Intel Core i9 10850K vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 10850K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz Intel Core i9 10850K with 10-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X with 8-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i9 10850K
70
Ryzen 7 2700X
58
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i9 10850K
69
Ryzen 7 2700X
48
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i9 10850K
52
Ryzen 7 2700X
46
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i9 10850K
64
Ryzen 7 2700X
53
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2700X and 10850K
Advantages of Intel Core i9 10850K
- Newer — released 2-years and 3-months later
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2933 RAM
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
- More than 15° C higher critical temperature
- 21% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.
2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)
- 22% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1306 vs 1074 points
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Around 2.09 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than the Core i9 10850K – 105 vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i9 10850K
+19%
1319
Ryzen 7 2700X
1105
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 10850K
+53%
15599
Ryzen 7 2700X
10178
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i9 10850K
+27%
3098
Ryzen 7 2700X
2436
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i9 10850K
+31%
23169
Ryzen 7 2700X
17621
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i9 10850K
+21%
1306
Ryzen 7 2700X
1083
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 10850K
+45%
10729
Ryzen 7 2700X
7419
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 10850K and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | July 27, 2020 | April 19, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake-S | Zen+ |
| Model number | i9-10850K | — |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 10 | 8 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 6 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 5.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 20MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Transistors | — | 4.8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 125 W | 105 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 85°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
| Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i9 10850K
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 7 2700X
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i9 10850K official page | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i9 10850K
9 (90%)
Ryzen 7 2700X
1 (10%)
Total votes: 10
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i9 10850K and Apple M1 Pro
2.
Intel Core i9 10850K and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
3.
Intel Core i9 10850K and Intel Core i9 11900K
4.
Intel Core i9 10850K and Intel Core i7 12700K
5.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
6.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
7.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900K
Availability
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy on Amazon
$245
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy on Amazon
$349
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck.
The better performing Core i9-10900K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
-
Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-10900K — $245.0 vs $349.0
-
Up to 19% better value when playing VALORANT than Core i9-10900K — $0.55 vs $0.68 per FPS
-
Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K — 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
-
Performs up to 15% better in VALORANT than Ryzen 7 2700X — 515 vs 446 FPS
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X — 20 vs 16 threads
-
Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn’t have integrated graphics
VALORANT
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
446
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.
55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler — YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $245 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
515
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
81%
Price, $
$349
70%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
1026
FPS
1177
FPS
League of Legends
256
FPS
296
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
446
FPS
515
FPS
VALORANT
629
FPS
727
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
1367
FPS
1564
FPS
Minecraft
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1039
75%
Multi-Core
6842
63%
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1392
100%
Multi-Core
10794
100%
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
vs |
Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date |
Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 8 | Cores |
10 |
| 16 | Threads |
20 |
3. 7 GHz |
Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
5.3 GHz |
|
105 W |
TDP | 125 W |
|
12 nm |
Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics |
UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Ryzen 7 2700X or Core i9-10900K
VALORANT, 1080p, High
Skytech Prism II Gaming PC
510 FPS
$3.73/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i9-10900K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,899.99
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos White Gaming PC
568 FPS
$4.05/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Core i9-10900K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,299.99
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
510 FPS
$5.
45/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i9-10900K
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,779.99
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
297 FPS
$4.71/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.99
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Dell Inspiron High Performance Gaming Desktop PC
165 FPS
$11.51/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,899
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC
281 FPS
$4.73/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,328.81
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS 10TH-060US Gaming Desktop PC
515 FPS
$9.
71/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900K
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$4,999.99
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC
515 FPS
$11.43/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$5,886
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Adamant Custom 10-Core Extreme Gaming Desktop PC
515 FPS
$8.35/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900K
32 GB, 5 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$4,299.99
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Adamant Custom 10-Core Liquid Cooled Gaming Desktop PC
366 FPS
$6.97/FPS
GeForce RTX 2080
Core i9-10900K
32 GB, 4 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,549.99
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i9-11900K
$344.95
Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
Xeon E5-2643 v2
N/A Stock
Core i9-10900K
Core i7-2600S
$104.98
Core i9-10900K
Core i5-4430S
Core i9-10900K
Core i5-660
Core i9-10900K
Xeon E3-1505M v5
N/A Stock
Core i9-10900K
FX-9590
$344.04
Core i9-10900K
Core 2 Duo T7300
N/A Stock
Core i9-10900K
Core i7-4800MQ
N/A Stock
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9-10910
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9-10910
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on one side and the Intel Core i9-10910 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,3GHz.
