Cheapest amd cpu: The Best Budget AMD Gaming CPUs In 2023

The Intel i5-13600K is a very power-efficient CPU, especially due to it being a 14-core, 20-thread CPU clocked over 5GHz. It gets nowhere near as hot as its 13900K bigger brother. This is a testament to just how well Intelo can do at the low end, as well as the high end.

The 13900K is incredibly cost-effective, costing between the 7600X and the 7700X on team red’s side, but pretty well outperforming the former and just getting the latter, Intel is seriously a force to be reckoned with this time around.  

The 13600K is perfect for average gamers looking to upgrade their CPU without breaking the bank, and it has a full 20 threads to back it up when you want to do some multi-core-based workloads. This is a special balance that not many other CPUs have, they weather aim for one or the other. The 13600K is very much a jack-of-all-trades. 

Best budget CPU: Things to consider

There are plenty of things to consider when opting for a budget CPU, factors range from Core speed to generation. We assume that you’re not going to be opting for the latest generation of CPUs, but we’ve included them just in case.

Here are what we believe to be the factors you should consider when finding the best budget CPU.

Cores and threads

A CPU’s cores are the processing units that execute instructions and perform calculations. The more cores a CPU has, the more tasks it can perform simultaneously. This can result in faster and more efficient processing of tasks, particularly in applications that can take advantage of multiple cores, such as video editing or rendering software.

Threads, on the other hand, are virtual cores that allow a single physical core to execute multiple tasks simultaneously. CPUs with support for multi-threading can handle more tasks concurrently than those without, resulting in faster processing times and improved overall performance.

The combination of core and thread count is important because it can have a significant impact on a CPU’s performance in different tasks. A CPU with a higher core count and multi-threading support can perform well in tasks that require high parallelisms, such as gaming, video editing, or scientific simulations. However, a CPU with fewer cores but higher clock speeds may perform better in tasks that require single-threaded performance, such as some gaming or office applications.

Core speed

Core speed, also known as clock speed, refers to the rate at which a CPU’s processing cores can execute instructions. The higher the core speed, the faster the CPU can process data.

The importance of core speed in a CPU lies in its ability to affect overall system performance. A higher core speed can enable a CPU to complete more instructions per second, allowing for faster and more efficient processing of tasks, such as running applications or playing games.

CPU generation

CPU generation refers to the version or iteration of a CPU’s design and architecture. Each CPU generation represents an improvement or advancement over the previous generation, with enhancements to the design, architecture, and manufacturing process.

The importance of CPU generation lies in its impact on CPU performance. Newer generations of CPUs typically offer better performance and efficiency than older ones due to advancements in technology, such as increased core counts, higher clock speeds, and improvements in power efficiency.

For example, newer generations of CPUs may feature improved architectures that enable faster and more efficient processing of instructions. They may also include additional features, such as integrated graphics, enhanced security, or support for newer technologies like PCIe 5. 0 or USB 4.

Additionally, newer CPU generations are often manufactured using smaller process nodes, which can result in lower power consumption and better thermal performance. This can be particularly important for laptops and other mobile devices where power efficiency is critical. But we don’t need to consider the mobile platform.

CPU socket

A CPU socket is a physical interface on a computer’s motherboard that houses the CPU. It is a connector that allows the CPU to communicate with other components on the motherboard, including memory, expansion cards, and storage drives.

The CPU socket is designed to match the specific requirements of the CPU, including its size, shape, and electrical properties. Different CPU models from different manufacturers have different socket types, so it is important to ensure that the motherboard socket matches the CPU socket type.

When installing or upgrading a CPU, it is essential to ensure compatibility between the CPU and the motherboard, including the socket type. If the CPU and the motherboard have different socket types, they will not be compatible, and the CPU will not fit or function correctly.

Now that we have the things to consider out of the way, we can start to home in on our choices for the best budget CPU. But what should you go for?

How good are modern budget CPUs?

Thanks to the fierce ongoing competition between the two tech giants, Intel and AMD, there are numerous budget-friendly processors available to you in 2023. Budget processors are designed to offer you the best performance for the price you pay. In other words, you get the best bang for your buck. 

