GPU Specs, Prices, and FPS in Games
Refine results to filter 355 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Calculation Parameters
Processor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Graphics Preset
Sort By
Popularity
Filters
Performance Rating
Value Rating
GPU Type
Desktop
25
Mobile
0
Integrated
0
Found 355 GPUs.
Popularity
Graphics Card
Performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3060
Jan 12th, 2021
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 6700
Jun 9th, 2021
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Nov 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Performance Rating
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce GT 730
Jun 18th, 2014
Performance Rating
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Nov 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Dec 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 2060
Jan 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Performance Rating
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Performance Rating
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- .
..
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
175%
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
| 75% higher gaming performance. |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
70 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (82 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | TU102 () | vs | GP104 (GP104-300-A1) | |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 16 nm | |
| Die Size | 754 mm² | vs | 314 mm² | |
| Transistors | 18,600 million | vs | 7,200 million | |
| Shaders | 4352 | vs | 2432 | |
| Compute Units | 68 | vs | 19 | |
| Core clock | 1350 MHz | vs | 1607 MHz | |
| ROPs | 88 | vs | 64 | |
| TMUs | 272 | vs | 152 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Bus Width | 352 bit | vs | 256 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 2002 MHz 8008 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 11264 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 180 watts | |
| Release Date | 20 Aug 2018 | vs | 26 Oct 2017 |
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
132.
00 GP/s -
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
107.70 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
408.00 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
255.80 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
616.00 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
256.30 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
13056.00 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
8186.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
198
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
137
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
142
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
97
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
107
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
68
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
169
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
102
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
201
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
119
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
191
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
116
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
187
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
114
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
156
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
116
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
114
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
97
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
118
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
104
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
114
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
62
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
119
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
103
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
134
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
86
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
184
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
154
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
122
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
87
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
95
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
54
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
50
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
141
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
91
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
92
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
47
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
182
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
115
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
204
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
131
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
175
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
126
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
138
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
84
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
197
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
122
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
208
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
117
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
186
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
106
FPS (higher is better)
Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
288
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
103
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
186
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
96
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
124
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
75
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
87
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
143
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
78
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
155
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
89
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
153
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
86
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
138
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
82
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
153
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
85
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
108
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
113
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
73
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
91
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
47
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
119
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
77
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
103
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
61
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
105
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
65
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
151
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
107
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
102
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
55
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
76
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
47
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
29
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
113
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
62
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
75
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
37
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
141
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
75
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
133
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
85
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
143
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
83
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
104
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
156
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
91
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
153
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
81
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
138
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
79
FPS (higher is better)
Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
167
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
75
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
105
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
55
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
79
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
50
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
90
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
94
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
97
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
53
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
81
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
44
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
91
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
63
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
33
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
74
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
58
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
30
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
79
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
61
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
33
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
71
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
53
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
27
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
50
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
35
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
17
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
71
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
49
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
22
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
76
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
67
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
81
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
59
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
29
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
88
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
47
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
90
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
46
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
78
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
46
FPS (higher is better)
Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
99
-
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
46
FPS (higher is better)
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 6800 | TITAN RTX |
| VS | ||
| TITAN RTX | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Is it worth changing a graphics card 6 years after purchase — GeForce RTX 3050 vs GeForce GTX 1070 from Benchmark
What is a 2016 graphics card capable of 6 years after it went on sale? Let’s figure it out
The old GeForce GTX 1070 hit stores in the summer of 2016. These were the times when no one had yet heard of the existence of miners, and the semiconductor crisis did not descend, taking away all video cards in an unknown direction. In fact, not all, because some went to resellers, but today is not about that. 6 years after the release of the GeForce GTX 1070, gamers had the opportunity to try out the power of the new GeForce RTX 3050 graphics chip. The video card received a recommended price of $250, but it hit the shelves of European stores for $400 and more, and even arrived in Russian retail for $600 . Surprisingly, in 2016 the GeForce GTX 1070 received an MSRP of 499 dollars, and in Russian stores it could be found for 600 dollars a few weeks after the release.
It turns out that we have models that are identical in cost. And what does NVIDIA offer us after 6 years? Understanding this issue is not easy, but the Benchmark team is ready to answer a difficult question. The results are presented in 1080p resolution, the graphics settings were automatically selected, and the Core i5-12600K was used as the processor. Before you study the results, let’s add that the author of this material bought such a video card in 2017. She did an excellent job with her tasks and was successfully sold in 2020 after switching to a more powerful GeForce RTX 2070 Super. Perhaps that is why our judgments are not entirely objective, because we simply refuse to consider a modern video card that demonstrates performance similar to the not the most expensive model 6 years ago.
As you can see, there is an average difference of 10 frames per second between video cards, but with the previous generation processor, the gap may not be noticeable at all.
