3070 vs 2060 super: RTX 3070 vs RTX 2060 SUPER Game Performance Benchmarks (Core i9-10900K vs i7-8700K)

30 июня, 2023

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3070
54% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2060 Super
60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce RTX 3070 .
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (48 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU Name GA104 (GA104-300-A1) vs TU106 (TU106-410-A1)
Fab Process 8 nm vs 12 nm
Die Size 392 mm² vs 445 mm²
Transistors 17,400 million vs 10,800 million
Shaders 5888 vs 2176
Compute Units 46 vs 34
Core clock 1500 MHz vs 1470 MHz
ROPs 64 vs 64
TMUs 184 vs 136

Memory Configuration
GeForce RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR6
Bus Width 256 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 1750 MHz

14 Gbps effective		 vs 1750 MHz

14000 MHz effective
Memory Size 8192 Mb vs 8192 Mb
Additional details
GeForce RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 2060 Super
TDP 220 watts vs 160 watts
Release Date 1 Sep 2020 vs 9 Jul 2019

GigaPixels — higher is better

GigaTexels — higher is better

GB/s — higher is better

GFLOPs — higher is better

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Extreme Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Extreme Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Extreme Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce RTX 3070 Radeon RX 6750 XT
VS
GeForce RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Super Radeon RX 6650 XT
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Super Radeon RX 5700
VS
Radeon RX 6800 TITAN RTX
VS
TITAN RTX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 6144 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,8 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2176 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q2 2021

Q3 2019
Model number

GA104-400-A1

TU106-410-A1
GPU name

GA104

TU106
Architecture

Ampere

Turing
Generation

GeForce 30

GeForce 20
Lithography

8 nm

12 nm
Transistors

17. 400.000.000

10.800.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

1.575 MHz

1.470 MHz
GPU boost clock

1.770 MHz

1.650 MHz
Memory frequency

1.188 MHz

1.750 MHz
Effective memory speed

19 Gbps

14 Gbps
Memory size

8 GB

8 GB
Memory type

GDDR6X

GDDR6
Memory bus

256 Bit

256 Bit
Memory bandwidth

608,3 GB/s

448,0 GB/s
TDP

290 W

175 W
Suggested PSU 750W ATX Power Supply 550W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

—

—
Outputs

1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort

1x DVI
1x HDMI
2x DisplayPort
1x USB Type-C
Max display resolution

3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP),

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),

7680 x 4320@120Hz (2xDP),

7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),

4096 x 2160@144Hz (DP),

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)
Maximum GPU Temperature

93°C

89°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

48

34
Shading units (cuda cores)

6. 144

2.176
TMUs

192

136
ROPs

96

64
Tensor cores

192

272
RT cores

48

34
Cache memory

4 MB

4 MB
Pixel fillrate

169,9 GP/s

105,6 GP/s
Texture fillrate

339,8 GT/s

224,4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)

21,8 TFLOPS

14,4 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)

21,8 TFLOPS

7,2 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

339,8 GFLOPS

224,4 GFLOPS
Tensor FLOPS

174T

57,4T
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

21.750
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

7.181

The difference is 203%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super Founders Edition

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.