That’s not to say modern budget processors lack in performance, though. Budget processors are noticeably weaker than their more expensive counterparts from the same lineup, but the difference is felt mostly in productivity applications that rely heavily on multicore performance. 

If you’re a casual PC user or interested in gaming, you’ll find the budget CPU we recommend more than capable of handling those activities.

If you are, however, looking for a productivity or workstation processor, you may want to raise your budget to go with something that has more cores and threads. 

Should you get an older CPU when on a budget?

Certainly, older CPUs have the advantage of being cheaper, but you might be sacrificing performance because of the generational differences and the difference in architecture.

With that being said, it’s important to note that you may be able to grab yourself a deal and obtain an upgrade in the core count for the same money as a modern lesser-count CPU. In this case, it’s almost always worth it, unless you have a specific use case in mine, such as gaming, or are worried about future-proofing.

For example, a Ryzen 7 3700X will perform better in multi-core benchmarks than a newer Ryzen 5 5600X would. you can’t really beat the power of additional cores, but the 5600X will have the 3700X beat in single-core workloads, thanks to more advanced core technology.

Best budget CPU for gaming: Single-core or multi-core?

Single-core performance is more important for gaming than multi-core performance because most games are designed to utilize only one or two cores of a processor. While some modern games can utilize more cores, the vast majority of games still rely on single-threaded performance.

This means that the speed and efficiency of a single core are more important than the number of cores a processor has. A processor with a high clock speed and a powerful single core will provide better performance for gaming than a processor with many cores but a lower clock speed.

Is a budget CPU worth it?

Whether a budget CPU is worth it or not depends on your specific needs and use case. A budget CPU may be a good choice if you’re building a computer for basic tasks like web browsing, word processing, and email.

However, if you plan on using your computer for more demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, a budget CPU may not be able to keep up with the demands of these applications. In this case, you may want to invest in a more powerful CPU.

Another factor to consider is the longevity of the CPU. While a budget CPU may be a good option for short-term use, it may not last as long as a more expensive CPU. If you plan on using your computer for several years, investing in a higher-end CPU may be a better long-term investment.

Final Word

In conclusion, finding the best budget CPU can be a challenging task, but it’s worth the effort to get the most out of your money. After researching and testing various options, we have found that the Ryzen 5 5600X is the top choice for those seeking a powerful CPU at an affordable price.

It provides excellent performance and value for its cost, making it an ideal choice for gamers, content creators, and anyone who needs a reliable and efficient processor for their everyday needs. However, there are other options to consider based on your specific needs and budget, so be sure to do your research and choose the CPU that best fits your requirements.

WePC is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

AMD Athlon X4 950: The cheapest quad-core processor for AM4

4/23/2018

With the introduction of the Ryzen series of processors, AMD has finally been able to compete with Intel in the mid-range desktop chip class. And although many considered the return of AMD a triumph, the manufacturer still has a lot to do. For example, while the company has nothing to answer in the top class. A difficult situation has also developed in the budget class.

The thing is that the new AMD AM4 processor socket, in which all models of the Ryzen series are made, has so far been deprived of a balanced inexpensive solution. The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 was the most budget-friendly solution. By itself, this is a great processor, but the problem is that Intel offers cheaper processors from the Kaby Lake family, and for building entry-level gaming PCs with a discrete graphics card, many people choose them.

AMD Athlon X4 950

Yes, AMD has the old FM2+ platform where you can find similarly priced solutions. At the same time, the FM2+ socket is already obsolete: all new developments will be released on AMD AM4. So it turns out a strange situation when AMD offers a promising AM4 platform, but at the same time does not release budget processors for it, on which it would be possible to build a system with an eye for a further upgrade.

Recently, AMD has been offering low-cost A6 series chips, such as the AMD A6-9500 Bristol Ridge. But their problem is that they have only two cores, while not supporting multi-threading. In addition to this, these processors are hybrid, that is, they carry integrated graphics. From the point of view of budget office or multimedia computers, such a solution may be in demand, but we are talking about inexpensive gaming assemblies where a discrete graphics card is required, and an integrated GPU is a waste of money.

