1070Ti vs rx 590: GTX 1070 Ti vs RX 590 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-7700K vs i7-8700K)

11 декабря, 2022

Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

  • Radeon RX 590

    100%

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    128%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 590
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports FreeSync
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports TrueAudio
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
28% higher gaming performance.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (45 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
Radeon RX 590 GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GPU Name Polaris 30 (Polaris 30 XTX) vs GP104 (GP104-300-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 16 nm
Die Size 244 mm² vs 314 mm²
Transistors 5,700 million vs 7,200 million
Shaders 2304 vs 2432
Compute Units 36 vs 19
Core clock 1257 MHz vs 1607 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 64
TMUs 144 vs 152

Memory Configuration
Radeon RX 590 GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 256 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 2000 MHz

8000 MHz effective		 vs 2002 MHz

8008 MHz effective
Memory Size 8192 Mb vs 8192 Mb
Additional details
Radeon RX 590 GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
TDP 0 watts vs 180 watts
Release Date UNRELEASED vs 26 Oct 2017

  • Radeon RX 590

    49. 44 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    107.70 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • Radeon RX 590

    222.50 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    255.80 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • Radeon RX 590

    256.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    256.30 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • Radeon RX 590

    7119.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    8186.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    80

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    97

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    46

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    68

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    93

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    119

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    96

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    116

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    84

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    114

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    58

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    62

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    80

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    103

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    77

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    86

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    42

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    54

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    28

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    38

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    80

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    91

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    39

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    47

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    90

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    115

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    63

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    90

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    117

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    59

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    75

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    34

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    48

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    66

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    72

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    86

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    60

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    82

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    41

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    47

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    58

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    77

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    56

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    61

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    33

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    21

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    52

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    62

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    32

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    37

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    53

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    75

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    43

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    56

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    64

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    81

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    33

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    19

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    26

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    39

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    52

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    44

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    53

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    30

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    44

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    19

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    30

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    31

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    30

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    33

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    21

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    26

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    11

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    17

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    29

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    36

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    21

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    22

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    30

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    38

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • Radeon RX 590

    21

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    29

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • Radeon RX 590

    38

  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

    46

FPS (higher is better)

VS
Radeon RX 590 Radeon RX 5500
VS
Radeon RX 590 GeForce GTX 1660
VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Radeon RX 6600
VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Radeon RX 6600 XT
VS
Radeon RX 6650 XT GeForce RTX 2060 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Super Radeon RX 5700

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)


Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 590

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 869.7x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 180 Watt
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 1797.792
  • 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 26.444
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3638
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3638












Launch date 15 November 2018 vs 2 November 2017
Texture fill rate 222.48 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 175 Watt vs 180 Watt
Geekbench — OpenCL 52086 vs 51972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2083.862 vs 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 139. 477 vs 26.444
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz
  • 1153x better floating-point performance: 8,186 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 14627 vs 9652
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 883 vs 811
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 137.469
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 12.353
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 762.142
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13383
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13383
  • Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 6797 vs 4742













Core clock speed 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
Boost clock speed 1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Floating-point performance 8,186 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark 14627 vs 9652
PassMark — G2D Mark 883 vs 811
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 182.11 vs 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.071 vs 12.353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1035.984 vs 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16128 vs 13383
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16128 vs 13383
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 6797 vs 4742

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
















PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

137.469

182.11

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

2083.862

1797.792

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

12. 353

14.071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

139.477

26.444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

762.142

1035. 984

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

GPU 1
GPU 2


















Name AMD Radeon RX 590 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark — G3D Mark 9652 14627
PassMark — G2D Mark 811 883
Geekbench — OpenCL 52086 51972
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 137.469 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2083.862 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.353 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 139.477 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 762.142 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13383 16128
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3344
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13383 16128
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3344
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 4742 6797

Compare specifications (specs)



























AMD Radeon RX 590 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Architecture GCN 4. 0 Pascal
Code name Polaris 30 GP104
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
Launch date 15 November 2018 2 November 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $279 $399
Place in performance rating 146 123
Type Desktop Desktop
Price now

$379. 99
Value for money (0-100)

44.74
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1683 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1469 MHz 1607 MHz
Floating-point performance 7.1 TFLOPs 8,186 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Pixel fill rate 49. 54 GP/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2304
Texture fill rate 222.48 GTexel/s 255.8 GTexel / s
Texture Units 144
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 175 Watt 180 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 7,200 million
Pipelines

2432
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
G-SYNC support

Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin
DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 256 GB/s 256.

2024 © All rights reserved