Core 2 Duo vs. Core i3: Desktop and Mobile Processors Compared
Core 2 Duo vs Core i3: The Veteran vs. The Rookie
The Core 2 Duo has been the processor of choice in laptops for about three years. Over those three years the average speeds of Core 2 Duo processors have advanced significantly, and many of today’s Core 2 Duo laptops have speeds of around 2.2Ghz or faster. Core 2 Duo processors have also been the go-to for many less expensive desktop systems, with speeds reaching over 3Ghz.
However, there is a newcomer which is challenging the Core 2 Duo. This is the Core i3. It is very similar to the Core 2 Duo in many ways. Both are dual-core processors and most Core 2 Duos and Core i3 have similar clock speeds. However, the processors are based on different architectures.
So, which one is better?
Architecture
The Core 2 Duo processors are based off the Core 2 architecture. The Core and Core 2 architectures were arguably Intel’s most successful architectures, as they replaced the Pentium 4 processors in desktop systems and made Intel competitive in that space once again.
The Core i3 is based off a new architecture called Nehalem. The Nehalem architecture has numerous advantages over the Core 2 architecture. Nehalem is better constructed for quad-core processors, has hyper-threading available, and can use a feature called Turbo Boost which maximizes processor speed. However, because the Core i3 is the low-end Nehalem variant, most of these features are disabled or not relevant — the Core i3 is a dual core processor and Turbo Boost is disabled, but hyper-threading is enabled.
Processor Performance
The Core i3 is the slowest variant of the Nehalem based processor. The Core 2 Duo processors, however, don’t have the same differentiation between versions of the same architecture. The fastest Core 2 Duo desktop processor has a speed of 3.33Ghz, while the fastest Core i3 desktop processor is clocked at 3.06Ghz.
You might therefor expect that the Core 2 Duo would have the edge — particularly when you consider that the Core 2 Duo costs almost three times as much if you buy it individually — but in fact the Core i3 is faster, and often by no small margin.
The Core i3 is faster even in single-threaded applications, but the performance gap really widens in multi-threaded applications. This is because the Core i3 has hyper-threading, which turns the two real cores into four virtual cores. Windows works with the Core i3 as if it is a quad-core processor.
These results remain true in the mobile space, as well. Core i3 processors punch at least 500Mhz above their weight in single-thread applications, and are virtually always faster in multi-threaded applications, no matter the clock speeds of the Core 2 Duo and Core i3 processors you are comparing.
Power Usage and Heat
A look at the technical specifications of the Core i3 processors automatically puts them into a negative light when it comes to power consumption. The desktop Core i3 parts at listed as having a 73 Watt TDP, while most Core 2 Duo desktop parts have a 65 Watt TDP. In laptops the Core i3 has a 35 watt TDP, while Core 2 Duo mobile processors usually have a 25 Watt TDP.
These differences pan out about how you’d expect them to when it comes to absolute power consumption. The Core i3 processors do consume just slightly more power than Core 2 Duo processors at load and at idle. We’re talking a difference of around 10 Watts on desktops and a few on laptops — nothing huge, but a difference none the less.
However, when it comes to power efficiency the answer becomes less clear. In order for a processor to be power efficient, it needs to not only have low power consumption but also the ability to complete tasks quickly. This lowers the overall “task energy” because a faster processor will be done with a task before a slower processor, and once done it will slip back into an idle state.
When viewed from this perspective, the Core i3 is much more efficient than the Core 2 Duo on both the desktop and the laptop. This means that the Core i3 will probably not use any more power than a Core 2 Duo — and may actually use less — unless your usage patterns place a constant load on your processor.
Verdict
Overall, the answer is clear — the Core i3 is the better processor.
That doesn’t mean that it absolutely body-slams the Core 2 Duo. The Core 2 Duo isn’t hugely slower. However, the Core 2 Duo is on its way out, and the Core i3 is slightly better in just about every way.
In the desktop space, the ease with which you can find a Core i3 desktop means there is little reason to purchase a Core 2 Duo based system unless you’re on a very tight budget. On laptops, however, the story is a bit different. There are still some competent Core 2 Duo systems available, and they’re worth considering if their other advantages out-weight the slightly out of date processor.