Fortunately, AMD is now finally able to offer an inexpensive chip that meets all of the above requirements. We are talking about a quad-core AMD Athlon X4 9 processor50. It belongs to the same Bristol Ridge family, and is on the same level as the AMD A6-9500, but it already has four cores, and the integrated graphics have been deactivated.

The new processor is available in two packages: Tray and BOX.

To get a more objective impression of the budget chip, let’s compare it with the youngest of the new 2nd generation AMD Ryzen chips — AMD Ryzen 3 2200G.

Model	AMD Athlon X4 950	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Code name	Bristol Ridge	Raven Ridge
Production technology	28 nm	14 nm
Cores/Threads	4/4	4/4
Base frequency	3. 5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Turbo frequency	3.8GHz	3.7 GHz
Acceleration	✔	✔
L2 cache	No	4 MB
L3 cache	No	4 MB
Memory support	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2933
Graphics	—	Vega 8
Number of GPU stream processors	—	704
GPU frequency	—	1. 25 GHz
TDP	65W	65 W

Despite the partial similarity to the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G (we will not pay attention to the presence of integrated graphics), it becomes obvious that the AMD Athlon X4 950 is an older solution, although it was introduced quite recently.

The new model belongs to the previous Bristol Ridge family. This means that it is based on an outdated microarchitecture, moreover, on an older process technology. However, even taking into account the huge difference between 14 and 28 nm and AMD Athlon X4 950, and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G fit within the TDP of 65W.

AMD Athlon X4 950

But otherwise, the two processors are similar: both have four processing cores and operate at similar frequencies. Yes, AMD Athlon X4 950 is limited to support for RAM up to DDR4-2400, but since we are talking about a budget assembly, faster RAM modules are unlikely to be in demand.

The new AMD Athlon X4 950 processor has already been tested by independent computer publications. The results were expected: despite the apparent proximity to the initial AMD Ryzen chips, it still lags far behind them. Time makes itself felt: the Bulldozer architecture, on which the discussed processor is built, appeared back in 2011, and since then a lot of water has flowed under the bridge.

At the same time, the AMD Athlon X4 950 is the most affordable quad-core processor for the AMD AM4 socket. So, even taking into account the relatively low performance, this is an excellent contender for the role of a temporary processor: you can build the most inexpensive PC with an AM4 connector with it, and upgrade to the required level in the future. Moreover, AMD will present processors for AM4 for more than one year.

AMD processors

See also

ASUS Radeon RX 6650 XT Dual OC: overclocked version of the updated video card

The mid-range AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT video card compares favorably with the RX 6600 XT with increased frequencies. ASUS Radeon RX 6650 XT Dual OC, in turn, stands out with even higher frequencies. An interesting novelty is already available in XCOM-SHOP.

07.10.2022

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT: An update to the popular

AMD has updated its 6000 series graphics cards. The Radeon RX 6750 XT received increased core and memory frequencies compared to its predecessor. Two models of the new family are already available in XCOM-SHOP: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6750 XT GAMING OC and MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC.

07/20/2022

3rd Gen AMD EPYC: Higher Clocks, Zen 3 Architecture, Up to 64 Cores

3rd Gen AMD EPYC server CPUs are clocked faster and can execute more instructions per clock. Chips EPYC 72F3, EPYC 7313, EPYC 7413, EPYC 7443, EPYC 7453, EPYC 7513 and EPYC 7763 have already arrived at XCOM-SHOP.

08/16/2021

Delivery of goods

change

Checkout

cheapest under AM5 GECID.com.

::>Processors
>2023
> AMD Ryzen 5 7600

30-03-2023

Right now AMD’s most affordable new generation processor is the Ryzen 5 7600. Let’s test its capabilities.

Many people want the new AMD AM5 platform, but so far it is prickly — because the price for the «motherboard + DDR5 + processor» bundle turns out to be quite high. At the same time, the ice is slowly melting — more affordable motherboards and Ryzen 7000 processors have already been announced without the X index in the title. Namely Ryzen 97900, Ryzen 7 7700 and Ryzen 5 7600 is the hero of this article.

$229 Ryzen 5 7600 — what’s the catch?

