GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
No items available
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
No items available
Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is 851 days older than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — 406 vs 378 FPS
- Up to 38% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — 11 vs 8 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — 215 vs 250 Watts
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
FPS
406
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Desktop • Jul 9th, 2019
FPS
378
93%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Desktop • Jul 9th, 2019
213
FPS
191
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
881
FPS
817
FPS
League of Legends
406
FPS
378
FPS
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege
394
FPS
365
FPS
VALORANT
1145
FPS
1072
FPS
Minecraft
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
139. 2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Desktop • Jul 9th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
75%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
vs |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Mar 10th, 2017 | Release Date |
Jul 9th, 2019 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | GeForce 20 |
$699 | MSRP |
$499 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
11 GB |
Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5X | Type | GDDR6 |
352-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
484. 4 GB/s |
Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1481 MHz | Base Clock Speed |
1605 MHz |
1582 MHz | Boost Clock Speed |
1770 MHz |
1376 MHz | Memory Clock Speed |
1750 MHz |
Builds Using GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege, 1080p, High
CyberpowerPC Gamer Supreme Liquid Cool Gaming PC
341
FPS
$
8.79
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Core i7-9700K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$2,999
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
ROG Strix GA15DH Gaming Desktop PC
353
FPS
$
2. 83
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 3800X
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC
353
FPS
$
4.25
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Core i9-9900K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,499
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
345
FPS
$
5.51
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 3700X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,899.99
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
388
FPS
$
5. 64
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Core i7-11700F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,188.88
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
ASUS ROG Strix GL10DH Gaming Desktop PC
345
FPS
$
7.82
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 3700X
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,699
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
CyberpowerPC Gamer Supreme Liquid Cool Gaming Desktop PC
372
FPS
$
9.67
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Core i9-10850K
16 GB, 500 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$3,599
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 6670
N/A Stock
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 6670
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 6770
N/A Stock
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 6770
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7990
N/A Stock
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7990
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7790
N/A Stock
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7790
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7950
N/A Stock
used GTX 1080 ti vs RTX 2070 for 4K
2019-01-03, 12:18 AM
#1
I have a large 4K monitor which is good for working, but Im planning to upgrade my graphic card so I can play something else than WoW at 4K. I will not play the most graphic demanding games tho.
Should I get a new 2070 for ~550€ or would 1 year old 1080 ti priced at 550-600€ range be better value?
e: Im mostly thinking about future. Would 2070 suddenly become a way better with DLSS and so on?
Last edited by mmocfd1b0ab5a3; 2019-01-03 at 12:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 12:22 AM
#2
I think anything less than 2080 or better is too weak for 60ish FPS.
So either settle for less resolution and wait for the next generation or settle for less FPS with the cards you mentioned.
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
To resist the influence of others, knowledge of oneself is most important.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 12:30 AM
#3
Originally Posted by Vargur
I think anything less than 2080 or better is too weak for 60ish FPS.
So either settle for less resolution and wait for the next generation or settle for less FPS with the cards you mentioned.Im not expecting a 60fps with ultra settings and will tune settings down if needed. 2080 is unfortunately above my budget.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 12:33 AM
#4
Originally Posted by rauta
Im not expecting a 60fps with ultra settings and will tune settings down if needed. 2080 is unfortunately above my budget.
if your turning settings down then a 1080ti should suffice anyways…
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 12:37 AM
#5
I can only directly report from my 1080 ti. It runs WoW great at 4k. Other games are a different story sometimes but it is more than playable. I could also be wrong about this but usually a 80 card kind of replaces the 80 ti card of the previous generation in a power scale (but with some gains in new tech tools).
I would mostly look at deals. If you find a great deal on a 1080ti go with it. If you find a great deal on the 2070 go with it. At least as far as WoW is concerned. I think if you plan to play 4k with different games probably the 1080ti (within the options you gave) would be a better idea but we aren’t talking about a death choice here. A few frames here or there.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 12:51 AM
#6
Originally Posted by Low Hanging Fruit;50680257 I could also be wrong about this but usually a 80 card [B
kind of[/B] replaces the 80 ti card of the previous generation in a power scale (but with some gains in new tech tools).
In the last three generations, 2 out of 3 the 70 matched the previous 80ti, the 970 matched the 780ti (the 800s were for laptops) the 1070 matched the 980ti. Only in this series does this not happen, the 2070 barely matches the 1080 (Outside of RT and DLSS which you can’t bet on yet). For 4k gaming the 1080ti is currently much better.
https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreview…perature-noise
Last edited by Onikaroshi; 2019-01-03 at 12:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 12:58 AM
#7
after watching some reviews the 1080 ti does indeed look better in benchmarks. It would be horrible tho if in a year RTX 2070 outperforms a way better if games will start to use its new tech..
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 01:02 AM
#8
I don’t think you have to worry about that in the next year or two, it’s more like a 5 year outlook to see if DLSS will take off, IDK if RT ever will.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 01:04 AM
#9
For now, 1080ti is closer to 2080. so i would pick 1080ti but since its nvidia we are talking about, the gimping starts soon and 1000 series are gonna be behind even if 1080ti wins 2070 now, after few months 2070 is propably faster than 1080ti. . And yes i have owned several nvidia gpu’s aswell as amd. i had 6970+6990 (3 gpus) at one point, then 2x 290x. and 2x 780 ti, then one 980ti and now 1080ti and im not gonna even touch 2000 series. Look past and current benchmarks on vega 64 and you can clearly tell how nvidia is gimping «old» cards with drivers while amd optimizes several generation old cards with drivers.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 01:08 AM
#10
Originally Posted by rauta
after watching some reviews the 1080 ti does indeed look better in benchmarks. It would be horrible tho if in a year RTX 2070 outperforms a way better if games will start to use its new tech..