The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 20 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 5,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Intel Core i9-10910 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Comet Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Comet Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 7 2000 | Core i9-10000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YD270XBGM88AF | i9-10910 | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q3 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm+++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 10 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,3 GHz | 5,0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 20 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 45,8 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 105 W | 125 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Comet Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 460,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1200 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 85°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 476 | 551 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 5. 031 |
6.676 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 180 | 202 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.828 | 2.344 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.428 | 3.079 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 17.584 | 21.358 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.823 | 6.270 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
26.797 | 39.667 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
384,3 GFLOPS | 673,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
255 pts / W | 317 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i9-10910 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i9-10910 is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is lower. The Intel Core i9-10910 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10910 |
551 6.676 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
476 5.031 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10910 |
202 2.  344 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
180 1.828 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10910 |
3.079 21.  358 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
2.428 17.584 |
In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10910 |
6.270 39.667 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.  82326.797 |
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10910 |
6.128 38.367 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.820 26.430 |
In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel equivalentIntel Core i9-10910 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700U
Intel Core i9 10900K vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 10900K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Which is better: 10-core Intel Core i9 10900K at 3.7 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 2700X with 8 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i9 10900k
74
Ryzen 7 2700x
58
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i9 10900k
70
Ryzen 7 2700x
48
Energy Equality
Energy Effect CHIP
Core I9 10900K
Ryzen 7 2700x
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46 9000 46
Core i9 10900K
66
Ryzen 7 2700X
53
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2700X and 10900K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 10900K
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2933
- Introduced 2 years later than rival
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB more than L3 cache
- 15°C higher max operating temperature
- 23% faster Turbo Boost frequency (5.
3GHz vs 4.3GHz) - 24% faster Geekbench v5 single core score of 1336 and 1074 points
- Integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 2.09 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- More modern process — 12 vs. 14 nanometers
- 16% lower than Core i9 10900K peak power consumption — 105 vs 125 Watts
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i9 10900K
+29%
1426
Ryzen 7 2700X
1105
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i9 10900K
+52%
15464
Ryzen 7 2700X
10178
Passmark CPU (Single Core)
Core i9 10900K
+31%
3184
Ryzen 7 2700X
2436
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i9 10900K
+36%
23899
Ryzen 7 2700X
17621
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i9 10900K
+24%
1342
Ryzen 7 2700X
1083
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i9 10900K
+47%
10907
Ryzen 7 2700X
7419
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications for Intel Core i9 10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | May 1, 2020 | April 19, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | Zen+ |
| Model number | i9-10900K | — |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores 9019four | 10 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 20 | 16 |
| Frequency | 3. |
3.7 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 5.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 37x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 20MB (general) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 105W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 85°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
| Max. |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i9 10900k
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 7 2700x
N/D
Memory Support
| Memorial type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official website | Site Intel Core i9 10900K | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i9 10900K
0 (0%)
Ryzen 7 2700X
4 (100%)
Total votes: 4
Competitors
1.
Core i9 10900K and Core i9 11900K
2.
Core i9 10900K and Apple M1
3.
Core i9 10900K and Core i7 12700K
4.
Core i9 10900K and Core i5 12600K
5.
Core i9 10900K and Core i5 12400
6.
Core i9 10900K and Core i5 12400F
7.
Core i9 10900K and Core i7 12700KF
8.
Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 5600X
9.
Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 5800X
10.
Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 5700X
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X or Intel Core i9 10900K?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9-9900KS — VsRank
Benefits
General information
Specifications
RAM Integrated video core Advanced technologies
Cinebench 9 benchmarks0611 Geekbench tests Other tests
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X lost!
Number of points: 11806
Intel Core i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS won!
Number of points: 11908
- +2 MB advantage of L2 cache
- 22 W less power consumption
- 2 nm less process
- +267 MHz RAM clock advantage
- +300 MHz CPU clock advantage
- +700 MHz CPU turbo clock advantage
- Has integrated UHD Graphics 630
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Core i9-9900KS series and architecture information, as well as processor release date.