AMD priced the new product at $229. Expensive? Cheap? Judge for yourself.

We have almost the same Ryzen R5 7600X with similar characteristics: 6 cores in 12 threads, 32 MB of L3 cache and a similar cache of the first and second levels.

Compared to X, the slightly simplified Ryzen 5 7600 has only 4: 9 differences0003

1. Lower supply voltage;
2. As a result — a smaller thermal package, aka TDP;
3. Slightly more modest maximum clock speed;
4. Official price less than $70.

Ryzen 5 7600

• TDP — 65W
• Frequencies — 3.8 GHz / 5.1 GHz
• Price — $229

Ryzen 5 7600X

• TDP — 105W
• Frequencies — 4.7 GHz / 5.3 GHz
• Price — $299

And, perhaps, the main question here, will almost minus 1 GHz of the base frequency greatly affect performance? What about temperatures? Since Ryzen 7000s can sometimes get noticeably hot. To uncover this moment and more, we need opponents. Let’s move on to them, and at the same time we’ll look at real prices.

Which CPUs are we comparing with?

First, let’s look at the price of the Ryzen 5 7600. Interestingly, in our market, the real price jumped not far from the official $229. And at first glance, you might think that it is not too different from the cost of the Ryzen 5 7600X. But in fact, the «big brother» in the «boxed» version comes without a cooler. And the regular Ryzen 5 7600 is already with the proprietary AMD Wraith Prism. The latter will be enough for many not to spend money on a separate tower.

These beauties are the first pair of participants.

Further, perhaps, the main competitor for the review hero is Ryzen 7 5800X . From the pros:

• it costs about the same money, about UAH 10,000;
• offers 2 more cores and 4 more threads;
• requires a much cheaper AM4 platform — where you can even rake in affordable motherboards, and DDR4 memory is not so affordable.

Well, from the minuses, all of the above is more of a solution for the «here and now», without a supply of interesting chips, advanced technologies and potential for the distant future. And we will soon find out the difference in performance.

The fourth test participant is almost a direct predecessor, Ryzen 5 5600X .

There are also 6 cores in 12 threads, 32MB L3 and 65W TDP. On its example, we will see the advantage of the new generation, which will also include higher frequencies and faster DDR5.

And finally, the fifth horse, now from the blue Intel camp — Core i5-11600K .

Of course, it would be nice not him, but the new Core i5-13400. But the latter is only coming to us, so it will appear in the following reviews. In the meantime, the 11th generation is also appropriate, because it costs about the same. The LGA1200 platform has the same advantages and disadvantages as the AM4. The processor itself offers 6 cores in 12 threads at a frequency of up to 4.9GHz.

Also, let’s see where we charged our five and under what conditions we tested.

Under what conditions were you tested?

Three platforms have been introduced by the following ASUS ROG motherboards. All names in front of you:

• AM5 — ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING (WI-FI)
• AM4 — ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
• LGA1200 — ASUS ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

The CPU was cooled by an updated tower DeepCool AK620 , which has a mount in all new sockets. It has the same power as LSS, because it weighs under one and a half kilograms, has a double radiator and dissipates up to 260 watts of heat.

So that the test bench did not rest on the capabilities of the graphics subsystem, a powerful video card Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC was installed.

The RAM was, of course, different. Under the AMD AM5 platform, they took DDR5 at a frequency of 6400 MHz. Namely 32 GB in dual-channel mode with slats Kingston FURY Renegade RGB . They have:

• cool backlight compatible with all motherboard brands;
• quality components carefully tuned and tested;

The

• has rather nice CL32 delays, easily selectable with a 1. 4V profile and a target frequency.

Two older platforms worked with DDR4 3600 MHz — also 2 x 16 GB, two Kingston Fury Renegade RGB sticks.

Windows 11 and benchmarks were run with M.2 SSD Kingston KC3000 on 1 TV with very high read/write speed under 7 GB/s.

Powered the system Seasonic PRIME GX-1000 according to the gold standard, which is confirmed by the corresponding certificate. By the way, with the current collection I did it silently, because the load did not exceed 500 watts. And the brand also has Seasonic SYNCRO cases with CONNECT modules that provide freedom from wires on the sides of the case.

