Xeon X3320 [in 1 benchmark]
Intel
Xeon X3320
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
Intel started Intel Xeon X3320 sales 1 January 2008. This is desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems.
Compatibility-wise, this is LGA775 processor with a TDP of 95 Watt.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.60%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General info
Xeon X3320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 1918 | |
| Value for money | 0.18 | |
| Market segment | Server | |
| Release date | 1 January 2008 (15 years old) | |
| Current price | $151 | of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | of 768 (EPYC 7373X) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — | |
| Unlocked multiplier | — | |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3320 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA775 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 95 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3320. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | |
| Turbo Boost Technology | — | |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | — | |
| Idle States | + | |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | |
| FSB parity | — |
Security technologies
Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | — | |
| EDB | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Xeon X3320. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon X3320
1.60
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation.
There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Xeon X3320
1986
Relative perfomance
Overall Xeon X3320 performance compared to nearest competitors among server CPUs.
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
103.13
Intel Xeon X3230
103.13
Intel Xeon E5420
101.25
Intel Xeon X3320
100
Intel Xeon E5506
98.75
Intel Xeon E5410
98.13
Intel Xeon E5603
97.5
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Xeon
E5420
Compare
Xeon
E5410
Compare
Xeon
X3230
Compare
Xeon
L5410
Compare
Xeon
X3330
Compare
Xeon
L5420
Compare
Recommended GPUs
People consider these graphics cards to be good for Xeon X3320, according to our PC configuration statistics.
GeForce GT
630
5.7%
Radeon HD
6670
4.3%
Radeon HD
7770
4.3%
GeForce GT
1030
4.3%
GeForce GT
730
4.3%
GeForce GTX
650
4.3%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
2.9%
GeForce GT
640
2.
9%
GeForce GTS
250
2.9%
GeForce GT
240
2.9%
These are the fastest graphics cards for Xeon X3320 in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 70 configurations based on Xeon X3320 in our database.
GeForce RTX
2080 Ti
1.4% (1/70)
GeForce GTX
970
1.4% (1/70)
GeForce GTX
1060 3 GB
1.4% (1/70)
Radeon RX
480
1.
4% (1/70)
Radeon RX
6400
1.4% (1/70)
Radeon RX
570
2.9% (2/70)
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
2.9% (2/70)
GeForce GTX
1050
1.4% (1/70)
Radeon R9
270X
2.9% (2/70)
GeForce GTX
1630
1.4% (1/70)
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Xeon X3320 (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — February 2023
Intel Xeon X3320 (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i7-7700K
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-6850K
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-6900K
Intel Core i7-6800K
Intel Core i7-6950X
Intel Core i5-6600
Intel Core i7-5930K
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-4670K
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Pentium G3258
Intel Core i7-5820K
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i7-4930K
Intel Core i7-4820K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Pentium G4400
Intel Core i5-4670
Intel Core i7-5960X
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-6820HK
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i3-4160
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-2700K
Intel Core i5-3550
Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
Intel Core i7-3960X
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i7-3820
Intel Pentium G3260
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i5-2550K
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i7-4710MQ
Intel Core i5-4210H
Intel Core i5-3450
Intel Core i7-3930K
Intel Core i7-3520M
Intel Core i5-4200H
Intel Core i7-4700MQ
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Core i7-6500U
Intel Core i7 X 990
Intel Core i5-4430
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Core i7-3630QM
Intel Core i5-3350P
AMD FX -9590
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i5-4210M
Intel Pentium G3220
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
Intel Core i7-5500U
Intel Core i7-3610QM
Intel Core i7 X 980
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i5-3320M
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Xeon W3690
AMD FX -9370
Intel Pentium G2030
Intel Core i7-4510U
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i7-3632QM
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i5-4200M
AMD FX-8370
Intel Pentium G2020
Intel Core i7-3612QM
AMD FX -4350
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-3210M
AMD FX -8350
AMD A10-6800K
AMD A10-7890K
Intel Xeon X5675
Intel Xeon X5470
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Core i3-2120
AMD FX-8370E
Intel Xeon X5670
Intel Core i7-2620M
AMD FX -6350
Intel Core i5-4300U
Intel Core i7 870
Intel Core i5-2320
Intel Core i7 960
Intel Core i5-5200U
AMD Athlon X4 845
AMD A8-6600K
AMD A10-5800K
Intel Xeon E5-2670
Intel Core i5-2540M
AMD A6-6400K
AMD FX -8320
Intel Core i5 760
AMD A10-7870K
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Intel Core i5-2310
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Intel Core i7 950
AMD FX -8300
AMD FX -4300
AMD FX -6300
AMD Athlon X4 860K
AMD FX-8320E
Intel Core i3-2100
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
Intel Xeon X5460
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i5-2300
Intel Core i7 860
Intel Core i3-6100U
AMD Athlon X4 750K
AMD A10-7860K
AMD A6-5400K
AMD A8-5600K