It turns out that if you went to the store in 2016 and bought a GeForce GTX 1070 there, then today you might not even think about the need to replace the video card. Consider that in 2019 the GeForce GTX 1070 was available on the secondary market for $250 or less. Why the millions of gamers who are beating against closed doors today have not bought anything powerful over the years is a big question. It is possible that some were just waiting for the next generation of graphics cards to come out. Before the release of the GeForce RTX 3000 series, we saw massive sales of old video cards, when gamers assured that in a month they could buy themselves a super-powerful GeForce RTX 3080, adding a couple of hundred dollars.
We have to admit that the GeForce GTX 1070 is still relevant. Even 6 years after the start of sales, she does an excellent job with games. Does this mean the GeForce RTX 3050 is bad? But here everything is complicated. Keep in mind that NVIDIA set a price of $250 for the video card, while for similar performance in 2016 it was necessary to pay $500 and more.
Perhaps we would not have seen so many complaints about the new GeForce RTX 3050 if it were not for the need for a huge overpayment. Well, in the current conditions, paying $ 600 for such low performance is the height of stupidity.
recommendations
This content was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
2x1070ti or 2080ti | Render.ru
Alexey Nevazhnovich (Malbred)
Expert
#1
#1
Good afternoon. Assign Maya (RS) + Fusion to composit.
It costs 1070ti and there are thoughts, whether to increase the amount of memory at the expense of the second 1070ti or sell your own and take a new 2080ti with a large number of where cores. But the second option is more expensive in terms of money.
What do you recommend?
3DKing
Master
#2
#2
Two GTXs do not add video memory. It will just be possible to render in parallel on 2 video cards. Therefore, if you run into 8GB of video memory, then it’s time to switch to 2080ti.
Alexey Nevazhnovich (Malbred)
Expert
#3
#3
3DKing said:
Two GTXs don’t add video memory.
It will just be possible to render in parallel on 2 video cards. Therefore, if you run into 8GB of video memory, then it’s time to switch to 2080ti.
Click to expand…
Good. Ie sli not sli will not be merged?
And then, Let it be 8 + 8 or just 16, both cards will be used during rendering (fortunately clickable on / off) and in fact the volume will be used to the fullest. That is, IMHO, I do not see the difference, but I can be wrong …. probably special cases of using a full large volume of Vram. But even so, I don’t take a Tesla and I don’t take a square. Correct me if I’m wrong
3DKing
Master
#4
#4
Aleksey Nevazhnovich (Malbred) said:
Good.
Ie sli not sli will not be merged?
And then, Let it be 8 + 8 or just 16, when rendering both cards will be used (fortunately clickable on / off) and in fact the volume will be used to the fullest. That is, IMHO, I do not see the difference, but I can be wrong …. probably special cases of using a full large volume of Vram. But even so, I don’t take a Tesla and I don’t take a square. Correct me if I’m wrong
Click to expand…
Today, GTXs are not able to combine memory. With some quadras there was such a trick. And in DX12 they promised to bring the vram association … but something didn’t grow together.
And in this case 8+8 will not equal 16. It will be 8 on one card, 8 on the second card. And that’s it. To understand the principle, imagine that each video card is just a separate PC connected via a local network. HERE you have two computers. Each has 64GB of RAM. They are connected via a local network. Does each computer have 2 times more memory? No. It’s the same with video cards)
Extrvisor
Active Member
#5
#5
I think it makes more sense to sell the 1070ti (while it’s still worth something and gamers can take it) and add a 2080Ti rather than two 1070ti.
Now all developers are actively sawing software for tensor cores, when adding two 1070ti cards, there is still no increase in pure x2, approximately 1.75 and with the addition of cards it also decreases. In the case of a new generation of 2xxx, when adding a second card, there will be a significant increase in rendering. And the speed will increase not only in rendering, but also when working in general.
Here is an example comparison in redshift:
https://www.cgdirector.com/redshift-benchmark-results/
-
Screenshot 2019-07-05 at 10.08.03.png
1.7 MB
Views: 393
Alternative
Active member
#6
#6
Redshift doesn’t work with sly even GTX even quards.
Developers mention it in the documentation. From my experience I can say that increasing the maps does not speed up the rendering in a linear way.. i.e. if it costs one 1070 and the render lasts 1 minute, then adding the second 1070, then the render time will be reduced by 15-20 seconds. (if the PSU allows)..
itself has 2 «frames» on one 4x1070ti, on the second 2×1080 and 2×1070 .. I use it in 90% of cases by handing out tasks between 4 maps. If the scenes are complex, then all 4 maps are rendered together.
Last edit:
Alexey Nevazhnovich (Malbred)
Expert
#7
#7
Alternative said:
Redshift doesn’t work with sly even GTX even quards.
