values.
The integrated video core Radeon RX Vega 11 received 704 stream processors with a clock frequency of 1400 MHz. It does not have its own memory, so it all depends on the speed and operating mode of the operative.
Now let’s go over the rest of the test bench configuration. Based on the board MSI B450M MORTAR MAX microATX format. Its audio subsystem is based on the Realtek ALC892 8-channel codec, and Chemicon audio capacitors are used in the harness. The entire audio path is electrically isolated from other components. The left and right audio channels are located on different layers of textolite to improve sound quality.
CPU cooling was assigned to the cooler Aerocool Verkho 5 Dark . Its fan is based on a hydraulic bearing with a claimed lifespan of 60,000 hours. For a cheaper plain bearing, this figure is usually 2 times lower. The noise level is in the range of 15-27 dBA. That is, it is a reliable and not too noisy solution.
For the iGPU test, the choice of RAM is very important. The 16 GB Series 9 kit helped us close this issue.0007 Team Group DARK Z Alpha with stylish aluminum heatsinks. At your request, we have reduced its frequency from 4000 to 3200 MHz. Thanks to the 2-channel mode, the bus width reached 128 bits and the throughput exceeded 51 GB / s. With one bar it would be 2 times less.
One terabyte 2.5-inch SSD PATRIOT P200 was not enough for the operating system and all games. I had to add PATRIOT BURST of a similar form factor, but with a capacity of 960 GB. During active work, the first was heated up to 40°C, and the second — up to 33°C.
«Platinum» power supply Seasonic FOCUS PX-650 pleased us not only with high power, quality and reliability, but also with ease of use. It uses a fully modular design and easy-to-stow cables. A total of four 8-pin PCIe connectors and ten SATA connectors are available, so you don’t deny yourself anything.
All of these components fit easily and comfortably into the RIOTORO CR400 . Although this is a budget option with an average price tag of about $ 50, it pleased with the ventilation holes on the bottom, front and top panels with dust filters. By the way, at the top there is one USB 3.0 port, two USB 2.0 and two audio ports for easy connection of peripherals and headphones.
All pieces of iron presented — it’s time to move on to the test.
Dota 2 can be run in Full HD at maximum speed if you are ready to put up with constant twitching of the video sequence. They made us nervous, so we took a step back in the settings to get a smooth and enjoyable gameplay. The average speed slightly fell short of the coveted 60 FPS, but this did not spoil the impression.
Fans of tank drifting and one-shots War Thunder will appreciate the comfortable gameplay with a high profile. There were no lags in the video sequence or delays in control.
Only the indicator of very rare events is reduced to 35 frames / s, but this does not lead to discomfort.
World of Tanks can be run at a high preset if image quality is important to you. The average speed rises above 50 frames / s, but the statistics of very rare events around 24 FPS are slightly annoying. On a fast light tank, the gameplay doesn’t feel entirely pleasant and responsive, although you can still be very effective in combat in this mode.
For the sake of experiment we went down to the middle profile and exhaled with relief. The video sequence is completely smooth, it is very comfortable to aim and shoot. Yes, and the indicators rise by at least 36%. If you play with maximum efficiency for the result, then it is better at medium settings.
In ARK Survival Evolved there was a glitch in the menu: select and apply the minimum preset, but the game shows «Custom». Otherwise, everything is expected: the picture is ugly, like a reflection in the mirror after the holidays, friezes slip through and the average speed does not exceed 50 frames / s.
But if you really want to, then you can play.
CS: GO in the heaviest mode Danger Zone flies at the minimum from the first minutes. The average frame rate exceeds 100 fps and the rest of the statistics do not spoil the impression of the game. There are no complaints about management either. Simpler maps will be even more fun.
The Quake Champions engine itself offered a low preset with a resolution scale of 67%. It ran perfectly, nothing buggy and did not interfere. The average speed again rose over a hundred FPS, and very rare events traditionally sank below 30 at the time of the death and rebirth of the hero.
If desired, the drawing scale can be increased to 100%. The comfort of the gameplay does not suffer from this. Yes, the average frame rate drops to 80 frames / s, but the ease of shooting and the smoothness of the video sequence remain at a high level.
