Processor Ranking
Best Desktop Processors
In the Desktop Segment, AMD has overtaken Intel with their new Ryzen 3000 processors, For the same price as Intel Core i9-9900K, the Ryzen 9 3900X has higher cores (12). The upcoming 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X will be leading this chart once it becomes available in September 2019.
At high-end as well as mid-range, AMD offers more value and is a better choice for productivity. However, when it comes to gaming, Intel is slightly ahead due to their high frequency that goes beyond 5 GHz. Currently, the fastest mainstream Desktop Processor is Ryzen 9 3900X followed by the Core-i9 9900K. The Ryzen 7 3800X and 3700X take the 3rd and 4th spot. Ryzen 7 3700X is a better choice over 3800X due to much lower cost. The Intel Core i7 9700K is an excellent CPU for Gaming but it lacks Hyper-Threading thus its performance is productivity isn’t as good as its competition.
In the mid-range segment, the Ryzen 5 3600 offers exceptionally good value for money and it is comparable to the Intel’s previous gen Core-i5 8700K. If we go sub $200, we have option such as Core i5 9400F and AMD’s APUs like 3400G & 3200G. Without a discrete GPU, these APU’s offer decent gaming experience on budget. These APUs compete with low-end GPUs like Nvidia GT 1030 and AMD Radeon RX 550.
But when a discrete GPU is present, the i5 9400F or a previous gen Ryzen 5 2600 makes more sense.
Source: Tech Centurion
Best Desktop Mainstream Processors
Best Mobile Processors
In the Smartphone Segment, the Apple Processors are ahead of the Snapdragon & Exynos Processors. The upcoming A13 Bionic SOC is only going to extend this list further. Snapdragon and Apple have their own custom GPUs and their GPUs are superior when compared to the Mali GPUs of Samsung Exynos, Kirin, and MediaTek. However, Samsung is partnering with AMD to bring Radeon Graphics to their SOCs by 2021 so Samsung can take the lead in next 2 years.
When it comes to raw CPU Performance, Apple and Samsung are ahead when compared to Snapdragon & Kirin.
However, Apple is still on a 4G Modem while the other brands have successfully made progress with 5G Modems. All these top mobile Processors are manufactured using either TSMC’s 7nm Node or Samsung’s 7nm/8nm Node and these are extremely power efficient. When you choose a phone with these SOCs, you are not only getting superior performance but also a smartphone whose battery lasts longer.
Apple’s A13 Bionic chipset will compete with the upcoming Snapdragon 865. As per the initial reviews and benchmarks, it seems like Apple SOCs will continue their dominance over Qualcomm’s & Samsung’s flagship offerings
Best Mobile Processors
How we Rank Processors
The Desktop Processors are ranked on the basis of Multi-Core Score + Single-Core Score tests performed using our algorithm.
Our algorithm consists of various test such as running complex code blocks like SHA-3, AES, MD5, Dijkstra, Image Compressing/Decompression, Histogram Equalization, Ray Tracing, Image Segmentation etc.
We also run Deep Learning algorithms involving Complex Neural Networks to judge the AI Performance.
While ranking Mobile Processors, we also take into account power efficiency and throttling on extended usage. Rest of the tests are the same on Mobile Platforms as well. As Mobile Processors have graphics on-board, we also take the Gaming & Graphics Compute performance into consideration. Thus, our Mobile Processors ranking can be better defined as ‘Mobile SOC Rankings’. In a SOC, all the components such as CPU, GPU, DSP, ISP, and NPU are taken into consideratio
Here is a slideshow in which we have presented our rankings for Desktop & Mobile Phone CPUs.
Rankings of Processors
Our Documents
Processors Ranking Official Channels
Help us Improve the Ranking System
Want to help us in constantly improving the rankings?
Fill this Google Form and tell us about your experience while using your current CPU.
Your feedback is very valuable to us and will certainly be taken into consideration when we improve our Ranking Algorithms.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is now PassMark’s highest ranking mobile CPU
The Ryzen 9 5900HX is not even the fastest CPU of the Cezanne FP6 series, yet it was enough to top the PassMark mobile CPU ranking in both single and multi-threaded benchmarks.
AMD introduced its first Zen3 based mobile CPUs aka Ryzen 5000H series at CES 2021. The new series was introduced in four variants, including:
- U-Series – 15W – Ultra-mobile
- HS-Series – 35W – High Performance for thin gaming laptops
- H-Series – 45W – High Performance
- HX-Series – 45W+ – Unlocked CPUs
The Ryzen 9 5900HX is an unlocked 8-core and 16-thread CPU clocked at 3.3 GHz up to 4.7 GHz. The CPU is targetted for high-end gaming laptops, such as ASUS ROG Zephyrus or Strix series (the source of today’s leak).
The CPU scored 24,039 points in PassMark’s ranking, which is a multi-threaded score.
