Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super: What is the difference?
59points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
63points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparison winner
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Why is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super?
- 55W lower TDP?
160Wvs215W - 5°C lower load GPU temperature?
69°Cvs74°C - 38.14mm narrower?
228.6mmvs266.74mm
Why is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060?
- 240MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1605MHzvs1365MHz - 2.61 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
9.06 TFLOPSvs6.45 TFLOPS - 32.66 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
113.3 GPixel/svs80. 64 GPixel/s - 81.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
283.2 GTexels/svs201.6 GTexels/s - 33.33% more VRAM?
8GBvs6GB - 112GB/s more memory bandwidth?
448GB/svs336GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus width?
256bitvs192bit - 640 more shading units?
2560vs1920
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
4 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
9. 8/10
4 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
0 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.8/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
10.0/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Fan noise
9.0/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
4 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1365MHz
1605MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1680MHz
1770MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3. pixel rate
80.64 GPixel/s
113.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
6.45 TFLOPS
9.06 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
201.6 GTexels/s
283.2 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1750MHz
1750MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
14000MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
336GB/s
448GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
192bit
256bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Graphics cards Comparison
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce RTX 2060 stacks up against GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, check out specs charts below.
GeForce RTX 2060
Check Price
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 215 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 34% more power consumption, than GeForce RTX 2060.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce RTX 2060.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER are build with Turing architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is 285 MHz higher, than GeForce RTX 2060.
- GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER are manufactured by 12 nm process technology.
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is 38 mm longer, than GeForce RTX 2060.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is 14000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
low / 720p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
high / 1080p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 250−260 | 270−280 |
medium / 1080p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Fortnite is 16% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
low / 720p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Forza Horizon 4 is 19% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Metro Exodus is 26% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
medium / 1080p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 300−350 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 230−240 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 350−400 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GeForce RTX 2060. |
Full Specs
GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | |
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | Turing TU106 | Turing TU104 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 January 2019 | 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1620 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 201. 6 | 283.2 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | + |
VR Ready | + | + |
DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1. 2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II
- GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs Radeon Pro Vega II
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs Radeon Pro Vega II
- GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super mobile
- GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super mobile
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super mobile
- GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super mobile
RTX 2060 vs RTX 2070 [Benchmarked & Tested]
Currently, the best graphics cards you can find are from the RTX 3000 and RX 6000 lineup. What if you want a card that is less expensive, but that also has ray tracing support? Both the RTX 2070 and RTX 2060 are exceptional candidates but the GPU you should choose will depend on your individual needs.
In this article, we will weigh in on the RTX 2060 vs. RTX 2070 debate and help you figure out which graphics card is a better choice for you.
If you’re looking to build a gaming rig or to upgrade your existing PC with a new GPU, you probably have a budget in mind to get the performance you want. However, there has recently been an interesting trend in the GPU market, especially on NVIDIA’s side, where the price points are spread apart more than the performance marks.
It might initially seem like a no-brainer to go with the RTX 2070, simply because the model number is higher. If you dig a little deeper and notice the difference in price, it might further encourage you to choose that GPU. Even so, there are some points that you should consider before making a decision.
Table of ContentsShow
Specification
As their names suggest, both of these GPUs come from NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 20 line, and both are made using the 12nm manufacturing process which is an optimized 14nm node from TSMC. They also both have 10.8 billion transistors and their die size is identical at 445 mm2. That, for the most part, is where the similarities end.
Let’s take a look at some technical specifications for both GPUs and analyze where the differences lie and why some specs matter more than others.
Model Name | Shader Processors | Texture Mapping Units | Render Output Units | Ray Tracing Cores | Tensor Cores |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 1920 | 122 | 48 | 30 | 240 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | 2304 | 144 | 65 | 36 | 288 |
Shader Processors and Texture Mapping Units
It might seem that roughly 400 more shader processors will make the RTX 2070 a lot better at the shading process, but the truth is that this is not enough to make a noticeable difference. It’s true that shading will be a tougher job for the RTX 2060 than the RTX 2070, but this isn’t enough to make a meaningful difference to performance.
However, the difference is greater in the number of texture mapping units. Although the RTX 2070 is stronger, it’s very important to note that even their score of 144 is not at the level of many other cards in the same price range. The RTX 2060 ranks the lowest in this category in its tier of our GPU hierarchy and it is much closer to the tier below.
Basically, while there’s some difference between these two in this department, neither can really be proud of their texture mapping units.
The RTX 2070 shines more in its number of ROPs and its number of ray tracing cores. Both of these are directly responsible for greater output and, when all of these little benefits are combined, there’s a clear advantage.
Tensor Cores
Another disadvantage of the RTX 2060 is its number of tensor cores. However, neither of these GPUs is truly powerful enough to take advantage of ray tracing. Fortunately, NVIDIA’s upscaling solution, DLSS 2.0 is starting to gain a lot of traction, allowing users with RTX GPUs to see a lot more FPS in games.
Games that have implemented DLSS version 2.0 enjoy a significant increase in performance while maintaining image quality. In fact, some games even manage to improve image quality with DLSS enabled.
Despite the RTX 3000 series coming in strong with its number of tensor cores, the improvement in ray tracing or DLSS is minimal or non-existent.
The slight difference in RT cores is almost negligible when compared to the powerhouse that is the RTX 2080 Ti. Still, both of these GPUs offer ray tracing, which is currently something that few GPUs out there can claim.
Model | L2 Cache (MB) | Base core clock (MHz) | Boost core clock (MHz) |
Memory Size (GB) | Bandwidth (GB/s) |
Bus width (bits) |
RTX 2060 | 3 | 1365 | 1680 | 6 | 336 | 192 |
RTX 2070 | 4 | 1410 | 1620 | 8 | 448 | 256 |
Core Clocks
As there is only a slight disparity in the amount of cache memory, it’s tempting to think that it doesn’t matter much. However, specifically, the L2 cache is vital for computing speed. The RTX 2070 is in line with every other RTX 20 series GPU, with the exception of the mammoth 5.5 for the RTX 2080 Ti, and even crazier 6 MB for the Titan RTX.
The next interesting point of comparison is clock speed. The base core clock metric doesn’t offer many surprises in favor of the RTX 2070, but boost clock will certainly draw more attention. This is the only number that gives an advantage to the RTX 2060, but this can be deceiving.
If every other metric in this RTX 2060 vs RTX 2070 comparison was equal, then the 2060’s boost clock might be advantageous, but that simply isn’t the case. The reason why this metric matters less is that there are several different factors involved for the RTX 2060 to achieve that 1680 MHz burst, and that will not happen often.
Next is the area where the RTX 2070 dominates and removes any doubt about which card is better. They both use GDDR6 which was the standard at the time of their release, but the advantages in size, bandwidth and bus width make the RTX 2070 a far better choice for tasks such as 4K gaming and video editing.
Neither GPU supports NVLink nor SLI, so those offer no room for performance improvement. Game or driver support for SLI is almost completely gone, so it’s never really a good idea to go down that path, even if it is available.
Gaming Performance
The reason why people choose a powerful GPU is to have a more enjoyable gaming experience. If you are worried that you won’t be able to get a top-notch performance out of either the RTX 2060 or RTX 2070, you would be wrong. Below is a good comparison video of how both of these GPUs perform in relatively modern games.
With a simple eye test, we can see that a roughly 10% difference is noticeable, but it also depends on the specific game. The gap is far smaller in games with linear level design. It was somewhat expected that the RTX 2060 would perform better in those types of games, but it’s also interesting that the RTX 2070 doesn’t increase its performance there.
Below is a more comprehensive test that highlights the FPS performance of the RTX 2060 when compared to the RTX 2070.
As expected, there is a noticeable difference across the board. It’s also important to note that the outliers don’t make things look good for the RTX 2060. In contrast, the RTX 2070 has a clear advantage in the spec section and it outperforms its opponent in the gaming performance department as well.
Dollar Value
It’s time for the RTX 2060 to finally show why it’s a worthy contender to be your next GPU. At $349, it’s significantly cheaper than the RTX 2070, which retails at $499. While the RTX 2070 is undoubtedly the better card, it is also approximately 30% more expensive, while only bringing a 10-15% improvement in terms of performance. That should really be the deciding factor when choosing between these two.
Another point of interest is the 2060’s 165W power need which is below the 2070’s 185W. This translates to the former needing a 500W PSU, while the latter needs to bump it up to 550W. This power consumption might seem less significant but, when it comes to the choice of needing to upgrade your PSU to accommodate your GPU, it’s definitely better to go with a lower-consuming card.
However, it’s probably important to consider the fact that the RTX 2070 was discontinued pretty quickly, which means you might struggle to find a new one on the market. Your only options for a 2070 might be on the second-hand market.
RTX 2060 vs RTX 2070: The Verdict
Overall, it’s plain to see that the RTX 2070 is the superior card in this head to head, but the debate should really lie in the performance-per-dollar metric. In this category, the RTX 2060 is simply a better choice. If you’re looking for superior performance, then the RTX 2070 is the smarter option.
However, if you’re willing to spend $500 for a GPU, it might be better to compare the price points of the RTX 2070 and RTX 2070 Super. If you’re on a tighter budget, it will probably be a better choice to go for the RTX 2060.
If you’re willing to wait a while longer, the RTX 3000 series’ mid-range and budget options easily outperform both the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super and RTX 2060 Super Review
The long time coming GeForce RTX Super graphics cards are here and without wasting any time, let’s take a look at the specs and pricing to see what we’re dealing with.
The new RTX 2060 Super is coming in at $400, a small price premium over existing non-Super models. For that 14% bump in price you receive a significant upgrade in terms of specs, though at first glance that may not appear to be the case. We’re receiving a small 13% boost in CUDA cores, however we also see a massive 33% increase in ROPs and this extends the 192-bit wide memory bus of the original RTX 2060 to 256-bit wide for the Super version.
Because the same 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory is used, the bandwidth has increased by 33% to 448 GB/s, so then the RTX 2060 Super has the same memory subsystem as the RTX 2070 and 2070 Super, and this means it gets 8GB of VRAM. Essentially it’s a slightly cut down version of the 2070 as both use TU106 silicon.
The new RTX 2060 Super is a slightly cut down version of the original RTX 2070 as both use TU106 silicon. Meanwhile, the RTX 2070 Super is a boosted version of the original for the same price.
The RTX 2070 Super comes in at the same $500 price point as the original, effectively replacing this part and you can expect vanilla 2070s to be phased out shortly. For the same money we’re getting an 11% upgrade in CUDA cores and 28% more Texture Units while the ROP count remains the same.
We see a reasonable 9% increase in boost clocks for the core, but given most cards are factory overclocked this will have little impact on performance. Finally, the memory configuration remains the same, 8GB of GDDR6 memory with data rate of 14 GBps for a bandwidth of 448 GB/s. Unlike the standard 2070 which uses TU106 silicon, the Super version has been upgraded to TU104, the same silicon used by the RTX 2080.
The RTX 2060 Super looks to be a rather substantial upgrade over the base model, but you’re paying a bit more. While the 2070 Super looks to be a similar upgrade over the 2070, but in this case you’re getting that extra performance at no added cost. I guess it’s the extra memory that Nvidia’s stinging gamers for with the 2060 Super.
There will also be an RTX 2080 Super and that model is going to slot in at the same $700 price point (same as the original) and arrive later, in July 23. Nvidia has teased it’ll have 15.5 Gbps GDDR6 memory and it will be faster than the Titan Xp. We don’t expect it to reach 2080 Ti levels of performance but it should be a nice boost overall nonetheless, again, for the same price.
For testing the RTX 2070 Super and RTX 2060 Super we’ve used a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3400 memory. The latest drivers available at the time of testing have been used and all the data was gathered fresh for this review. We have 12 games to look at before the usual performance breakdowns and cost per frame data. Let’s get into the results.
Benchmarks
First up we have Battlefield V and here we see the 2070 Super bridging the gap between the 2070 and 2080, not a massive performance boost but not bad either. The Radeon VII is still 18% faster in this title, but it does cost at least 36% more, I suspect the 2070 Super is going to cause more pain for AMD’s current flagship GPU.
Meanwhile the RTX 2060 Super looks… adequate. It was 9% faster than the RTX 2060 in this title and while that had it nipping at the 2070’s heals and ahead of Vega 56, that’s not exactly an exciting result given it costs 14% more, but I guess there is some utility in having that extra VRAM.
This time when testing with Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege the RTX 2070 Super is closer to the 2080 than it is the 2070 and it also comfortably beat the older GTX 1080 Ti, so a very solid result here. We should also note that it comfortably beat AMD’s Radeon VII, too.
The 2060 Super was 16% slower than the 2070 Super with an average of 111 fps and this placed it a little behind the standard 2070. Another instance of a good but not particularly impressive result given the increase in price.
Moving on we have Metro Exodus, here the 2070 Super was nipping at the heels of the Radeon VII, falling short by just a few frames per second. This also meant it was much closer to the RTX 2080 than it was the 2070. Then we see the 2060 Super outpacing the standard 2060 by a 10% margin to deliver 2070-like performance.
Testing with Resident Evil 2 has the RTX 2070 Super right on the Radeon VII’s tail again and sitting right between the 2070 and 2080. The 2060 Super is a smidgen slower than the 2070, but faster than Vega 64, so another 10% performance boost over the standard 2060.
The 2060 Super is a little more impressive in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, beating the 2060 by a 13% margin and this made it quite a bit faster than Vega 64. Meanwhile the 2070 Super matched the GTX 1080 Ti and was just a few frames slower than the RTX 2080, so a very solid result there.
Fortnite isn’t a great title for AMD. The RTX 2060 Super is just 5 fps down on the much more expensive Radeon VII. The 2070 Super was quite a bit slower than the RTX 2080, but it had no trouble brushing the Radeon VII aside, beating it by an 11% margin.
The Division 2 results look pretty typical given what we’ve seen so far. The 2060 Super is 10% faster than the standard model and the 2070 Super is 14% faster than the standard model. This made the 2070 Super faster than Vega 64 while the 2070 Super was faster than the Radeon VII.
The Radeon GPUs fair much better in DiRT Rally 2 and here the 2060 Super is only able to match Vega 64 and was just 5% faster than Vega 56 which is now selling for around $300. The 2070 Super was just 7% slower than the Radeon VII, so it fares better in this comparison.
Here we have another racing simulator in Forza Horizon 4 and coincidentally this is another great title for AMD. The Radeon VII streaks ahead of the 2070 Super, making Nvidia’s new $500 offering 17% slower. The 2060 Super is also done in by Vega 56, losing by a 10% margin.
Moving on to some Far Cry New Dawn testing and here we see the 2060 Super right behind the 2070 while the 2070 Super is right behind the 2080. This means the 2060 Super was able to match Vega 64 but the 2070 Super was 8% slower than the Radeon VII.
In World War Z the RTX 2060 Super couldn’t keep pace with Vega 56, while the Radeon VII was significantly faster than the 2070 Super. Still relative to Nvidia’s own product stack these new Super versions performed quite well.
Finally we have Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey… here the 2060 Super was 11% faster than the standard 2060 which is typical based on what we’ve seen so far. Meanwhile the 2070 Super was 10% faster than the standard 2070 and this put it right on the tail of the 2080 and 1080 Ti. So that’s going to do it for the gaming benchmarks, let’s move on to check out power consumption.
Power Consumption
Looking at GPU consumption first we see that the RTX 2060 Super is very efficient, consuming only 5% more power than the standard 2060 and just 2% or 4 watts more than the Radeon RX 590.
The RTX 2070 Super jumped up to 198 watts and that made it 11% more power hungry than the 2060 Super. Still it was considerably more fuel efficient than the Radeon competition, consuming 20% less power than the Radeon VII.
However once we factor in the entire system draw those margins are reduced substantially. Now the 2070 Super consumes just 10% less power than the Radeon VII. There are some interesting changes here when measuring power draw from the wall. Vega 64 jumps well ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, in the GPU test it consumed slightly less power.
The reason for this change is that we’re now including the power draw of the graphics card as well as other components such as the CPU, which has to work harder when paired with certain GPUs, typically the more powerful models. Anyway, the Super variants slot in exactly where you’d expect them to in terms of power usage.
Overclocking
Moving on into operating frequencies, temperatures, fan speeds and a little overclocking. Out of the box the RTX 2060 Super Founders Edition ran at 70C with a fan speed of just 1650 RPM, so it was virtually silent. The GPU maintained an average operating frequency of 1815 MHz after an hour-long loop of the F1 2018 benchmark.
Overclocked our sample was able to sustain 2010 MHz after the hour long test and this saw the operating temperature increase to 75C with a fan speed of 1900 RPM, so a pretty typical 11% overclock for a Turing based GPU.
Moving on to the 2070 Super and we see out of the box the Founders Edition model peaked at just 68 degrees with a fan speed of 1600 RPM, and this allowed it to maintain an operating frequency of 1890 MHz.
Overclocked our sample maintained an operating frequency of 1980 MHz. During the first few minutes of the test it was running at over 2 GHz but after about 5 minutes began throttling down and by the end of the hour sustained 1980 MHz which is a mere 5% overclock. The card was only running at 71C with a fan speed of 1700 RPM, so it was incredibly quiet.
Performance Summary
With all that performance data behind us, let’s make full sense of it. For that we have a few performance breakdown charts, head to head comparisons, and then we’ll check out our cost per frame graph.
RTX 2060 Super vs. RTX 2070
As you can now guess, the RTX 2060 Super is only slightly slower than the original GeForce RTX 2070. For the most part ~4% slower with the only game where performance was a match being Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
RTX 2060 Super vs. RTX 2060
When compared to the standard 2060 the new super duper version was 9% faster on average, though we are comparing it to MSI’s Gaming Z version. Nvidia suggests the Super model should be 15% faster to a regular clocked version, though either way it’s not an overly impressive boost given you also have to pay 14% more for it.
RTX 2060 Super vs. Radeon Vega 56
A less favorable scenario for the new 2060 Super is seen when compared to AMD’s Vega 56 which can be had for less than $300 now. Surely that GPU is on the way out, but at least in the short term it delivers good value.
RTX 2070 Super vs. RTX 2080
Moving on to the 2070 Super, on average it was a mere 7% slower than the much more expensive RTX 2080, effectively eliminating that part as the 2070 Super is almost 30% cheaper. At least relative to existing RTX parts the 2070 Super does look like a good deal.
RTX 2070 Super vs. RTX 2070
On average you’re getting 12% more performance for the same price, it’s not an amazing deal but it revives the RTX 2070 as a true contender.
RTX 2070 Super vs. Radeon VII
The 2070 Super is just 4% slower on average than the 7nm Radeon. Considering it will set you back far less (26% savings) the 2070 Super effectively kills the Radeon VII as it was never more than 17% slower. Without a price cut the Radeon VII can be declared dead at this point.
Cost per Frame and Closing Remarks
Running a true cost per frame analysis can be a little tricky at launch since cards can be more expensive initially until things settle, and full discounts on older models are not realized until later as well. For that reason we’re running an MSRP comparison before we look at the current asking prices. Don’t focus on this data too much as it can be misleading, but we wanted to compare MSRPs first as it shows where we came from with the Pascal generation.
Here we see the 2060 Super costs $4.59 per frame and that makes the GTX 1070 24% more costly, which sounds good for Turing, but remember the GTX 1070 is a 3 year old product. While that is progress, it’s not a lot of progress. We should note that the 2060 Super is 30% faster than the GTX 1070, but it’s also 5% more expensive.
The 2070 Super on the other hand comes out at a cost of $4.90 per frame, so it’s 16% faster than the 2060 Super but only costs 7% more per frame, making it the better value option. This also means the GTX 1080 Ti cost 33% more per frame, so not a bad result for the 2070 Super comparing it to a now 2 year old product.
Now let’s compare the MSRP of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super to the current market prices of competing products. For this we’ve removed the end of production Pascal parts as new models are overpriced.
Here we see that the 2060 Super remains a worse value than the 2060 since you can buy some models for a slight discount at $330. Worse still, you can get Vega 56 for just $270 right now and that makes the 2060 Super 35% more costly per frame. Having said that, keep in mind those Vega 56 deals aren’t available in all regions.
Thankfully the 2070 Super is better value than the 2070. An 8% discount per frame is not exactly a cause for celebration but it does manage to one-punch knock out the Radeon VII and RTX 2080 graphics cards, so there’s that.
Wrap Up
In case it isn’t obvious, this is Nvidia’s attempt to steal AMD’s thunder as they launch Navi next week. In our opinion they could have given us a lot more, but perhaps they don’t need to.
We are obliged to ignore AMD’s Navi from the equation as we’re under NDA with cards sitting on the test bench right now… so ignoring Navi, it’s fair to say this ~12-month refresh from Nvidia is somewhat underwhelming, but maybe we won’t really know how pricing plays out until GPUs from both camps are fighting it out in the street in the weeks to come.
The RTX 2070 Super is good, it kills off the Radeon VII at its current price and does the same to the RTX 2080. So you’re almost getting $700 performance for $500, almost. There’s also no better deal to be had at this price point and that’s why we need AMD to step it up a notch, or ten.
We’re definitely more excited about the RTX 2070 Super’s prospects than the 2060 Super. Price to performance the 2060 Super is technically better value, but you expect that with lower end parts. The new 2060 Super is more costly than the original for a small boost in performance, though you do get that extra 2GB of VRAM.
The Founders Edition cards we tested ran cool and very quiet, the build quality is excellent and they look nice. But perhaps most exciting of all, this time around you don’t have to pay a premium for the FE models, you can get them at the base MSRP making them worthy of our recommendation.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon, Google Express
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon, Google Express
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon, Google Express
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon, Google Express
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600X on Amazon, Google Express
NVIDIA RTX 2060 Super & 2070 Super Review: Killing Radeon VII | GamersNexus
NVIDIA RTX 2060 Super & 2070 Super Specs
GamersNexus. net
|
RTX 2070 Super
|
RTX 2070
|
RTX 2060 Super
|
RTX 2060
|
GPU Die
|
TU104-410
|
TU106-400
|
TU106-410
|
TU106-200
|
Process Node
|
12nm FinFET
|
12nm FinFET
|
12nm FinFET
|
12nm FinFET
|
Transistor Count
|
13.6B
|
10.8B
|
10.8B
|
10.8B
|
Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC)
|
«5 or 6»
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Streaming Multiprocessors
|
40
|
36
|
34
|
30
|
Texture Processing Clusters (TPC)
|
20
|
18
|
17
|
15 (?)
|
FP32 Units («CUDA Cores»)
|
2560
|
2304
|
2176
|
1920
|
Tensor Cores
|
320
|
288
|
272
|
240
|
RT Cores
|
40
|
36
|
34
|
30
|
Texture Units
|
160
|
144
|
136
|
120
|
ROPs
|
64
|
64
|
64
|
48
|
Base/Boost
|
1605/1770MHz
|
1410/1620MHz
|
1470/1650MHz
|
1365/1680MHz
|
Memory Clock
|
7000MHz
|
7000MHz
|
7000MHz
|
7000MHz
|
Memory Data Rate
|
14Gbps
|
14Gbps
|
14Gbps
|
14Gbps
|
L2 Cache
|
4MB
|
4MB
|
4MB
|
3MB
|
VRAM
|
8GB GDDR6
|
8GB GDDR6
|
8GB GDDR6
|
6GB GDDR6
|
Memory Interface
|
256-bit
|
256-bit
|
256-bit
|
192-bit
|
Memory Bandwidth
|
448GB/s
|
448GB/s
|
448GB/s
|
336GB/s
|
Texture Filter Rate
|
283. 2GT/s
|
233.3GT/s
|
246.2GT/s
|
201.6GT/s
|
Advertised TDP
|
215W
|
175W
|
175W
|
160W
|
MSRP
|
$500
|
$500
|
$400
|
$350
|
For a very quick explanation of what’s happening, NVIDIA has binned-out its chips to help with cost management of the relatively large Turing dies. The RTX 2070 will now run 5 or 6 GPCs by spec, varying from die-to-die. The fact that it’s “5 or 6” tells us that this is a matter of binning based on defects. As with all silicon manufacturing, some percentage of silicon will be defective. NVIDIA is taking TU104 GPUs that may have otherwise failed validation for an RTX 2080 and is instead turning them into 2070 Supers, which means that more chips will pass validation for this product SKU than might have for a 2080. The 2080 has 46 streaming multiprocessors, or functional cores, each of which has its own hardware within, like FP32 and INT units. The 2070 Super has 40 SMs, so cutting 6 but boosting the clock speeds from 1710MHz boost to 1770MHz boost means that performance should be close in most comparisons, as you’ll see in our benchmarks today. That “5 or 6” number means that the functional SMs will move around the die based upon what passed in validation, so this isn’t going to be some artificial limit that NVIDIA set, it’s actually based on yields for the dies. If it were artificially locked, they’d all be set 5 or 6 GPCs, not either 5 or 6 per card. This is an optimization in manufacturing process that allows NVIDIA to better min-max its price-to-performance on Super versus the base models. Clocks do the rest.
UPDATE: NVIDIA has made a last-minute change (literally made within hours of the review going up). While some of the 2070 Supers will have «5 or 6» GPCs, the company decided to only fuse them off to 6 GPCs going forward, so that «5» number should be pretty rare to encounter after the initial batch, if ever.
Opening our card up revealed that these were assembled on May 31, so when considering shipping timelines, holidays, and Computex, these haven’t been in existence for very long. The board design is the same, so the RTX 2070 Super card uses the same PCB layout as the RTX 2080, which means that existing water blocks will fit, albeit with the wrong name plate. More on this in our upcoming tear-down video.
Let’s get into the testing. We have all new testing today.
Test Methodology
We have overhauled the host test bench and had updated with new games. Our games selection is a careful one: Time is finite, and having analyzed our previous testing methodologies, we identified shortcomings where we were ultimately wasting time by testing too many games that didn’t provide meaningfully different data from our other tested titles. In order to better optimize our time available and test “smarter” (rather than “more,” which was one of our previous goals), we have selected games based upon the following criteria:
- Game Engine: Most games run on the same group of popular engines. By choosing one game from each major engine (e.g. Unreal Engine), we can ensure that we are representing a wide sweep of games that just use the built-in engine-level optimizations
- API: We have chosen a select group of DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 API integrations, as these are the most prevalent at this time. We will include more Vulkan API testing as more games ship with Vulkan
- Popularity: Is it something people actually play?
- Longevity: Regardless of popularity, how long can we reasonably expect that a game will go without updates? Updating games can hurt comparative data from past tests, which impacts our ability to cross-compare new data and old, as old data may no longer be comparable post-patch
Game graphics settings are defined in their respective charts.
We are also testing most games at all three popular resolutions – at least, we are for the high-end. This includes 4K, 1440p, and 1080p, which allows us to determine GPU scalability across multiple monitor types. More importantly, this allows us to start pinpointing the reason for performance uplift, rather than just saying there is performance uplift. If we know that performance boosts harder at 4K than 1080p, we might be able to call this indicative of a ROPs advantage, for instance. Understanding why performance behaves the way it does is critical for future expansion of our own knowledge, and thus prepares our content for smarter analysis in the future.
For the test bench proper, we are now using the following components:
GPU Test Bench (Sponsored by Corsair)
Component
|
Courtesy of
|
|
CPU
|
Intel i7-8086K 5.0GHz
|
GamersNexus
|
GPU
|
This is what we’re testing!
|
Often the company that makes the card, but sometimes us (see article)
|
Motherboard
|
ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero
|
ASUS
|
RAM
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB 3200MHz
|
Corsair
|
PSU
|
Corsair AX1600i
|
Corsair
|
Cooler
|
NZXT Kraken X62
|
NZXT
|
SSD
|
Plextor 256-M7VC
|
GamersNexus
|
All memory timings are completely controlled for our new GPU testing, which has significantly tightened our error margins. Windows is version 1903. Note that some games, like GTA V and Hitman 2, have been manually tuned outside of a simple preset to ensure we have a proper benchmark. GTA V uses 2x MSAA in our testing, as it runs into engine frame limits at 187.5FPS and triggers engine-level bugs. Hitman 2 has crowd simulation and sound simulation settings that we tune back to the 4-core setting, as running higher than that creates a CPU bottleneck (and more of a CPU benchmark, as a result).
NVIDIA RTX Super Frequency Scaling
We’ll start with frequency plots so that we can better illustrate NVIDIA’s changes. Most of the changes are lower-level activations on SMs and parts of GPCs, but some of it is frequency tuning. This first chart shows frequency over a 30-minute 3DMark burn-in for the RTX 2070 Super. The Super has a nearly perfectly flat line, which is ideal. We don’t see lines like this typically unless it’s a good partner cooler; typically, the line will fluctuate, kind of like the 2070 Black line on this chart, because of bouncing off of power, thermal, or voltage limits. The 2070 Super is nearly perfectly flat and averages at 1890MHz. The fall-off at the beginning is a result from temperature ramp from under 40 degrees to about 70 degrees Celsius, and Boost behavior means we see fall-off as this ramps. The 2070 XC Ultra partner model still has a higher frequency, but won’t perform as well as the 2070 Super due to hardware-level differences.
As for the 2060 Super’s frequency, that trends lower than the 2060 Founders Edition, but occasionally spikes above it. The additional hardware enabled on the chip pushes a higher thermal density and causes spikier frequency behavior under the smaller cooler, although the overall frequency is still very stable. We see it averaging at about 1845MHz versus the 1875MHz of the 2060 FE. Fan RPM is still the same as the 2070 Super at 3700RPM and hits the same 1700RPM range under an auto load due to thermal targets. More on this later. Let’s get into games next.
Sniper Elite 4 – NVIDIA RTX 2060 Super & 2070 Super Benchmarks
Sniper Elite 4 remains one of our most-used games as a benchmark, always because of its excellent reliability and good DirectX 12 and asynchronous compute implementations. Both teach us about how graphics architectures handle modern games. We’ll get to the other Dx12 and Vulkan games freshly added after this.
For Sniper Elite 4 testing, used at 4K to produce a bit of a synthetic load for better review usability, we found the RTX 2060 Super card performs at 68FPS AVG, with lows well-spaced at 59FPS 1% and 54FPS 0.1%. This is more a testament to the game, at this point. The 2060 non-Super FE card runs the same workload at 57FPS AVG, allowing the Super card a massive gain of 20%. Both cards were freshly retested on the newest drivers. This jump is from the gains in compute performance from unlocked hardware on the 2060 Super and is nothing to do with the memory.
The RTX 2070 Super ends up at 79FPS AVG, putting it about on par within an RTX 2080. The 2080 FE, for reference, was at about 84FPS, although we’ve placed the cheaper Gigabyte model as we think it’s a more realistic representation of what people actually buy. They’re about the same and within error. The Super and 2080 differences exit error, but are perceptually the same. This allows Radeon VII a lead of about 6.5% over the 2070 Super, although the Super is priced at $500 and Radeon VII still runs at about $680 on a good day. At this point, it’s difficult to impossible to justify Radeon VII for gaming uses. If you’re curious about its uses in workstation applications where the 16GB framebuffer might get utilized, we have a separate GPU workstation video you can check out for that. In gaming, though, Radeon VII simply looks bad when compared to the new 2070 Super, which also is positioned about 20% ahead of the original EVGA RTX 2070 Black, which was the cheaper non-A model of the 2070 – the one that shipped actually at MSRP, as opposed to the A-binned ones with a higher clock. The RTX 2060 Super outpaces the RTX 2070 Black card in this test. For reference, we included the 2070 XC Ultra more expensive A-bin model, which ranks at 71FPS AVG and equals an overclocked 2060 Super. We won’t include this data going forward as we’re more interested in comparing at actual MSRP, but you can find it in our older GPU reviews.
Strange Brigade – RTX 2060 & 2070 vs. 2060 Super & 2070 Super
Our next test is new. The game is Strange Brigade, made by the same people who made Sniper. This game was chosen because it leverages both Vulkan and DirectX 12, and so we tested with both APIs. We’ll first look at performance with the Vulkan API, an important and underrepresented API in the market, and we’ll then do a performance scaling comparison against DirectX 12.
With Vulkan and tested at 1440p/Ultra, the RTX 2060 Super places at 117FPS AVG, with lows again well-timed. This positions it as ahead of the overclocked and undervolted Vega 56 card’s 110FPS AVG, but also ahead of the 2060 FE’s 101FPS AVG. The latter is surpassed by 16%. The 2060 Super therefore ends up near the non-A SKU RTX 2070 MSRP model, priced at about $480 these days. Overclocking Super puts it just below an overclocked RTX 2070, which still performs well when manually boosted, despite the non-A die. The 2060 Super and 2070 are functionally equal in this testing, especially with the OC. Finally, NVIDIA starts to look like it got the message on price: We beat NVIDIA over the head with its own 1080 Ti when the RTX cards launched, primarily pointing toward the generational price creep for equivalent performance. Now, with the 2070 Super stock card slightly better than the 1080 Ti, and with a price of $500 to the 1080 Ti’s $700 to $800 range, it’s finally starting to look better.
As for an overclock on the 2070 Super, it ends up past the stock RTX 2080 and about equal with an overclocked Radeon VII, although Radeon VII’s 0.1% lows are marginally better; note though that 0.1% low error margins are wider than averages. NVIDIA’s compute improvements for Turing chip away at an advantage AMD previously had, chewing Radeon VII’s lead over the 2070 Super down to just 4%. Radeon VII isn’t even meant to compete with a $500 2070 refresh, it’s meant to compete with the 2080. Things aren’t looking good for gaming use cases for the card.
At 4K with Vulkan, AMD architecture scales a bit better and puts the R7 ahead of the 2070 Super by 16%. This isn’t to do with memory capacity, but instead with memory bandwidth and GCN tripping over itself at higher CU counts with workloads that don’t match the architecture’s capabilities properly. As for the stars of the show today, the 2060 Super ends up at 67FPS AVG, leading the 2060 FE’s 55FPS AVG by 20%. The 2070 Super roughly matches the 2080, allowing the 2080 a slight lead.
Moving on from these tests and into a scaling comparison, we get something really interesting and unique to our new test methods. Contrary to our expectations, AMD actually does better with DirectX 12 in this game, as does Pascal. It appears the older architectures prefer Strange Brigade’s Dx12 implementation. We saw roughly 4% higher performance with Radeon VII on Dx12, resulting in a jump from 141FPS to about 147FPS AVG. The NVIDIA Turing cards do better on Vulkan, sometimes significantly so. We see a bigger jaunt with the low-ish end RTX 2060 and 2070 Black than others, but even the 2080 Ti saw a 5% jump.
GTA V – Radeon VII vs. RTX 2070 Super
We have more Dx12 tests to get through, but it’d be good to first visit the third major graphics API: GTA V gives us a long-standing look at a traditionally built Dx11 game and features the many abstraction layers that once inhibited hardware.
At 1080p, 2060 Super ends up at 128FPS AVG, positioned roughly tied with the overclocked 2060 FE at 127FPS AVG. The lead over the stock 2060 FE’s 119FPS AVG is about 7.5%. The 2070 Super measures at 138FPS AVG, putting it slightly ahead of Radeon VII and about 4.6% ahead of the 2070 Black. Between this result and the GTA V results, we see closer performance between the Super and non-Super cards. This is because GTA V is more frequency intensive, so the 2060 Super and 2070 Super are primarily deriving gains from the frequency rather than from the additional SMs. Overclocking the 2070 Super puts it at about 2080 levels of performance, further reinforcing that frequency matters more than the additional SMs in this title. AMD has historically done poorly in GTA V, demonstrated by Vega 56’s lackluster performance and near-equivalence with a GTX 1070.
1440p shows more of the same: An overclocked 2070 Super is roughly equivalent to a 2080 stock card, a 2070 Super stock card lands between Radeon VII stock and overclocked results, and an overclocked 2060 Super is roughly equivalent to Radeon VII stock while outperforming the non-A SKU 2070 Black.
Just quickly, at 4K, the RTX 2080 holds a lead of about 9% over the 2070 Super when stock, but overclocking ties them up; obviously, you could then overclock the 2080 to keep that distance. The 2060 Super ends up at 51FPS AVG, which roughly ties it with the previous RTX 2070 Black card.
F1 2018 – NVIDIA Super Benchmarks
We’ll look at another DirectX 11 game next, then back to Dx12.
F1 2018 at 1080p positions the 2070 Super at 159FPS AVG, which is between the Radeon VII and 1080 Ti FTW3. Overclocking Super puts it just below the RTX 2080, with the RTX 2080 Ti useful primarily to illustrate that we aren’t hitting a CPU bottleneck with the 2070 Super and 2080. The 2060 Super ties with the 2070 Black, and the 2060 FE overclocked is just below the 2060 Super. Overall, the 2070 Super stock carries a lead of 16% over the 2070 Black, with the 2060 Super stock carrying a lead of 13% over the stock 2060 FE at 120FPS AVG.
At 1440p, the stack remains largely the same: AMD GCN architecture has always posted stronger low performance in this game than the others, and that’s illustrated again with Radeon VII’s frametime consistency. By averages, the 2070 Super is functionally tied with Radeon VII, but Radeon VII’s frametimes are more consistent. That said, it’s also about $180 more expensive. The 2080 holds a lead of 7.6% over the 2070 Super, which is a gap closed when overclocking the 2070 Super. The 2060 Super is roughly tied with the 2070 Black.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmarks – RTX 2060 Super vs. RTX 2060, 2070 Super
Shadow of the Tomb Raider with Dx12 puts the RTX 2070 Super at 126FPS AVG with very consistent frametime performance, positioned ahead of Radeon VII in both averages and lows and nearing the 1080 Ti. The RTX 2080 still manages to hold a lead of 8% over the 2070 Super card. The 2060 Super ties with the 2070 Black and 2060 FE overclocked cards, but holds a lead of 10% over the stock 2060 FE.
At 1440p, the scaling remains similar, so we won’t repeat all of that. More importantly, the 2060 Super is well-equipped to play this game at 1440p with High settings, running at 73FPS AVG and again tying the non-A SKU 2070. The 2060 FE can also manage, but the Super card holds a lead of 11%, which may justify the $50 price tag.
We also decided to check 4K. At 4K, the 2070 Super holds at 50FPS, with an overclock allowing it to push 55FPS AVG. This could be made do-able at 60FPS with some settings reductions, like by dropping a few GPU-intensive settings to medium while leaving GPU memory-intensive settings, like texture resolution, at higher qualities. The 2060 Super’s 41FPS AVG and 44FPS OC mostly relegate it to 1440p and below for Tomb Raider.
Hitman 2 Benchmarks – DirectX 12 vs.
DirectX 11
Hitman 2 is up next. For this one, we’re testing both DirectX 12 and DirectX 11 to illustrate how each architecture scales APIs, similar to Strange Brigade. Note that we turn down the CPU binding settings (like crowd simulation and audio simulation), as running them maxed will result in a hard CPU bottleneck and therefore less usefulness for GPU testing.
First, at 1080p and with Dx12, the RTX 2070 Super stock card ends up at 124FPS AVG, roughly tied with AMD’s Radeon VII when overclocked. The 2070 Super additionally maintains better low performance and frametime consistency. Overclocking the 2070 Super puts it about where an RTX 2080 or 1080 Ti place when stock. The 2060 Super card roughly ties with the 2070 Black, therefore also roughly tying the Radeon VII. For reference, an overclocked 2060 Super at 113FPS manages 92% of the performance of a stock 2070 Super, meaning you could forego the latter for the former and get similar performance, though obviously overclocking the latter would create a wider gap. Note also that Hitman 2’s Dx12 implementation has some serious 0.1% low issues, which is why we originally used Dx11 in our CPU testing before commenters demanded Dx12. Well, this is why we didn’t use it. We now use both for GPU to illustrate the scaling issues.
At 1440p, the RTX 2070 Super manages 91FPS AVG, the 2060 Super holds 76FPS AVG, and the 2060 FE runs at 69FPS AVG. This positions the 2070 Super as a bit better than an overclocked 2070, with an overclocked 2070 Super approaching a 2080 stock card, though not quite there.
Here’s a chart of Hitman 2 with Dx11 and the same settings to compare. Everything in this game performs better with DirectX 11, with the one exception being at the very top-end with the RTX 2080 TI’s averages, although its lows are better with DirectX 11. The stack remains similar otherwise.
To fully illustrate the frametime consistency issue, here’s a 2070 Super card plotted with Dx11 and Dx12 runs in the same test. As you can see, the Dx12 line encounters hard frametime spikes throughout the test, but has an especially hard slam to about 70ms in the middle. This is repeatable and happens in every test, sometimes worse than others. Remember, lower frametimes are better, but it’s more important for them to be more consistent. In this instance of the 2070 Super, Dx11 is both more consistent and lower on average. For all the people who complained about our Dx11 use in Hitman in our CPU tests, this is why we chose it; also, DirectX is a graphics API anyway, but we did end up switching to Dx12 in CPU reviews by popular demand.
RTX 2060 Super & 2070 Super Power Consumption
Our GPU power testing has been completely overhauled. Instead of testing based on total system power draw and taking deltas, we’re now measuring power down the PCIe slot with a custom-built interposer and power at the PCIe cables. We could also measure 3.3V down the PCIe slot, but opted to just look at 12V power for now. At most, 3.3V tends to be about 10W. PCI-SIG allows for roughly 5.5A down the 12V lines in the slot, or about 66W max, plus some overhead for 3. 3V. The total is roughly 75W down the slot. Although total system power consumption has a place, measuring only video card power for a GPU review is much more accurate and reduces our margin of error significantly. It also allows us to directly see how much power the video card takes without the noise of the system, so you can more easily figure out how much extra power you’ll need to account for.
The first set of data is from some synthetic loads, although we also have a few gaming tests. 3DMark’s TimeSpy Extreme gives us a look at a GPU-heavy scenario that is similar in some ways to game execution. The 2060 Super runs at about 164.4W max across 12V. That puts it at about 10W below TDP, and so we clamped 3.3V and found about 9W more power. This puts the 2060 Super at almost exactly NVIDIA’s advertised 175W TDP and also about 10W-15W higher than the 2060 Founders Edition. The extra 4 SMs, more populated GPU, and additional memory modules account for this change. The 2070 Super ran over TDP when running FurMark, although to be fair, that’s a power virus workload. We were about at spec with TimeSpy Extreme, running around 200-205W across 12V for the Super. The other 10W, again, comes from 3.3V. We don’t have a 2070 reference card to test, so matched against the 2070 XC by EVGA, we see power as higher than the RTX 2070 XC card. The 2070 XC lists a TDP of 175W, but this is based upon the reference spec and doesn’t account for EVGA’s changes to the VBIOS and VF tables. The 2070 Super is closer to a 2080 FE in power consumption, which runs about 220-235W. That makes sense, seeing as the 2070 Super uses the same GPU as the RTX 2080 card, just with some binning done and frequency tuning. Overclocking the 2060 Super puts it at about the same power consumption as a 2070 Super, which is something to remember for later. Overclocking the 2070 Super puts it above the RTX 2080 stock power consumption. We also noted a hard spike with FurMark in this configuration, bringing us up to 265W for about 15 seconds of the test, then oscillating down to about 240W, then back up again.
The second dataset is from a real-world gaming scenarios. The RTX 2060 Super operates at 164.4W down 12V for F1 2018 when at both 1440p and 4K, hitting a power hard power limit in VBIOS. Overclocking the 2060 Super puts it at nearing 200W with the 4K test, with the 2070 Super at about 176-200W stock. Again, the 3.3V line accounts for the rest. Overclocking the 2070 Super puts it at around 2080 levels.
RTX 2070 Super Thermals
As for how the cards behave, here’s an RTX 2070 Super with thermocouples placed on the memory and the MOSFETs, giving us a read on the hotspots of the card. Thermocouples give much more accurate measurement than thermal imaging and allow us to test a cooler’s efficiency at its job. During this FurMark burn-in, the GPU temperature measured at about 70 degrees Celsius, which is about what VBIOS tries to target. The hotspot MOSFET measured at about 55 degrees Celsius, which is actually very good for a power component that can take at or beyond 125 degrees. The hotspot memory module we selected measured at around 80 degrees Celsius. This is on the warm side, especially considering that a hot case would push this toward 90 degrees, but it is still acceptable. We’d like to see improvement specifically to NVIDIA’s memory cooling, as using these cards in a closed-off case will easily push it toward the maximum acceptable temperature of about 95 degrees for GDDR6.
As for fan speed at these temperatures, the fans hit around 1700RPM and held there, producing a noise level around roughly 38dBA and 39dBA.
RTX 2060 Super & 2070 Super Founders Edition Noise Levels
Because the 2060 Super and 2070 Super share the same fans and a similar fan curve, the only point that really matters is the RPM of the fans. The RPM will change based on your ambient and case ambient temperature, as VBIOS tries to follow a thermal target and adjust fans accordingly. In an ambient environment of about 22 degrees Celsius, we find that the fans tend to hover at around 1500RPM when idle, which is the minimum fan speed for FE coolers, and that they boost to about 1700RPM in a 22-degree environment to maintain a target of roughly 70C on the cards. Most people will likely operate closer to 30 degrees with a warm case, but the end result is that you can expect auto fan speeds to place the cards around 37-39dBA. This fan curve ramps noise levels a little more aggressively than others as it reaches higher RPMs.
Conclusion
The Super video card launch packs more punch for a refresh than we would typically expect, but it also moves the stack around in interesting ways. The 2060 Super has relatively large gains in performance that put it close to the original RTX 2070 in most instances and the 2070 Super is very nearly a 2080, although not quite. It has moved the 2070 SKU up to a TU-104 die from TU-106, though, and that’s significant.
At this point, we loop back to that same scenario: By pushing the Super cards and shuffling the price stack, even if it were purely competitive, NVIDIA has demonstrated that it has heard concerns. And if it hasn’t heard them, it very minimally has seen AMD’s Navi plans, and one of those two things makes for new products with comparatively lower prices when matched versus the phased-out predecessors.
Whichever path it was, the point is that NVIDIA ends up looking good for bringing higher-performing models down to lower prices, but will inevitably sour recent RTX buyers with a refresh. At some level, buyer’s remorse is silly – new stuff comes out all the time in this industry, and so being mad about a purchase when something new launches just doesn’t make much sense. That said, this is among the shortest refresh windows we’ve ever seen, so that’ll make some early buyers of RTX feel like the beta testers we always said they would be.
Either way, looking at the product in a vacuum of just performance. RTX Super is a compelling launch. It’d have been even better if NVIDIA started here, with RTX-ready games and better prices, but they’re here now. We’re primarily looking at rasterization performance because the RTX story has been told to death, and at this point, it’s just a matter of better implementation that’s more interesting and more widespread. Just for rasterization, performance is competitive against NVIDIA’s own cards, which does spell a difficult launch ahead for AMD’s Navi GPUs. We’ll have to come back to check on those.
Editorial, Testing: Steve Burke
Video: Josh Svoboda, Andrew Coleman
Nvidia RTX 2060 Super and RTX 2070 Super Review: RTX Just Got Good
Nvidia’s RTX Super cards are still expensive, but they’re totally worth it
By
Luke Larsen
Dan Baker/Digital Trends
Nvidia knows what it’s doing. It knows exactly what it’s doing.
The RTX 20-series cards launched less than a year ago, but today, we have three new RTX cards to replace them. That seems a bit strange, as RTX was the debut of a new graphics architecture and a new direction for real-time ray tracing. I’d normally expect new flagship cards to remain in that position for more than a year.
Nvidia’s new release is well timed, however. AMD is gearing up to launch its own new line of graphics cards, the RX 5700 and 5700 XT. Though we don’t know exactly how those will perform, one thing’s for sure. Team Green isn’t about to let AMD have its moment in the spotlight.
What’s so super about RTX Super?
The RTX 2060 Super and 2070 Super look nearly identical to the non-Super versions. Build quality is still off the charts with an aluminum shroud and dual-fan cooling. The only notable difference is a new reflective, almost glass-like surface between the two fans atop the card. It’s an interesting choice, though I have to admit I favor the simpler aesthetic of the standard RTX series.
Dan Baker/Digital Trends
As the green “Super” logo indicates, there’s something special going on with both these new GPUs. Essentially, Nvidia is moving each GPU up in its product stack. The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2080, and the RTX 2060 Super replaces the RTX 2070. The RT 2080 Super is coming later this month, but Nvidia claims it sits right between the RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti.
Why is all this rearranging important? Well, it’s all a cost savings to you. Graphics cards have grown considerably in price over the past few years, and sometimes the real-life performance gain on games you play isn’t as great as you’d hope. These Super cards change that by delivering a better value every way you can slice it. Here’s how the new lineup breaks down.
RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 2080 Super | RTX 2080 | RTX 2070 Super | RTX 2070 | RTX 2060 Super | RTX 2060 | |
GPU | TU102 | TU104 | TU104 | TU104 | TU106 | TU106 | TU106 |
CUDA cores | 4,352 | 3,072 | 2,944 | 2.560 | 2,304 | 2,176 | 1,920 |
Tensor cores | 544 | 384 | 368 | 320 | 288 | 272 | 240 |
RT Cores | 68 | 48 | 46 | 40 | 36 | 34 | 30 |
Base clock | 1,350MHz | 1,650MHz | 1,515MHz | 1,605MHz | 1,410MHz | 1,470MHz | 1,365Mhz |
Boost clock | 1,545MHz | 1,815MHz | 1,710Mhz | 1,770MHz | 1,620MHz | 1,650MHz | 1,680MHz |
Memory | 11GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 | 6GB GDDR6 |
Memory speed | 14 Gbps | 15. 5Gbps | 14Gbps | 14Gbps | 14Gbps | 14Gbps | 14Gbps |
Bandwidth | 616 GBps | 496GBps | 448GBps | 448GBps | 448GBps | 448GBps | 336GBps |
TDP | 250w | 250w | 215w | 215w | 175w | 175w | 160w |
CUDA cores have been boosted across both cards, by 10% for the RTX 2070 Super and 12% for the 2060 Super. The 2070 Super, though, gains a larger increase in clock speed, bumping up 12% from the standard RTX 2070. The 6% boost in clock speed to the RTX 2060 Super might not seem like much, but it also gains 2GB of GDDR6 RAM and 15 watts of power. That brings memory bandwidth up to speed with the rest of the RTX lineup. For that alone, it’s worth the $50 bump over the RTX 2060.
Compared to Nvidia’s competition, the forthcoming Radeon RX 5700 XT has 2,560 cores, exactly matching the new RTX 2070 Super. The RX 5700 has more cores than even the new RTX 2060 Super, at 2,304, and nearly identical clock speeds. Again, Nvidia knew exactly what it was after with these cards.
How fast are they?
While we can’t yet compare the new Super cards against their intended competitors, we can compare them to other rivals, such as the Radeon VII and and Vega 64. These two AMD cards represent a range of the company’s lineup in terms of price and performance. We tested all these cards in a test rig sporting a Core i7-8086K, 16GB of G.Skill DDR4 RAM, and a Samsung 950Pro M.2 SSD.
As we always do, we started with 3DMark’s Time Spy benchmark, a DX12 test that represents a large swath of the modern PC games you play today. The results weigh heavily in Nvidia’s favor.
As you can see, the RTX 2070 Super doesn’t match the RTX 2080, but it’s not far behind. We didn’t have an RTX 2070 on hand, but you can see how much ground the 2070 Super has made on the 2080. That’s impressive.
The RTX 2060 Super lands 11% behind the 2070 Super, but more importantly, it squeaks ahead of the Radeon VII. This is bad news for AMD, because Nvidia’s card is $300 less expensive.
The situation looks even worse for AMD’s older flagship, the Vega 64. The late 2017 release originally launched at $499, and squares up poorly against the cheaper RTX 2060 Super.
Benchmarks don’t tell the whole story, though. We also took the Super cards through our typical suite of test games, which include Fortnite, Battlefield V, Civilization VI, and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Again, Nvidia has come out with its all-stars and puts the ball squarely in AMD’s court.
In Fortnite at 1080p at Epic settings, The RTX 2060 Super puts the Radeon VII to shame. As in Time Spy, the $699 card is a few frames behind the more affordable RTX 2060 Super. The 2070 Super, meanwhile, spit out a speedy 172 FPS. That’s plenty for that high refresh monitor you might have. Even at 4K Epic, the 2070 Super averages over 60 FPS. That kind of 4K capability in a fast-paced game like Fortnite was previously limited to cards over $699.
Civilization VI is more CPU-heavy game than some of the others, which explains why the difference between these cards at 1080p isn’t all that noticeable. However, when you move to 1440p or 4K, you again see the raw strength of the RTX 2070 Super. The game blistered along at an average of 96 FPS in 4K Ultra, a solid 18% above the RTX 2060 Super. Though it’s priced the same as the Radeon VII, it beats by 15 FPS in 4K and by 21 FPS in 1440p. Ouch. Fortunately for AMD, the Radeon VII at least keeps up with the 2060 Super in this one.
We always test cards with Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, a game that provides a seriously demanding workload on graphics cards. At lower settings, anywhere from 1080p High to 1440p High, the RTX 2060 Super beats the Radeon VII by a few FPS. From 1440p Ultra High on up to 4K, the Radeon VII takes back that lead, but never quite enough to catch the RTX 2070 Super. In this game in particular, the 2070 Super is neck-and-neck with the 2080, which is again an impressive achievement. Though none of these cards can play Odyssey at 4K over 60 FPS, the game plays beautifully at 1080p.
Dan Baker/Digital Trends
Battlefield V is the primary outlier in our results. All the Nvidia cards lag behind in this game, and that includes the RTX 2080. The Radeon VII happily leads the pack, even beating the expensive RTX 2080 in most graphic detail settings and high resolutions. Neither of the Super cards can capture 60 FPS at 4K, which is a bit disappointing. 4K in Battlefield V isn’t ruled out entirely, you’ll need to drop graphics settings down to Medium for smoother gameplay. While 4K is a nice goal post, most people will probably stick with 1080p though, and here the 2060 Super can still land you over 100 FPS at max detail.
Despite the hiccup in Battlefield V, these two Super cards are serious rock stars, and add tremendous value to already powerful GPUs.
The larger war looms
If you’ve been holding off a purchase until you heard more about these Super cards, your patience will be rewarded. With significant performance improvements at hardly any cost increase. In many ways, they feel like the cards that should have launched a year ago. The RTX 2070 Super is still priced well beyond what the average gamer can afford, but even it makes a better case for the strength of the Turing architecture than ever before.
The Super cards win Nvidia the battle, but the real war is ahead. AMD’s RX 5000-series GPUs land just next week, and when they do, they’ll have tough competition from Nvidia. Who will win? Check back soon to find out.
Editors’ Recommendations
-
The Aorus RTX 4090 Master is the biggest GPU we’ve ever seen
-
EVGA’s feud with Nvidia gives new options to GPU makers
-
Nvidia’s DLSS 3 could make the monstrous RTX 4090 a little less power hungry
-
AMD cuts GPU prices at just the right time to pull ahead of Nvidia
-
Nvidia CEO’s response to the EVGA controversy may surprise you
0024 175W vs 215W
69°C vs 74°C
258W vs 314W
41. 5dB vs 45.5dB
228.6mm vs 266.74mm
- GPU frequency 135MHz higher?
1605MHz vs 1470MHz - 1.88 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
9.06 TFLOPS vs 7.18 TFLOPS - 7.7 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? higher number of textured pixels? more stream processors?
2560 vs 2176 - 120MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1770MHz vs 1650MHz - 2800million more transistors?
13600 million vs 10800 million - 24 more texture units (TMUs)?
160 vs 136
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 30003
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Asus Turbo GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
0004 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Super
GeForce RTX 20003
vs
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
vs
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2060 OC
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall rating
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Games
10. 0 /10
1 VOTES
Reviews not yet
performance
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
Reviews yet not
9000 /10
1 Votes
Reviews not yet
Reliability
10.0255 /10
1 Votes
020 Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1470MHz
1605MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
1650MHz
1770MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel speed
105.6 GPixel/s
113.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
7.18 TFLOPS
9.06 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.
5. texture size
224.4 GTexels/s
283.2 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1750MHz
1750MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
14000MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
448GB/s
448GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
256bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5. GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.GPU Temperature at Boot
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2. HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3.Version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
Mini DisplayPort 6.outs
Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
- 55W below TDP?
160W vs 215W - 5°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
69°C vs 74°C - 38.14mm narrower?
228.6mm vs 266.74mm
- GPU frequency 240MHz higher?
1605MHz vs 1365MHz - 2. 61 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
9.06 TFLOPS vs 6.45 TFLOPS - 32.66 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? higher number of textured pixels?
283.2 GTexels/s vs 201.6 GTexels/s - 33.33% more VRAM?
8GB vs 6GB - 112GB/s more memory bandwidth?
448GB/s vs 336GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 192bit - 640 more stream processors?
2560 vs 1920
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce 200003
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
0004 AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Laptop vs
305 Nvidia GeForce RTX
8. 8 /10
4 Votes
Reviews not yet
10.0 /10
4 VOTES
Reviews yet not
9000
4 Votes
Reviews not yet
Fan noise
/10
4 Votes
003
10.0 /10
4 Votes
Reviews not yet
Productivity
1. TECTIC FECTION GP
1365MHz
1605MHz
Graphic processor (GPU) has a higher applicant frequency.
2.turbo GPU
1680MHz
1770MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
80.64 GPixel/s
113.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
6.45 TFLOPS
9.06 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
201.6 GTexels/s
283.2 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1750MHz
1750MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
14000MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
336GB/s
448GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
192bit
256bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5. GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.GPU Temperature at Boot
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8. supports DLSS
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3.Version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
Mini DisplayPort 6.outs
Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Price match
Cancel
Which graphic cards are better?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Games
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Video card
Video card
Introduction
We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a Turing-based GeForce 20 generation graphics card released Jan 7th, 2019. It comes with 6GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has a 1x 8-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is a Turing-based GeForce 20 generation graphics card released on Jul 9th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 watts.
Specs
Graphics Card
Name
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Release Date
Jan 7th, 2019
0004 283.2 GTexel/s
FP16 (half) performance
12.90 TFLOPS (2:1)
18.12 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance
6.451 TFLOPS
9.062 TFLOPS
FP64 (double ) Performance
201. 6 GFLOPS (1:32)
283.2 GFLOPS (1:32)
Clock Speeds
Basic frequency
1365 MHZ
MHZ 9000 9000 9000 MHZ0004 12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Opengl
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
3.0
3.03
1.5
7.5000 9000 VULKAN
Board Design
Heating
160W
215W
power connectors
1x 8-PIN
1x 6-Pin + 1x 8-Pin
004 Dual-slot
Benchmarks
3DMark Graphics
3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+35%
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular program for creating 3D content. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+44%
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+39%
Games
1920×1080, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
The Witcher 3 | ||
Average | 74. 15 fps | 113.34 fps |
2560×1440, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Monster Hunter World | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
The Witcher 3 | ||
Average | 56. 00 fps | 87.52 fps |
3840×2160, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | ||
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Grand Theft Auto V | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Monster Hunter World | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
Average | 34. 25 fps | 50.41 fps |
Key differences
Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
Uses 26% less power — 160W vs 215W
Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060?
Newer — released 6 months later
Has 39% higher average FPS in games at 1080p — 113.34 FPS versus 74.15 FPS
Has 57% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 87.52 Has 57% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 87.52 versus 56.00 FPS
Has 48% higher average FPS in games at 2160p — 50.41 FPS versus 34.25 FPS GB/s
Has a 41% higher pixel fill rate — 113.3 GPixel/s vs 80.64 GPixel/s
Has a 41% higher texture fill rate — 283.2 GTexel/s vs 201.6 GTexel/s blocks +40
Has 640 more shading units
Has 80 more tensor cores
Has 10 more RT cores
Conclusion
Which is better GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers 39% better performance, consumes up to 35% more energy and holds 2 GB more memory. According to our research, GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than GeForce RTX 2060.
Is GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER good today?
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 8 GB memory and shows an average of 87.52 FPS in 10 games at 1440p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. It is 6% more powerful, uses 5% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. It is 3% more powerful, uses 7% less energy, holds the same amount of memory, and has higher average FPS in games at 1080p, 1440p, 2160p.
How does GeForce RTX 2060 perform compared to GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and other graphics cards?
Relative capacity
Total capacity
Desktop performance
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile.
VS
General Information
The general information section of the video card comparison list provides release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile . Please note that the comparison takes place across all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.
72
Position in the performance rating
33
48.00 9000
Laptop
6 January 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date0003
No data
$ 964 (2.8x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 1443
23.84 9000 Market segment
Laptop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.
1920
Conveyors
2560
1320 MHZ
Tibility of the nucleus
1140 MHZ
1680 MHZ
Acceleration
9000 MHZ
10.800 Milleion 9000) nm
Process
12 nm
160 Watt
Power Consumption (TDP)
115 Watt
201.6
Number of texels processed per second10003
220.8
1920
Converse / CUDA nuclei
2560
1620 mHz
Acceleration
1380 MHZ
10,000 115 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile graphics cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIE 3.0 X16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
229 mm
length
No data
1x 8-pin
Additional power
No data
LAPTOP Size
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile:
GDDR6
Type of memory
GDDR6
6 GB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
8 GB
192 BIT
DISTRUCTION of memory
256 BIT
14000 14000 MHZ 9000 MHZ 9000 Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory Memory 336.0 Gb/s
memory capacity
448.0 GB/S
—
Demeded memory
—
Support for ports and displays
Let’s find out the difference in ports that are equipped with NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2070 Super Mobile. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display
NO Outputs
+
Support G-Sync
+
HDMI
Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
+
VR support
+
+
Multiple monitors
+
7.5
CUDA
7.5
API support
The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2.131
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — Th200
Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Games
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Video card
Video card
Introduction
We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Turing GeForce 20 Generation Graphics Card Released Jul 9th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a Turing-based GeForce 20 generation graphics card released on Jul 9th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has a 1x 8-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.
Spec
Graphics Card
Name
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
40
34
Graphics Features
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
Cuda
7.5
7.5
VULKAN
1. 2
1.2
Board Design
Heating
215W
175W
Power Conventors
1x 6-PIN + 1x 8-PIN
1x 8-pin
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Benchmarks
3DMark Graphics
3DMark is a test tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+21%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Games
1920×1080, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2070 Super | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
The Witcher 3 | ||
Average | 113. 34 fps | 98.02 fps |
2560×1440, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
The Witcher 3 | ||
Average | 87. 52 fps | 74.96 fps |
3840×2160, Ultra
Game | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
Battlefield V | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
DOOM Eternal | ||
Far Cry 5 | ||
Hitman 3 | ||
Metro Exodus | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
Average | 50. 41 fps | 42.38 fps |
Key differences
Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?
Has 13% higher average FPS in games at 1080p — 113.34 FPS versus 98.02 FPS
Has 17% higher average FPS in games at 1440p — 87.52 FPS versus 74.96 FPS
Has 19% higher average FPS in games at 2160p — 50.41 FPS versus 42.38 FPS /s vs 105.6 GPixel/s
Has 27% higher texture fill rate — 283.2 GTexel/s vs 224.4 GTexel/s
Has more texture units +24
Has 384 more shading units
Has 48 more tensor cores
Has 6 more RT cores
Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
Uses 19% less power — 175W vs 215W
Conclusion
Which is better GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER or GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers 13% better performance, consumes up to 23% more energy and holds the same amount of memory. According to our research, the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER.
Is GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER good today?
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 8 GB memory and shows an average of 87.52 FPS in 10 games at 1440p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. It is 6% more powerful, uses 5% more energy, and holds the same amount of memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER?
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. It is 3% more powerful, uses 7% less energy, holds the same amount of memory, and has higher average FPS in games at 1080p, 1440p, 2160p.
How does GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER perform compared to GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and other graphics cards?
Relative capacity
Total capacity
Bench performance
Which is better Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2060 Super Gaming OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Super Ventus OC
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Super Ventus OC vs Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2060 Super Gaming OC Highlights
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 OC
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2060 Super Gaming OC
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1605MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
1470MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326. 6 MHz
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
FLOPS
A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
8.69TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
6.86TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1785MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
1650MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375. 8 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
285.6 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
224.4 GTexels/s
448GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
448GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
14000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984. 5 MHz
14000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
6
Average: 4.5
6
Average: 4.5
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
215W
Average: 140.4W
160W
Average: 140.4W
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
12 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
12 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
13600 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
10800 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Mean: 2. 8
3
Mean: 2.8
Width
257mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
280.35mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
Height
127mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
116.45mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games for enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12
max 12. 2
Average: 11.1
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4
Shader model version
6. 5
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.5
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
version VULKAN
1.2
1.2
version CUDA
7.5
7.5
HDMI Output has exit the HDMI exit. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Full display
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Average: 2
2
max 2.1
Average: 2
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2
3
Average: 2
Number of HDMI connectors
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
one
Average: 1. 1
one
Average: 1.1
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
17782
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
16132
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
126109
max 1
Average: 80042.3
117403
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21015
max 38276
Average: 12463
19401
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
23958
max 49575
Average: 11859. 1
21337
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
32953
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
28922
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance score
67668
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
65142
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
4
max 533357
Average: 372425. 7
475718
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks
71
max 202
Average: 62.4
60
max 202
Average: 62.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
69
max 202
Average: 64
58
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Siemens NX
12
max 212
Average: 14
9
max 212
Average: 14
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
124
max 232
Average: 121. 3
113
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 score — Showcase
125
max 175
Average: 108.4
114
max 175
Average: 108.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical
41
max 107
Average: 39.6
max 107
Average: 39.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
41
max 107
Average: 39
37
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya
147
max 177
Average: 129. 8
150
max 177
Average: 129.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
156
max 180
Average: 132.8
154
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy score
12
max 25
Average: 9.7
eleven
max 25
Average: 9.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
12
max 21
Average: 10. 7
ten
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Creo
49
max 153
Average: 49.5
44
max 153
Average: 49.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
fifty
max 153
Average: 52.5
45
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
97
max 189
Average: 91.