This post is part of the series: Core i3, i5, and i7 Explained
It is often difficult to discern which new processors are the best. This guide to Intel’s new Core i3, i5, and i7 processors gives advice and information about them so that you can decide which processor is best for your needs.
- Core i3 vs i5 vs i7: A Summary of Intel’s Processors
- Core i3 vs Core i5: What’s the Difference?
- Core i5 vs. Core i7: What’s the Difference?
- Mobile Core i3 vs i5 vs i7: Showdown In Your Laptop
- Champion vs. Rookie: Core 2 Duo vs Core i3
Core i3 Vs. Core 2 Duo (What’s The Difference?)
Finding the perfect PC configuration can be overwhelming as there are many different specs and components to choose from.
If you want to build your own setup, you may want to look for the specs that match your purposes.
In addition, your budget can play a significant role in the final result.
If you’re looking for a budget system for an entry-level computer, you may come across two CPU types: Core 2 Duo and Core i3.
If you don’t know what these CPUs offer, you may get confused about which one to choose.
This post will break down the differences between these two CPUs and show you which one can be a better option for different purposes.
Core i3 Vs. Core 2 Duo (What’s The Difference?)
Core i3
Core i3 belongs to Intel’s “i” series of processors released for the first time in 2010.
Since then, Intel has released 12 generations of this series, each generation building upon the previous and improving its features.
Here are the architecture codenames of each Core i3 generation:
- 1st Generation: Westmere
- 2nd Generation: Sandy Bridge
- 3rd Generation: Ivy Bridge
- 4th Generation: Haswell
- 6th Generation: Skylake
- 7th Generation: Kaby Lake
- 8th & 9th Generations: Coffee Lake
- 10th Generation: Comet Lake
- 12th Generation: Golden Cove
They’re available for desktop and laptop computers, as well as mobile and embedded devices.
This proprietary processor built on the multi-core architecture is a dual-core processor with a built-in HUD graphics card.
It’s also available at different speeds, with the latest ones being up to 4.40 GHz.
These processors also come with varying core numbers, with the newest generation ranging from 4 to 8 cores.
They feature Intel’s smart cache of up to 12 MB that supports four threads.
Other features used in the latest generations of core i3 include:
- Error Correction Code memory
- Intel OS Guards
- Intel Platform Protection Security
- Intel Gaussian & Neural Accelerator
- Intel Thread Director
- Intel Flex Memory Access
The latest generations of Corei3, namely the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th generations, also support the Turbo boost.
It’s a technology that increases a processor’s clock speed whenever the system requires it.
This way, the clock speed increases without much power consumption and heat generation because it can reach the desired speed faster and whenever needed.
However, it doesn’t mean that Corei3 processors have high low power consumption; the latest generation of these cores can have a thermal design power (TDP) of as low as 15.
This low power consumption makes them ideal for laptops.
Although most Core i3 processors have DDR3 RAM types, the latest generations come with RAM types of up to DDR5 4800 MT/s.
Core 2 Duo
The Core 2 Duo series of Intel processors are the predecessors of the Core i3 series.
They’re also dual-core, first launched in 2006.
Compared to dual-core processors, the Core 2 Duo had a faster performance thanks to its overclocking abilities and bigger cache memory, enabling users to multitask.
It’s a 64-bit dual-core processor, which means the processor has two cores that work in parallel.
The first-generation Core 2 Duo, with the code name Conroe, replaced Pentium 4 and Pentium D processors, improving performance by 40%.
They featured a revolutionary design that beat AMD processors.
Thanks to their then-new 65nm technology, these processors had a lower heat generation.
They featured up to 2.13 GHz of clock speed and 4 MB of L2 cache.
Different models of Conroe CPU were launched, which were phased out in 2009.
Other generations include Conroe XE, Allendale, Conroe-L, and Conroe-CL.
They all feature different clock speeds and cache sizes.
For example, Allendale was a lower-cost version of Conroe featuring 800 MHz of bus frequency and a 2MB half-L2 cache.
At the time, one of the biggest competitors of Intel’s Dual-core Duo processor was AMD’s Turion 64 ×2, with the former outperforming the latter.
Here are some of the technologies used in Core 2 Duo:
- Virtualization Technology
- Dynamic FSB Switching
- Smart Memory Access
These technologies meant faster data transfer, better usage of the pipeline, and improved output per clock cycle than the predecessors.
The Conroe-L version was a single-core CPU built on the 65NM Conroe-L core microarchitecture.
Generally speaking, the Intel Core 2 Duo series is suitable for light computing tasks, such as word processing, media playing, or internet browsing.
However, overclocking abilities make them capable of doing heavier tasks.
Core i3 Vs. Core 2 Duo: Similarities
Comparing the Core 2 Duo and Core i3 processors may not be a completely logical comparison because the latter was launched as a pure improvement over the former.
In addition, as mentioned, the Core 2 Duo series has been phased out, while the Core i3 series is still in production, with the 12th generation recently launched with significant improvements.
Since the Core i3 is the successor of the Core 2 Duo, they share many features, including clock speeds and the number of cores.
Still, since they’re built on different architectures, each coming with different models, the differences may be more prominent than the similarities.
However, both belong to the series of low-end, entry-level computers that can’t offer much clock speed and performance compared to higher-end generations, including Core i5 and i7.
One of the main similarities between Core i3 and Core 2 Duo is that both are dual-core.
It means both have two distinct processors working in the same integrated circuit.
Dual-core processors can operate much quicker than single-core types because each core has a separate cache, enabling the OS to multitask and handle tasks in parallel.
As a result, both of these processors can perform faster than single-core ones while lowering heat generation and power consumption.
Core i3 Vs. Core 2 Duo: Differences
Generally speaking, since the Core i3 is a newer technology that has been improving since its launch in 2008, it’s more powerful than the Core 2 Duo.
As a result, Core i3 processors have improved considerably, becoming much different from the Core 2 Duo.
For example, both had 3 MB of Intel’s Smart Cache but, Core i3 processors have increased their cache to 12 MB.
However, since both have several models and architectures, you may find a Core 2 Duo model that works better for your specific purposes.
That’s why you should compare them on a model-by-model basis.
That said, below are some of their general differences.
1. Hyperthreading
One of the most important differences between Intel’s Core i3 and Core 2 Duo is the former’s hyperthreading ability.
In fact, Intel introduced hyperthreading with the Core i3 series, which means none of the models before the i3 series had hyperthreading features.
Hyperthreading allows the CPU to double its cores by creating virtual cores.
This way, it tricks the operating system into believing it has more cores to improve efficiency and performance.
Each physical core gets two virtual cores, making a total of four virtual cores.
That’s why Core i3 CPUs are generally considered better than Core 2 Duo CPUs, which handle one thread per core.
2. Performance
As mentioned earlier, the core i3 series has developed many advanced features that were not initially available in the first generations.
The architecture has changed over the years, making the series much better than the Core 2 Duo processor in speed and performance.
While the highest clock speed for the Core 2 Duo series is 3.33 GHz, some of the latest models of the Core i3 processor can be as fast as 4.4 GHz.
This faster performance is obvious in both single-thread and multi-thread applications in computer and mobile processors.
What’s more, the socket type used in Core 2 Duo processors is typically LGA 777 with an FSB bus, which is much slower than the DMI bus in the Core i3.
In addition to these features, newer manufacturing processes, bigger L2 cache capacity, higher overclocking speeds, smart cache, DDR5 RAM, and integrated GPU make the Core i3 a better and faster CPU.
The lower fabrication process in Core i3 CPUs also means better performance because it shows a lower distance between the CPU components and the transistors.
As a result, data transfer can be faster, leading to higher performance and power efficiency.
It also refers to the size of transistors measured in nanometers.
Smaller transistors mean you can have more of them inside the same space, allowing for a faster data transfer.
3. Power Consumption And Heat Generation
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is the maximum power a CPU draws under full load.
Different models of Core i3 processors have different TDP values, but they’re generally higher than those of Core 2 Duo processors.
It means the Core i3 series draws more power at full load.
However, regarding power efficiency, Core i3 processors work much better than core 2 Duo because of their higher speeds.