I didn’t want to play regular PUBG on Vega 8 because of uncomfortable gameplay.
On Vega 11, you can already run at a very low quality preset. Of course, the frame rate is not exorbitant, but without jamming and jelly control. You will definitely not be an easy victim for opponents.
In the comments you asked to add PUBG Lite — accept and sign. On the ultras, the stators slipped at first, and we immediately moved to the high profile. Everything was comfortable here. The statistics of rare and very rare events rose above 40 fps. For weak systems — must have!
The Fortnite engine offered a high graphics preset, but it was awkward to play. To begin with, we went down to the middle profile. The average speed almost reached the coveted 60 FPS, the video sequence became smoother, but occasionally there were slight lags.
To completely get rid of them, we switched to a low profile. The quality of the picture suffered, but the gameplay became completely enjoyable, without friezes and stators.
For a multiplayer survival game, this is much more important. Experienced gamers by manual selection of settings will achieve an even better balance between the beauty and comfort of the video sequence.
Test and Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G — Fewer Changes Than Expected
Last year, Raven Ridge APUs proved to be a very worthy alternative if you needed to build an economical and inexpensive office computer. The combination of Zen processor and Vega graphics provides enough casualness for everyday scenarios. But what about new models in the form of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G? We will talk about this in the review. But since there are not so many changes, there are no surprises to be expected.
With the announcement of the Ryzen 3000 family, AMD also updated two of its APUs that combine Zen compute cores with Vega graphics. They are very attractive for building office PCs or for casual gamers. It seems that the appearance of new APUs can be welcomed, but there are not as many changes as we would like.
Newer AMD Matisse CPUs, such as the Ryzen 9 3900X or the «younger» Ryzen 5 3600, use the updated Zen 2 architecture, which allows AMD to compete with Intel on an equal footing. In the case of two APUs, you will have to be content with the Zen + architecture, so the differences from the Raven Ridge processors are very small. At the very least, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G are made on the more advanced 12LP process technology, and the clock speeds are higher.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G operates at a base frequency of 3.7 GHz, in Boost mode it can reach 4.2 GHz, which is a good 300 MHz higher than its predecessor. In the case of the younger Ryzen 3 3200G, clock speeds have increased to 3.6 and 4.0 GHz, respectively. Both APUs are based on four Zen + cores, but only the older model has SMT support, which allows you to process eight threads simultaneously. We also note the dual-channel DDR4-2933 interface and the L3 cache cut down to 4 MB.
On the integrated graphics, we also get differences between the two models.
Ryzen 5 uses Vega 11 graphics, the younger model uses Vega 8. In practice, we get a decrease in the number of stream processors from 704 to 512. In both cases, the GPU clock speeds are increased to 1.4 and 1.25 GHz, respectively. For predecessors, they were limited to 1.25 and 1.1 GHz. The TDP of both Picasso APUs is 65W. However, the thermal package can be reduced to 45 W if necessary.
| Cores/Threads | Base frequency/Boost | L3 cache | L2 cache | TDP | Price | |
| Ryzen 9 3950X | 16 / 32 | 3.5 / 4.7 GHz | 64MB | 8MB | 105 W | from 56.400 ₽ |
| Ryzen 9 3900X | 12 / 24 | 3.8 / 4. 6 GHz |
64MB | 6MB | 105 W | from 45.500 ₽ |
| Ryzen 7 3800X | 8 / 16 | 3.9 / 4.5 GHz | 32MB | 4MB | 105 W | from 28.800 ₽ |
| Ryzen 7 3700X | 8 / 16 | 3.6 / 4.4 GHz | 32MB | 4MB | 65 W | from 22.900 ₽ |
| Ryzen 5 3600X | 6 / 12 | 3.8 / 4.4 GHz | 32MB | 3MB | 95 W | from 35.400 ₽ |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | 6 / 12 | 3.6 / 4.2 GHz | 32MB | 3MB | 65 W | from 14.800 ₽ |
| Ryzen 5 3400G | 4 / 8 | 3.7 / 4.2 GHz | 4MB | 2MB | 65 W | |
| Ryzen 3 3200G | 4 / 4 | 3.6 / 4.0 GHz | 4MB | 2MB | 65 W | from 13.
|