So far no other mobile CPU has been able to break this barrier:
PassMark Mobile CPU Ranking, Source: PassMark
The processor has also topped the single-threaded ranking with 3365 points. This is even higher than the Intel Tiger Lake-U series or current H-series flagship, the Core i9-10980HK CPU (which is also unlocked):
| PassMark Laptop CPU Benchmarks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Name | Thread Mark | CPU Mark | ||
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX |
24039 |
|||
| Intel Core i7-1185G7 |
11526 |
|||
| Intel Core i9-10980HK |
16594 |
|||
| Intel Core i9-10885H |
16084 |
|||
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
10368 |
|||
| Intel Core i7-10870H |
16407 |
|||
| Intel Core i7-10875H |
15998 |
|||
| Intel Core i7-10850H |
12781 |
|||
| Intel Core i5-10400H | ||||
| Intel Core i7-10750H |
12619 |
|||
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 | ||||
| Intel Core i3-1115G4 | ||||
| AMD Ryzen 9 4900H |
19047 |
|||
| Intel Core i9-10880H |
15108 |
|||
| Intel Core i9-9980HK |
15170 |
|||
The website provides more detailed charts:
PassMark CPU Ranking, Source: PassMark
The 5000H series features eight SKUs officially.
AMD surprisingly did not announce the Ryzen 9 5900H, which had already appeared in the leaks. It is unclear if this SKU will ever be released.
While Ryzen 9 5900HX is 100 MHz slower than 5980HX, it is important to note that so far no notebook manufacturer has announced a laptop with the latter. The CPU might appear later, as more chips go through the binning process.
| AMD Ryzen Mobile Series | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VideoCardz | Cores / Threads | Base Clock | Max Boost Clock | GPU Cores | TDP |
| AMD Ryzen 5000 H-Series (Cezanne “Zen3”) | |||||
| Ryzen 9 5980HX |
8C/16T |
3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 9 5980HS |
8C/16T |
3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 9 5900HX |
8C/16T |
3.3 GHz |
4. |
||
| Ryzen 9 5900H |
8C/16T |
TBC | TBC | ||
| Ryzen 9 5900HS |
8C/16T |
3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 7 5800H |
8C/16T |
3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 7 5800HS |
8C/16T |
2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 5 5600H |
6C/12T |
3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 5 5600HS |
6C/12T |
3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz |
||
| AMD Ryzen 4000 H-Series (Renoir Zen2) | |||||
| Ryzen 9 4900H |
8C/16T |
3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 9 4900HS |
8C/16T |
3. |
4.3 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 7 4800H |
8C/16T |
2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 7 4800HS |
8C/16T |
2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 5 4600H |
6C/12T |
3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
||
| Ryzen 5 4600HS |
6C/12T |
3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
||
7 GHz
0 GHzThe CPU has been tested with ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 17 G733 gaming laptop. ASUS is among the few notebook makers who decided to completely shift their high-end laptop portfolio to AMD CPUs:
Source: PassMark CPU scoreboard Ryzen 9 5900HX individual result
Many thanks to Martin and HWGeek for the tips!
Ryzen 9 7950X [in 15 benchmarks]
AMD
Ryzen 9 7950X
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD Ryzen 9 7950X sales on September 26, 2022.
This is a top Raphael (Zen4) architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 16 cores and 32 threads and is manufactured using 5nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 5700MHz, the multiplier is unlocked. nine0005
In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket AM5 processor with a TDP of 170W and a maximum temperature of 47°C. It supports DDR5-5200 memory.
It provides good performance in tests at the level of
62.92%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
EPYC
7h22
Compare
Value for money
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Ryzen 9 7950X quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock status.
They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests. nine0041
of 12 (Core 2 QUAD Q9550)
,
GO level
9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9004 9005 9005 9004 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9005 9ATH E3950)
of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies. | Expanded instructions | 5 NM (CCD), 6 NM (I/O) NM, 0.650 — 1.475V | AES -Ni |
| AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X that accelerate virtual machines are listed.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory support
Types, maximum amount and channels of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. nine0005
| RAM | DDR5-5200 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Built -in video — characteristics
21
General parameters of the integrated graphics card in Ryzen 9 7950X.
| GPU | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
Peripherals
Supported Ryzen 97950X peripherals and how to connect them.
| PCI Express revision | 5.0 |
Benchmark tests
1
1
These are the results of the Ryzen 9 7950X performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. nine0005
Ryzen 9 7950X
62.92
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.
5 64-bit multi-core - Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- WinRAR 4.0
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
nine0007 Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Ryzen 9 7950X
63438
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
nine0003 Ryzen 9 7950X
2194
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance.
This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen 9 7950X
23028
nine0005
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 9 7950X
8520
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 9 7950X
72561
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 9 7950X
nine0040 21157
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen 9 7950X
69
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 9 7950X
6005
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 9 7950X
317
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 9 7950X
3.8
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second. nine0005
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Ryzen 9 7950X
32
WinRAR 4.