I wouldn’t worry about that tbh….the 20 series really isn’t worth investing in…even if youre in the market for a new GPU…I have told all my friends either get a 1080 or 1080ti and wait for Navi and the next generation of RTX
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 01:14 AM
#11
I was faced with this exact same conundrum a month ago. I went with the 1080 ti. What clinched it for me? Witcher 3. A 1080 ti was the bare minimum for running the game at 4k 60fps on ultra. The 2070 fell well short of that. Frankly, a 1080 ti really isn’t even enough for 4k. Games like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and Dragon Quest 11 choke at 4k, to the point of me needing to lower the resolution slider to about 85%. A 2070 would have to go even lower. I could run WoW in 4k on my gtx 1060 for the last two years, but if you’re serious about playing AAA titles at this resolution, I would say a 1080 ti or 2080 are your gateway cards. The 2070 is probably good for 1440p but not for 4k. The 20 series is also plagued with problems and high failure rates. Get a used 1080 ti.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 01:25 AM
#12
Originally Posted by Merie
I was faced with this exact same conundrum a month ago. I went with the 1080 ti. What clinched it for me? Witcher 3. A 1080 ti was the bare minimum for running the game at 4k 60fps on ultra. The 2070 fell well short of that. Frankly, a 1080 ti really isn’t even enough for 4k. Games like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and Dragon Quest 11 choke at 4k, to the point of me needing to lower the resolution slider to about 85%. A 2070 would have to go even lower. I could run WoW in 4k on my gtx 1060 for the last two years, but if you’re serious about playing AAA titles at this resolution, I would say a 1080 ti or 2080 are your gateway cards. The 2070 is probably good for 1440p but not for 4k. The 20 series is also plagued with problems and high failure rates. Get a used 1080 ti.
I appreciate you shared this. Im gonna pick the used one tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 02:19 AM
#13
Originally Posted by rauta
I appreciate you shared this. Im gonna pick the used one tomorrow.
Please ask what that 1080ti has been used for.
Always be wary of anyone selling 1080’s and 1080ti’s used. Many of them have been used in bitcoin mining and thus are nearing their death date. Since bitcoin mining basically runs those cards at stress test levels 24/7 for a very long time.
Inactive Wow Player Raider.IO | Inactive D3 Player | Permanent Retired EVE Player | Inactive Wot Player | Retired Openraid Raid Leader| Inactive Overwatch Player | Inactive HotS player | Youtube / Twitter | Steam | My Setup
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 05:03 AM
#14
Originally Posted by Saphyron
Please ask what that 1080ti has been used for.
Always be wary of anyone selling 1080’s and 1080ti’s used. Many of them have been used in bitcoin mining and thus are nearing their death date. Since bitcoin mining basically runs those cards at stress test levels 24/7 for a very long time... .no it doesn’t.
They undervolt and run them cool as a cucumber.
Cards actually get more stressed by gaming loads as they see-saw between running super hot and idle.
Both LTT and Science Studio have done videos on it. There’s no problem with mining cards as long as the person wasn’t a complete newb to mining.
Running them flat-out and hot is less efficient. You end up spending more on power than you gain in hash rate.
Last edited by Kagthul; 2019-01-03 at 05:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-03, 05:05 AM
#15
Originally Posted by Merie
I was faced with this exact same conundrum a month ago. I went with the 1080 ti. What clinched it for me? Witcher 3. A 1080 ti was the bare minimum for running the game at 4k 60fps on ultra. The 2070 fell well short of that. Frankly, a 1080 ti really isn’t even enough for 4k. Games like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and Dragon Quest 11 choke at 4k, to the point of me needing to lower the resolution slider to about 85%. A 2070 would have to go even lower. I could run WoW in 4k on my gtx 1060 for the last two years, but if you’re serious about playing AAA titles at this resolution, I would say a 1080 ti or 2080 are your gateway cards. The 2070 is probably good for 1440p but not for 4k. The 20 series is also plagued with problems and high failure rates. Get a used 1080 ti.
Yup hard to argue unless you go to cherry picked site tests.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-05, 01:58 PM
#16
1080 ti was a good move. Games are working great at 4k. Aorus 1080 ti with 2 years warranty left for 580€, couldn’t be happier. Used for gaming only.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-05, 02:03 PM
#17
2070 is good with RTX off. check benchmarks, there are plenty around.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-05, 09:48 PM
#18
Originally Posted by Xjev
2070 is good with RTX off. check benchmarks, there are plenty around.
2070 doesn’t beat the 1080ti at 4k on any benchmark i’ve found
https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreview…perature-noise
Reply With Quote
2019-01-06, 04:39 PM
#19
Originally Posted by Onikaroshi
2070 doesn’t beat the 1080ti at 4k on any benchmark i’ve found
https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreview…perature-noise
Because the 2070 is equal to the 1080, not the 1080ti.
Reply With Quote
2019-01-06, 04:45 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Temp name
Because the 2070 is equal to the 1080, not the 1080ti.