That’s because they perform tasks faster, making them more power-efficient.
In addition, the Core 2 Duo processor architectures have 65nm and 45nm fabrications.
In comparison, it’s 32 nm and 22 nm for the Core i3, which means the Core Duo 2 is less power efficient and slower than the Core i3.
That said, power efficiency also depends on the tasks you perform on your computer and your usage pattern.
You might find specific Core 2 Duo models that are more efficient than Core i3 because of the user’s usage patterns.
The Verdict
Generally speaking, the Core 2 Duo processor is considered obsolete.
With today’s powerful computers and high processing power, it can’t be a good choice even for low-range computing purposes.
The Core i3 processors were the first generation of the i series that replaced the Core 2 Duo processors.
As a result, the Core i3 was a definite improvement over its predecessors.
It had more refined architectures, which continued to evolve over the following generations.
For example, they ditched the front-side bus design and enabled hyper-threading.
The new architecture, Nehalem, which was used in the first generation of the i3, moved the northbridge onto the CPU die.
It used to be a separate chip that connected the CPU, the bus, the memory, and the southbridge to the peripherals.
These features mean more computing power, making the Core i3 processor a better choice than the Core 2 Duo.
The Core i3 can support more instruction sets thanks to the higher number of transistors and lower lithography.
However, it’s not comparable to the Core i5 and Core i7 series with high-end advancements in computing technology.
That said, you should consider your goals and requirements to choose the best CPU for your system.
Suppose you look for an entry-level configuration with decent processing speed and performance.
In that case, the Core i3 series is a better choice than the Core 2 Duo.
In addition, since there are a large number of models produced under the name of Core Duo 2 and Core i3, you need to compare them by the model and see which specs can fit your purposes.
For example, a powerful Core 2 Due CPU from the Penryn series may even outperform a 1st generation Core i3.
Here’s a comparison of two models from a Core 2 duo series and Core i3 series:
| Cores | Clock Speed | Architecture | Cache | Lithography | Bus Speed | TDP | Launch Date | Turbo Boost | |
| Core 2 Duo E7500 | 2 | 2. 93GHz |
Wolfdale | 3 MB L2 | 45 nm | 1066 MHz FSB | 65W | 2009 | No |
| Core i3 8100 | 4 | 3.6GHz | Coffee Lake | 6 MB | 14 nm | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 65W | 2017 | Yes |
And now, compare these specs with one model from the latest generation of the Core i3:
| Cores | Clock Speed | Architecture | Cache | Lithography | TDP | Launch Date | |
| Core i3-12300HE | 8 | 4.40 GHz | Alder Lake | 12 MB Smart Cache | Intel 7 | 69W | 22 |
Upgrading From Core 2 Duo To Core i3
Now that you know a Core i3 processor may be better than a Core 2 Duo for your entry-level to mid-range computing purposes, you may wonder if you can upgrade your current Core 2 Duo to an i3.
The short answer to this question is no.
That’s because these processors aren’t backward or forward compatible, meaning you can’t replace them.
The most important factor that makes these incompatible is the socket types.
The Core 2 Duo PCU uses the LGA775 socket, which you can’t find in the i3 series.
Here are the socket types found in Core i3 CPUs:
LGA 1150-1151-1155-1156-1200.
In addition, most Core Duo 2 processors use a DDR3 RAM, while the latest Corei3 processors use a DDR4 and 5 RAM types.
You may find a Core i3 processor with a DDR3 RAM type, but it would be a lower-end and older CPU that may not serve your purposes.
Another thing you should consider is if your motherboard can support a new CPU because some CPUs are soldered onto the motherboard.
In such cases, you’ll need to change your motherboard, too.
Is Core i3 Good For Gaming?
If you want a budget gaming setup, you may think of getting a Core i3 CPU, but are they powerful enough for today’s gaming purposes?
As you saw throughout this article, the latest generations of Core i3 CPUs have powerful features that make them decent choices for many CPU-intensive applications.
The number of cores and the hyperthreading abilities combined with the built-in GPUs allow you to play many games with 60 FPS and higher.
However, you may experience stuttering with some CPU-intensive games such as Battlefield V or Assassin’s Creed.