However, the current build is based on be quiet! SILENT BASE 802 Window Black .

AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs opponents

Before diving into work and play tests, let’s warm up our muscles and our new product. Remember that the absence of the letter «X» in the name, lower voltage and frequencies promised us more pleasant temperatures? So, under the maximum stress load, the Ryzen 5 7600X heats up to 96 ° C, and the simplified analogue reaches a maximum of 83, that is, 13 ° C less.

At the same time, not much inferior to the current megahertz. What does it give? The stock can be converted into less cooling system noise or a discount on the price tag. For in normal games, the temperature indicator will be noticeably more modest, as well as the requirements for CO.

And now let’s boldly move on to working imitation and synthetics

AIDA64: Cache & Memory does not get tired of showing the difference in the speed of DDR4 and DDR5 RAM. And also the fact that AM4 processors do not write to RAM as well as representatives of LGA1200. Fortunately, this cant was well fixed in the current Ryzen 7000.

3DMark Time Spy scanned the entire CPU with an evaluating eye and chose the one with 8 cores and 16 threads in first place. That is Ryzen 5 5800X. Despite a more powerful memory and higher frequencies, the hero of the review lost 15% to him in terms of CPU Score. But all of the above gave an advantage in the confrontation with the Ryzen 5 5600X by the same 15% and up to 11-24% by Intel.

In 7-ZIP Benchmark everything worked out quite well for the hero of the review. It loses only 6% of its «X» version and 3-16% of its 8-core competitor. The size and taste of victory is much brighter — up to 20% compared to the Ryzen 5 5600X, and up to 49% against Core i5-11600K.

But the Blender saves you money and says it renders scenes best on the Ryzen 5 5800X. Because the platform is several times cheaper, and the performance is one to one like that of the Ryzen 5 7600X. The new 65 W small car lags behind both leaders by 7-9%. However, it wins over its almost direct predecessor and blue by 31-34%.

In CineBench R23 , the reduced TDP of the «usually quoted» Ryzen 5 7600 brought minus 6-8% compared to the older «X», and minus 9% in multi-threaded mode against Ryzen 7 5800X. However, the hero of the material defeated the 16-thread opponent in the load per core — by 15%. You can’t beat Zen 4 on this field.

Finally, of course, the Ryzen 5 7600 looks cool in Geekbench 6 . Only 4-6% behind the senior and up to 40% victory over others. Even the 8-core managed to do 12-23%.

And we complete the synthetic section with the benchmark HandBrake , which, apparently, loves exactly 8 cores in 16 threads. Therefore, the first place is occupied by the Ryzen 5 5800X — its test execution time is the shortest. Ryzen 5 7600X is in second place, and its younger version is in third. The hero of the review lagged behind the leader by 5-14%.

This block has been dealt with. We will summarize the results at the end of the material, after the gaming benchmarks. Let’s move on to them.

As always, the graphics settings were selected in such a way as to load the processors as much as possible.

Starting the run with A Plague Tale: Requiem with ultra performance DLSS and max settings, no ray tracing.

The Ryzen 5 7600 seemed to fall into place — we finally see a clear gradation, where the old processors are behind, and the new ones are in front. And both Zen 4 go almost toe to toe. The difference in 300 MHz and up to 15 W TDP had almost no effect on the number of FPS. But the temperature of the younger one is 7 ° C lower. The victory over the Ryzen 7 5800x ranged from 11 to 15%.

Cyberpunk 2077 tried twice. First, with the most soapy DLSS and without tracing. Who has won? Ryzen 5 7600 of course! Moreover, even 9% ahead of the «X» version of very rare events. Although she was just unlucky — she caught a blunt.

In other respects, parity even despite a small difference in the frequency of the cores and a 5 ° C lower temperature. It is interesting that the trio of outsiders, as they agreed, go hand in hand side by side and quietly take offense at the advantage of the first in 22-32%. The destruction was significant.

With the addition of rays, the position of the players on the field has not changed much. Of course, the statistics dipped, but for all the contestants and, most importantly, in proportion to the preliminary results.