. The developers mention it in the documentation. From my experience I can say that increasing the maps does not speed up the rendering in a linear way.. i.e. if it costs one 1070 and the render lasts 1 minute, then adding the second 1070, then the render time will be reduced by 15-20 seconds. (if BP allows)..
itself has 2 «frames» on one 4x1070ti, on the second 2×1080 and 2×1070 .. I use it in 90% of cases when distributing tasks between 4 cards. If the scenes are complex, then all 4 maps are rendered together.
Click to expand…
Useful. Thanks for info
Ylana
Expert
#8
#8
Alternative said:
From my experience, zooming in maps doesn’t speed up rendering linearly.
I have come across information that states that: «… video card performance in Redshift scales very well as additional cards are added. ..» as more cards are being added…»
Alternative
Active member
#9
#9
Ylana said:
The topic is not about Redshift, but the statements are interesting.
I came across information that states that: «… video card performance in Redshift scales very well as additional cards are added. ..» i.e. — «… video card performance in Redshift scales very well as additional cards are being added.
..»
Click to expand…
yes, I also hoped for that, but there is no proportional increase. Maybe something else depends on the processor. In my tasks video cards are rarely loaded at 100%, usually these are undulating bursts of activity.I can also assume that in certain tasks, when GI uses brute force in both engines and you need to render in the scene and reflections, transparency with caustics with wound dof and motion blur.
Ylana
Expert
#10
#10
I hope Alexander will not be offended by us that wedged into his topic (see post1)
Alternative said:
Maybe something else depends on the processor
Click to expand .
..
Of course , to feel this (performance gain from two or more video cards), you need to use a processor with a high clock speed.
You can talk a lot about this, or you can find information in previous topics and continue to develop them based on the conclusions laid out.
-
Redshift.png
30.1 KB
Views: 343
Alternative
Active Member
#11
#11
Ylana said:
I hope Alexander will not be offended by us that wedged into his topic (see post1)
Of course to feel this (performance gain from two or more video cards), you need to use a processor with a high clock speed.
You can talk a lot about this, or you can find information in previous topics and continue to develop them based on the conclusions laid out.
Click to expand…
If you use up to two cards, then you can take 9900K, overclock it to 5 GHz, and the frequency is high and the probability of loading is good. For Alexander, in principle, this should be a normal option. I have farms with 4 cards each and stones from the consumer segment will not provide the corresponding number of PCI lanes .. And processors that can already have much more cores with a much lower frequency and overclocking potential.
According to my observation, one card is loaded by one processor core — translation of the scene into the engine, + construction of the IRmap, and then the vidyuha starts working. My scenes are not complicated and frame rendering often does not exceed a minute on one card, if you force all 4 cards to render, then the rendering time will not be 15 seconds, it will be about 30 seconds (checked several times under different conditions) .
.
The benchmark most likely loads the vidyuha for all 100 with a large number of samples and all kinds of meshes such as caustics and dof, and I think that if you run this benchmark on a farm, the speed will grow linearly .. but in real tasks I have not yet encountered this. Need to test this bench.
PS: on the Internet I regularly meet users who complain that the vidyuha is loaded by 30-40% during rendering ..
Alexey Nevazhnovich (Malbred)
Expert
#12
#12
Alternative said:
… then I recommend to have a top solution, 2080ti or for the same money 2×2080 super (if the PSU allows).
.
Click to expand…
The market does not yet know the price tags for the new super series.
I looked at the code — GV-N208SAORUS-8GC
h**ps://ru.gecid.com/prtnews.php?id=56590 they write here that they say the price is also unclear.
Alternative
Active Member
#13
#13
Aleksey Nevazhnovich (Malbred) said:
Yamarket doesn’t know anything about price tags for the new super series yet.
I looked at the code — GV-N208SAORUS-8GC
h**ps://ru.gecid.com/prtnews.php?id=56590 they write here that they say the price is also unclear.
Click to expand…
Extrvisor
Active member
#14
#14
However!
RT Cores is only part of the story. RTX cards also support NVLink, which allows you to sum up card memory available for rendering with minimal impact on performance.
NVLink
NVLink is a port that allows you to connect two or more video processors and allow them to exchange information at very high speeds. This means that one GPU can access the memory of another. Consequently, programs such as V-Ray can place scenes in the shared memory of video cards that were too large for one of them.
Usually, during rendering, the scene is duplicated in the memory of all cards involved in the calculations, but NVLink allows you to combine their memory. For example, two accelerators with 11GB on board each will have 22GB together.
So, I think the choice is for new cards,
here is a link to the source:
https://render.ru/ru/Intenditore/post/14099
A E (LightZergo)
Active member
#15
#15
Full NVLink is available Only for the professional segment, and also for the combination of Two Titan RTX.
That’s All!
Everything else is enhanced SLI and it’s All You Can Count On!
Extrvisor
Active Member
#16
#16
In the GeForce RTX 2000 series, only high-end adapters received support for NVLink technology — these are the GeForce RTX 2080 (Super) and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti.