AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 3 3200G: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
We compared two 4-core desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 2400G against the 3.6 GHz Ryzen 3 3200G. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G
44
Ryzen 3 3200G
43
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 5 2400G
19
Ryzen 3 3200G
15
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 5 2400G
45
Ryzen 3 3200G
56
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 5 2400G
39
Ryzen 3 3200G
37
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 3200G and 2400G
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Newer — released 1-year and 8-months later
- More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
- 3% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4 GHz vs 3.
9 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+8%
1016
Ryzen 3 3200G
937
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+43%
4754
Ryzen 3 3200G
3314
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
2145
Ryzen 3 3200G
+2%
2196
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+22%
8729
Ryzen 3 3200G
7132
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+2%
911
Ryzen 3 3200G
892
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 5 2400G
+16%
3540
Ryzen 3 3200G
3056
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 3200G
General
| Vendor | AMD | AMD |
| Released | February 12, 2018 | September 30, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Zen (Raven Ridge) | Zen+ (Picasso) |
| Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 11 | Radeon Vega 8 |
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 3. 6 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Total Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Total Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36x | 36x |
| L1 Cache | 128K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 4MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistors | 4. 9 billions |
4.9 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| TDP | 65 W | 45-65 W (configurable) |
| Peak temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | Radeon Vega 8 |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Shading Units | 704 | 512 |
| TMUs | 44 | 32 |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 11 | 8 |
| TGP | 65 W | 65 W |
Max. Resolution |
3840×2160 — 60 Hz | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Ryzen 5 2400G
1.746 TFLOPS
Ryzen 3 3200G
1.13 TFLOPS
Memory Support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| Official site | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G official page | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 8 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 5 2400G
160 (70.
8%)
Ryzen 3 3200G
66 (29.2%)
Total votes: 226
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G or Ryzen 3 3200G
2.
Intel Core i3 10100 or AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
3.
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G or Ryzen 3 3200G
4.
AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G or Ryzen 3 3200G
Compare other CPUs (480+)
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 3200G or Ryzen 5 2400G?
Name
Message
Promotion
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Raven Ridge | Picasso | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 2000 | Ryzen 3 3000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD2400C5M4MFB, |
YD3200C5M4MFH, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2018 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 950.000.000 |
4.950.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 4,0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2933 |
DDR4-2933 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 11 | 8 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 704 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1250 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1. 746 GFLOPS |
1.229 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 423 | 429 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2.272 | 1.666 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.006 | 982 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 4.827 | 3.909 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2. 153 |
2.216 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8.735 | 7.204 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.958 | 4.137 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
11.738 | 11.434 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
165,5 GFLOPS | 184,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
181 pts / W | 176 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
423 2.272 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
429 1.666 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
1.  0064.827 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
982 3.909 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
2.  1538.735 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
2.216 7.204 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
3.958 11.  738 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
4.137 11.434 |
In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 3 3200G Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GEAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Goodram DDR4-2400 memory kit GD2400D464L17/8G:
We have already reviewed DDR4 memory kits, both with Haswell-E (LGA2011-v3 socket) and Skylake processors.
In this review, we will look at another Goodram DDR4-2400 DDR4 memory kit.
Goodram memory module range
Goodram’s memory modules, which are presented as a competitive advantage, are made in Poland. On the company’s website, they are presented exactly as Polish memory modules. Apparently, marketers are hinting at European quality here. True, it is not very clear why the European quality of memory modules can be better than the Chinese one, but for someone it may matter. Naturally, we are talking only about the production of memory modules. The memory chips themselves are, of course, made in China.
Judging by the information on the Goodram website, the company has a very large range of DDR4 memory. It includes regular memory and memory of the Play series, which is positioned for games and overclocking.
Regular memory includes DDR4-2133 and DDR4-2400 modules, and the capacity of a single module can be 4, 8, and 16 GB. DDR4-2133 memory modules have CL=15, while DDR4-2400 memory modules have CL=17.
Ordinary memory does not have meaningless heatsinks — in any case, they do not carry any functional load, since additional cooling is not required for memory chips, and they are used solely to increase the cost of memory modules and diversify the line. Therefore, ordinary memory is just the right memory.
But the memory of the Play series is distinguished by the presence of meaningless heatsinks (black, red, silver and gold). The frequency range for this series extends from 2133 to 3000 MHz, and the memory modules have a capacity of 4, 8 and 16 GB. Well, the timings of the memory of the Play series are slightly lower (CL=15 or 16).
Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) memory
the memory is no worse than the more expensive memory of the Play series.
It makes no sense to talk about the scope of delivery in this case. Modules are supplied in standard transparent packing boxes.
Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) memory modules are double-sided and based on Nanya NT5AD512M8B1 memory chips.
Each module has 16 such memory chips.
Overclocking and synthetic test results
To test Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) memory modules, we used the bench with the following configuration:
On our testbed with default UEFI BIOS settings, Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) ran at 2400MHz with 17-17-17 timings and 1.2V supply voltage.
More info about timings Memory is given by the AIDA64 utility.
And we will also give the results of testing the speed of reading and writing by the AIDA64 utility.
As you can see, with the default settings, the Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) memory works exactly as it should.
Now let’s see if this memory can be overclocked.
The memory does not have any XMP profiles, so overclocking is only possible in manual mode. We overclocked the Asus Maximus IX Apex boards through the UEFI BIOS only by selecting the memory frequency and increasing the supply voltage to 1.4 V. We did not change the timings, leaving it at the mercy of the memory controller.
When choosing the DDR4-2600 mode, the memory timings became even better (15-17-17).
Accordingly, the speed of reading and writing has slightly increased.
When DDR4-2800 mode was selected, the memory timings changed (16-18-18), but the read and write speed increased a little more.
When choosing the DDR4-3000 mode, the memory timings remained the same as for the DDR4-2800 mode. The read and write speeds have increased again.
The maximum speed to which we managed to overclock the Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) memory was 3100 MHz. More precisely, the system started up even when DDR4-3200 was selected, but the memory operation at this frequency turned out to be unstable.
Timings changed to 17-18-18 in DDR4-3100 mode.
Well, the results for the speed of writing and reading.
We also present the test results (read speed, write speed, copy speed) of Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17/8G) memory for various modes on the diagram.
Looking at the AIDA64 test results, we can conclude that in the overclocked mode to a frequency of 3100 MHz, the memory becomes faster than in the default mode.
Indeed, as the frequency increases from 2400 to 3100 MHz (an increase of 29.17%) read speed increases by 17.6%, write speed by 29.44%, and copy speed by 24.07%. However, we are talking about the results of a synthetic test («parrots»), which are not indicative of real applications. Fast memory makes sense only if it allows you to increase the performance of the system as a whole when working with real applications. And if not, then fast memory has no practical meaning and it makes no sense to overpay for megahertz.
Therefore, we tested the memory using the iXBT Application Benchmark 2017 based on real applications.
Tests based on real applications
We tested memory in two modes. Once with default settings, that is, at a frequency of 2400 MHz with timings 17-17-17-39 (supply voltage 1.
2 V), and the second time in a state of overclocking to a frequency of 3100 MHz with timings 17-18-18-36 and at a supply voltage increased to 1.35 V.
We used our methodology to evaluate performance using the iXBT Application Benchmark 2017 (with updated reference results).
From the iXBT Application Benchmark 2017 package, we excluded tests whose results depend on the performance of the storage subsystem.
Test results in the iXBT Application Benchmark 2017 are shown in the table.
| Logic group of tests | Referential system (Core i7-6700K) |
Core i3-7350K DDR4-2400 (17-17-17-39) |
Core i3-7350K DDR4-3100 ( 17-18-18-36) |
52.55 ± 0.22 | 52,7 0.3 | 261.7±0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LuxRender 1.6 x64 OpenCL, with | 252.7±1.4 | 486.2±0.6 | ±484 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| lender 2.77a, | 220. 7±0.9 |
417±5 | 416±10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0130 | 100 | 65.32 ± 0.10 | 66.31 ± 0.20 | ADOBE PREMIREEE PRO 2015.4, ° C | 215.8±0.4 | 211.9±2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Magix Vegas Pro 13, with | 366.0±0.5 | 677.6±0.7 | Magix Movie Edit Pro 2016 Premium v.15.0.0.1020130 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABBYY FINEREADER 12 Professional, with | 442.4 ± 1.4 | 913.2 ± 1.4 | 902.0 ± 0.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9012U
| 100 |
59.75 ± 0.16 |
65.4 ± 0.3 |
WINRAR 5.40 CPU, with |
91.65 ± 0.0.0.0.0.05 |
0.4 140. |
 0±0.7 Scientific calculations, points |
100 |
63,9 712 ± 2 |
695 ± 3 |
NAMD 2.11, with |
234.0 ± 1.0 |
432.4 ± 0.5 |
431 ± 3 |
FFTW 3.3.5, MS |
, MS , MS , MS , MS , MS 32.8±0.6 |
41.5±1.8 |
37.5±1.0 |
Mathworks Matlab 2016a, s |
117.9± 0.6 |
199.2 ± 1.1 |
198 ± 2 |
Dassault SolidWorks 2016 SP0 Flow Simulation, with |
252.5 ± 1.6 |
335 ± 5 |
320 320 ± 5 |
Integral result CPU, points |
100 |
59.10 ± 0.16 |
60.63 ± 0.15 |
|
9002
The results .17% (from 2400 to 3100 MHz) system performance increases by an average of 2.59%.
The result, of course, is very modest, and it is simply unrealistic to notice it with the «naked eye».
In fact, it can be interpreted as follows. When working with the vast majority of real applications, the transition from DDR4-2400 memory to DDR4-3100 memory does not provide a noticeable performance gain. That is, for the vast majority of applications, the bandwidth of DDR4-2400 memory in dual-channel mode is enough, and further growth in bandwidth does not make sense.
Conclusion
In real applications, the performance gain that can be obtained from memory overclocking is extremely small and, by and large, «the game is not worth the candle.» Of course, this applies not only to Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17 / 8G) memory, but also to any other. Nevertheless, this fact does not bother fans of overclocking, especially since overclocking has become a professional business for many, which, as they say, feeds. In this case, the question “why” is inappropriate, this is overclocking just for the sake of overclocking, it does not become less popular because there is no practical sense in it.
And if you need memory for overclocking, then Goodram DDR4-2400 (GD2400D464L17 / 8G) is a very good option.
In conclusion, we suggest watching our video review of the memory kit Goodram DDR4-2400 GD2400D464L17/8G:
Our video review of the GODRAM DDRAM DDR4-2400 GD2400D4L17/8G can also be viewed at ixbt.video March 9000
Sergey Pakhomov
News
-
“The deal was cashless” — the structure of Rosatom gained control over the Elbrus processor developer
February 10, 2023
-
Is this really an enthusiast processor? Xeon W7-2495X loses to Core i9-13900K in Geekbench test
February 10, 2023
-
One of the most unusual motherboards. Asus X670 Mini-ITX has one of the chipset chips located on a hidden separate board
February 9, 2023
Newsroom >
Why is the RAM I bought not working? -TEAMGROUP
RAM is entering the DDR5 era soon, which means that DDR4 technology is already relatively mature.
We see 8GB 3200MHz RAM in stores and 32GB 4000MHz RAM in unboxing articles on various forums. Three years ago, before AMD took off, having 16GB of 3600MHz memory with an I7-8700K was already awesome.
DDR4 technology is much more advanced now than it was a few years ago. When you buy a new RAM, you are so excited, excited and delighted, and look forward to the moment when you can install and enjoy your upgraded PC. But it happens that the joy can fade as soon as you open the package and discover problems with the product…
And in today’s article of ours, we want to share with you tips and answers to the most frequently asked questions, and we hope that you can be calm when you find any problems with the RAM upon purchase.
1. Compatibility issues
The IC, PCB, and Layout used by different memory manufacturers are different, as well as models and specifications. Usually, the QVL (Qualified Vendor List) of memory is checked for compatibility before it goes on sale.
The screenshots below are for your reference. Information about QVL can be found on the motherboard manufacturers page by going to >>Support>>Memory.
We know there are many different types of motherboards. Manufacturers produce 4 or 5 types of boards depending on the type of chip. With such a huge number, the manufacturer will give priority to updating new chipsets, because the number of users of old chips is gradually decreasing. Users of older chipsets usually have DRAM that will no longer be upgraded, because memory manufacturers are oriented towards the fact that motherboards up to a certain generation will not support new chipsets or specifications. Therefore, if you buy new memory and install it in your old PC, or if you use new memory and old memory together, then in such cases, the likelihood of a problem is incompatibility is high.
Solution ：
Before purchasing RAM, please check the QVL of your motherboard.
That is, you need to check the following information:
1) Memory manufacturer you want to select
2) What capacity is supported?
3) What frequency is supported?
4) How many memory slots can be installed?
In short, knowledge and understanding of CL and external material number is not required; avoid installing old and new memory together; not only the difference in specifications can cause incompatibility problems, but products with the same specification can also cause problems, the reason lies in the chips used in different periods.
A more efficient solution would be to replace the entire set of memory if you want to upgrade. In the case of TEAMGROUP, the RAM is sent to the motherboard manufacturer for testing during the development phase, and remains there until the new motherboard is released. Therefore, TEAMGROUP RAM is a reliable choice as it passes numerous compatibility tests.
You can check the list of QVL motherboards by following the link:
ASUS : https://www.
asus.com/Motherboards-Components/Motherboards/All-series/TUF-GAMING-X570-PLUS-WI-FI/HelpDesk_QVL/
MSI: https://www.msi. com/Motherboard/support/MEG-X570-ACE#support-mem-19
GIGABYTE: https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X570-AORUS-MASTER-rev-11-12/support#support- doc
ASRock: https://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/X570%20AQUA/Specification.asp#MemoryMS
2. Memory overclocking problems
This is a complex question for which there is no single answer and involves the relationship between the processor, motherboard and memory. There are too many scenarios, but we can give some background information for building a logical chain. The most frequent questions we receive:
1) I bought a 3200 MHz memory, but why does it only work at 2400 MHz?
2) Your data sheet says that the memory can be overclocked to 4000 MHz, but no matter how I try to overclock, it’s only 3600 MHz, what’s the problem?
3) If I buy 3200 MHz memory, is overclocking to 4000 MHz guaranteed?
If you have questions about overclocking, be sure to include your motherboard model, processor model, and BIOS version you are using so we can pinpoint the issue.
Otherwise, without the necessary information, it will be impossible to give a correct solution to the problem!
Solution： Regarding the problems with frequency , the first thing to pay attention to is what is the maximum frequency supported by the motherboard with the characteristics of the motherboard you purchased. In order to see the details, you need to click on the «SPEC» page on the motherboard, and scroll down to the «Memory» section, where you will see the necessary information.
- Processor support . It’s worth remembering that memory overclocking is not a standardized specification, and means that it’s not enough to just refer to the specifications listed on the INTEL and AMD websites. It takes experience to know what memory frequency a processor can overclock. Different motherboards will have different results, but in general, the higher the processor, the higher the memory overclock can be.
Below is a brief explanation of overclocking. For INTEL, we recommend choosing products with the letter “K” at the end, for example, 9-10900K, I7-10700K. For AMD, we recommend choosing products with an «X» at the end, such as R9-3900X, R5-3600X. If your processor does not fall into any of the above categories, your memory may be clock-limited for overclocking.
- BIOS version. We think this is the most underestimated problem. Sometimes the memory support capability changes during the BIOS update process, and if an older version has not been updated, the memory frequency may be limited.
The BIOS update can be downloaded from the official website of the motherboard manufacturer. For those who have not upgraded before, we recommend that you first check the SOP updates provided by the motherboard manufacturer, this is important, as mistakes made in the process can lead to the failure of the entire motherboard!
- Checking the label type.
This means you need to check if the frequency indicated on the package is the same as the standard JEDEC frequency or the frequency after XMP is enabled. JEDEC is an international semiconductor technology association that sets different parameters for different memory frequency ranges. Since the memory is manufactured with the JEDEC standard, consumers do not have to do anything after purchasing the memory. Just connect the memory to the motherboard so that the specifications match what is indicated on the package.
The other type requires XMP, which is classified as overclocking memory. Once purchased and installed, the easiest way is to enter the BIOS and enable XMP, then let the motherboard detect the SPD value in memory, and automatically overclock to the frequency indicated on the package. Just look up information about JEDEC and the frequency you need and you will find the corresponding CL values. If the frequency and CL value of the memory you purchased match, it means that it is within the JEDEC standard and you can use it immediately after connecting.
If the CL values for the memory you purchased are below the JEDEC standard, then this is the one that requires XMP.
Please note that not all motherboards can support the latest standard JEDEC frequency! Recently, JEDEC 3200MHz memory has been slowly appearing on the market, but only the latest motherboard chipsets support this frequency, such as INTEL Z490, Z390, AMD TRX40, X570, B550. So if your motherboard’s chipset isn’t one of them, you’ll need to check the type of memory you’re buying.
Another situation is when the memory is of a type that requires XMP, but you did not enter the BIOS to enable XMP, then in this case, only the frequency without overclocking will be displayed. That’s why many users, when they buy 3600 MHz memory, end up seeing only 2400 MHz.
- DOA problem. DOA or Dead On Arrival — product damaged in transit. This can happen with any electronic product, not just memory, which means it can’t be avoided if you buy any device.