Intel Core i5 750
Intel Core i3 550
Intel Core i7-2670QM
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Intel Xeon E5450
AMD A10-7700K
AMD A10-7800
Intel Core i5-3337U
Intel Core i7 930
Intel Core i5-2430M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Intel Core i5 M 560
Intel Core i3 540
Intel Xeon X5650
AMD A8-7600
Intel Xeon X5450
Intel Core i5-2450M
(YOU) Intel Xeon X3320
Intel Xeon X3440
AMD A8-7650K
Pentium E5700
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-2410M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
AMD Athlon X4 740
Intel Core i7-2630QM
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Xeon E5440
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i7 920
Pentium E6500
Intel Core i3 530
Intel Core i5 M 480
Intel Pentium G620
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Pentium E5500
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Intel Core i5 M 460
Intel Core i5 M 520
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
Pentium E5400
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Pentium E5300
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
AMD FX -8150
Pentium E5200
Intel Xeon L5420
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Intel Core i3 M 380
Intel Core i3-2350M
Intel Core i5 M 430
Intel Core i7 Q 720
AMD FX -8120
Intel Core i3 M 370
Intel Core i3-4030U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-2330M
Intel Core 2 Quad
AMD FX -6100
AMD FX -4100
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core i3-2310M
AMD A10-8700P
Intel Core i3 M 350
Intel Core i3-3217U
Intel Core i3-4005U
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Intel Core i3 M 330
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD A8-7410
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
AMD A8-6410
AMD A8-4500M
AMD Phenom II X4 840
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
AMD A6-6310
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AMD Athlon II X2 250
AMD Athlon II X4 640
AMD Athlon II X2 245
AMD Phenom II X4 925
AMD Athlon II X4 630
AMD Athlon II X2 240
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Intel Pentium N3540
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N3050
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Xeon X3320 processor [in 1 benchmark]
Intel
Xeon X3320
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
Intel started Intel Xeon X3320 sales on January 1, 2008.
This is a desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems.
In terms of compatibility, this is an LGA775 socket processor with a TDP of 95W.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.60%
from the leader which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Xeon X3320, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Value for money
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Xeon X3320 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state.
They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
| Basic frequency | 2.50 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technological process | 45 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940hs) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The maximum nucleus temperature | 71 ° C 1100005
Safety Technologies
Technologies embedded in the Xeon X3320 that improve system security, such as those designed to protect against hacking.
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon X3320 | Intel Pentium 4 560 | Short description | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Boost | — | Intel Auto Overclocking Technology. |
Also includes a separate single-threaded test. 
9%
4% (1/70) 
1
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon X3320 | Intel Pentium 4 560 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | — | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. | |
| Stop Grant state | — | Energy saving status. | |
| Extended HALT state | — | Extended stop state. | |
| HALT state | — | Stop status. | |
| Thermal Monitoring | — | Temperature monitoring. | |
| Idle States | — | Idle states. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon X3320 | Intel Pentium 4 560 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | — | Multimedia extensions. | |
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | — | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | |
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | — | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | |
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | — | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | |
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | — | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. |
|
| EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | — | 64-bit extended memory technology. | |
| NX (Execute disable bit) | — | Execution inhibit bit. | |
| SSE4.1 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4.1) | — | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4.1. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon X3320 | Intel Pentium 4 560 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) | — | Trusted Execution Technology. | |
| EDB (Execute Disable Bit) | — | Execute trip bit. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon X3320 | Intel Pentium 4 560 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VT-x (Virtualization technology) | — | Virtualization technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Xeon X3320 | Intel Pentium 4 560 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper-Threading | — | Hyperthreading technology. | |
| Dynamic FSB frequency switching | — | Dynamic FSB frequency switching. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating can be calculated according to the formula, taking into account all indicators, such as test results in programs, year of release, structure, base frequency, socket, number of cores and threads, temperature conditions, technologies, instructions, and other indicators.