That said, you could experience smooth gameplay if you play with lower settings, especially with Gen 12 Core i3 CPUs.
For example, the i3-12100 Processor is a decent budget CPU for gaming because it has four cores and four threads and a Turbo frequency of 4.30 GHz.
You can use most Core i3 CPUs for 1080p gaming with 1440p monitors, although you may experience occasional stuttering.
Although you may think that the number of cores matters the most in the performance of the CPU, the technologies used in its development and the amount of RAM play a more significant role.
The number of cores can help you multitask more efficiently and smoothly.
However, if you upgrade your RAM capacity, you can get more bang for your buck without upgrading your CPU or motherboard.
If you want to play games at high settings and frame rates, you may want to consider a Core i5 or i7 CPU.
Core i3 CPUs aren’t future-proof, and you may experience incompatibilities in future games and other software and applications.
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Intel Core i3-12100: comparison
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Rating: 2 points
WINNER
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Rating: 3 points
Technology
Performance
Memory specification
3
Main features
Interfaces and communications
0003
Top specifications and features
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of Cores
- CPU base clock
- Number of threads
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Intel Core i3-12100: 60 W
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600: 65 W
Process
Intel Core i3-12100: 7 nm
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600: 45 nm
Number of cores
Intel Core i3-12100: 4
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600: 2
Base clock speed
Intel Core i3-12100: 3.
3 GHz
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600: 3.06 GHz
Number of threads
Intel Core i3-12100: 8
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600:
Description
The Intel Core i3-12100 runs at 3.3 Hz, the second Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 runs at 3.06 Hz. Intel Core i3-12100 is capable of overclocking up to 4.3 Hz and the second up to No data Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 60W, while the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 has 65W.
Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i3-12100 is built on 7nm technology. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 on 45 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i3-12100 can support DDR5. The maximum supported volume is 128 MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 76.8. Second processor Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 capable of supporting DDR No data available. Throughput is No data. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics.
The Intel Core i3-12100 has an UHD Intel 730 graphics core. The frequency of which is — 300 MHz. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 received a video core No data. Here the frequency is No data MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i3-12100 scored No data. And the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 scored 1134 points.
Why Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 is better than Intel Core i3-12100
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 60 W vs 65 W, -8% less
- Process 7 nm vs 45 nm, -84% less
- Number of cores 4 vs. 2, 100% more
- CPU base clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 3.06 GHz, 8% higher
- L2 cache size 5 MB vs 3 MB, 67% more
Comparison of Intel Core i3-12100 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7600: highlights0003
Intel Boot Guard
Yes
N/A
Number of threads
The more threads, the better the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform multiple tasks simultaneously.
Show all
8
max 256
Average: 10.7
max 256
Average: 10.7
L2 Cache Size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
5MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
3MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
4.3GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.
2 GHz
GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
3.3GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
3.06GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Max. number of PCI Express lanes
20
max 64
Average: 22.7
max 64
Average: 22.
7
PCI Express Configurations
Up to 1×16+4. 2×8+4
No data
Idle states
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost technology
Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all
2
Mean: 1.9
Mean: 1.9
Turbo Boost Max 3.0
N/A
N/A
Graphics
UHD Intel 730
n/a
Max. graphics system frequency
1.4GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
GHz
max 1.
55
Average: 1.1 GHz
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
5
Mean: 3.5
Mean: 3.5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
76.8GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
Max. number of memory channels
The greater the number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor
2
max 16
Mean: 2.
9
max 16
Mean: 2.9
Max. memory capacity
Largest RAM memory capacity.
128GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
Max. resolution (DP)
7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
N/A
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
Yes
Yes
OpenCL
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
Hyper-Threading Technology
Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-threading technology.
Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Show all
Yes
No
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Full text
Yes
No data
Version sse
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show in full
VT-D
is
No data
VT-X
is
is
Quick Sync Video 9000
Yes
No data
HDMI
Yes
No data
7 nm
Average: 36.
8 nm
45 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
60W
Average: 67.6W
65W
Average: 67.6W
No data
Corps size
45.0 mm x 37.5 mm
37.5mm x 37.5mm
PLD
0x4692
9000 9000 Basic frequency GPUs GPUs 9000. ) is characterized by a high clock frequency.
300MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.
8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show more
Yes
Yes
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing improved graphics
12
max 12.1
Average: 12
max 12.1
Average: 12
Maximum processor temperature
A reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all
100°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
°C
max 110
Average: 96°C
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
4
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
Codename
Alder Lake
Wolfdale
Purpose
Desktop
Desktop
FAQ
Can Intel Core i3-12100 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 work in 4K mode?
Intel Core i3-12100 — Not available. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 — Not available.
How many PCIe lanes
Intel Core i3-12100 — 20. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 — Not available.
How much RAM is supported?
Intel Core i3-12100 supports 128 GB. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 supports N/AGB.
How fast are the processors?
Intel Core i3-12100 runs at 3.3 GHz.06 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
Intel Core i3-12100 has 4 cores. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 has 2 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
Intel Core i3-12100 — Not available.
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 — Not available.
Does the Intel Core i3-12100 have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i3-12100 — UHD Intel 730. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 — N/A
What kind of RAM does the
Intel Core i3-12100 support DDR5. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 supports DDR No data available.
What is the socket of the processors?
FCLGA1700 is used to install the Intel Core i3-12100. To install the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600, LGA775 is used.
What architecture is used?
The Intel Core i3-12100 is based on the Alder Lake architecture. The Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 is based on the Wolfdale architecture.
Is the multiplier unlocked on the Intel Core i3-12100 processor?
Intel Core i3-12100 — Not available. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 — Not available.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-12100 scored No data points according to PassMark. Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 scored 1134 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i3-12100 reaches 4.
3 Hz. The maximum frequency of the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 reaches No data Hz.
How much energy do they consume?
The power consumption of the Intel Core i3-12100 can be up to 60 watts. The Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 has up to 60 watts.
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium E5800
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD Athlon II X2 255
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD Athlon II X2 250e
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium E6700
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD A6-3410MX
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD Phenom II X2 B55
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Celeron N3160
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium 3805U
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium 977
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Celeron 3215U
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD A6-5350M
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD Phenom X3 8850
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium N3520
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Pentium G640T
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
AMD A9-9420e
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core 2 Extreme X7800
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i3-2312M
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Xeon W3505
VS
Intel Core i3-12100
Comparison of Intel Core i3-540 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-540 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Core i3-540
versus
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-540
- Newer processor, approx. core temp: 72.6°C vs 72.4°C
- Newer process technology to make the processor more powerful but with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- L1 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 22% higher: 1514 vs 1239
- Performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 5% more: 459 vs 439
- about 35% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1015 vs 754
- about 48% more performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) : 0.508 vs 0.344 - CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) approximately 29% faster: 29.815 vs 23.046
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) approximately 76% faster: 0.151 vs 0.086
| Release date | January 2010 vs August 2008 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.6°C vs 72.4°C |
| Process | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1514 vs 1239 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 459 vs 439 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1015 vs 754 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.508 vs 0.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.815 vs 23.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.151 vs 0.086 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
- About 9% more clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 3.06 GHz
- 0040
- About 12% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 73 Watt
- About 5% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1321 vs 1256
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10% more: 2.496 vs 2.263
| Maximum frequency | 3.33GHz vs 3.06GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 6144 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 73 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1321 vs 1256 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
2.496 vs 2.263 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-540
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-540 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1256 | 1321 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1514 | 1239 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 459 | 439 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1015 | 754 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.508 | 0.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.815 | 23.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.151 | 0.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.816 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.263 | 2.496 |
Feature comparison
| Intel Core i3-540 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Clarkdale | Wolfdale |
| Issue date | August 2008 | |
| Price at first issue date | $45 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2655 | 2628 |
| Price now | $21 | $39. 99 |
| Processor Number | i3-540 | E8500 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 37.72 | 16.84 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 06 GHz |
3.16 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 81 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6144KB |
| Level 3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Process | 32nm | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72. 6°C |
72.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz | 3.33GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | 410 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.6500V-1.4000V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16. 38GB |
|
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Graphics base frequency | 733MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1156 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4.
|