Titan x benchmarks: UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX Titan X

10 декабря, 2022

GeForce GTX TITAN X [in 6 benchmarks]


NVIDIA
GeForce GTX TITAN X

Buy

  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16

  • Core clock speed 1000

  • Max video memory 12 GB

  • Memory type GDDR5

  • Memory clock speed 7.0 Gbps

  • Maximum resolution

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce GTX TITAN X sales 17 March 2015 at a recommended price of $999. This is Maxwell 2.0 architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 12 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 7.0 GB/s are supplied, and together with 384 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 336.5 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is dual-width card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 10.5″ (26.7 cm). 6-pin + 8-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 250 Watt.

It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at


37.53%

of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.


GeForce GTX
TITAN X

vs


GeForce RTX
4090

General info


Of GeForce GTX TITAN X’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating 94
Value for money 22.31
Architecture Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code name GM200
Market segment Desktop
Release date 17 March 2015 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Current price $370 (0. 4x MSRP) of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0

  • 50

  • 100

Technical specs


GeForce GTX TITAN X’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX TITAN X’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 3072 of 18432 (AD102)
CUDA cores 3072
Core clock speed 1000 MHz of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed 1075 MHz of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Number of transistors 8,000 million of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP) 250 Watt of 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate 192 billion/sec of 939. 8 (h200 SXM5)
Floating-point performance 6,691 gflops of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements


Information on GeForce GTX TITAN X’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5″ (26.7 cm)
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Width 2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin + 8-pin
SLI options 4x

Memory


Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX TITAN X: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width 384 Bit of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed 7.0 GB/s of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth 336.5 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs and ports


Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX TITAN X. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display Connectors Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2. 0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor support 4 displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal

Technologies


Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX TITAN X. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream +
GeForce ShadowPlay +
GPU Boost 2.0
GameWorks +

API support


APIs supported by GeForce GTX TITAN X, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4
OpenGL 4.5 of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA +

Benchmark performance


Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce GTX TITAN X. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


GTX TITAN X
37.53

  • Passmark

  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL

  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

  • GeekBench 5 CUDA

  • Octane Render OctaneBench

  • Unigine Heaven 4. 0

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%


GTX TITAN X
13239

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%


GTX TITAN X
39047

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%


GTX TITAN X
53345

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 5%


GTX TITAN X
33524

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%


GTX TITAN X
125

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

Benchmark coverage: 1%


GTX TITAN X
2604

Mining hashrates


Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX TITAN X. Usually measured in megahashes per second.


Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 788 Mh/s  

Game benchmarks


Let’s see how good GeForce GTX TITAN X is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Relative perfomance


Overall GeForce GTX TITAN X performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
101.92


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
101.52


NVIDIA RTX A2000
100.91


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
100


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
98.37


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
96.4


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
95.26

AMD equivalent


The nearest GeForce GTX TITAN X’s AMD equivalent is Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, which is faster by 2% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.


Radeon Vega
Frontier Edition


Compare


Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX TITAN X:


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
104.45


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
102.93


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
101.52


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
100


AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
76.69


AMD Radeon RX 590
72.93


AMD Radeon R9 Fury
72.1

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Radeon Vega
Frontier Edition


Compare


Radeon R9
FURY X


Compare


GeForce GTX
1060 3 GB


Compare


TITAN
V


Compare


GeForce GTX
TITAN Z


Compare


GeForce GTX
TITAN BLACK


Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GTX TITAN X according to our statistics.


Ryzen Threadripper
PRO 3995WX

7.1%


Xeon Platinum
9282

4.2%


Core i7
4790K

2.9%


Core i9
9900K

2.9%


Core i9
10900KF

2.2%


Core i9
10980XE

2.2%


Core i7
5930K

2%


Core i5
10400F

2%


Ryzen Threadripper
3990X

1. 8%


Ryzen 9
5950X

1.8%

User rating


Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about GeForce GTX TITAN X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-titan-x%23general-info

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
3090 Ti



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










Review and testing of the video card Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)

Table of contents

  • Introduction
  • Specifications
  • Review Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)
    • Appearance and dimensions
    • PCB
    • Cooling system
  • Test bench and software
  • Instrumentation and Test Method
  • Play tests
  • Cooling System Potential Study
  • Acceleration and details
  • Test results
    • Star Wars Battlefront
    • Battlefield 4
    • The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
    • Sniper Elite III
    • Fallout 4
    • Hitman (2016)
    • Ashes of the Singularity
    • Grand Theft Auto V
    • Tom Clancy’s The Division
    • Rise of the Tomb Raider
    • 3DMark
  • Average number of frames
  • Conclusion

Introduction

Contrary to established traditions, the current generation of graphics accelerators exists in a somewhat truncated form. On the one hand, AMD has released an incomplete line of graphics cores. On the other hand, Nvidia, seeing this, decided to limit itself to models of the middle and budget classes. Indeed, in the new GeForce GTX 10X0 line, the niche of a powerful video card, which the GeForce GTX 980 Ti used to be, remains empty.