The results of the overall rating showed that the Xeon X3320 processor is not much superior to its rival Pentium 4 560. The Pentium 4 560 processor itself managed to score 2114.34 points, slightly losing to the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
All processors presented on our website have been tested in PassMark. The benchmark has a wide range of tools for evaluating personal computer data, including the CPU. Tests include extended instruction checking, compression, integer calculations, encryption, floating point calculations, game physics calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In this case, you can compare the results obtained with the rest of the configurations in the common database. This is perhaps the most popular benchmark tester on the Internet.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Single-Core version — it uses only one rendering thread and one core. The test is carried out on Windows, Mac. The main performance testing mode is multi-level reflections, spatial lights, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, simulating global illumination, and procedural shaders.
Uses the method of geometric optics — ray tracing. It is possible to test many processor systems. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is outdated in our time. MAXON appeared, it was based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi Core is another test option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core testing mode. It should be noted that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark, it can load the processor to full using all threads and cores. It differs from previous versions of the program, 64 threads will be involved here.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old fully functional Cinebench version 11.5 from the Maxon team. His tests are still relevant. In this case, Single-Core tests are performed using one core and one thread.
In testing, the ray tracing process is also used, a high-polygonal three-dimensional space is calculated with many translucent and glass and crystal balls. The result of the check is the «frames per second» parameter.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread Cinebench 15 will test your build to the fullest, showing everything it can. Enables all CPU cores and threads while rendering detailed 3D objects. Ideal for testing new multithreaded processors from AMD and Intel. it is capable of using 256 threads.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the most up-to-date tester from the Finns from Maxon. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of highly detailed objects, light sources and reflections. It tests the entire system: both processors and video cards. For CPU, the result of the calculation is the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the value of frames per second FPS. In this version of Single Core, only 1 thread is involved in rendering.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the support for various operating systems and devices that makes Geekbench the most popular tests now.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single threaded benchmark
The latest single threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing home PCs and laptops. For the first time in this version of the tester, both tablets and smartphones on Android and iOS operating systems are supported. The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on OS: Mac OS, Windows, Linux. The Single-Core test uses one processor thread.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread version of Geekbench 3 benchmark — will allow you to make a big synthetic test of your PC and show the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded benchmark
The Geekbench multi-platform benchmark is often used to test a system under Mac, but it can work on both Windows and Linux.
The basic purpose is to check the performance of processors. The 32-bit version of the program loads only one thread and one CPU core.
Geekbench 2
Today, an outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester. Today there are newer options, the current fifth and fourth. On our site you can find about two hundred processor models that have data on testing in this benchmark.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. Number of frames processed per second. — test result. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it encodes at a constant speed. Ideal test for multi-thread processors and multi-core.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is done at a variable rate. The final value is also defined in frames per second.
As a result, we get a better quality video file. It is important to understand that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in many encoders. And this means that the results of testing really evaluate the performance of the platform.
3DMark06 CPU
Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and CPU. This test is often used by fans to overclock the system and overclockers and gamers. Based on DirectX by the Finnish team Futuremark. CPUs are tested in two ways: the artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and the second test emulates the system using PhysX.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
It can be argued that almost 200 CPUs on our Internet resource have 3DMark FSP test data. This is an arithmetic test that makes calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
Everyone knows the data archiver. The checks were made under the control of the Windows system. The compression speed of the RAR algorithm was tested, for this, huge amounts of random data were taken.