X1950 pro benchmark: Официальное тестирование RV570, он же Radeon X1950 Pro / Видеокарты

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/radeon-x1950-pro%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



Radeon RX
580

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
12400F



Core i3
1115G4



Core i3
12100F



Core i5
1135G7








Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/radeon-x1950-pro%23memory-specs

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs


Radeon RX
580



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce RTX
4090



GeForce GTX
1660 Super



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



Radeon RX
580

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
12400F



Core i3
1115G4



Core i3
12100F



Core i5
1135G7








Official testing of RV570, aka Radeon X1950 Pro / Video cards

A lot has already been said about the long-awaited new products from ATI under the code names RV570 and RV560. The earth is full of rumors, but sometime you still have to put an end to it. Today we can finally tell you about this new video processor and acquaint you with the results of its performance quite officially. We tested the Radeon X1950Pro, including on the new stand, based on the Intel Core Duo X6800, but first things first.

We will get acquainted with the new GPU, designed to compete for a place under the sun in the class of products priced at $199-229, using the X1950Pro video card from PowerColor. The video card is designed for use with the PCI-Express bus, equipped with a VIVO/HDTV-out connector and two DVI Dual-Link connectors supporting resolutions of 2048×1536 @ 85 Hz with analog connection and up to 2560×1600 with digital connection.

The first thing that catches your eye is a huge cooler from Arctic Cooling. Of course, it was a little strange to see such a huge cooler for cooling a chip with a rather modest power consumption, made according to the 80 nm process technology. However, in the fight for silence, TUL, whose brand PowerColor is, decided not to save. This is a plus for her.

Heat pipes and a lot of radiator fins are located under the casing inside the cooler. The fan spins at a speed of about 1000 rpm, that is, it is completely silent. Well, we did not expect anything else from the Arctic Cooling product. The «thickness» of the cooler occupies two standard slots, but this has long become commonplace for solutions of this class.

For better heat dissipation from the GPU, a copper base is used, to which as many as 3 heat pipes are attached. The memory chips are cooled due to their contact with the sole of the aluminum heatsink through thermal rubber bands.

The PCB design has quite a lot in common with the typical PCB used for older Radeons, but there are also significant differences. First of all, the changes affected the power subsystem. The number of small things has almost halved, and there are only 3 power elements (covered with black radiators), which directly indicates the rather modest appetites of the RV570 in terms of power consumption. Another interesting point is the two pin combs, reminiscent of the SLI connector on NVIDIA video cards. However, the purpose of these pins on the Radeon X19 PCB50 Pro is the same — to ensure the operation of two identical video cards in CrossFire mode without a Master card, but with the help of an adapter. We can say that ATI recognized the effectiveness of NVIDIA’s approach to combining two video cards, but decided not to limit themselves to simple copying, but went a little further. The secret of having two connectors is simple — ATI has used a bidirectional bus to exchange information between video cards. According to ATI specialists, this should increase the efficiency of the CrossFire bundle, but we can’t say yet by how much. The test sample came to our laboratory in a single copy and without any additional accessories. What pleases in Radeon X1950 Pro did not abandon support for the VIVO function and the ATI Rage Theater chip is present in its rightful place.

The reverse side of the video card is replete with many small elements, but without any special attractions. Unless, apparently, the simplification of the power supply system also affected the reverse side of the PCB.

The ATI RV570 video processor contains 36 pixel pipelines, respectively — 12 texture units, the number of vertex pipelines has not changed and is 8 units. As you can see, the pipeline formula is identical to the one we saw with X1900GT, this is not surprising. The X1950 Pro is intended to replace it, so the X1900GT will soon be taken out of production, since its production is much more expensive. The clock frequency of the RV570 on the board from PowerColor is 580 MHz.

Compare the core sizes of R580 and RV570. The chip area has been significantly reduced, despite the presence in the RV570 of additional blocks for the organization of CrossFire.

The total amount of video memory is 256 MB, typed in 8 microcircuits manufactured by Samsung. Used common video memory with an access time of 1.4 ns and a nominal frequency of 1400 MHz DDR. At this frequency, the memory also works. The memory bus width, as it should be for a serious product, is 256 bits.

Perhaps these are all the details that I would like to mention at the moment. Moreover, for serial models there is a chance to see a rather large spread both in the applied cooling systems and in frequencies. But we can get a first glimpse of the RV570’s performance right now. Let’s move on to the tests.

This time we did not conduct overclocking tests. At the time of testing, none of the utilities that we usually use to change the frequencies of the video card could not change the stock frequencies of the X1950Pro, and they were constantly reset to default values. As for the thermal regime, thanks to the thin process technology, low power consumption of the new chip, and an efficient cooler from Arctic Cooling, the temperature of the video chip under load did not exceed 55°. The new chip has overclocking potential, at least in terms of temperature. What it will be in reality, we will find out very soon.