All that the Ryzen 5 7600X could squeeze out of its almost +400 MHz was a measly 2 frames per second at the average frequency. A zilch that cost up to 5°C extra heat and a little more noise from the cooling tower. As evidenced by the difference in the number of revolutions per minute.

Benchmark Forza Horizon 5 with extreme graphics and the most aggressive DLSS also judged everyone by passport data.

Ryzen 5 7600 only lost a few percent to the leader, but punished: 8-core by 11-18%; 6-nuclear counterpart — by 15-27%; Intel generally obscene 33-59%.

The only thing where the Core i5-11600 still kicks is in the temperature indicator. He was the coldest of all.

God of War takes over from its predecessors with the same graphics settings logic.

The main subject of the study, the Ryzen 5 7600, again looks awesome against the background of the X brother. FPS is the same in all respects, despite the limited supply voltage, TDP and frequency. Other competitors are behind by 13-43%.

And finally, the «frying pan» for the CPU is not Tefal, but Total War Saga: Troy . Here the end is as indicative — such a culmination. Look, the Ryzen 5 7600X is over 10°C hotter than the Ryzen 5 7600 while the cooler burns 40% faster and louder to cool down the X version! And what is the profit? But he is not.

The limited Ryzen 5 7600 still wins by the power of statistical error. This is a plus of the newcomer, on the one hand. But on the other hand, there are those damned AM4s that are still aiming for the “TOP for their money”. Ryzen 7 5800X with «weak» DDR4 does everything with the help of its two additional cores. Not much, but a fact.

Conclusions

Yes, you need to look at the prices of all platforms again and only then draw conclusions. Intel took the KF version — theoretically cheaper due to the lack of a video core. We were looking for motherboards with VRM cooling, E-Katalog even has a separate filter for this. And the DDR5 memory was chosen with the optimal frequency, in our opinion, of 5600 MHz, based on the tests of our previous review compared to RAM.

Prices for processors. E-catalog. End of March 2023

• Ryzen 5 7600 from ~ UAH 9 600
• Ryzen 5 7600X from ~10 000 UAH
• Ryzen 5 5600X from ~ 7 250 UAH
• Ryzen 7 5800X from ~ 9 500 UAH
• Core i5-11600KF from ~9 400 UAH

Motherboard prices

• Socket AM5 | Ryzen 7000 | from ~6 400 UAH
• LGA1200 |Intel Gen 11| from ~3 700 UAH
• Socket AM4 |Ryzen 5000| from ~2 750 UAH

Prices for RAM

• DDR4-3600 from 1800 UAH
• DDR5-5600 from 3700 UAH

Minimum prices for bundles processor + board + memory

The Ryzen 5 7600 only loses 5% to the X in workload and shows almost the same performance in games. At the same time, the «budget» processor:

• is slightly cheaper;
• does not require additional funds for the cooling system, if you look at the box-version, which has a pretty good proprietary cooler;
• and also noticeably colder.

Therefore, the Ryzen 5 7600 without question is a better entry ticket to the AM5 platform!

Further, the hero of the review loses Ryzen 7 5800X 4% in synthetics, but defeats him by 11% in games. How nice. Here are just a set of processor + board + memory with a brand new one — 40% (!) More expensive than a similar set with an opponent. Here you already need to weigh what is more important — a new platform and a potential upgrade or sufficient performance here and now.

At the same time, the Ryzen 5 7600 smashes the Core i5-11600KF. It’s 27% better in workload, up to 39-47% better in games! The base on AM5 costs 32% more, but it is newer and more promising. Here you can overpay.

Relative to the handicap over the simulated direct predecessor, the Ryzen 5 5600X. The seven thousandth outperforms him by 18% on average as a working tool and 25-30% as a gaming assistant. The price difference is as much as 67%. If you want to get the most out of every penny, the Ryzen 5 5600X is by far the best option among the tested opponents.

As for the overall result, the Ryzen 5 7600 can be safely called a cool and powerful processor, at the same time — the coldest among all Ryzen 7000 with the ability to overclock with an unlocked multiplier. All this makes the transition to the AM5 platform a little easier. But…. with current prices for boards and RAM — this choice requires an overpayment for the upgrade potential.