Ryzen 7
Core i9 (Desktop)
Zen+
COFFEE LAKE-S
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
Intel Core i
2
2019-10-30
3.0
3.0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Core i9-9900KS Processor Specifications.
8
8
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)
16
16
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)
3700 MHz
4000 MHz
Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz
4300 MHz
5000 MHz
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)
4MB
2MB
Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)
16MB
16MB
Leader — AMD Epyc 7742
256MB
105W
127W
Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)
12 nm
14 nm
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)
Information about the type and support of the maximum amount of RAM, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.
128 GB
128GB
Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)
2933 MHz
2666 MHz
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)
2
2
Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)
DDR4
DDR4
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i9-9900KS
Integrated GPU specifications. Support for 4K, clock speed, as well as the amount of video core memory.
n.a.
UHD Graphics 630
n.a.
Leader — Intel Core i7-8706G (931)
n/a
1.2 GHz
Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 MHz
n/a
64 GB
Leader — Intel Xeon E-2176G (128)
n.
a.
4096×2304@24Hz
n.a.-9900KS
n.a.
12
n.a.
4.5
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
Intel Core i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
Intel Core I9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
11 ITEL 7 2700X 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000-9900ks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
Intel Core i9-9900ks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
Intel Core I9-9900KS
CineMark CineMark CineMark CineMark is a pleasantly known and well-known product and fame . The program was developed on the basis of MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation.
No data
4819.5
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (8857)
No data
511.5
Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (514)
1801
2058
Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)
176
216
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)
18.
68
23.15
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)
1.95
2.45
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)
34763
51778.5
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)
5256
8183
Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)
Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work.
25919
35586
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (55569)
4999
6308
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6308)
No data
35932
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (35932)
No data
6313
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6313)
A range of different benchmarks, including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many other benchmarks.
106435
14883.5
Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)
10.8
7.42
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)
578.29
414.14
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)
3.48
3.6
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)
96.62
87.88
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)
4779
8353
Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)
226.
7
278.83
Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (279)
104.5
122.5
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (167)
No data
16.26
Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (27)
10.6
12.15
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (20)
1.6
2.1
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (3)
1
1.
2
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)
264
224.55
Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (111)
No data
5734
Leader — Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9643)
No data
55735
Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (93099)
226.7
278.83
Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (50)
No data
44538
Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i9-7920X
69.5
Ryzen 7 2700X
71.6 (+2.9%)
Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i9-7920X
59.8 (+9.9%)
Ryzen 7 2700X
53.9
maximum
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking.
Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i9-7920X 67.9 (+1.9%) Ryzen 7 2700X 66.6 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i9-7920X 59.1 (+6.4%) Ryzen 7 2700X 55.3 |
Extreme |
|
Core i9-7920X 33.1 (+29.9%) Ryzen 7 2700X 23.2 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum).
A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i9-7920X
188 (+5.9%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
177
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-7920X
2438 (+25.5% )
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
1817
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i9-7920X
1126 (+5.7%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
1062
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-7920X
11498 (+38.3%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
7100
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i9-7920X
120.
9
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
211.2 (+42.8%)
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i9-7920x
4876 (+0.5%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
4850
Geekbench 3 Multi Core
4572 4572 4572 ( AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
26040
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i9-7920x
2.19 (+4.1%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
9000 2.1
Cinebench R111 30%)
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
18.72
Passmark
Intel Core i9-7920x
23470 (+25%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
17596 9000
Data are still not overlaid. tables may be missing information or missing existing features.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i9-7920X X-series Processor (16. 50M Cache, up to 4.30 GHz) |
|
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Skylake | |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
| Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 10-2019 | 10-2020 |
| Model Official name. | i9-7920X | |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 12 | 8 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. |
24 | 16 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. |
2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 4.3 GHz | 4.05 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 16. 5 |
No data |
| Instructions | 64-bit | |
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | |
| Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI | |
| Number of QPI links | No data | |
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. |
140 | No data |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2017X |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | ||
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | No data |
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
| Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
RAM
| Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 128 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. |
DDR4-2666 | |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 4 | |
| RAM bandwidth | ||
| ECC Memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. |
3 | No data |
| PCI configuration options | ||
| Number of PCI lanes | 44 |
Data security
| AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i9-7920X
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 10%.