Today we will compare the performance of Radeon X1950Pro with the performance of the following video cards — Radeon X1900GT as its immediate predecessor, GeForce 7900GT/GS as close in class and, in the case of 7900GS, at a target price of $199, as well as Radeon X1900XT 256 MB, which is a representative of the higher segment.

First, we will introduce you to the results of testing on our old, time-tested stand. And then let’s compare it with what we got «reseeding» on a powerful modern stand based on the Intel Core Duo processor.

3DMark

Based on the synthetic benchmark results, we can say that the performance of the Radeon X1950 Pro slightly outperforms the results of the X1900GT, apparently due to the higher speed of the video memory. As for the direct «price» competitor GeForce 7900GS (and 7900GT too), the advantage is more significant, except for the 3DMark’03 test, where NVIDIA video adapters traditionally look better.

Half Life 2

The general alignment of forces is preserved in Half-Life 2 as well. Radeon X1950 Pro outperforms both X1900GT and 7900GS, and even 7900GT at high resolutions.

DOOM 3

As expected, in DOOM 3 the situation is reversed. The X1900GT is already at the very bottom of the table, while the X1950 Pro occupies an intermediate position between it and the 7900GS.

F.E.A.R.

In F. E.A.R. X19 results50 Pro, 7900GS and 7900GT are very close to each other and there is no clear leader.

New test bench

The need to change the test stand is long overdue. Today we are pleased to present you our new high-performance stand, which appeared in our laboratory thanks to the support of our friends and partners. From now on, we will test video cards on it. Meet!

Bright red color shows the results corresponding to the new stand, orange — the old one. The very first tests on the new stand show a significant increase in the popular «parrots». That’s the way it should be. If in 3DMark’06 CPU tests are directly included in the final scoring, then the rest of the «brands» in the default modes are quite processor-dependent and also receive an increase from an increase in CPU performance. But what about real applications?

At 1024×768 resolution, the difference in test results on different stands is maximum. But as the resolution increases, this difference greatly decreases.

We see the same thing in DOOM 3. The results obtained on different stands at 1280×1024 and 1600×1200 are almost identical.

This trend continues in F.E.A.R.

However, for those who have carefully read the article «Processor dependence of a video system. Part I — Analysis», there is nothing surprising here. It just showed that if the video card works in a «heavy» mode, then its line of results takes the form of a «shelf» and the FPS value ceases to depend on the power of the central processor.

We focused on this issue in order to show the difference between «parrots» and the results of real tests. Of course, in parrots everything is “much longer”, but since the video card remains the same when moving to a new stand, we will see the same FPS in real applications. Which is what was shown.

Terminals

In general, we can say that the Radeon X1900GT received a worthy successor — economical, quiet and more productive. The recommended price of $199-229 makes the Radeon X1950 Pro a good purchase candidate and a serious competitor for the GeForce 7900GS. Of course, at first retail prices for the X1950 Pro will differ from the recommended ones, but this is typical for all new products entering the market. This concludes our review of the Radeon X19 sample.50 Pro based on the new ATI RV570 video processor. And we are waiting for the appearance in our laboratory of serial products based on this very promising GPU.


⇣ Contents

If you notice an error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER.

Related materials

Permanent URL: https://3dnews.ru/186483/page-1.html

Tags:

⇣ Comments

performance overview and gaming performance tests

The Radeon X1950 PRO video card was released by ATI, release date: October 1, 2006. The video card is designed for desktop computers and is built on the R500 architecture, codenamed RV570.

Core frequency — 575 MHz. Texturing speed — 6.9 GTexel / s. Technological process — 80 nm. The number of transistors is 330 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 66 Watt.

Memory type: GDDR3. The maximum memory size is 256 MB. Memory bus width — 256 Bit. Memory frequency — 1380 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 44.2 GB / s.

Benchmarks

PassMark
G3D Mark
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
PassMark
G2D Mark
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
Name Value
PassMark — G3D Mark 113
PassMark — G2D Mark 318

Features

Architecture R500
Codename RV570
Production date October 1, 2006
Place in the ranking 477
Type Desktop
Core frequency 575MHz
Technological process 80nm
Texturing speed 6. 9 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 66 Watt
Number of transistors 330 million
Video connectors 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
Additional power connectors 1x 6-pin
DirectX 9.0c
OpenGL 2.0
Maximum memory size 256MB
Memory bandwidth 44.

2024 © All rights reserved