And, judging by the latest trends, we were never destined to get a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, instead Nvidia offered Titan X (Pascal) to demanding gamers. Naturally, the choice fell on the GP100-102 core. I write the name with a hyphen for a reason, and here’s why:

Designation

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan Black

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan Z

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X

Nvidia Titan X (Pascal)

Nvidia Tesla P40

Nvidia Quadro P6000

Nvidia Tesla P100

Nvidia Tesla P100
Codename

Kepler

Kepler

Kepler

Maxwell

Pascal

Pascal

Pascal

Pascal

Pascal
Version

GK110

GK110

GK110

GM200

GP102

GP102

GP102

GP100

GP100
Process technology, nm

28

28

28

28

16

16

16

16

16
Core size/cores, mm 2

561

561

561×2

601

471

471

471

610

610
Number of transistors, million

7 100

7 100

7100×2

8000

12 000

12 000

12 000

15 300

15 300
Core frequency, MHz

837

889

705

1000

1417

1303

1417

1126

1126
Core frequency (Turbo), MHz

876

980

876

1075

1531

1531

1563

1303

1303
Number of shaders (PS), pcs.

2688

2880

5760

3072

3584

3840

3840

3584

3584
Number of texture units (TMU), pcs.

224

240

480

192

224

240

240

224

224
Number of rasterization blocks (ROP), pcs.

48

48

96

96

96

96

96

96

96
Maximum fill rate, Gpix/s

40. 2

42.7

67.7

96

136




Maximum texture sampling rate, Gtex/s

188

213

338

192

317.4




Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5

GDDR5X

GDDR5

GDDR5X

HBM2

HBM2
Effective memory frequency, MHz

1500

1750

1750

1750

2500

1800

2250

1400

1400
Memory, GB

6

6

6

12

12

24

24

16

12
Memory bus bit

384

384

384

384

384

384

384

4096

3072
Memory bandwidth, GB/s

288

336

672

336

480

346

432

720

540
Power, connectors Pin

6+8

6+8

8+8

6+8

6+8




Power consumption, Watts

250

250

375

250

250

250

250

250

250
CrossFire/Sli

V

V

V

V

V

—

—

—

—
Announcement price, $

999

999

3000

999

1200




Announcement date

February 19, 2013

March 1, 2014

May 8, 2014

March 27, 2015

August 2, 2016

December 5, 2016

October 2, 2016

December 5, 2016

December 5, 2016

The entire Titan range spans several generations, starting with the Kepler core. Now the third generation of the block configuration architecture has entered the series, let me explain more precisely…

recommendations

The Pascal graphics processor for top-end video cards is available in two configurations — GP102 and GP100. Both are similar in a unified structure and differ only in the configuration of the memory system. In the first case, these are controllers for GDDR5 (X), in the second — HBM2. It is quite logical to assume that more transistors are used for HBM2, so their total number increases by 3.3 billion.

The fully configured GP102 core contains 3840 unified processors, 240 TMUs and 96 ROPs. For the Titan X, Nvidia reduced the number of processors to 3584, and in parallel, the number of TMUs also decreased to 224. The new model has a complete twin brother — Quadro P6000. Although the video card has been announced, it will be available for sale closer to the middle of winter. Another thing is its characteristics. Not only did she get a full Pascal core, but the frequencies are in no way inferior to the new product. But to be honest, its price tag is unlikely to be comparable to the Nvidia Titan X (Pascal).

Another representative of Pascal is Tesla P40 with full configuration and GDDR5 memory. Thus, the GTX Titan X has two brothers, but they are not twins at all, since they are equipped with 3840 unified processors and a large amount of memory. On the other side of the branch of evolution is the GP100 core. And here everything is more complicated: in terms of its capabilities, it repeats the PS / TMU / ROP ratio of the younger version GP102, but is endowed with HBM2 memory and a possibly large number of potentially installed FP64 blocks.

Once again, all of the above is just my personal assumption, and theoretically Nvidia has the opportunity to release the GP100 with 3840 unified processors if necessary, or at the next annual update of the line.

Specifications

Designation

Nvidia

GeForce GTX 1080

Nvidia

Titan X (Pascal)
Codename

GP104

GP102
Version

Pascal

Pascal
Process technology, nm

16

16
Core size/cores, mm 2

314

471
Number of transistors, million

7 200

12 000
Core frequency, MHz

1607

1417
Core frequency (Turbo), MHz

1734

1531
Number of shaders (PS), pcs.

2560

3584
Number of texture units (TMU), pcs.

160

224
Number of rasterization blocks (ROP), pcs.

64

96
Maximum fill rate, Gpix/s

102.8

136
Maximum texture sampling rate, Gtex/s

257.1

317.4
Memory type

GDDR5X

GDDR5X
Effective memory frequency, MHz

2500

2500
Memory, GB

eight

12
Memory bus bit

256

384
Memory bandwidth, GB/s

320. 3

480
Power, connectors Pin

eight

6+8
Power consumption (2D / 3D), Watt

-/180

-/250
CrossFire/Sli

V

V
Announcement price, $

650

1200
Replacement model

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX Titan

Obviously, there is no Titan X (Pascal) threat from AMD yet, so the cost of the new video card is quite high. In addition, it has not yet been imported to Russia, but the key word here is “yet”, because in the near future everything will change and several hundred Nvidia brand fans will have the opportunity to buy a new product.

By the way, Nvidia itself positions Titan X (Pascal) primarily as an effective tool for training neural networks and solving problems related to Deep Learning algorithms (deep learning). These algorithms are now actively used in a variety of areas: speech recognition, images, video, hydrometeorological forecasting, more accurate medical diagnoses, high-precision mapping, robotics, self-driving cars and more. We are also interested in the game side of the issue.