0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Ryzen 9 7950X
nine0040 15900
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark that results in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
nine0003 Ryzen 9 7950X
270
x264 encoding pass 1
The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
nine0003 Ryzen 9 7950X
381
Relative capacity
Overall performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
130.91
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
125.94
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
100.13
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
100
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
99.06
Intel Core i9-13900KS
98.9
Intel Core i9-13900K
94.6
Competitor from Intel
We believe that the closest competitor to Ryzen 9The 7950X from Intel is the Core i9-13900KS, which is 1% slower on average and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Core i9
13900KS
Compare
Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the Ryzen 9 7950X:
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
100
Intel Core i9-13900KS
nine0040 98. 9
Intel Core i9-13900K
94.6
Intel Core i9-13900KF
94.37
Intel Core i9-13900F
92.31
Intel Core i7-13700K
74.19
Intel Core i7-13700KF
73.24
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Ryzen Threadripper
3970X
Compare
Ryzen Threadripper
PRO 3975WX
Compare
Core i9
13900K
nine0004
Compare
Core i9
13900KF
Compare
Core i9
13900F
Compare
Ryzen Threadripper
3960X
Compare
The best video cards for Ryzen 9 7950X
There are 159 in our database2 configurations based on Ryzen 9 7950X.
According to statistics, these cards are most often used with the Ryzen 9 7950X:
GeForce RTX
4090
39.4%
GeForce RTX
4090 Ti
8.4%
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
7.7%
GeForce RTX
3060
3.9%
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
1.8%
GeForce RTX
3090
1.7%
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
1.7%
GeForce RTX
3070 Ti
1.4%
GeForce RTX
3070
1. 4%
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
1.3%
Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with the Ryzen 9 7950X according to user statistics:
nine0038
GeForce RTX
4090
39.4% (627/1592)
GeForce RTX
4080
1.2% (19/1592)
Radeon RX
7900 XTX
0.9% (15/1592)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
nine0002 7.7% (123/1592)
GeForce RTX
4070 Ti
0.3% (4/1592)
Radeon RX
6950XT
1.1% (18/1592)
Radeon RX
7900XT
0. 9% (15/1592)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
1.8% (28/1592)
GeForce RTX
3090
1.7% (27/1592)
GeForce RTX
3080 12GB
0.7% (11/1592)
User rating
Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the Ryzen 9 7950X processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX [in 3 benchmarks]
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX sales 8 March 2022. This is a top Chagall PRO architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at professional systems. It has 64 cores and 128 threads and is manufactured using 7nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 4500MHz, the multiplier is locked. nine0005
In terms of compatibility, this is a socket processor
AMD Socket WRX8
with a TDP of 280W and a maximum temperature of 95°C. It supports DDR4-3200 memory.
It delivers outstanding test performance on par with
94.16%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
EPYC
7h22
nine0045 Compare
General
Details of the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX type (desktop or laptop) and architecture, as well as launch time and cost at the time.
| place in the performance rating | 2 | |||||
| Popularity | ||||||
|
053 | Price now | 6701 $ | out of 25332 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
The price-quality
for obtaining the costs and their costs and their costs are compared.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Characteristics
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
| 64 | Streams | 128 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2.7 GHz | of 7.3 (Ryzen 9 7900) | |||||||||||||||||
| Maximum frequency | 4.5 GHC | of 8.3 (Ryzen 7 7700) 9005 9006 9006 9006 9006 9006 9006 9006 9006 9 | 64K (on the kernel) | of 1536 (Epyc Embededed 3401) | ||||||||||||||
| level 2 level | 512K (for the core) |
| AES-Ni | + | |
| AVX | + |
9002
Technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX that accelerate virtual machines. nine0005
| AMD-V | + |
Memory support
Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
| RAM types | DDR4-3200 | of 56000055
| — |
|
|
Peripherals
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supported peripherals and how to connect them.
| Aviation PCI Express | 4.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Tests in the benchmarks
These are the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX non-gaming benchmark performance results. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. nine0005
Overall performance in tests
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
94.16
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
nine0007 GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
94929
nine0005
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
1520
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
24939
Relative capacity
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 59 Overall Performance95WX compared to its closest competitor in server processors.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
100
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
96.97
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
77.56
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
72.31
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
67. 41
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
65.64
Intel Xeon E7-8895v2
60.22
Other processors
Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Xeon Platinum
8368
Compare
Xeon Gold
6338
Compare
Xeon Platinum
8352Y
Compare
Xeon Gold
6258R
Compare
Xeon Platinum
8380
Compare
Xeon Gold
6240R
Compare
Best graphics cards for Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
We have 8032 configurations based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX in our database.
Statistically, the most commonly used graphics cards with the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX are:
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
nine0002 36.6%
GeForce RTX
4090
9.1%
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
6.4%
GeForce RTX
3090 SUPER
4.3%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
nine0002 3.2%
GeForce RTX
3060
3%
GeForce RTX
4090 Ti
2.6%
GeForce RTX
3090
2.2%
Radeon RX
Vega 7
1. 6%
GeForce RTX
3050 Ti Mobile
1.6%
Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
9.1% (728/8032)
GeForce RTX
4080
nine0002 0.04% (3/8032)
Radeon RX
7900 XTX
0.07% (6/8032)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
36.6% (2942/8032)
GeForce RTX
4070 Ti
0.01% (1/8032)
Radeon RX
6950XT
0.6% (52/8032)
Radeon RX
7900XT
0.